Does laparoscopic ovarian diathermy affect the outcome of IVF–embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome? A retrospective comparative study

• Published in: Human reproduction (Oxford) 2001-01, Vol.16 (1), p.91-95
• Main Authors: Tozer, A.J., Al-Shawaf, T., Zosmer, A., Hussain, S., Wilson, C., Lower, A.M., Grudzinskas, J.G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Birth control; Diathermy - adverse effects; Embryo Transfer; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics; Humans; Infertility, Female - etiology; Infertility, Female - therapy; IVF-embryo transfer; laparoscopic ovarian diathermy; Laparoscopy; Medical sciences; Ovulation Induction; polycystic ovarian syndrome; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - complications; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - therapy; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Sterility. Assisted procreation
• ISSN: 0268-1161; 1460-2350
• DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.1.91

Controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF and embryo transfer and outcome parameters were compared retrospectively in 31 women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Of these women, 15 had previously undergone laparoscopic ovarian diathermy before IVF (group A, total 22 cycles) and 16 had not had surgical treatment (group B, total 24 cycles). No statistically significant differences were observed in the number of oocytes retrieved, although the number of embryos available for transfer was significantly higher in group B (7.1 ± 3.8 versus 4.6 ± 2.7, P < 0.01). The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer appeared to be higher in group B (63.2 versus 41.2%), as did the miscarriage rate (66.7 versus 28.6%), giving an apparent improved ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo transfer in group A (29.4 versus 10.5%), but this was not statistically significantly different. The incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was apparently higher in group B (4.2 versus 0%), but this difference was not statistically significant. No cases of severe OHSS were seen in group A. Ovarian diathermy does not appear to have a deleterious effect on controlled ovarian stimulation, and the outcome of IVF–embryo transfer may be beneficial in decreasing the risk of severe OHSS and improving the ongoing clinical pregnancy rate.