Loading…
Systematic review of antimicrobial agents used for chronic wounds
Background: This paper is one of a series of eight systematic reviews that aim to identify effective interventions for chronic wounds. Here, antimicrobial agents are evaluated. Methods: Electronic databases and other relevant sources were accessed to identify published and unpublished material. Stud...
Saved in:
| Published in: | British journal of surgery 2001-01, Vol.88 (1), p.4-21 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4478-8a4362330746ac41fa37b2d5aa3b73ebe4e23f51a1c882881e8c39110e56a1f63 |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 21 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 4 |
| container_title | British journal of surgery |
| container_volume | 88 |
| creator | O'Meara, S. M. Cullum, N. A. Majid, M. Sheldon, T. A. |
| description | Background:
This paper is one of a series of eight systematic reviews that aim to identify effective interventions for chronic wounds. Here, antimicrobial agents are evaluated.
Methods:
Electronic databases and other relevant sources were accessed to identify published and unpublished material. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they used concurrent controls, recruited participants with chronic wounds, evaluated an intervention designed to prevent or treat chronic wounds, and incorporated an objective assessment of wound healing. All included studies were assessed against a comprehensive checklist for methodological quality. A narrative overview was conducted.
Results:
Thirty trials were included, 25 of randomized design. Small sample size and other methodological problems meant that findings were often difficult to interpret. Results do not support the routine use of systemic antibiotics for leg ulcers or diabetic foot ulcers without acute infection, but they may be useful as an adjunct to surgery for pilonidal sinuses. Several topical preparations may be helpful, including dimethyl sulphoxide, silver sulphadiazine, benzoyl peroxide, oxyquinoline and gentamicin.
Conclusion:
Most of this research requires replication in larger, well designed studies to establish both clinical and cost effectiveness. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01631.x |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70553725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70553725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4478-8a4362330746ac41fa37b2d5aa3b73ebe4e23f51a1c882881e8c39110e56a1f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0ctuEzEUBmALFdG08ApopErdzWD7-Bapm7aBFlTBolyW1hnHAw5zKfYMSd4eh4Sw8sLffyz_h5CC0YpRod6sKgZKlpwpU3FKWUWZAlZtnpHZ8eKEzCilumTA4ZScpbTKEKjkL8gpY5kBFTNy_bhNo-9wDK6I_nfw62JoCuzH0AUXhzpgW-B334-pmJJfFs0QC_cjDn3262Hql-kled5gm_yrw3lOvrx7-_n2vnz4dPf-9vqhdEJoUxoUoDgA1UKhE6xB0DVfSkSoNfjaC8-hkQyZM4Ybw7xxMGeMeqmQNQrOyeV-7lMcfk0-jbYLyfm2xd4PU7KaSgmaywxfH-BUd35pn2LoMG7tv09ncHEAmBy2TcTehXR0-e255Fld7dU6tH77fwq1uxXYld01bXdN290K7N8V2I29-fAomMnxch8Pud_NMY7xp1UatLTfPt7Zm_liYb4u5lbAHwo1hzY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70553725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic review of antimicrobial agents used for chronic wounds</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>O'Meara, S. M. ; Cullum, N. A. ; Majid, M. ; Sheldon, T. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Meara, S. M. ; Cullum, N. A. ; Majid, M. ; Sheldon, T. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
This paper is one of a series of eight systematic reviews that aim to identify effective interventions for chronic wounds. Here, antimicrobial agents are evaluated.
Methods:
Electronic databases and other relevant sources were accessed to identify published and unpublished material. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they used concurrent controls, recruited participants with chronic wounds, evaluated an intervention designed to prevent or treat chronic wounds, and incorporated an objective assessment of wound healing. All included studies were assessed against a comprehensive checklist for methodological quality. A narrative overview was conducted.
Results:
Thirty trials were included, 25 of randomized design. Small sample size and other methodological problems meant that findings were often difficult to interpret. Results do not support the routine use of systemic antibiotics for leg ulcers or diabetic foot ulcers without acute infection, but they may be useful as an adjunct to surgery for pilonidal sinuses. Several topical preparations may be helpful, including dimethyl sulphoxide, silver sulphadiazine, benzoyl peroxide, oxyquinoline and gentamicin.
Conclusion:
Most of this research requires replication in larger, well designed studies to establish both clinical and cost effectiveness. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01631.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11136304</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSUAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Topical ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Bacterial Infections - prevention & control ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chronic Disease ; Diabetic Foot - drug therapy ; Humans ; Leg Ulcer - drug therapy ; Medical sciences ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pilonidal Sinus - drug therapy ; Pressure Ulcer - drug therapy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Ulcer - drug therapy ; Wounds and Injuries - drug therapy</subject><ispartof>British journal of surgery, 2001-01, Vol.88 (1), p.4-21</ispartof><rights>2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4478-8a4362330746ac41fa37b2d5aa3b73ebe4e23f51a1c882881e8c39110e56a1f63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=881952$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11136304$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Meara, S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullum, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majid, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, T. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic review of antimicrobial agents used for chronic wounds</title><title>British journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><description>Background:
This paper is one of a series of eight systematic reviews that aim to identify effective interventions for chronic wounds. Here, antimicrobial agents are evaluated.
