Loading…

Sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized cat dander extract: evaluation of efficacy in a double blind placebo controlled study

Little information is available on the clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using extracts derived from mammalian epithelia. To assess clinical efficacy of cat SLIT based on natural exposure challenge test (NCT). Fifty cat allergic patients with rhinoconjunctivitis with or without as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Allergy 2007-07, Vol.62 (7), p.810-817
Main Authors: Álvarez-Cuesta, E, Berges-Gimeno, P, Mancebo, E.G, Fernández-Caldas, E, Cuesta-Herranz, J, Casanovas, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4225-245245c30dff7decf334fcb080782bd2d5eb7d0f60b9e9d43e5afd08bd7a02733
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4225-245245c30dff7decf334fcb080782bd2d5eb7d0f60b9e9d43e5afd08bd7a02733
container_end_page 817
container_issue 7
container_start_page 810
container_title Allergy
container_volume 62
creator Álvarez-Cuesta, E
Berges-Gimeno, P
Mancebo, E.G
Fernández-Caldas, E
Cuesta-Herranz, J
Casanovas, M
description Little information is available on the clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using extracts derived from mammalian epithelia. To assess clinical efficacy of cat SLIT based on natural exposure challenge test (NCT). Fifty cat allergic patients with rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma were included in a randomized double blind placebo controlled clinical trial of cat SLIT during 1 year. Twenty-five patients received active treatment and 25 placebo. Sublingual immunotherapy efficacy was assessed by natural exposure challenge to a cat in a cat-room and by skin tests. Airborne Fel d 1 levels, symptom scores and peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were monitored. Thirty-three (66%) out of 50 patients completed the treatment. Fel d 1 content of the maximum concentration was 0.51 μg per ml. During the build up phase, the accumulated dose was 1.7 μg of Fel d 1 and during the entire length of the study was 17.1. No adverse reports were reported. The active group showed a marked reduction (62%) in symptoms during the NCT (P < 0.001) with no changes in placebo group. Active group also showed a reduced PEF response to cat exposure (P < 0.05), and an improvement in skin test reactivity to a standardized cat extract (P < 0.05), without significant changes in placebo group. Mean Fel d 1 exposure during the NCT was 6.2 ± 2.21 ng/m³. The results suggest that the cat SLIT used in this study was able to improve cat allergy based on natural exposure challenge.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01365.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70620684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70620684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4225-245245c30dff7decf334fcb080782bd2d5eb7d0f60b9e9d43e5afd08bd7a02733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU-P1CAYxonRuOPqV1BO3lpfoB1aEw-bjf-SSTyseyaUP7tMaBmBulOPfnKpM9GjEhIg_J7nPfwQwgRqUtabfU1Y31V937c1BeA1ELZt6-MjtPnz8RhtgEBbNS3rLtCzlPZQSNrDU3RBeMsZZ7BBP2_mwbvpbpYeu3Gcp5DvTZSHBT-4fI8lTllOWkbtfhiNlcxYl7eJ2BxzlCq_xea79LPMLkw4WGysdUqqBbuphHUo7QavEzQ-eKnMELAKU47B-9KX8qyX5-iJlT6ZF-fzEt1-eP_1-lO1-_Lx8_XVrlINpW1Fm7ZsxUBby7VRlrHGqgE64B0dNNWtGbgGu4WhN71umGml1dANmkugnLFL9PrUe4jh22xSFqNLyngvJxPmJDhsKWy75p8ghYb0pbCA3QlUMaQUjRWH6EYZF0FArKLEXqw-xOpDrKLEb1HiWKIvzzPmYTT6b_BspgDvTsCD82b572Jxtdutt5J_dcpbGYS8iy6J2xtaqAJ3rKGE_QKfjK28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20419733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized cat dander extract: evaluation of efficacy in a double blind placebo controlled study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Álvarez-Cuesta, E ; Berges-Gimeno, P ; Mancebo, E.G ; Fernández-Caldas, E ; Cuesta-Herranz, J ; Casanovas, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Álvarez-Cuesta, E ; Berges-Gimeno, P ; Mancebo, E.G ; Fernández-Caldas, E ; Cuesta-Herranz, J ; Casanovas, M</creatorcontrib><description>Little information is available on the clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using extracts derived from mammalian epithelia. To assess clinical efficacy of cat SLIT based on natural exposure challenge test (NCT). Fifty cat allergic patients with rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma were included in a randomized double blind placebo controlled clinical trial of cat SLIT during 1 year. Twenty-five patients received active treatment and 25 placebo. Sublingual immunotherapy efficacy was assessed by natural exposure challenge to a cat in a cat-room and by skin tests. Airborne Fel d 1 levels, symptom scores and peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were monitored. Thirty-three (66%) out of 50 patients completed the treatment. Fel d 1 content of the maximum concentration was 0.51 μg per ml. During the build up phase, the accumulated dose was 1.7 μg of Fel d 1 and during the entire length of the study was 17.1. No adverse reports were reported. The active group showed a marked reduction (62%) in symptoms during the NCT (P &lt; 0.001) with no changes in placebo group. Active group also showed a reduced PEF response to cat exposure (P &lt; 0.05), and an improvement in skin test reactivity to a standardized cat extract (P &lt; 0.05), without significant changes in placebo group. Mean Fel d 1 exposure during the NCT was 6.2 ± 2.21 ng/m³. The results suggest that the cat SLIT used in this study was able to improve cat allergy based on natural exposure challenge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0105-4538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1398-9995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0108-1675</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01365.