Multiplex real-time PCR for the detection and differentiation of equid herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) and equid herpesvirus 4 (EHV-4)

• Published in: Veterinary microbiology 2007-07, Vol.123 (1), p.93-103
• Main Authors: Diallo, Ibrahim S., Hewitson, Glen, Wright, Lucia L., Kelly, Mark A., Rodwell, Barry J., Corney, Bruce G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alphaherpesvirinae; Alphaherpesvirus; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Equid herpesvirus 1; Equid herpesvirus 1 and equid herpesvirus 4; Equid herpesvirus 4; Equine herpesvirus; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; genes; glycoproteins; Herpesvirus; Herpesvirus 1, Equid - genetics; Herpesvirus 1, Equid - isolation & purification; Herpesvirus 4, Equid - genetics; Herpesvirus 4, Equid - isolation & purification; microbial detection; Microbiology; Miscellaneous; Multiplex real-time PCR; Multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction; new methods; pathogen identification; polymerase chain reaction; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods; Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary; Rabbits; rapid methods; Sensitivity and Specificity; strain differences; strains; viral proteins; Virology
• ISSN: 0378-1135; 1873-2542
• DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.02.004

A multiplex real-time PCR was designed to detect and differentiate equid herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) and equid herpesvirus 4 (EHV-4). The PCR targets the glycoprotein B gene of EHV-1 and EHV-4. Primers and probes were specific to each equine herpesvirus type and can be used in monoplex or multiplex PCRs, allowing the differentiation of these two closely related members of the Alphaherpesvirinae. The two probes were minor-groove binding probes (MGB™) labelled with 6-carboxy-fluorescein (FAM™) and VIC ® for detection of EHV-1 and EHV-4, respectively. Ten EHV-1 isolates, six EHV-1 positive clinical samples, one EHV-1 reference strain (EHV-1.438/77), three EHV-4 positive clinical samples, two EHV-4 isolates and one EHV-4 reference strain (EHV-4 405/76) were included in this study. EHV-1 isolates, clinical samples and the reference strain reacted in the EHV-1 real-time PCR but not in the EHV-4 real-time PCR and similarly EHV-4 clinical samples, isolates and the reference strain were positive in the EHV-4 real-time PCR but not in the EHV-1 real-time PCR. Other herpesviruses, such as EHV-2, EHV-3 and EHV-5 were all negative when tested using the multiplex real-time PCR. When bacterial pathogens and opportunistic pathogens were tested in the multiplex real-time PCR they did not react with either system. The multiplex PCR was shown to be sensitive and specific and is a useful tool for detection and differentiation of EHV-1 and EHV-4 in a single reaction. A comprehensive equine herpesvirus disease investigation procedure used in our laboratory is also outlined. This procedure describes the combination of alphaherpesvirus multiplex real-time PCR along with existing gel-based PCRs described by other authors.