Loading…

In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis

Objective The objective of this study was to compare the in vitro antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococcus faecalis with sodium hypochlorite in 2 different concentrations (1.5% and 5.25%). Study design Eighty human lower premolars with single root canals were prepared, aut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2007-05, Vol.103 (5), p.702-706
Main Authors: Oliveira, Daniel P., DDS, MSc, Barbizam, Joao V.B., DDS, MSc, Trope, Martin, BDS, DMD, Teixeira, Fabricio B., DDS, MSc, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-c6c08d158e966dafa74b43f3d906e52e64f5cff89c23636297535e5ea74e897d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-c6c08d158e966dafa74b43f3d906e52e64f5cff89c23636297535e5ea74e897d3
container_end_page 706
container_issue 5
container_start_page 702
container_title Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics
container_volume 103
creator Oliveira, Daniel P., DDS, MSc
Barbizam, Joao V.B., DDS, MSc
Trope, Martin, BDS, DMD
Teixeira, Fabricio B., DDS, MSc, PhD
description Objective The objective of this study was to compare the in vitro antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococcus faecalis with sodium hypochlorite in 2 different concentrations (1.5% and 5.25%). Study design Eighty human lower premolars with single root canals were prepared, autoclaved, and infected for 7 days with E. faecalis monocultures. The roots were then separated into 5 experimental groups according to the irrigant solution used during the standardized preparation. To assess the antimicrobial action of the irrigant solutions, 3 microbial samples were taken: S1-initial (before the biomechanical preparation), S2- posttreatment (immediately after the biomechanical preparation), and S3-final (7 days after the biomechanical preparation). The microbiological samples were plated to count the colony-forming units (CFU). Results The 2% chlorhexidine gel and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite significantly reduced the E. faecalis CFU in the posttreatment and final microbiological samples. The 1.5% sodium hypochlorite also reduced the E. faecalis CFU immediately after the root canal instrumentation, but the E. faecalis CFU increased in the final sample showing no statistical difference from the control group. Conclusion The 2% chlorhexidine gluconate gel and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite were effective in eliminating E. faecalis even 7 days after the instrumentation; moreover, the higher the concentration of sodium hypochlorite the better its antimicrobial action.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70443352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1079210406008699</els_id><sourcerecordid>70443352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-c6c08d158e966dafa74b43f3d906e52e64f5cff89c23636297535e5ea74e897d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFvFCEYhonR2Fr9CZq56G1GGAYGLpqmqbVJEw_axBthPz4a1llYYabJ_nvZ7CRNvPQECc_7Ac9LyHtGO0aZ_Lzt5hz2E6aup1R2jHWUji_IORO9arkWv1_WPR112zM6nJE3pWxpBbnWr8kZG7lUVIzn5P42No9hzqmxcQ4bCzPmYKcGvQ9g4dAk32B0yaV6DE3IOTxUsjT2wYZY5uY61kSCBLCUxlsEO4Xylrzydir4bl0vyP23619X39u7Hze3V5d3LQg2zC1IoMoxoVBL6ay347AZuOdOU4miRzl4Ad4rDT2XXPZ6FFygwMqh0qPjF-TTae4-p78LltnsQgGcJhsxLcWMdBg4F30FxQmEnErJ6M0-h53NB8OoOfo0W7P6NEefhjFTfdbch_WCZbND95RaBVbg4wrYUr_us40QyhOntVKj1JX7euKw6ngMmE2BgBHQhYwwG5fCs0_58t8EmEKsJU1_8IBlm5Ycq2vDTOkNNT-P5R-7p5JSJbXm_wCJA6xq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70443352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Oliveira, Daniel P., DDS, MSc ; Barbizam, Joao V.B., DDS, MSc ; Trope, Martin, BDS, DMD ; Teixeira, Fabricio B., DDS, MSc, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Daniel P., DDS, MSc ; Barbizam, Joao V.B., DDS, MSc ; Trope, Martin, BDS, DMD ; Teixeira, Fabricio B., DDS, MSc, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The objective of this study was to compare the in vitro antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococcus faecalis with sodium hypochlorite in 2 different concentrations (1.5% and 5.25%). Study design Eighty human lower premolars with single root canals were prepared, autoclaved, and infected for 7 days with E. faecalis monocultures. The roots were then separated into 5 experimental groups according to the irrigant solution used during the standardized preparation. To assess the antimicrobial action of the irrigant solutions, 3 microbial samples were taken: S1-initial (before the biomechanical preparation), S2- posttreatment (immediately after the biomechanical preparation), and S3-final (7 days after the biomechanical preparation). The microbiological samples were plated to count the colony-forming units (CFU). Results The 2% chlorhexidine gel and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite significantly reduced the E. faecalis CFU in the posttreatment and final microbiological samples. The 1.5% sodium hypochlorite