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17573730</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Sublingual ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Animals ; Asthma ; cat allergic rhinitis and asthma ; Cats - immunology ; Double-Blind Method ; Fel d 1 ; Female ; Hair - immunology ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity - therapy ; immunotherapy ; Immunotherapy - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Placebos ; Rhinitis - therapy ; sublingual immunotherapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Allergy, 2007-07, Vol.62 (7), p.810-817</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4225-245245c30dff7decf334fcb080782bd2d5eb7d0f60b9e9d43e5afd08bd7a02733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4225-245245c30dff7decf334fcb080782bd2d5eb7d0f60b9e9d43e5afd08bd7a02733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17573730$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Álvarez-Cuesta, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berges-Gimeno, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancebo, E.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Caldas, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuesta-Herranz, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casanovas, M</creatorcontrib><title>Sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized cat dander extract: evaluation of efficacy in a double blind placebo controlled study</title><title>Allergy</title><addtitle>Allergy</addtitle><description>Little information is available on the clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using extracts derived from mammalian epithelia. To assess clinical efficacy of cat SLIT based on natural exposure challenge test (NCT). Fifty cat allergic patients with rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma were included in a randomized double blind placebo controlled clinical trial of cat SLIT during 1 year. Twenty-five patients received active treatment and 25 placebo. Sublingual immunotherapy efficacy was assessed by natural exposure challenge to a cat in a cat-room and by skin tests. Airborne Fel d 1 levels, symptom scores and peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were monitored. Thirty-three (66%) out of 50 patients completed the treatment. Fel d 1 content of the maximum concentration was 0.51 μg per ml. During the build up phase, the accumulated dose was 1.7 μg of Fel d 1 and during the entire length of the study was 17.1. No adverse reports were reported. The active group showed a marked reduction (62%) in symptoms during the NCT (P &lt; 0.001) with no changes in placebo group. Active group also showed a reduced PEF response to cat exposure (P &lt; 0.05), and an improvement in skin test reactivity to a standardized cat extract (P &lt; 0.05), without significant changes in placebo group. Mean Fel d 1 exposure during the NCT was 6.2 ± 2.21 ng/m³. The results suggest that the cat SLIT used in this study was able to improve cat allergy based on natural exposure challenge.</description><subject>Administration, Sublingual</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>cat allergic rhinitis and asthma</subject><subject>Cats - immunology</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Fel d 1</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hair - immunology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - therapy</subject><subject>immunotherapy</subject><subject>Immunotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Rhinitis - therapy</subject><subject>sublingual immunotherapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0105-4538</issn><issn>1398-9995</issn><issn>0108-1675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU-P1CAYxonRuOPqV1BO3lpfoB1aEw-bjf-SSTyseyaUP7tMaBmBulOPfnKpM9GjEhIg_J7nPfwQwgRqUtabfU1Y31V937c1BeA1ELZt6-MjtPnz8RhtgEBbNS3rLtCzlPZQSNrDU3RBeMsZZ7BBP2_mwbvpbpYeu3Gcp5DvTZSHBT-4fI8lTllOWkbtfhiNlcxYl7eJ2BxzlCq_xea79LPMLkw4WGysdUqqBbuphHUo7QavEzQ-eKnMELAKU47B-9KX8qyX5-iJlT6ZF-fzEt1-eP_1-lO1-_Lx8_XVrlINpW1Fm7ZsxUBby7VRlrHGqgE64B0dNNWtGbgGu4WhN71umGml1dANmkugnLFL9PrUe4jh22xSFqNLyngvJxPmJDhsKWy75p8ghYb0pbCA3QlUMaQUjRWH6EYZF0FArKLEXqw-xOpDrKLEb1HiWKIvzzPmYTT6b_BspgDvTsCD82b572Jxtdutt5J_dcpbGYS8iy6J2xtaqAJ3rKGE_QKfjK28</recordid><startdate>200707</startdate><enddate>200707</enddate><creator>Álvarez-Cuesta, E</creator><creator>Berges-Gimeno, P</creator><creator>Mancebo, E.G</creator><creator>Fernández-Caldas, E</creator><creator>Cuesta-Herranz, J</creator><creator>Casanovas, M</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200707</creationdate><title>Sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized