Reconsideration of sample pH adjustment in bioanalytical liquid–liquid extraction of ionisable compounds

• Published in: Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2007-06, Vol.853 (1-2), p.234-241
• Main Authors: Hendriks, G., Uges, D.R.A., Franke, J.P.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Analysis; Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry; Bioanalysis; Biological and medical sciences; Chemistry Techniques, Analytical - methods; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General pharmacology; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Kinetics; Liquid–liquid extraction; Medical sciences; Modelling; pH adjustment; Pharmacology. Drug treatments; Recovery; Selectivity; Solvents - chemistry
• ISSN: 1570-0232; 1873-376X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.03.017

Liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) is widely used as a simple and robust sample preparation technique in bioanalytical sample preparation. When extracting ionisable compounds, most bioanalysts adjust the pH of the sample to achieve fully unionized compounds. Usually, a generally accepted rule is applied to adjust the pH of the aqueous phase, known as the pKa±2 rule, depending on the acid/base characteristics of the analyte. By taking a closer look at the general equations that describe the extraction behaviour of ionisable compounds, we extended this pH adjustment rule by taking the distribution ratio and the volume of both liquid phases into account. By choosing an extraction pH based on this extended rule, the selectivity of the extraction can be influenced without loss of recovery. As a measure of this selectivity, two equations were proposed to indicate the ability of the extraction system to discriminate between two compounds. Also, milder extraction pH can be used for pH labile analytes. To use this new rule quantitatively, a new calculation method for the determination of the distribution ratio was derived. These calculations were based on normalized recoveries making this method less susceptible to errors in absolute recovery determination. The proposed equations were supported by demonstrating that careful pH adjustment can lead to higher selectivity. The main conclusion was that a closer look at the extraction pH in bioanalytical methods extends the possibilities of obtaining a higher selectivity or the possibilities of extracting pH labile analytes at milder pH conditions without loss of recovery.