Loading…

Reliability and Safety of Current Dynamic Sentinel Node Biopsy for Penile Carcinoma

Abstract Objectives Dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) has been performed at our department since 1994 to assess status of inguinal lymph nodes of clinically node-negative (cN0) patients with penile carcinoma. Over time, several modifications were made to reduce the false-negative rate and thus inc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European urology 2007-07, Vol.52 (1), p.170-177
Main Authors: Leijte, Joost A.P, Kroon, Bin K, Valdés Olmos, Renato A, Nieweg, Omgo E, Horenblas, Simon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1f718ddc7223c9858ead3c9f20a7b6f6afcb8da9d51402f35c9d34f948714e753
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1f718ddc7223c9858ead3c9f20a7b6f6afcb8da9d51402f35c9d34f948714e753
container_end_page 177
container_issue 1
container_start_page 170
container_title European urology
container_volume 52
creator Leijte, Joost A.P
Kroon, Bin K
Valdés Olmos, Renato A
Nieweg, Omgo E
Horenblas, Simon
description Abstract Objectives Dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) has been performed at our department since 1994 to assess status of inguinal lymph nodes of clinically node-negative (cN0) patients with penile carcinoma. Over time, several modifications were made to reduce the false-negative rate and thus increase sensitivity. We compared the false-negative and complication rates of the current procedure, as performed at our institute since 2001, with the prior procedures. Materials and methods The patients who underwent DSNB for penile carcinoma in the period from 1994 until July 2004 were divided into two cohorts: cohort A: patients treated from 1994 until 2001; cohort B: patients treated from 2001 until 2004. Cohort A consisted of 92 patients, in whom 157 groins were explored. Cohort B consisted of 58 patients, with a total of 105 explored groins. Medians for follow-up in cohorts A and B were 83 (range: 24–130) and 30 (range: 24–49) mo, respectively. The false-negative and complication rates were determined in both cohorts. Results In cohort A, 21 of 157 explored groins contained tumour-positive sentinel nodes, and five false-negative procedures were encountered, resulting in a false-negative rate of 19.2%. In cohort B, 20 of 105 explored groins contained tumour-positive sentinel nodes, and one procedure was false-negative. The false-negative rate was 4.8%. The rate of complications dropped from 10.2% in cohort A to 5.7% in cohort B. All complications were minor and transient. Conclusions The false-negative and complication rates of DSNB have decreased since the procedure was modified. The current procedure has false-negative and complication rates of 4.8% and 5.7%, respectively. DSNB has matured into a reliable and safe method for assessing status of lymph nodes in cN0 penile carcinoma patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.107
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70549438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0302283807001480</els_id><sourcerecordid>70549438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1f718ddc7223c9858ead3c9f20a7b6f6afcb8da9d51402f35c9d34f948714e753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwDxDyBW6bju3dtfeCRMNXpYpWBM6WY48lh1072Fmk_fc4SqSe5kPPO4dnCHnLYM2A9Tf7Nc55zmnNAeQaWN3KZ2TFlBSN7Hp4TlYggDdcCXVFXpWyBwDRDeIluWJSsH7o5Ypsf-IYzC6M4bhQEx3dGo-1TZ5u5pwxHunnJZopWLqtQ4g40h_JIb0N6VAW6lOmjxjDiHRjsg0xTeY1eeHNWPDNpV6T31-__Np8b-4fvt1tPt03VgxwbJiXTDlnJefCDqpTaFxtPAcjd73vjbc75czgOtYC96KzgxOtH1olWYuyE9fkw_nuIae_M5ajnkKxOI4mYpqLltC1QytUBdszaHMqJaPXhxwmkxfNQJ9k6r0-y9QnmRpY3coae3e5P-8mdE-hi70KvL8Aplgz-myiDeWJU4pxxqFyH88cVhv_AmZtxxBDjfzBBcs-zTlWUZrpwjXo7elvp7eBBGCtAvEfDuCT9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70549438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability and Safety of Current Dynamic Sentinel Node Biopsy for Penile Carcinoma</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Leijte, Joost A.P ; Kroon, Bin K ; Valdés Olmos, Renato A ; Nieweg, Omgo E ; Horenblas, Simon</creator><creatorcontrib>Leijte, Joost A.P ; Kroon, Bin K ; Valdés Olmos, Renato A ; Nieweg, Omgo E ; Horenblas, Simon</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives Dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) has been performed at our department since 1994 to assess status of inguinal lymph nodes of clinically node-negative (cN0) patients with penile carcinoma. Over time, several modifications were made to reduce the false-negative rate and thus increase sensitivity. We compared the false-negative and complication rates of the current procedure, as performed at our institute since 2001, with the prior procedures. Materials and methods The patients who underwent DSNB for penile carcinoma in the period from 1994 until July 2004 were divided into two cohorts: cohort A: patients treated from 1994 until 2001; cohort B: patients treated from 2001 until 2004. Cohort A consisted of 92 patients, in whom 157 groins were explored. Cohort B consisted of 58 patients, with a total of 105 explored groins. Medians for follow-up in cohorts A and B were 83 (range: 24–130) and 30 (range: 24–49) mo, respectively. The false-negative