Methods:
Electronic databases and other relevant sources were accessed to identify published and unpublished material. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they used concurrent controls, recruited participants with chronic wounds, evaluated an intervention designed to prevent or treat chronic wounds, and incorporated an objective assessment of wound healing. All included studies were assessed against a comprehensive checklist for methodological quality. A narrative overview was conducted.
Results:
Thirty trials were included, 25 of randomized design. Small sample size and other methodological problems meant that findings were often difficult to interpret. Results do not support the routine use of systemic antibiotics for leg ulcers or diabetic foot ulcers without acute infection, but they may be useful as an adjunct to surgery for pilonidal sinuses. Several topical preparations may be helpful, including dimethyl sulphoxide, silver sulphadiazine, benzoyl peroxide, oxyquinoline and gentamicin.
Conclusion:
Most of this research requires replication in larger, well designed studies to establish both clinical and cost effectiveness. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd</description><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leg Ulcer - drug therapy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pilonidal Sinus - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pressure Ulcer - drug therapy</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Ulcer - drug therapy</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - drug therapy</subject><issn>0007-1323</issn><issn>1365-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0ctuEzEUBmALFdG08ApopErdzWD7-Bapm7aBFlTBolyW1hnHAw5zKfYMSd4eh4Sw8sLffyz_h5CC0YpRod6sKgZKlpwpU3FKWUWZAlZtnpHZ8eKEzCilumTA4ZScpbTKEKjkL8gpY5kBFTNy_bhNo-9wDK6I_nfw62JoCuzH0AUXhzpgW-B334-pmJJfFs0QC_cjDn3262Hql-kled5gm_yrw3lOvrx7-_n2vnz4dPf-9vqhdEJoUxoUoDgA1UKhE6xB0DVfSkSoNfjaC8-hkQyZM4Ybw7xxMGeMeqmQNQrOyeV-7lMcfk0-jbYLyfm2xd4PU7KaSgmaywxfH-BUd35pn2LoMG7tv09ncHEAmBy2TcTehXR0-e255Fld7dU6tH77fwq1uxXYld01bXdN290K7N8V2I29-fAomMnxch8Pud_NMY7xp1UatLTfPt7Zm_liYb4u5lbAHwo1hzY</recordid><startdate>200101</startdate><enddate>200101</enddate><creator>O'Meara, S. M.</creator><creator>Cullum, N. A.</creator><creator>Majid, M.</creator><creator>Sheldon, T. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200101</creationdate><title>Systematic review of antimicrobial agents used for chronic wounds</title><author>O'Meara, S. M. ; Cullum, N. A. ; Majid, M. ; Sheldon, T. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4478-8a4362330746ac41fa37b2d5aa3b73ebe4e23f51a1c882881e8c39110e56a1f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leg Ulcer - drug therapy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pilonidal Sinus - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pressure Ulcer - drug therapy</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Ulcer - drug therapy</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - drug therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Meara, S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullum, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majid, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, T. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Meara, S. M.</au><au>Cullum, N. A.</au><au>Majid, M.</au><au>Sheldon, T. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic review of antimicrobial agents used for chronic wounds</atitle><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><date>2001-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>4</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>4-21</pages><issn>0007-1323</issn><eissn>1365-2168</eissn><coden>BJSUAM</coden><abstract>Background:
This paper is one of a series of eight systematic reviews that aim to identify effective interventions for chronic wounds. Here, antimicrobial agents are evaluated.
Methods:
Electronic databases and other relevant sources were accessed to identify published and unpublished material. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they used concurrent controls, recruited participants with chronic wounds, evaluated an intervention designed to prevent or treat chronic wounds, and incorporated an objective assessment of wound healing. All included studies were assessed against a comprehensive checklist for methodological quality. A narrative overview was conducted.
Results:
Thirty trials were included, 25 of randomized design. Small sample size and other methodological problems meant that findings were often difficult to interpret. Results do not support the routine use of systemic antibiotics for leg ulcers or diabetic foot ulcers without acute infection, but they may be useful as an adjunct to surgery for pilonidal sinuses. Several topical preparations may be helpful, including dimethyl sulphoxide, silver sulphadiazine, benzoyl peroxide, oxyquinoline and gentamicin.
Conclusion:
Most of this research requires replication in larger, well designed studies to establish both clinical and cost effectiveness. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>11136304</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01631.x</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-1323 |
| ispartof | British journal of surgery, 2001-01, Vol.88 (1), p.4-21 |
| issn | 0007-1323 1365-2168 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70553725 |
| source | Oxford Journals Online |
| subjects | Administration, Topical Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibacterial agents Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents Bacterial Infections - prevention & control Biological and medical sciences Chronic Disease Diabetic Foot - drug therapy Humans Leg Ulcer - drug therapy Medical sciences Pharmacology. Drug treatments Pilonidal Sinus - drug therapy Pressure Ulcer - drug therapy Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Ulcer - drug therapy Wounds and Injuries - drug therapy |
| title | Systematic review of antimicrobial agents used for chronic wounds |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T10%3A56%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20review%20of%20antimicrobial%20agents%20used%20for%20chronic%20wounds&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=O'Meara,%20S.%20M.&rft.date=2001-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=4-21&rft.issn=0007-1323&rft.eissn=1365-2168&rft.coden=BJSUAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01631.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70553725%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4478-8a4362330746ac41fa37b2d5aa3b73ebe4e23f51a1c882881e8c39110e56a1f63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70553725&rft_id=info:pmid/11136304&rfr_iscdi=true |