Loading…
Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape
Both area and edge effects have a strong influence on ecological processes in fragmented landscapes, but there is little understanding of how these two factors might interact to exacerbate local species declines. To test for synergistic interactions between area and edge effects, we sampled a divers...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology (Durham) 2007, Vol.88 (1), p.96-106 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633 |
container_end_page | 106 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 96 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Ewers, Robert M. Thorpe, Stephen Didham, Raphael K. |
description | Both area and edge effects have a strong influence on ecological processes in fragmented landscapes, but there is little understanding of how these two factors might interact to exacerbate local species declines. To test for synergistic interactions between area and edge effects, we sampled a diverse beetle community in a heavily fragmented landscape in New Zealand. More than 35 000 beetles of ∼900 species were sampled over large gradients in habitat area (10−2—106 ha) and distance from patch edge (20—2ⁱ⁰ m from the forest edge into both the forest and adjacent matrix). Using a new approach to partition variance following an ordination analysis, we found that a synergistic interaction between habitat area and distance to edge was a more important determinant of patterns in beetle community composition than direct edge or area effects alone. The strength of edge effects in beetle-species composition increased nonlinearly with increasing fragment area. One important consequence of the synergy is that the slopes of species—area (SA) curves constructed from habitat islands depend sensitively on the distance from edge at which sampling is conducted. Surprisingly, we found negative SA curves for communities sampled at intermediate distances from habitat edges, caused by differential edge responses of matrix- vs. forest-specialist species in fragments of increasing area. Our data indicate that distance to habitat edge has a consistently greater impact on beetle community composition than habitat area and that variation in the strength of edge effects may underlie many patterns that are superficially related to habitat area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[96:SIBEAA]2.0.CO;2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70478148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27651071</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27651071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkdGLEzEQxhdRvHr6J6iLoCi4dZLsJhPvqdaqB4d9qAeKSMims70t291esvXof2_KljvwRTAvIcwv38x8X5K8ZTBmqOEdAOOZlgW-5gDqDeJPLd8vzj_MJpNffAzj6fyM30tGTAudaabgfjK6_XKSPAphDfGwHB8mJ0zlqPMCR8n3xb4lv6pDX7u0bnvy1vV114a0pP6GqE1puaLUtsvUerIpVRW5PkQ0tekV2d91s08rb1cbip-XaRPJ4OyWHicPKtsEenK8T5PLT7Nv0y_Zxfzz-XRykbki5zIrUfKc50hqKVCUArXVJQorXQ4glSYhFJDWuhLaoQTBdSWFKwqrUXEpxGnyatDd-u56R6E3mzo4auIg1O2CUZArjFv_E2Ra8kJyHcEXf4HrbufbuIThTEcLCwYR-jhAzncheKrM1tcb6_eGgTnkZQ7mm4P55pCXQYwPM-RluAEznRseZZ4de-3KDS3vRI4BReDlEbDR1iY63bo63HEolVCyiNzXgbupG9r_1zBmNv1xqCJGK6Lg00FwHfrO3wry2IyBYrH-fKhXtjN25eNQlwsOTACgAAQp_gCF2cfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219001510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Ewers, Robert M. ; Thorpe, Stephen ; Didham, Raphael K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ewers, Robert M. ; Thorpe, Stephen ; Didham, Raphael K.</creatorcontrib><description>Both area and edge effects have a strong influence on ecological processes in fragmented landscapes, but there is little understanding of how these two factors might interact to exacerbate local species declines. To test for synergistic interactions between area and edge effects, we sampled a diverse beetle community in a heavily fragmented landscape in New Zealand. More than 35 000 beetles of ∼900 species were sampled over large gradients in habitat area (10−2—106 ha) and distance from patch edge (20—2ⁱ⁰ m from the forest edge into both the forest and adjacent matrix). Using a new approach to partition variance following an ordination analysis, we found that a synergistic interaction between habitat area and distance to edge was a more important determinant of patterns in beetle community composition than direct edge or area effects alone. The strength of edge effects in beetle-species composition increased nonlinearly with increasing fragment area. One important consequence of the synergy is that the slopes of species—area (SA) curves constructed from habitat islands depend sensitively on the distance from edge at which sampling is conducted. Surprisingly, we found negative SA curves for communities sampled at intermediate distances from habitat edges, caused by differential edge responses of matrix- vs. forest-specialist species in fragments of increasing area. Our data indicate that distance to habitat edge has a consistently greater impact on beetle community composition than habitat area and that variation in the strength of edge effects may underlie many patterns that are superficially related to habitat area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[96:SIBEAA]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17489458</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; area effects ; Beetles ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Coleoptera ; Conservation biology ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Edge effects ; Effects ; Entomology ; environmental models ; Forest cover ; Forest ecology ; Forest habitats ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitat fragmentation ; Habitats ; Insecta ; Insects ; Invertebrates ; landscape ecology ; Landscapes ; matrix habitat ; Metapopulation ecology ; New Zealand ; Population Dynamics ; scale ; slope ; Species ; species diversity ; species-area relationship ; statistical analysis ; statistical models ; synergistic interactions ; wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2007, Vol.88 (1), p.96-106</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2007 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27651071$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27651071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18673765$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17489458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ewers, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorpe, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Didham, Raphael K.