Loading…
Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales
The competition—colonization trade-off has long been a mechanism explaining patterns of species coexistence and diversity in nonequilibrium systems. It forms one explanation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) for local communities—specifically that diversity should be maximized at inte...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology (Durham) 2007-04, Vol.88 (4), p.823-829 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243 |
container_end_page | 829 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 823 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Cadotte, Marc William |
description | The competition—colonization trade-off has long been a mechanism explaining patterns of species coexistence and diversity in nonequilibrium systems. It forms one explanation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) for local communities—specifically that diversity should be maximized at intermediate disturbance frequencies, yet only a fraction of empirical studies support IDH predictions. Similarly, this trade-off is also a powerful explanation of coexistence at larger spatial scales. I show, with a microbial experimental system, that the diversity—disturbance relationship is dependent on the relative distribution of species along this trade-off. Here I show that, when species are skewed toward late-successional habits, local diversity declines with disturbance. Yet, despite this trait skew, diversity at scales larger than the patch appears insensitive to the trade-off distribution. Intermediate disturbance frequencies produce the greatest diversity in patch successional stage, thus benefiting the maximum number of species at larger scales. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/06-1117 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70567445</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27651173</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27651173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoMoznUUf4FaBHVVzcl3lnIZR2HQhc7CVUjzIb20zTVpkfHXm9KLA8JgNiF5n_Oe5D0IPQX8FpTG77BoAUDeQzvQVLcaJL6PdhgDabXg6gw9KuWA6wKmHqIzkJwKofUOfd6n8Rjmfu7T1Lo0pKn_bddDM2frQ5tiLI2dfOP7Mi-5s5MLTYgxuLnez824DHN_HEJTnB1CeYweRDuU8OS0n6PrDxff9h_bqy-Xn_bvr1rHuKCti4xL3mnfOYo9ZeC7oBljUXAtqIws-tBVTXUqgiRMK-eF7Gz0DnBHGD1HrzffY04_l1BmM_bFhWGwU0hLMRJzIRnj_wWhxqOpXB1f_gMe0pKn-glDQGNCBZcVerNBLqdScojmmPvR5hsD2KyDMFiYdRCVfH6yW7ox-FvulHwFXp0Au0YXc022L7eckiCUFJUjG_erH8LNXf3Mxf47wVgqxRShtejZVnQoc8p_i4gUfH1c1V9serTJ2B-5Nr7-SjBQjBVRCjD9A5QHsII</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219023657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Cadotte, Marc William</creator><creatorcontrib>Cadotte, Marc William</creatorcontrib><description>The competition—colonization trade-off has long been a mechanism explaining patterns of species coexistence and diversity in nonequilibrium systems. It forms one explanation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) for local communities—specifically that diversity should be maximized at intermediate disturbance frequencies, yet only a fraction of empirical studies support IDH predictions. Similarly, this trade-off is also a powerful explanation of coexistence at larger spatial scales. I show, with a microbial experimental system, that the diversity—disturbance relationship is dependent on the relative distribution of species along this trade-off. Here I show that, when species are skewed toward late-successional habits, local diversity declines with disturbance. Yet, despite this trait skew, diversity at scales larger than the patch appears insensitive to the trade-off distribution. Intermediate disturbance frequencies produce the greatest diversity in patch successional stage, thus benefiting the maximum number of species at larger scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/06-1117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17536699</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>abiotic stress ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; colonizing ability ; Ecological competition ; Ecological disturbance ; Ecological genetics ; Ecological succession ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Eukaryota - growth & development ; Eukaryota - physiology ; Experiments ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; intermediate disturbance hypothesis ; Marine ecology ; metacommunity ; Metapopulation ecology ; microcosm ; Microcosms ; microhabitats ; Microorganisms ; Models, Biological ; ponds ; Population Dynamics ; Population Growth ; Porifera - growth & development ; Porifera - physiology ; prediction ; Protozoa ; provenance ; regional vs. local ; Rotifera ; spatial data ; spatial scale ; Species ; Species diversity ; Species Specificity ; succession ; Synecology ; Water - parasitology</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2007-04, Vol.88 (4), p.823-829</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2007 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Apr 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27651173$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27651173$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18716876$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17536699$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cadotte, Marc William</creatorcontrib><title>Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>The competition—colonization trade-off has long been a mechanism explaining patterns of species coexistence and diversity in nonequilibrium systems. It forms one explanation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) for local communities—specifically that diversity should be maximized at intermediate disturbance frequencies, yet only a fraction of empirical studies support IDH predictions. Similarly, this trade-off is also a powerful explanation of coexistence at larger spatial scales. I show, with a microbial experimental system, that the diversity—disturbance relationship is dependent on the relative distribution of species along this trade-off. Here I show that, when species are skewed toward late-successional habits, local diversity declines with disturbance. Yet, despite this trait skew, diversity at scales larger than the patch appears insensitive to the trade-off distribution. Intermediate disturbance frequencies produce the greatest diversity in patch successional stage, thus benefiting the maximum number of species at larger scales.