and complication rates were determined in both cohorts. Results In cohort A, 21 of 157 explored groins contained tumour-positive sentinel nodes, and five false-negative procedures were encountered, resulting in a false-negative rate of 19.2%. In cohort B, 20 of 105 explored groins contained tumour-positive sentinel nodes, and one procedure was false-negative. The false-negative rate was 4.8%. The rate of complications dropped from 10.2% in cohort A to 5.7% in cohort B. All complications were minor and transient. Conclusions The false-negative and complication rates of DSNB have decreased since the procedure was modified. The current procedure has false-negative and complication rates of 4.8% and 5.7%, respectively. DSNB has matured into a reliable and safe method for assessing status of lymph nodes in cN0 penile carcinoma patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17316967</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EUURAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma - secondary ; False Negative Reactions ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Inguinal Canal ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Male genital diseases ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Penile Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Penile Neoplasms - pathology ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - trends ; Time Factors ; Tumors ; Urology</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2007-07, Vol.52 (1), p.170-177</ispartof><rights>European Association of Urology</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1f718ddc7223c9858ead3c9f20a7b6f6afcb8da9d51402f35c9d34f948714e753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1f718ddc7223c9858ead3c9f20a7b6f6afcb8da9d51402f35c9d34f948714e753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18812120$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17316967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leijte, Joost A.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroon, Bin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdés Olmos, Renato A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieweg, Omgo E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horenblas, Simon</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability and Safety of Current Dynamic Sentinel Node Biopsy for Penile Carcinoma</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives Dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) has been performed at our department since 1994 to assess status of inguinal lymph nodes of clinically node-negative (cN0) patients with penile carcinoma. Over time, several modifications were made to reduce the false-negative rate and thus increase sensitivity. We compared the false-negative and complication rates of the current procedure, as performed at our institute since 2001, with the prior procedures. Materials and methods The patients who underwent DSNB for penile carcinoma in the period from 1994 until July 2004 were divided into two cohorts: cohort A: patients treated from 1994 until 2001; cohort B: patients treated from 2001 until 2004. Cohort A consisted of 92 patients, in whom 157 groins were explored. Cohort B consisted of 58 patients, with a total of 105 explored groins. Medians for follow-up in cohorts A and B were 83 (range: 24–130) and 30 (range: 24–49) mo, respectively. The false-negative and complication rates were determined in both cohorts. Results In cohort A, 21 of 157 explored groins contained tumour-positive sentinel nodes, and five false-negative procedures were encountered, resulting in a false-negative rate of 19.2%. In cohort B, 20 of 105 explored groins contained tumour-positive sentinel nodes, and one procedure was false-negative. The false-negative rate was 4.8%. The rate of complications dropped from 10.2% in cohort A to 5.7% in cohort B. All complications were minor and transient. Conclusions The false-negative and complication rates of DSNB have decreased since the procedure was modified. The current procedure has false-negative and complication rates of 4.8% and 5.7%, respectively. DSNB has matured into a reliable and safe method for assessing status of lymph nodes in cN0 penile carcinoma patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma - secondary</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inguinal Canal</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male genital diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Penile Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Penile Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - trends</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwDxDyBW6bju3dtfeCRMNXpYpWBM6WY48lh1072Fmk_fc4SqSe5kPPO4dnCHnLYM2A9Tf7Nc55zmnNAeQaWN3KZ2TFlBSN7Hp4TlYggDdcCXVFXpWyBwDRDeIluWJSsH7o5Ypsf-IYzC6M4bhQEx3dGo-1TZ5u5pwxHunnJZopWLqtQ4g40h_JIb0N6VAW6lOmjxjDiHRjsg0xTeY1eeHNWPDNpV6T31-__Np8b-4fvt1tPt03VgxwbJiXTDlnJefCDqpTaFxtPAcjd73vjbc75czgOtYC96KzgxOtH1olWYuyE9fkw_nuIae_M5ajnkKxOI4mYpqLltC1QytUBdszaHMqJaPXhxwmkxfNQJ9k6r0-y9QnmRpY3coae3e5P-8mdE-hi70KvL8Aplgz-myiDeWJU4pxxqFyH88cVhv_AmZtxxBDjfzBBcs-zTlWUZrpwjXo7elvp7eBBGCtAvEfDuCT9A</recordid><startdate>20070701</startdate><enddate>20070701</enddate><creator>Leijte, Joost