Loading…
Comparison of Two Dietary Folate Intake Instruments and Their Validation by RBC Folate
An optimal folate nutritional status is important in minimizing developmental and degenerative disease. Therefore, constant monitoring of folate intake and of biomarkers of folate nutritional status is essential. The objective of this research was to compare two folate intake instruments and validat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2007-05, Vol.55 (9), p.3737-3740 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3 |
container_end_page | 3740 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 3737 |
container_title | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Owens, Janel E Holstege, Dirk M Clifford, Andrew J |
description | An optimal folate nutritional status is important in minimizing developmental and degenerative disease. Therefore, constant monitoring of folate intake and of biomarkers of folate nutritional status is essential. The objective of this research was to compare two folate intake instruments and validate each one against RBC folate measured by a high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HT LC-MS/MS) method described in the companion paper (Owens, J. E.; Holstege, D. M.; Clifford, A. J. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3292−3297). A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and a folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents (DFE) screener were compared and individually validated against an HT LC-MS/MS method. RBC folate was 1178 ± 259 nmol/L (mean ± SD) in a population of 337 normal adult subjects. Folate intakes were 556 ± 265 μg/day by the FFQ and 524 ± 276 μg/day by the DFE screener. Folate intakes by the DFE screener were approximately 34 μg less than by the FFQ (paired t test, p < 0.01), but the intake instruments were highly correlated for total folate intake (r = 0.608, p < 0.01). Correlations between instruments and RBC folate were low (r < 0.35) but strong (p < 0.01). ROC curve analysis indicates that the measurement of RBC folate by the HT LC-MS/MS method is a better predictive tool than are intake instruments for the evaluation of marginal folate status. Keywords: RBC folate; LC-MS/MS; analytical method; folate intake; FFQ; DFE screener |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/jf063649h |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70422429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70422429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkcFu1DAQhi0EosvCgRcAX0DikDK249g5QmDbSpVatdu9WhOvQ7NN4sVOBH17XG3UvXAajeabf2b-IeQ9g1MGnH3dNVCIIi_vX5AFkxwyyZh-SRaQipmWBTshb2LcAYCWCl6TE6ZEqZjmC7KpfL_H0EY_UN_Q9R9Pf7RuxPBIV77D0dGLYcSHpxDHMPVuGCPFYUvX964NdINdu8WxTd31I735Xs1db8mrBrvo3s1xSe5WP9fVeXZ5dXZRfbvMMAc5ZtJZrYDlCvK6URZQCi5EDkIiFE3tSms1l0KXXOXWMsbrEiwUCEyylFuxJJ8Puvvgf08ujqZvo3Vdh4PzUzRJmPOclwn8cgBt8DEG15h9aPt0pmFgnkw0zyYm9sMsOtW92x7J2bUEfJoBjBa7JuBg23jktOKSpb2XJDtwbRzd3-c6hgdTKKGkWV_fmg2s1LXQlblJ_McD36A3-Ct9xdzdcmACQCmuy_w4GW00Oz-FIbn7nxP-AThTm4s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70422429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two Dietary Folate Intake Instruments and Their Validation by RBC Folate</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Owens, Janel E ; Holstege, Dirk M ; Clifford, Andrew J</creator><creatorcontrib>Owens, Janel E ; Holstege, Dirk M ; Clifford, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><description>An optimal folate nutritional status is important in minimizing developmental and degenerative disease. Therefore, constant monitoring of folate intake and of biomarkers of folate nutritional status is essential. The objective of this research was to compare two folate intake instruments and validate each one against RBC folate measured by a high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HT LC-MS/MS) method described in the companion paper (Owens, J. E.; Holstege, D. M.; Clifford, A. J. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3292−3297). A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and a folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents (DFE) screener were compared and individually validated against an HT LC-MS/MS method. RBC folate was 1178 ± 259 nmol/L (mean ± SD) in a population of 337 normal adult subjects. Folate intakes were 556 ± 265 μg/day by the FFQ and 524 ± 276 μg/day by the DFE screener. Folate intakes by the DFE screener were approximately 34 μg less than by the FFQ (paired t test, p < 0.01), but the intake instruments were highly correlated for total folate intake (r = 0.608, p < 0.01). Correlations between instruments and RBC folate were low (r < 0.35) but strong (p < 0.01). ROC