Loading…

Comparison of Two Dietary Folate Intake Instruments and Their Validation by RBC Folate

An optimal folate nutritional status is important in minimizing developmental and degenerative disease. Therefore, constant monitoring of folate intake and of biomarkers of folate nutritional status is essential. The objective of this research was to compare two folate intake instruments and validat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2007-05, Vol.55 (9), p.3737-3740
Main Authors: Owens, Janel E, Holstege, Dirk M, Clifford, Andrew J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3
container_end_page 3740
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3737
container_title Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
container_volume 55
creator Owens, Janel E
Holstege, Dirk M
Clifford, Andrew J
description An optimal folate nutritional status is important in minimizing developmental and degenerative disease. Therefore, constant monitoring of folate intake and of biomarkers of folate nutritional status is essential. The objective of this research was to compare two folate intake instruments and validate each one against RBC folate measured by a high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HT LC-MS/MS) method described in the companion paper (Owens, J. E.; Holstege, D. M.; Clifford, A. J. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3292−3297). A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and a folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents (DFE) screener were compared and individually validated against an HT LC-MS/MS method. RBC folate was 1178 ± 259 nmol/L (mean ± SD) in a population of 337 normal adult subjects. Folate intakes were 556 ± 265 μg/day by the FFQ and 524 ± 276 μg/day by the DFE screener. Folate intakes by the DFE screener were approximately 34 μg less than by the FFQ (paired t test, p < 0.01), but the intake instruments were highly correlated for total folate intake (r = 0.608, p < 0.01). Correlations between instruments and RBC folate were low (r < 0.35) but strong (p < 0.01). ROC curve analysis indicates that the measurement of RBC folate by the HT LC-MS/MS method is a better predictive tool than are intake instruments for the evaluation of marginal folate status. Keywords: RBC folate; LC-MS/MS; analytical method; folate intake; FFQ; DFE screener
doi_str_mv 10.1021/jf063649h
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70422429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70422429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkcFu1DAQhi0EosvCgRcAX0DikDK249g5QmDbSpVatdu9WhOvQ7NN4sVOBH17XG3UvXAajeabf2b-IeQ9g1MGnH3dNVCIIi_vX5AFkxwyyZh-SRaQipmWBTshb2LcAYCWCl6TE6ZEqZjmC7KpfL_H0EY_UN_Q9R9Pf7RuxPBIV77D0dGLYcSHpxDHMPVuGCPFYUvX964NdINdu8WxTd31I735Xs1db8mrBrvo3s1xSe5WP9fVeXZ5dXZRfbvMMAc5ZtJZrYDlCvK6URZQCi5EDkIiFE3tSms1l0KXXOXWMsbrEiwUCEyylFuxJJ8Puvvgf08ujqZvo3Vdh4PzUzRJmPOclwn8cgBt8DEG15h9aPt0pmFgnkw0zyYm9sMsOtW92x7J2bUEfJoBjBa7JuBg23jktOKSpb2XJDtwbRzd3-c6hgdTKKGkWV_fmg2s1LXQlblJ_McD36A3-Ct9xdzdcmACQCmuy_w4GW00Oz-FIbn7nxP-AThTm4s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70422429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two Dietary Folate Intake Instruments and Their Validation by RBC Folate</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Owens, Janel E ; Holstege, Dirk M ; Clifford, Andrew J</creator><creatorcontrib>Owens, Janel E ; Holstege, Dirk M ; Clifford, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><description>An optimal folate nutritional status is important in minimizing developmental and degenerative disease. Therefore, constant monitoring of folate intake and of biomarkers of folate nutritional status is essential. The objective of this research was to compare two folate intake instruments and validate each one against RBC folate measured by a high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HT LC-MS/MS) method described in the companion paper (Owens, J. E.; Holstege, D. M.; Clifford, A. J. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3292−3297). A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and a folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents (DFE) screener were compared and individually validated against an HT LC-MS/MS method. RBC folate was 1178 ± 259 nmol/L (mean ± SD) in a population of 337 normal adult subjects. Folate intakes were 556 ± 265 μg/day by the FFQ and 524 ± 276 μg/day by the DFE screener. Folate intakes by the DFE screener were approximately 34 μg less than by the FFQ (paired t test, p &lt; 0.01), but the intake instruments were highly correlated for total folate intake (r = 0.608, p &lt; 0.01). Correlations between instruments and RBC folate were low (r &lt; 0.35) but strong (p &lt; 0.01). ROC curve analysis indicates that the measurement of RBC folate by the HT LC-MS/MS method is a better predictive tool than are intake instruments for the evaluation of marginal folate status. Keywords: RBC folate; LC-MS/MS; analytical method; folate intake; FFQ; DFE screener</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jf063649h</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17397182</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAFCAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Diet ; Diet Records ; dietary intake ; Dietary Supplements ; erythrocytes ; Erythrocytes - chemistry ; Female ; folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents screener ; folic acid ; Folic Acid - administration &amp; dosage ; Folic Acid - blood ; food frequency questionnaires ; Food industries ; food intake ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry ; human nutrition ; Humans ; liquid chromatography ; Male ; mass spectrometry ; Nutritional Status ; ROC Curve ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2007-05, Vol.55 (9), p.3737-3740</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18725125$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17397182$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Owens, Janel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holstege, Dirk M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clifford, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two Dietary Folate Intake Instruments and Their Validation by RBC Folate</title><title>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><description>An optimal folate nutritional status is important in minimizing developmental and degenerative disease. Therefore, constant monitoring of folate intake and of biomarkers of folate nutritional status is essential. The objective of this research was to compare two folate intake instruments and validate each one against RBC folate measured by a high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HT LC-MS/MS) method described in the companion paper (Owens, J. E.; Holstege, D. M.; Clifford, A. J. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3292−3297). A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and a folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents (DFE) screener were compared and individually validated against an HT LC-MS/MS method. RBC folate was 1178 ± 259 nmol/L (mean ± SD) in a population of 337 normal adult subjects. Folate intakes were 556 ± 265 μg/day by the FFQ and 524 ± 276 μg/day by the DFE screener. Folate intakes by the DFE screener were approximately 34 μg less than by the FFQ (paired t test, p &lt; 0.01), but the intake instruments were highly correlated for total folate intake (r = 0.608, p &lt; 0.01). Correlations between instruments and RBC folate were low (r &lt; 0.35) but strong (p &lt; 0.01). ROC curve analysis indicates that the measurement of RBC folate by the HT LC-MS/MS method is a better predictive tool than are intake instruments for the evaluation of marginal folate status. Keywords: RBC folate; LC-MS/MS; analytical method; folate intake; FFQ; DFE screener</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet Records</subject><subject>dietary intake</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>erythrocytes</subject><subject>Erythrocytes - chemistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents screener</subject><subject>folic acid</subject><subject>Folic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Folic Acid - blood</subject><subject>food frequency questionnaires</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>food intake</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry</subject><subject>human nutrition</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0021-8561</issn><issn>1520-5118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkcFu1DAQhi0EosvCgRcAX0DikDK249g5QmDbSpVatdu9WhOvQ7NN4sVOBH17XG3UvXAajeabf2b-IeQ9g1MGnH3dNVCIIi_vX5AFkxwyyZh-SRaQipmWBTshb2LcAYCWCl6TE6ZEqZjmC7KpfL_H0EY_UN_Q9R9Pf7RuxPBIV77D0dGLYcSHpxDHMPVuGCPFYUvX964NdINdu8WxTd31I735Xs1db8mrBrvo3s1xSe5WP9fVeXZ5dXZRfbvMMAc5ZtJZrYDlCvK6URZQCi5EDkIiFE3tSms1l0KXXOXWMsbrEiwUCEyylFuxJJ8Puvvgf08ujqZvo3Vdh4PzUzRJmPOclwn8cgBt8DEG15h9aPt0pmFgnkw0zyYm9sMsOtW92x7J2bUEfJoBjBa7JuBg23jktOKSpb2XJDtwbRzd3-c6hgdTKKGkWV_fmg2s1LXQlblJ_McD36A3-Ct9xdzdcmACQCmuy_w4GW00Oz-FIbn7nxP-AThTm4s</recordid><startdate>20070502</startdate><enddate>20070502</enddate><creator>Owens, Janel E</creator><creator>Holstege, Dirk M</creator><creator>Clifford, Andrew