A.P</creator><creator>Kroon, Bin K</creator><creator>Valdés Olmos, Renato A</creator><creator>Nieweg, Omgo E</creator><creator>Horenblas, Simon</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070701</creationdate><title>Reliability and Safety of Current Dynamic Sentinel Node Biopsy for Penile Carcinoma</title><author>Leijte, Joost A.P ; Kroon, Bin K ; Valdés Olmos, Renato A ; Nieweg, Omgo E ; Horenblas, Simon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1f718ddc7223c9858ead3c9f20a7b6f6afcb8da9d51402f35c9d34f948714e753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma - secondary</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inguinal Canal</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male genital diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Penile Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Penile Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - trends</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leijte, Joost A.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroon, Bin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdés Olmos, Renato A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieweg, Omgo E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horenblas, Simon</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leijte, Joost A.P</au><au>Kroon, Bin K</au><au>Valdés Olmos, Renato A</au><au>Nieweg, Omgo E</au><au>Horenblas, Simon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability and Safety of Current Dynamic Sentinel Node Biopsy for Penile Carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2007-07-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>177</epage><pages>170-177</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><coden>EUURAV</coden><abstract>Abstract Objectives Dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) has been performed at our department since 1994 to assess status of inguinal lymph nodes of clinically node-negative (cN0) patients with penile carcinoma. Over time, several modifications were made to reduce the false-negative rate and thus increase sensitivity. We compared the false-negative and complication rates of the current procedure, as performed at our institute since 2001, with the prior procedures. Materials and methods The patients who underwent DSNB for penile carcinoma in the period from 1994 until July 2004 were divided into two cohorts: cohort A: patients treated from 1994 until 2001; cohort B: patients treated from 2001 until 2004. Cohort A consisted of 92 patients, in whom 157 groins were explored. Cohort B consisted of 58 patients, with a total of 105 explored groins. Medians for follow-up in cohorts A and B were 83 (range: 24–130) and 30 (range: 24–49) mo, respectively. The false-negative and complication rates were determined in both cohorts. Results In cohort A, 21 of 157 explored groins contained tumour-positive sentinel nodes, and five false-negative procedures were encountered, resulting in a false-negative rate of 19.2%. In cohort B, 20 of 105 explored groins contained tumour-positive sentinel nodes, and one procedure was false-negative. The false-negative rate was 4.8%. The rate of complications dropped from 10.2% in cohort A to 5.7% in cohort B. All complications were minor and transient. Conclusions The false-negative and complication rates of DSNB have decreased since the procedure was modified. The current procedure has false-negative and complication rates of 4.8% and 5.7%, respectively. DSNB has matured into a reliable and safe method for assessing status of lymph nodes in cN0 penile carcinoma patients.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>17316967</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.107</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-2838
ispartof European urology, 2007-07, Vol.52 (1), p.170-177
issn 0302-2838
1873-7560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70549438
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma - secondary
False Negative Reactions
Follow-Up Studies
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Inguinal Canal
Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Male genital diseases
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Penile Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Penile Neoplasms - pathology
Radionuclide Imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - trends
Time Factors
Tumors
Urology
title Reliability and Safety of Current Dynamic Sentinel Node Biopsy for Penile Carcinoma
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A55%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20and%20Safety%20of%20Current%20Dynamic%20Sentinel%20Node%20Biopsy%20for%20Penile%20Carcinoma&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Leijte,%20Joost%20A.P&rft.date=2007-07-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=177&rft.pages=170-177&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft.coden=EUURAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70549438%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1f718ddc7223c9858ead3c9f20a7b6f6afcb8da9d51402f35c9d34f948714e753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70549438&rft_id=info:pmid/17316967&rfr_iscdi=true