Loading…

Validity of self-reported influenza and pneumococcal vaccination status among a cohort of hospitalized elderly inpatients

Abstract Use of self-reported vaccination status is commonplace in assessing vaccination coverage for public health programs and individuals, yet limited validity data exist. We compared self-report with provider records for pneumococcal (23vPPV) and influenza vaccine for 4887 subjects aged ≥65 year...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vaccine 2007-06, Vol.25 (25), p.4775-4783
Main Authors: Skull, Susan A, Andrews, Ross M, Byrnes, Graham B, Kelly, Heath A, Nolan, Terence M, Brown, Graham V, Campbell, Donald A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Use of self-reported vaccination status is commonplace in assessing vaccination coverage for public health programs and individuals, yet limited validity data exist. We compared self-report with provider records for pneumococcal (23vPPV) and influenza vaccine for 4887 subjects aged ≥65 years from two Australian hospitals. Self-reported influenza vaccination status had high sensitivity (98%), positive predictive value (PPV) (88%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (91%), but low specificity (56%). Self-reported 23vPPV (previous 5 years) had a sensitivity of 84%, specificity 77%, PPV 85% and NPV 76%. Clinicians can be reasonably confident of self-reported influenza vaccine status, and for positive self-report for 23vPPV in this setting. For program evaluation, self-reported influenza vaccination coverage among inpatients overestimates true coverage by about 10% versus 1% for 23vPPV. Self-report remains imperfect and whole-of-life immunisation registers a preferable goal.
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.04.015