Loading…

Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales

The competition—colonization trade-off has long been a mechanism explaining patterns of species coexistence and diversity in nonequilibrium systems. It forms one explanation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) for local communities—specifically that diversity should be maximized at inte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology (Durham) 2007-04, Vol.88 (4), p.823-829
Main Author: Cadotte, Marc William
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243
container_end_page 829
container_issue 4
container_start_page 823
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 88
creator Cadotte, Marc William
description The competition—colonization trade-off has long been a mechanism explaining patterns of species coexistence and diversity in nonequilibrium systems. It forms one explanation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) for local communities—specifically that diversity should be maximized at intermediate disturbance frequencies, yet only a fraction of empirical studies support IDH predictions. Similarly, this trade-off is also a powerful explanation of coexistence at larger spatial scales. I show, with a microbial experimental system, that the diversity—disturbance relationship is dependent on the relative distribution of species along this trade-off. Here I show that, when species are skewed toward late-successional habits, local diversity declines with disturbance. Yet, despite this trait skew, diversity at scales larger than the patch appears insensitive to the trade-off distribution. Intermediate disturbance frequencies produce the greatest diversity in patch successional stage, thus benefiting the maximum number of species at larger scales.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/06-1117
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70567445</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27651173</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27651173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoMoznUUf4FaBHVVzcl3lnIZR2HQhc7CVUjzIb20zTVpkfHXm9KLA8JgNiF5n_Oe5D0IPQX8FpTG77BoAUDeQzvQVLcaJL6PdhgDabXg6gw9KuWA6wKmHqIzkJwKofUOfd6n8Rjmfu7T1Lo0pKn_bddDM2frQ5tiLI2dfOP7Mi-5s5MLTYgxuLnez824DHN_HEJTnB1CeYweRDuU8OS0n6PrDxff9h_bqy-Xn_bvr1rHuKCti4xL3mnfOYo9ZeC7oBljUXAtqIws-tBVTXUqgiRMK-eF7Gz0DnBHGD1HrzffY04_l1BmM_bFhWGwU0hLMRJzIRnj_wWhxqOpXB1f_gMe0pKn-glDQGNCBZcVerNBLqdScojmmPvR5hsD2KyDMFiYdRCVfH6yW7ox-FvulHwFXp0Au0YXc022L7eckiCUFJUjG_erH8LNXf3Mxf47wVgqxRShtejZVnQoc8p_i4gUfH1c1V9serTJ2B-5Nr7-SjBQjBVRCjD9A5QHsII</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219023657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Cadotte, Marc William</creator><creatorcontrib>Cadotte, Marc William</creatorcontrib><description>The competition—colonization trade-off has long been a mechanism explaining patterns of species coexistence and diversity in nonequilibrium systems. It forms one explanation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) for local communities—specifically that diversity should be maximized at intermediate disturbance frequencies, yet only a fraction of empirical studies support IDH predictions. Similarly, this trade-off is also a powerful explanation of coexistence at larger spatial scales. I show, with a microbial experimental system, that the diversity—disturbance relationship is dependent on the relative distribution of species along this trade-off. Here I show that, when species are skewed toward late-successional habits, local diversity declines with disturbance. Yet, despite this trait skew, diversity at scales larger than the patch appears insensitive to the trade-off distribution. Intermediate disturbance frequencies produce the greatest diversity in patch successional stage, thus benefiting the maximum number of species at larger scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/06-1117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17536699</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>abiotic stress ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; colonizing ability ; Ecological competition ; Ecological disturbance ; Ecological genetics ; Ecological succession ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Eukaryota - growth &amp; development ; Eukaryota - physiology ; Experiments ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; intermediate disturbance hypothesis ; Marine ecology ; metacommunity ; Metapopulation ecology ; microcosm ; Microcosms ; microhabitats ; Microorganisms ; Models, Biological ; ponds ; Population Dynamics ; Population Growth ; Porifera - growth &amp; development ; Porifera - physiology ; prediction ; Protozoa ; provenance ; regional vs. local ; Rotifera ; spatial data ; spatial scale ; Species ; Species diversity ; Species Specificity ; succession ; Synecology ; Water - parasitology</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2007-04, Vol.88 (4), p.823-829</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2007 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Apr 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27651173$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27651173$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18716876$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17536699$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cadotte, Marc William</creatorcontrib><title>Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>The competition—colonization trade-off has long been a mechanism explaining patterns of species coexistence and diversity in nonequilibrium systems. It forms one explanation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) for local communities—specifically that diversity should be maximized at intermediate disturbance frequencies, yet only a fraction of empirical studies support IDH predictions. Similarly, this trade-off is also a powerful explanation of coexistence at larger spatial scales. I show, with a microbial experimental system, that the diversity—disturbance relationship is dependent on the relative distribution of species along this trade-off. Here I show that, when species are skewed toward late-successional habits, local diversity declines with disturbance. Yet, despite this trait skew, diversity at scales larger than the patch appears insensitive to the trade-off distribution. Intermediate disturbance frequencies produce the greatest diversity in patch successional stage, thus benefiting the maximum number of species at larger scales.