</creatorcontrib><title>Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>Both area and edge effects have a strong influence on ecological processes in fragmented landscapes, but there is little understanding of how these two factors might interact to exacerbate local species declines. To test for synergistic interactions between area and edge effects, we sampled a diverse beetle community in a heavily fragmented landscape in New Zealand. More than 35 000 beetles of ∼900 species were sampled over large gradients in habitat area (10−2—106 ha) and distance from patch edge (20—2ⁱ⁰ m from the forest edge into both the forest and adjacent matrix). Using a new approach to partition variance following an ordination analysis, we found that a synergistic interaction between habitat area and distance to edge was a more important determinant of patterns in beetle community composition than direct edge or area effects alone. The strength of edge effects in beetle-species composition increased nonlinearly with increasing fragment area. One important consequence of the synergy is that the slopes of species—area (SA) curves constructed from habitat islands depend sensitively on the distance from edge at which sampling is conducted. Surprisingly, we found negative SA curves for communities sampled at intermediate distances from habitat edges, caused by differential edge responses of matrix- vs. forest-specialist species in fragments of increasing area. Our data indicate that distance to habitat edge has a consistently greater impact on beetle community composition than habitat area and that variation in the strength of edge effects may underlie many patterns that are superficially related to habitat area.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>area effects</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Edge effects</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>environmental models</subject><subject>Forest cover</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>landscape ecology</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>matrix habitat</subject><subject>Metapopulation ecology</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>scale</subject><subject>slope</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>species-area relationship</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><subject>statistical models</subject><subject>synergistic interactions</subject><subject>wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkdGLEzEQxhdRvHr6J6iLoCi4dZLsJhPvqdaqB4d9qAeKSMims70t291esvXof2_KljvwRTAvIcwv38x8X5K8ZTBmqOEdAOOZlgW-5gDqDeJPLd8vzj_MJpNffAzj6fyM30tGTAudaabgfjK6_XKSPAphDfGwHB8mJ0zlqPMCR8n3xb4lv6pDX7u0bnvy1vV114a0pP6GqE1puaLUtsvUerIpVRW5PkQ0tekV2d91s08rb1cbip-XaRPJ4OyWHicPKtsEenK8T5PLT7Nv0y_Zxfzz-XRykbki5zIrUfKc50hqKVCUArXVJQorXQ4glSYhFJDWuhLaoQTBdSWFKwqrUXEpxGnyatDd-u56R6E3mzo4auIg1O2CUZArjFv_E2Ra8kJyHcEXf4HrbufbuIThTEcLCwYR-jhAzncheKrM1tcb6_eGgTnkZQ7mm4P55pCXQYwPM-RluAEznRseZZ4de-3KDS3vRI4BReDlEbDR1iY63bo63HEolVCyiNzXgbupG9r_1zBmNv1xqCJGK6Lg00FwHfrO3wry2IyBYrH-fKhXtjN25eNQlwsOTACgAAQp_gCF2cfg</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Ewers, Robert M.</creator><creator>Thorpe, Stephen</creator><creator>Didham, Raphael K.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape</title><author>Ewers, Robert M. ; Thorpe, Stephen ; Didham, Raphael K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>area effects</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Edge effects</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>environmental models</topic><topic>Forest cover</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>landscape ecology</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>matrix habitat</topic><topic>Metapopulation ecology</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>scale</topic><topic>slope</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>species-area relationship</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><topic>statistical models</topic><topic>synergistic interactions</topic><topic>wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ewers, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorpe, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Didham, Raphael K.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ewers, Robert M.</au><au>Thorpe, Stephen</au><au>Didham, Raphael K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>96-106</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>Both area and edge effects have a strong influence on ecological processes in fragmented landscapes, but there is little understanding of how these two factors might interact to exacerbate local species declines. To test for synergistic interactions between area and edge effects, we sampled a diverse beetle community in a heavily fragmented landscape in New Zealand. More than 35 000 beetles of ∼900 species were sampled over large gradients in habitat area (10−2—106 ha) and distance from patch edge (20—2ⁱ⁰ m from the forest edge into both the forest and adjacent matrix). Using a new approach to partition variance following an ordination analysis, we found that a synergistic interaction between habitat area and distance to edge was a more important determinant of patterns in beetle community composition than direct edge or area effects alone. The strength of edge effects in beetle-species composition increased nonlinearly with increasing fragment area. One important consequence of the synergy is that the slopes of species—area (SA) curves constructed from habitat islands depend sensitively on the distance from edge at which sampling is conducted. Surprisingly, we found negative SA curves for communities sampled at intermediate distances from habitat edges, caused by differential edge responses of matrix- vs. forest-specialist species in fragments of increasing area. Our data indicate that distance to habitat edge has a consistently greater impact on beetle community composition than habitat area and that variation in the strength of edge effects may underlie many patterns that are superficially related to habitat area.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>17489458</pmid><doi>10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[96:SIBEAA]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 2007, Vol.88 (1), p.96-106 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70478148 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; JSTOR Archival Journals |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals area effects Beetles Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Coleoptera Conservation biology Ecology Ecosystem Edge effects Effects Entomology environmental models Forest cover Forest ecology Forest habitats Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Habitat fragmentation Habitats Insecta Insects Invertebrates landscape ecology Landscapes matrix habitat Metapopulation ecology New Zealand Population Dynamics scale slope Species species diversity species-area relationship statistical analysis statistical models synergistic interactions wildlife habitats |
title | Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A39%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Synergistic%20interactions%20between%20edge%20and%20area%20effects%20in%20a%20heavily%20fragmented%20landscape&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Ewers,%20Robert%20M.&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=96-106&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88%5B96:SIBEAA%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27651071%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219001510&rft_id=info:pmid/17489458&rft_jstor_id=27651071&rfr_iscdi=true |