curve analysis indicates that the measurement of RBC folate by the HT LC-MS/MS method is a better predictive tool than are intake instruments for the evaluation of marginal folate status. Keywords: RBC folate; LC-MS/MS; analytical method; folate intake; FFQ; DFE screener</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jf063649h</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17397182</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAFCAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Diet ; Diet Records ; dietary intake ; Dietary Supplements ; erythrocytes ; Erythrocytes - chemistry ; Female ; folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents screener ; folic acid ; Folic Acid - administration & dosage ; Folic Acid - blood ; food frequency questionnaires ; Food industries ; food intake ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry ; human nutrition ; Humans ; liquid chromatography ; Male ; mass spectrometry ; Nutritional Status ; ROC Curve ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2007-05, Vol.55 (9), p.3737-3740</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18725125$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17397182$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Owens, Janel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holstege, Dirk M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clifford, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two Dietary Folate Intake Instruments and Their Validation by RBC Folate</title><title>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><description>An optimal folate nutritional status is important in minimizing developmental and degenerative disease. Therefore, constant monitoring of folate intake and of biomarkers of folate nutritional status is essential. The objective of this research was to compare two folate intake instruments and validate each one against RBC folate measured by a high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HT LC-MS/MS) method described in the companion paper (Owens, J. E.; Holstege, D. M.; Clifford, A. J. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3292−3297). A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and a folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents (DFE) screener were compared and individually validated against an HT LC-MS/MS method. RBC folate was 1178 ± 259 nmol/L (mean ± SD) in a population of 337 normal adult subjects. Folate intakes were 556 ± 265 μg/day by the FFQ and 524 ± 276 μg/day by the DFE screener. Folate intakes by the DFE screener were approximately 34 μg less than by the FFQ (paired t test, p < 0.01), but the intake instruments were highly correlated for total folate intake (r = 0.608, p < 0.01). Correlations between instruments and RBC folate were low (r < 0.35) but strong (p < 0.01). ROC curve analysis indicates that the measurement of RBC folate by the HT LC-MS/MS method is a better predictive tool than are intake instruments for the evaluation of marginal folate status. Keywords: RBC folate; LC-MS/MS; analytical method; folate intake; FFQ; DFE screener</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet Records</subject><subject>dietary intake</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>erythrocytes</subject><subject>Erythrocytes - chemistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents screener</subject><subject>folic acid</subject><subject>Folic Acid - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Folic Acid - blood</subject><subject>food frequency questionnaires</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>food intake</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry</subject><subject>human nutrition</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0021-8561</issn><issn>1520-5118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkcFu1DAQhi0EosvCgRcAX0DikDK249g5QmDbSpVatdu9WhOvQ7NN4sVOBH17XG3UvXAajeabf2b-IeQ9g1MGnH3dNVCIIi_vX5AFkxwyyZh-SRaQipmWBTshb2LcAYCWCl6TE6ZEqZjmC7KpfL_H0EY_UN_Q9R9Pf7RuxPBIV77D0dGLYcSHpxDHMPVuGCPFYUvX964NdINdu8WxTd31I735Xs1db8mrBrvo3s1xSe5WP9fVeXZ5dXZRfbvMMAc5ZtJZrYDlCvK6URZQCi5EDkIiFE3tSms1l0KXXOXWMsbrEiwUCEyylFuxJJ8Puvvgf08ujqZvo3Vdh4PzUzRJmPOclwn8cgBt8DEG15h9aPt0pmFgnkw0zyYm9sMsOtW92x7J2bUEfJoBjBa7JuBg23jktOKSpb2XJDtwbRzd3-c6hgdTKKGkWV_fmg2s1LXQlblJ_McD36A3-Ct9xdzdcmACQCmuy_w4GW00Oz-FIbn7nxP-AThTm4s</recordid><startdate>20070502</startdate><enddate>20070502</enddate><creator>Owens, Janel E</creator><creator>Holstege, Dirk M</creator><creator>Clifford, Andrew J</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070502</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two Dietary Folate Intake Instruments and Their