</description><subject>abiotic stress</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>colonizing ability</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Ecological disturbance</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Ecological succession</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Eukaryota - growth & development</subject><subject>Eukaryota - physiology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>intermediate disturbance hypothesis</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>metacommunity</subject><subject>Metapopulation ecology</subject><subject>microcosm</subject><subject>Microcosms</subject><subject>microhabitats</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>ponds</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Population Growth</subject><subject>Porifera - growth & development</subject><subject>Porifera - physiology</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>provenance</subject><subject>regional vs. local</subject><subject>Rotifera</subject><subject>spatial data</subject><subject>spatial scale</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>succession</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Water - parasitology</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoMoznUUf4FaBHVVzcl3lnIZR2HQhc7CVUjzIb20zTVpkfHXm9KLA8JgNiF5n_Oe5D0IPQX8FpTG77BoAUDeQzvQVLcaJL6PdhgDabXg6gw9KuWA6wKmHqIzkJwKofUOfd6n8Rjmfu7T1Lo0pKn_bddDM2frQ5tiLI2dfOP7Mi-5s5MLTYgxuLnez824DHN_HEJTnB1CeYweRDuU8OS0n6PrDxff9h_bqy-Xn_bvr1rHuKCti4xL3mnfOYo9ZeC7oBljUXAtqIws-tBVTXUqgiRMK-eF7Gz0DnBHGD1HrzffY04_l1BmM_bFhWGwU0hLMRJzIRnj_wWhxqOpXB1f_gMe0pKn-glDQGNCBZcVerNBLqdScojmmPvR5hsD2KyDMFiYdRCVfH6yW7ox-FvulHwFXp0Au0YXc022L7eckiCUFJUjG_erH8LNXf3Mxf47wVgqxRShtejZVnQoc8p_i4gUfH1c1V9serTJ2B-5Nr7-SjBQjBVRCjD9A5QHsII</recordid><startdate>200704</startdate><enddate>200704</enddate><creator>Cadotte, Marc William</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200704</creationdate><title>Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales</title><author>Cadotte, Marc William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>abiotic stress</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>colonizing ability</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Ecological disturbance</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Ecological succession</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Eukaryota - growth & development</topic><topic>Eukaryota - physiology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>intermediate disturbance hypothesis</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>metacommunity</topic><topic>Metapopulation ecology</topic><topic>microcosm</topic><topic>Microcosms</topic><topic>microhabitats</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>ponds</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Population Growth</topic><topic>Porifera - growth & development</topic><topic>Porifera - physiology</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>provenance</topic><topic>regional vs. local</topic><topic>Rotifera</topic><topic>spatial data</topic><topic>spatial scale</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>succession</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Water - parasitology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cadotte, Marc William</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cadotte, Marc William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2007-04</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>823</spage><epage>829</epage><pages>823-829</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>The competition—colonization trade-off has long been a mechanism explaining patterns of species coexistence and diversity in nonequilibrium systems. It forms one explanation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) for local communities—specifically that diversity should be maximized at intermediate disturbance frequencies, yet only a fraction of empirical studies support IDH predictions. Similarly, this trade-off is also a powerful explanation of coexistence at larger spatial scales. I show, with a microbial experimental system, that the diversity—disturbance relationship is dependent on the relative distribution of species along this trade-off. Here I show that, when species are skewed toward late-successional habits, local diversity declines with disturbance. Yet, despite this trait skew, diversity at scales larger than the patch appears insensitive to the trade-off distribution. Intermediate disturbance frequencies produce the greatest diversity in patch successional stage, thus benefiting the maximum number of species at larger scales.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>17536699</pmid><doi>10.1890/06-1117</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 2007-04, Vol.88 (4), p.823-829 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70567445 |
source | Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | abiotic stress Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences colonizing ability Ecological competition Ecological disturbance Ecological genetics Ecological succession Ecology Ecosystem Eukaryota - growth & development Eukaryota - physiology Experiments Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects intermediate disturbance hypothesis Marine ecology metacommunity Metapopulation ecology microcosm Microcosms microhabitats Microorganisms Models, Biological ponds Population Dynamics Population Growth Porifera - growth & development Porifera - physiology prediction Protozoa provenance regional vs. local Rotifera spatial data spatial scale Species Species diversity Species Specificity succession Synecology Water - parasitology |
title | Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A38%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competition-colonization%20trade-offs%20and%20disturbance%20effects%20at%20multiple%20scales&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Cadotte,%20Marc%20William&rft.date=2007-04&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=823&rft.epage=829&rft.pages=823-829&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/06-1117&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27651173%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4563-cf4575b9dbc30d341dbe9444f659637f4fdebbc38b8f172498cd67bafdc10b243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219023657&rft_id=info:pmid/17536699&rft_jstor_id=27651173&rfr_iscdi=true |