Twelve-Year Follow-up on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Long-Term Outcomes of Prospectively Studied Osseous and Articular Injuries

• Published in: The American journal of sports medicine 2008-04, Vol.36 (4), p.671-677
• Main Authors: Hanypsiak, Bryan T., Spindler, Kurt P., Rothrock, Christopher R., Calabrese, Gary J., Richmond, Brad, Herrenbruck, Todd M., Parker, Richard D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery; Arthritis - etiology; Biological and medical sciences; Bone and Bones - injuries; Care and treatment; Cartilage - injuries; Diagnosis; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Documentation; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypotheses; Injuries; Knee; Knee Joint; Ligaments; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Medical sciences; NMR; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Orthopedic Procedures; Physiological aspects; Skin & tissue grafts; Sports injuries; Sports medicine; Surgery; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome; United States; Wounds and injuries
• ISSN: 0363-5465; 1552-3365
• DOI: 10.1177/0363546508315468

Background Although successful at restoring near normal laxity to the knee in the short term, anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions have not been shown to prevent the development of posttraumatic arthritis. Hypothesis Bone bruises and articular cartilage injuries sustained at the time of initial injury (1991) would not resolve. Our secondary hypothesis was that the presence of a bone bruise or articular cartilage injury originally identified on magnetic resonance imaging would not be associated with long-term outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by the International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire. Study Design Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 1. Methods We attempted to contact all patients from an original cohort (N = 54) for follow-up evaluation, which included repeat radiographs, magnetic resonance images, physical examination, and International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire more than a decade postoperatively. Results Forty-four patients (82% of the original cohort) returned for on-site follow-up. No patient with a bone bruise identified on original magnetic resonance imaging had one identified at 12-year follow-up. The mean (±SD) International Knee Documentation Committee score at follow-up with no bone bruise originally present was 70.6 (±12.7) versus 70.0 (±8.1) when a bone bruise was observed (P > .05). No consistent association was observed between the presence of an initial articular cartilage lesion with a lesion on follow-up magnetic resonance images. The mean (±SD) International Knee Documentation Committee score at follow-up with no articular cartilage injury was 69.0 (±11.9) versus 72.8 (±12.0) with articular cartilage lesion (P > .05). Conclusion All bone bruises identified in our study with magnetic resonance imaging at the time of initial injury had resolved at 12-year follow-up. The presence of a bone bruise at the time of initial injury did not significantly alter the patient-oriented outcome by International Knee Documentation Committee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Additionally, articular cartilage abnormality on magnetic resonance imaging did not influence the International Knee Documentation Committee score.