Loading…

Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape

Both area and edge effects have a strong influence on ecological processes in fragmented landscapes, but there is little understanding of how these two factors might interact to exacerbate local species declines. To test for synergistic interactions between area and edge effects, we sampled a divers...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology (Durham) 2007, Vol.88 (1), p.96-106
Main Authors: Ewers, Robert M., Thorpe, Stephen, Didham, Raphael K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633
container_end_page 106
container_issue 1
container_start_page 96
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 88
creator Ewers, Robert M.
Thorpe, Stephen
Didham, Raphael K.
description Both area and edge effects have a strong influence on ecological processes in fragmented landscapes, but there is little understanding of how these two factors might interact to exacerbate local species declines. To test for synergistic interactions between area and edge effects, we sampled a diverse beetle community in a heavily fragmented landscape in New Zealand. More than 35 000 beetles of ∼900 species were sampled over large gradients in habitat area (10−2—106 ha) and distance from patch edge (20—2ⁱ⁰ m from the forest edge into both the forest and adjacent matrix). Using a new approach to partition variance following an ordination analysis, we found that a synergistic interaction between habitat area and distance to edge was a more important determinant of patterns in beetle community composition than direct edge or area effects alone. The strength of edge effects in beetle-species composition increased nonlinearly with increasing fragment area. One important consequence of the synergy is that the slopes of species—area (SA) curves constructed from habitat islands depend sensitively on the distance from edge at which sampling is conducted. Surprisingly, we found negative SA curves for communities sampled at intermediate distances from habitat edges, caused by differential edge responses of matrix- vs. forest-specialist species in fragments of increasing area. Our data indicate that distance to habitat edge has a consistently greater impact on beetle community composition than habitat area and that variation in the strength of edge effects may underlie many patterns that are superficially related to habitat area.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[96:SIBEAA]2.0.CO;2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70478148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27651071</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27651071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkdGLEzEQxhdRvHr6J6iLoCi4dZLsJhPvqdaqB4d9qAeKSMims70t291esvXof2_KljvwRTAvIcwv38x8X5K8ZTBmqOEdAOOZlgW-5gDqDeJPLd8vzj_MJpNffAzj6fyM30tGTAudaabgfjK6_XKSPAphDfGwHB8mJ0zlqPMCR8n3xb4lv6pDX7u0bnvy1vV114a0pP6GqE1puaLUtsvUerIpVRW5PkQ0tekV2d91s08rb1cbip-XaRPJ4OyWHicPKtsEenK8T5PLT7Nv0y_Zxfzz-XRykbki5zIrUfKc50hqKVCUArXVJQorXQ4glSYhFJDWuhLaoQTBdSWFKwqrUXEpxGnyatDd-u56R6E3mzo4auIg1O2CUZArjFv_E2Ra8kJyHcEXf4HrbufbuIThTEcLCwYR-jhAzncheKrM1tcb6_eGgTnkZQ7mm4P55pCXQYwPM-RluAEznRseZZ4de-3KDS3vRI4BReDlEbDR1iY63bo63HEolVCyiNzXgbupG9r_1zBmNv1xqCJGK6Lg00FwHfrO3wry2IyBYrH-fKhXtjN25eNQlwsOTACgAAQp_gCF2cfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219001510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Ewers, Robert M. ; Thorpe, Stephen ; Didham, Raphael K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ewers, Robert M. ; Thorpe, Stephen ; Didham, Raphael K.</creatorcontrib><description>Both area and edge effects have a strong influence on ecological processes in fragmented landscapes, but there is little understanding of how these two factors might interact to exacerbate local species declines. To test for synergistic interactions between area and edge effects, we sampled a diverse beetle community in a heavily fragmented landscape in New Zealand. More than 35 000 beetles of ∼900 species were sampled over large gradients in habitat area (10−2—106 ha) and distance from patch edge (20—2ⁱ⁰ m from the forest edge into both the forest and adjacent matrix). Using a new approach to partition variance following an ordination analysis, we found that a synergistic interaction between habitat area and distance to edge was a more important determinant of patterns in beetle community composition than direct edge or area effects alone. The strength of edge effects in beetle-species composition increased nonlinearly with increasing fragment area. One important consequence of the synergy is that the slopes of species—area (SA) curves constructed from habitat islands depend sensitively on the distance from edge at which sampling is conducted. Surprisingly, we found negative SA curves for communities sampled at intermediate distances from habitat edges, caused by differential edge responses of matrix- vs. forest-specialist species in fragments of increasing area. Our data indicate that distance to habitat edge has a consistently greater impact on beetle community composition than habitat area and that variation in the strength of edge effects may underlie many patterns that are superficially related to habitat area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[96:SIBEAA]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17489458</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; area effects ; Beetles ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Coleoptera ; Conservation biology ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Edge effects ; Effects ; Entomology ; environmental models ; Forest cover ; Forest ecology ; Forest habitats ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitat fragmentation ; Habitats ; Insecta ; Insects ; Invertebrates ; landscape ecology ; Landscapes ; matrix habitat ; Metapopulation ecology ; New Zealand ; Population Dynamics ; scale ; slope ; Species ; species diversity ; species-area relationship ; statistical analysis ; statistical models ; synergistic interactions ; wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2007, Vol.88 (1), p.96-106</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2007 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27651071$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27651071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18673765$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17489458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ewers, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorpe, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Didham, Raphael K.