J</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070502</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two Dietary Folate Intake Instruments and Their Validation by RBC Folate</title><author>Owens, Janel E ; Holstege, Dirk M ; Clifford, Andrew J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet Records</topic><topic>dietary intake</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>erythrocytes</topic><topic>Erythrocytes - chemistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents screener</topic><topic>folic acid</topic><topic>Folic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Folic Acid - blood</topic><topic>food frequency questionnaires</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>food intake</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry</topic><topic>human nutrition</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Owens, Janel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holstege, Dirk M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clifford, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Owens, Janel E</au><au>Holstege, Dirk M</au><au>Clifford, Andrew J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two Dietary Folate Intake Instruments and Their Validation by RBC Folate</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><date>2007-05-02</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3737</spage><epage>3740</epage><pages>3737-3740</pages><issn>0021-8561</issn><eissn>1520-5118</eissn><coden>JAFCAU</coden><abstract>An optimal folate nutritional status is important in minimizing developmental and degenerative disease. Therefore, constant monitoring of folate intake and of biomarkers of folate nutritional status is essential. The objective of this research was to compare two folate intake instruments and validate each one against RBC folate measured by a high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HT LC-MS/MS) method described in the companion paper (Owens, J. E.; Holstege, D. M.; Clifford, A. J. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3292−3297). A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and a folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents (DFE) screener were compared and individually validated against an HT LC-MS/MS method. RBC folate was 1178 ± 259 nmol/L (mean ± SD) in a population of 337 normal adult subjects. Folate intakes were 556 ± 265 μg/day by the FFQ and 524 ± 276 μg/day by the DFE screener. Folate intakes by the DFE screener were approximately 34 μg less than by the FFQ (paired t test, p &lt; 0.01), but the intake instruments were highly correlated for total folate intake (r = 0.608, p &lt; 0.01). Correlations between instruments and RBC folate were low (r &lt; 0.35) but strong (p &lt; 0.01). ROC curve analysis indicates that the measurement of RBC folate by the HT LC-MS/MS method is a better predictive tool than are intake instruments for the evaluation of marginal folate status. Keywords: RBC folate; LC-MS/MS; analytical method; folate intake; FFQ; DFE screener</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>17397182</pmid><doi>10.1021/jf063649h</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8561
ispartof Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2007-05, Vol.55 (9), p.3737-3740
issn 0021-8561
1520-5118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70422429
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Diet
Diet Records
dietary intake
Dietary Supplements
erythrocytes
Erythrocytes - chemistry
Female
folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents screener
folic acid
Folic Acid - administration & dosage
Folic Acid - blood
food frequency questionnaires
Food industries
food intake
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
human nutrition
Humans
liquid chromatography
Male
mass spectrometry
Nutritional Status
ROC Curve
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Comparison of Two Dietary Folate Intake Instruments and Their Validation by RBC Folate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T07%3A00%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20Dietary%20Folate%20Intake%20Instruments%20and%20Their%20Validation%20by%20RBC%20Folate&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20food%20chemistry&rft.au=Owens,%20Janel%20E&rft.date=2007-05-02&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3737&rft.epage=3740&rft.pages=3737-3740&rft.issn=0021-8561&rft.eissn=1520-5118&rft.coden=JAFCAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jf063649h&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70422429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70422429&rft_id=info:pmid/17397182&rfr_iscdi=true