cat dander extract: evaluation of efficacy in a double blind placebo controlled study</title><author>Álvarez-Cuesta, E ; Berges-Gimeno, P ; Mancebo, E.G ; Fernández-Caldas, E ; Cuesta-Herranz, J ; Casanovas, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4225-245245c30dff7decf334fcb080782bd2d5eb7d0f60b9e9d43e5afd08bd7a02733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Administration, Sublingual</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>cat allergic rhinitis and asthma</topic><topic>Cats - immunology</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Fel d 1</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hair - immunology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - therapy</topic><topic>immunotherapy</topic><topic>Immunotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Rhinitis - therapy</topic><topic>sublingual immunotherapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Álvarez-Cuesta, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berges-Gimeno, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancebo, E.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Caldas, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuesta-Herranz, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casanovas, M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Allergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Álvarez-Cuesta, E</au><au>Berges-Gimeno, P</au><au>Mancebo, E.G</au><au>Fernández-Caldas, E</au><au>Cuesta-Herranz, J</au><au>Casanovas, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized cat dander extract: evaluation of efficacy in a double blind placebo controlled study</atitle><jtitle>Allergy</jtitle><addtitle>Allergy</addtitle><date>2007-07</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>810</spage><epage>817</epage><pages>810-817</pages><issn>0105-4538</issn><eissn>1398-9995</eissn><eissn>0108-1675</eissn><abstract>Little information is available on the clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using extracts derived from mammalian epithelia. To assess clinical efficacy of cat SLIT based on natural exposure challenge test (NCT). Fifty cat allergic patients with rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma were included in a randomized double blind placebo controlled clinical trial of cat SLIT during 1 year. Twenty-five patients received active treatment and 25 placebo. Sublingual immunotherapy efficacy was assessed by natural exposure challenge to a cat in a cat-room and by skin tests. Airborne Fel d 1 levels, symptom scores and peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were monitored. Thirty-three (66%) out of 50 patients completed the treatment. Fel d 1 content of the maximum concentration was 0.51 μg per ml. During the build up phase, the accumulated dose was 1.7 μg of Fel d 1 and during the entire length of the study was 17.1. No adverse reports were reported. The active group showed a marked reduction (62%) in symptoms during the NCT (P &lt; 0.001) with no changes in placebo group. Active group also showed a reduced PEF response to cat exposure (P &lt; 0.05), and an improvement in skin test reactivity to a standardized cat extract (P &lt; 0.05), without significant changes in placebo group. Mean Fel d 1 exposure during the NCT was 6.2 ± 2.21 ng/m³. The results suggest that the cat SLIT used in this study was able to improve cat allergy based on natural exposure challenge.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17573730</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01365.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0105-4538
ispartof Allergy, 2007-07, Vol.62 (7), p.810-817
issn 0105-4538
1398-9995
0108-1675
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70620684
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Administration, Sublingual
Adolescent
Adult
Animals
Asthma
cat allergic rhinitis and asthma
Cats - immunology
Double-Blind Method
Fel d 1
Female
Hair - immunology
Humans
Hypersensitivity - therapy
immunotherapy
Immunotherapy - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Placebos
Rhinitis - therapy
sublingual immunotherapy
Treatment Outcome
title Sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized cat dander extract: evaluation of efficacy in a double blind placebo controlled study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T23%3A01%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sublingual%20immunotherapy%20with%20a%20standardized%20cat%20dander%20extract:%20evaluation%20of%20efficacy%20in%20a%20double%20blind%20placebo%20controlled%20study&rft.jtitle=Allergy&rft.au=%C3%81lvarez-Cuesta,%20E&rft.date=2007-07&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=810&rft.epage=817&rft.pages=810-817&rft.issn=0105-4538&rft.eissn=1398-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01365.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70620684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4225-245245c30dff7decf334fcb080782bd2d5eb7d0f60b9e9d43e5afd08bd7a02733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20419733&rft_id=info:pmid/17573730&rfr_iscdi=true