also reduced the E. faecalis CFU immediately after the root canal instrumentation, but the E. faecalis CFU increased in the final sample showing no statistical difference from the control group. Conclusion The 2% chlorhexidine gluconate gel and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite were effective in eliminating E. faecalis even 7 days after the instrumentation; moreover, the higher the concentration of sodium hypochlorite the better its antimicrobial action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-2104</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-395X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17368057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - administration &amp; dosage ; Anti-Infective Agents, Local - pharmacology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chlorhexidine - administration &amp; dosage ; Chlorhexidine - pharmacology ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Dental Pulp Cavity - microbiology ; Dentistry ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Enterococcus faecalis - drug effects ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Root Canal Irrigants - administration &amp; dosage ; Root Canal Irrigants - pharmacology ; Sodium Hypochlorite - administration &amp; dosage ; Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2007-05, Vol.103 (5), p.702-706</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2007 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-c6c08d158e966dafa74b43f3d906e52e64f5cff89c23636297535e5ea74e897d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-c6c08d158e966dafa74b43f3d906e52e64f5cff89c23636297535e5ea74e897d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19988769$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17368057$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Daniel P., DDS, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbizam, Joao V.B., DDS, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trope, Martin, BDS, DMD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Fabricio B., DDS, MSc, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis</title><title>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</title><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</addtitle><description>Objective The objective of this study was to compare the in vitro antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococcus faecalis with sodium hypochlorite in 2 different concentrations (1.5% and 5.25%). Study design Eighty human lower premolars with single root canals were prepared, autoclaved, and infected for 7 days with E. faecalis monocultures. The roots were then separated into 5 experimental groups according to the irrigant solution used during the standardized preparation. To assess the antimicrobial action of the irrigant solutions, 3 microbial samples were taken: S1-initial (before the biomechanical preparation), S2- posttreatment (immediately after the biomechanical preparation), and S3-final (7 days after the biomechanical preparation). The microbiological samples were plated to count the colony-forming units (CFU). Results The 2% chlorhexidine gel and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite significantly reduced the E. faecalis CFU in the posttreatment and final microbiological samples. The 1.5% sodium hypochlorite also reduced the E. faecalis CFU immediately after the root canal instrumentation, but the E. faecalis CFU increased in the final sample showing no statistical difference from the control group. Conclusion The 2% chlorhexidine gluconate gel and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite were effective in eliminating E. faecalis even 7 days after the instrumentation; moreover, the higher the concentration of sodium hypochlorite the better its antimicrobial action.</description><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - pharmacology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity - microbiology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecalis - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Root Canal Irrigants - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Root Canal Irrigants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Sodium Hypochlorite - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1079-2104</issn><issn>1528-395X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFvFCEYhonR2Fr9CZq56G1GGAYGLpqmqbVJEw_axBthPz4a1llYYabJ_nvZ7CRNvPQECc_7Ac9LyHtGO0aZ_Lzt5hz2E6aup1R2jHWUji_IORO9arkWv1_WPR112zM6nJE3pWxpBbnWr8kZG7lUVIzn5P42No9hzqmxcQ4bCzPmYKcGvQ9g4dAk32B0yaV6DE3IOTxUsjT2wYZY5uY61kSCBLCUxlsEO4Xylrzydir4bl0vyP23619X39u7Hze3V5d3LQg2zC1IoMoxoVBL6ay347AZuOdOU4miRzl4Ad4rDT2XXPZ6FFygwMqh0qPjF-TTae4-p78LltnsQgGcJhsxLcWMdBg4F30FxQmEnErJ6M0-h53NB8OoOfo0W7P6NEefhjFTfdbch_WCZbND95RaBVbg4wrYUr_us40QyhOntVKj1JX7euKw6ngMmE2BgBHQhYwwG5fCs0_58t8EmEKsJU1_8IBlm5Ycq2vDTOkNNT-P5R-7p5JSJbXm_wCJA6xq</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Oliveira, Daniel