</creatorcontrib><title>Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>Both area and edge effects have a strong influence on ecological processes in fragmented landscapes, but there is little understanding of how these two factors might interact to exacerbate local species declines. To test for synergistic interactions between area and edge effects, we sampled a diverse beetle community in a heavily fragmented landscape in New Zealand. More than 35 000 beetles of ∼900 species were sampled over large gradients in habitat area (10−2—106 ha) and distance from patch edge (20—2ⁱ⁰ m from the forest edge into both the forest and adjacent matrix). Using a new approach to partition variance following an ordination analysis, we found that a synergistic interaction between habitat area and distance to edge was a more important determinant of patterns in beetle community composition than direct edge or area effects alone. The strength of edge effects in beetle-species composition increased nonlinearly with increasing fragment area. One important consequence of the synergy is that the slopes of species—area (SA) curves constructed from habitat islands depend sensitively on the distance from edge at which sampling is conducted. Surprisingly, we found negative SA curves for communities sampled at intermediate distances from habitat edges, caused by differential edge responses of matrix- vs. forest-specialist species in fragments of increasing area. Our data indicate that distance to habitat edge has a consistently greater impact on beetle community composition than habitat area and that variation in the strength of edge effects may underlie many patterns that are superficially related to habitat area.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>area effects</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Edge effects</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>environmental models</subject><subject>Forest cover</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>landscape ecology</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>matrix habitat</subject><subject>Metapopulation ecology</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>scale</subject><subject>slope</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>species-area relationship</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><subject>statistical models</subject><subject>synergistic interactions</subject><subject>wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkdGLEzEQxhdRvHr6J6iLoCi4dZLsJhPvqdaqB4d9qAeKSMims70t291esvXof2_KljvwRTAvIcwv38x8X5K8ZTBmqOEdAOOZlgW-5gDqDeJPLd8vzj_MJpNffAzj6fyM30tGTAudaabgfjK6_XKSPAphDfGwHB8mJ0zlqPMCR8n3xb4lv6pDX7u0bnvy1vV114a0pP6GqE1puaLUtsvUerIpVRW5PkQ0tekV2d91s08rb1cbip-XaRPJ4OyWHicPKtsEenK8T5PLT7Nv0y_Zxfzz-XRykbki5zIrUfKc50hqKVCUArXVJQorXQ4glSYhFJDWuhLaoQTBdSWFKwqrUXEpxGnyatDd-u56R6E3mzo4auIg1O2CUZArjFv_E2Ra8kJyHcEXf4HrbufbuIThTEcLCwYR-jhAzncheKrM1tcb6_eGgTnkZQ7mm4P55pCXQYwPM-RluAEznRseZZ4de-3KDS3vRI4BReDlEbDR1iY63bo63HEolVCyiNzXgbupG9r_1zBmNv1xqCJGK6Lg00FwHfrO3wry2IyBYrH-fKhXtjN25eNQlwsOTACgAAQp_gCF2cfg</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Ewers, Robert M.</creator><creator>Thorpe, Stephen</creator><creator>Didham, Raphael K.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape</title><author>Ewers, Robert M. ; Thorpe, Stephen ; Didham, Raphael K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>area effects</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Edge effects</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>environmental models</topic><topic>Forest cover</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>landscape ecology</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>matrix habitat</topic><topic>Metapopulation ecology</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>scale</topic><topic>slope</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>species-area relationship</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><topic>statistical models</topic><topic>synergistic interactions</topic><topic>wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ewers, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorpe, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Didham, Raphael K.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ewers, Robert M.</au><au>Thorpe, Stephen</au><au>Didham, Raphael K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>96-106</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>Both area and edge effects have a strong influence on ecological processes in fragmented landscapes, but there is little understanding of how these two factors might interact to exacerbate local species declines. To test for synergistic interactions between area and edge effects, we sampled a diverse beetle community in a heavily fragmented landscape in New Zealand. More than 35 000 beetles of ∼900 species were sampled over large gradients in habitat area (10−2—106 ha) and distance from patch edge (20—2ⁱ⁰ m from the forest edge into both the forest and adjacent matrix). Using a new approach to partition variance following an ordination analysis, we found that a synergistic interaction between habitat area and distance to edge was a more important determinant of patterns in beetle community composition than direct edge or area effects alone. The strength of edge effects in beetle-species composition increased nonlinearly with increasing fragment area. One important consequence of the synergy is that the slopes of species—area (SA) curves constructed from habitat islands depend sensitively on the distance from edge at which sampling is conducted. Surprisingly, we found negative SA curves for communities sampled at intermediate distances from habitat edges, caused by differential edge responses of matrix- vs. forest-specialist species in fragments of increasing area. Our data indicate that distance to habitat edge has a consistently greater impact on beetle community composition than habitat area and that variation in the strength of edge effects may underlie many patterns that are superficially related to habitat area.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>17489458</pmid><doi>10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[96:SIBEAA]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 2007, Vol.88 (1), p.96-106
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70478148
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
area effects
Beetles
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Coleoptera
Conservation biology
Ecology
Ecosystem
Edge effects
Effects
Entomology
environmental models
Forest cover
Forest ecology
Forest habitats
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Habitat fragmentation
Habitats
Insecta
Insects
Invertebrates
landscape ecology
Landscapes
matrix habitat
Metapopulation ecology
New Zealand
Population Dynamics
scale
slope
Species
species diversity
species-area relationship
statistical analysis
statistical models
synergistic interactions
wildlife habitats
title Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A39%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Synergistic%20interactions%20between%20edge%20and%20area%20effects%20in%20a%20heavily%20fragmented%20landscape&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Ewers,%20Robert%20M.&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=96-106&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88%5B96:SIBEAA%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27651071%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-b8624248e7d383b389a9b83a6c400679e3370e999f39c860329f63c55a9872633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219001510&rft_id=info:pmid/17489458&rft_jstor_id=27651071&rfr_iscdi=true