Validation by RBC Folate</title><author>Owens, Janel E ; Holstege, Dirk M ; Clifford, Andrew J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet Records</topic><topic>dietary intake</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>erythrocytes</topic><topic>Erythrocytes - chemistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents screener</topic><topic>folic acid</topic><topic>Folic Acid - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Folic Acid - blood</topic><topic>food frequency questionnaires</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>food intake</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry</topic><topic>human nutrition</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Owens, Janel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holstege, Dirk M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clifford, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Owens, Janel E</au><au>Holstege, Dirk M</au><au>Clifford, Andrew J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two Dietary Folate Intake Instruments and Their Validation by RBC Folate</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><date>2007-05-02</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3737</spage><epage>3740</epage><pages>3737-3740</pages><issn>0021-8561</issn><eissn>1520-5118</eissn><coden>JAFCAU</coden><abstract>An optimal folate nutritional status is important in minimizing developmental and degenerative disease. Therefore, constant monitoring of folate intake and of biomarkers of folate nutritional status is essential. The objective of this research was to compare two folate intake instruments and validate each one against RBC folate measured by a high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HT LC-MS/MS) method described in the companion paper (Owens, J. E.; Holstege, D. M.; Clifford, A. J. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3292−3297). A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and a folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents (DFE) screener were compared and individually validated against an HT LC-MS/MS method. RBC folate was 1178 ± 259 nmol/L (mean ± SD) in a population of 337 normal adult subjects. Folate intakes were 556 ± 265 μg/day by the FFQ and 524 ± 276 μg/day by the DFE screener. Folate intakes by the DFE screener were approximately 34 μg less than by the FFQ (paired t test, p < 0.01), but the intake instruments were highly correlated for total folate intake (r = 0.608, p < 0.01). Correlations between instruments and RBC folate were low (r < 0.35) but strong (p < 0.01). ROC curve analysis indicates that the measurement of RBC folate by the HT LC-MS/MS method is a better predictive tool than are intake instruments for the evaluation of marginal folate status. Keywords: RBC folate; LC-MS/MS; analytical method; folate intake; FFQ; DFE screener</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>17397182</pmid><doi>10.1021/jf063649h</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8561 |
ispartof | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2007-05, Vol.55 (9), p.3737-3740 |
issn | 0021-8561 1520-5118 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70422429 |
source | American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Diet Diet Records dietary intake Dietary Supplements erythrocytes Erythrocytes - chemistry Female folate-targeted semiquantitative Block dietary folate equivalents screener folic acid Folic Acid - administration & dosage Folic Acid - blood food frequency questionnaires Food industries food intake Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry human nutrition Humans liquid chromatography Male mass spectrometry Nutritional Status ROC Curve Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Comparison of Two Dietary Folate Intake Instruments and Their Validation by RBC Folate |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T07%3A00%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20Dietary%20Folate%20Intake%20Instruments%20and%20Their%20Validation%20by%20RBC%20Folate&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20food%20chemistry&rft.au=Owens,%20Janel%20E&rft.date=2007-05-02&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3737&rft.epage=3740&rft.pages=3737-3740&rft.issn=0021-8561&rft.eissn=1520-5118&rft.coden=JAFCAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jf063649h&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70422429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-5ec87014704bf7c0a532334035a06fbe9cc825389274cc112b90c06a0151cc1c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70422429&rft_id=info:pmid/17397182&rfr_iscdi=true |