P., DDS, MSc</creator><creator>Barbizam, Joao V.B., DDS, MSc</creator><creator>Trope, Martin, BDS, DMD</creator><creator>Teixeira, Fabricio B., DDS, MSc, PhD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis</title><author>Oliveira, Daniel P., DDS, MSc ; Barbizam, Joao V.B., DDS, MSc ; Trope, Martin, BDS, DMD ; Teixeira, Fabricio B., DDS, MSc, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-c6c08d158e966dafa74b43f3d906e52e64f5cff89c23636297535e5ea74e897d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - pharmacology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Cavity - microbiology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecalis - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Root Canal Irrigants - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Root Canal Irrigants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Sodium Hypochlorite - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Daniel P., DDS, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbizam, Joao V.B., DDS, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trope, Martin, BDS, DMD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Fabricio B., DDS, MSc, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oliveira, Daniel P., DDS, MSc</au><au>Barbizam, Joao V.B., DDS, MSc</au><au>Trope, Martin, BDS, DMD</au><au>Teixeira, Fabricio B., DDS, MSc, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis</atitle><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</addtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>702</spage><epage>706</epage><pages>702-706</pages><issn>1079-2104</issn><eissn>1528-395X</eissn><abstract>Objective The objective of this study was to compare the in vitro antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococcus faecalis with sodium hypochlorite in 2 different concentrations (1.5% and 5.25%). Study design Eighty human lower premolars with single root canals were prepared, autoclaved, and infected for 7 days with E. faecalis monocultures. The roots were then separated into 5 experimental groups according to the irrigant solution used during the standardized preparation. To assess the antimicrobial action of the irrigant solutions, 3 microbial samples were taken: S1-initial (before the biomechanical preparation), S2- posttreatment (immediately after the biomechanical preparation), and S3-final (7 days after the biomechanical preparation). The microbiological samples were plated to count the colony-forming units (CFU). Results The 2% chlorhexidine gel and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite significantly reduced the E. faecalis CFU in the posttreatment and final microbiological samples. The 1.5% sodium hypochlorite also reduced the E. faecalis CFU immediately after the root canal instrumentation, but the E. faecalis CFU increased in the final sample showing no statistical difference from the control group. Conclusion The 2% chlorhexidine gluconate gel and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite were effective in eliminating E. faecalis even 7 days after the instrumentation; moreover, the higher the concentration of sodium hypochlorite the better its antimicrobial action.</abstract><cop>St. Louis, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>17368057</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.007</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1079-2104
ispartof Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2007-05, Vol.103 (5), p.702-706
issn 1079-2104
1528-395X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70443352
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anti-Infective Agents, Local - administration & dosage
Anti-Infective Agents, Local - pharmacology
Biological and medical sciences
Chlorhexidine - administration & dosage
Chlorhexidine - pharmacology
Colony Count, Microbial
Dental Pulp Cavity - microbiology
Dentistry
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Enterococcus faecalis - drug effects
Humans
Medical sciences
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Root Canal Irrigants - administration & dosage
Root Canal Irrigants - pharmacology
Sodium Hypochlorite - administration & dosage
Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surgery
title In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A44%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20antibacterial%20efficacy%20of%20endodontic%20irrigants%20against%20Enterococcus%20faecalis&rft.jtitle=Oral%20surgery,%20oral%20medicine,%20oral%20pathology,%20oral%20radiology%20and%20endodontics&rft.au=Oliveira,%20Daniel%20P.,%20DDS,%20MSc&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=702&rft.epage=706&rft.pages=702-706&rft.issn=1079-2104&rft.eissn=1528-395X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70443352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-c6c08d158e966dafa74b43f3d906e52e64f5cff89c23636297535e5ea74e897d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70443352&rft_id=info:pmid/17368057&rfr_iscdi=true