</description><subject>abiotic stress</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>colonizing ability</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Ecological disturbance</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Ecological succession</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Eukaryota - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Eukaryota - physiology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>intermediate disturbance hypothesis</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>metacommunity</subject><subject>Metapopulation ecology</subject><subject>microcosm</subject><subject>Microcosms</subject><subject>microhabitats</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>ponds</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Population Growth</subject><subject>Porifera - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Porifera - physiology</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>provenance</subject><subject>regional vs. local</subject><subject>Rotifera</subject><subject>spatial data</subject><subject>spatial scale</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>succession</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Water - parasitology</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoMoznUUf4FaBHVVzcl3lnIZR2HQhc7CVUjzIb20zTVpkfHXm9KLA8JgNiF5n_Oe5D0IPQX8FpTG77BoAUDeQzvQVLcaJL6PdhgDabXg6gw9KuWA6wKmHqIzkJwKofUOfd6n8Rjmfu7T1Lo0pKn_bddDM2frQ5tiLI2dfOP7Mi-5s5MLTYgxuLnez824DHN_HEJTnB1CeYweRDuU8OS0n6PrDxff9h_bqy-Xn_bvr1rHuKCti4xL3mnfOYo9ZeC7oBljUXAtqIws-tBVTXUqgiRMK-eF7Gz0DnBHGD1HrzffY04_l1BmM_bFhWGwU0hLMRJzIRnj_wWhxqOpXB1f_gMe0pKn-glDQGNCBZcVerNBLqdScojmmPvR5hsD2KyDMFiYdRCVfH6yW7ox-FvulHwFXp0Au0YXc022L7eckiCUFJUjG_erH8LNXf3Mxf47wVgqxRShtejZVnQoc8p_i4gUfH1c1V9serTJ2B-5Nr7-SjBQjBVRCjD9A5QHsII</recordid><startdate>200704</startdate><enddate>200704</enddate><creator>Cadotte, Marc William</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200704</creationdate><title>Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales</title><author>Cadotte, Marc William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>abiotic stress</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>colonizing ability</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Ecological disturbance</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Ecological succession</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Eukaryota - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Eukaryota - physiology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>intermediate disturbance hypothesis</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>metacommunity</topic><topic>Metapopulation ecology</topic><topic>microcosm</topic><topic>Microcosms</topic><topic>microhabitats</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>ponds</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Population Growth</topic><topic>Porifera - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Porifera - physiology</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>provenance</topic><topic>regional vs. local</topic><topic>Rotifera</topic><topic>spatial data</topic><topic>spatial scale</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>succession</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Water - parasitology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cadotte, Marc William</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cadotte, Marc William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2007-04</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>823</spage><epage>829</epage><pages>823-829</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>The competition—colonization trade-off has long been a mechanism explaining patterns of species coexistence and diversity in nonequilibrium systems. It forms one explanation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) for local communities—specifically that diversity should be maximized at intermediate disturbance frequencies, yet only a fraction of empirical studies support IDH predictions. Similarly, this trade-off is also a powerful explanation of coexistence at larger spatial scales. I show, with a microbial experimental system, that the diversity—disturbance relationship is dependent on the relative distribution of species along this trade-off. Here I show that, when species are skewed toward late-successional habits, local diversity declines with disturbance. Yet, despite this trait skew, diversity at scales larger than the patch appears insensitive to the trade-off distribution. Intermediate disturbance frequencies produce the greatest diversity in patch successional stage, thus benefiting the maximum number of species at larger scales.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>17536699</pmid><doi>10.1890/06-1117</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 2007-04, Vol.88 (4), p.823-829
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70567445
source Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects abiotic stress
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
colonizing ability
Ecological competition
Ecological disturbance
Ecological genetics
Ecological succession
Ecology
Ecosystem
Eukaryota - growth & development
Eukaryota - physiology
Experiments
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
intermediate disturbance hypothesis
Marine ecology
metacommunity
Metapopulation ecology
microcosm
Microcosms
microhabitats
Microorganisms
Models, Biological
ponds
Population Dynamics
Population Growth
Porifera - growth & development
Porifera - physiology
prediction
Protozoa
provenance
regional vs. local
Rotifera
spatial data
spatial scale
Species
Species diversity
Species Specificity
succession
Synecology
Water - parasitology
title Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A38%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competition-colonization%20trade-offs%20and%20disturbance%20effects%20at%20multiple%20scales&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Cadotte,%20Marc%20William&rft.date=2007-04&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=823&rft.epage=829&rft.pages=823-829&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/06-1117&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27651173%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219023657&rft_id=info:pmid/17536699&rft_jstor_id=27651173&rfr_iscdi=true