Loading…
Assessing diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a local community: role of sampling effort and spatial heterogeneity
Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) was assessed in two 9.2 x 9.2-m plots planted with landscape trees and shrubs at an experimental site in Phoenix, AZ, USA. Twenty-five soil samples were collected in a regular grid pattern from each plot, and AMF species were identified using trap cult...
Saved in:
Published in: | Mycorrhiza 2007-07, Vol.17 (5), p.429-437 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-15e7bd77861ef5d76d48d3821f9fcacd3a05bf6c07ae970c7be6c846ce2931153 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-15e7bd77861ef5d76d48d3821f9fcacd3a05bf6c07ae970c7be6c846ce2931153 |
container_end_page | 437 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 429 |
container_title | Mycorrhiza |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Whitcomb, Sean Stutz, Jean C |
description | Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) was assessed in two 9.2 x 9.2-m plots planted with landscape trees and shrubs at an experimental site in Phoenix, AZ, USA. Twenty-five soil samples were collected in a regular grid pattern from each plot, and AMF species were identified using trap cultures. A total of 12 species were detected, with 7 species detected in one plot and 11 in the other. We found that sampling effort had a major impact on assessing species richness and composition in this local community. Fifteen samples would be necessary to detect 70-80% of species present in each plot. A limited number of additional undetected species are likely to be present in both plots, based on the sampling effort curves and jackknife estimates. Only two species, Glomus eburneum and Glomus microaggregatum, were detected in over 50% of the samples from both plots, and rank-frequency plots revealed a lognormal species distribution. Despite the patchiness of plants in the plots, the number of species detected per point exhibited spatial structuring only at the smallest sampling scale in a single plot, and only a single species in each plot was not randomly distributed. These results indicate that sampling effort and strategy can affect perceptions of AMF community structure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00572-007-0118-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70652592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2082766741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-15e7bd77861ef5d76d48d3821f9fcacd3a05bf6c07ae970c7be6c846ce2931153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCA7ABC6nsAvfGsZ10V1X8SZVYQNeWx7meukriwU6QBl4eRzNSJTasfGV93_HPYewVwnsE0B8ygNR1VcYKENtKPmEbbERdYdvBU7aBroFKCQVn7DznBwDUSuBzdoZaNIANbNif65wp5zDteB9-UcphPvDouU3bJbtlsImPBxdTug-_7cD9Mu0CDxO3fIiubLg4jstUpCue4kCrmu24H9ZA8j6mmdup53lv51Dwe5opxR1NVJQX7Jm3Q6aXp_WC3X36-OPmS3X77fPXm-vbyjVazxVK0tte61Yhedlr1TdtL9oafeeddb2wILdeOdCWOg1Ob0m5tlGO6k4gSnHB3h1z9yn-XCjPZgzZ0TDYieKSjQYla9nV_wWx07KuhS7g23_Ah7ikqTzCKBQgpOzWY_EIuRRzTuTNPoXRpoNBMGt_5tifWce1P7M6r0_By3ak_tE4FVaAyxNgc_l_n-zkQn7k2g4lNG3h3hw5b6Oxu1SYu-81lMuBbjWAEH8BRAGtng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>613035595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a local community: role of sampling effort and spatial heterogeneity</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Whitcomb, Sean ; Stutz, Jean C</creator><creatorcontrib>Whitcomb, Sean ; Stutz, Jean C</creatorcontrib><description>Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) was assessed in two 9.2 x 9.2-m plots planted with landscape trees and shrubs at an experimental site in Phoenix, AZ, USA. Twenty-five soil samples were collected in a regular grid pattern from each plot, and AMF species were identified using trap cultures. A total of 12 species were detected, with 7 species detected in one plot and 11 in the other. We found that sampling effort had a major impact on assessing species richness and composition in this local community. Fifteen samples would be necessary to detect 70-80% of species present in each plot. A limited number of additional undetected species are likely to be present in both plots, based on the sampling effort curves and jackknife estimates. Only two species, Glomus eburneum and Glomus microaggregatum, were detected in over 50% of the samples from both plots, and rank-frequency plots revealed a lognormal species distribution. Despite the patchiness of plants in the plots, the number of species detected per point exhibited spatial structuring only at the smallest sampling scale in a single plot, and only a single species in each plot was not randomly distributed. These results indicate that sampling effort and strategy can affect perceptions of AMF community structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1890</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00572-007-0118-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17340140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Arizona ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Community structure ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fungi ; Fungi - classification ; Fungi - isolation & purification ; geostatistics ; Glomus ; Heterogeneity ; Mycorrhizae ; Parasitism and symbiosis ; Plant physiology and development ; Plants - microbiology ; Selection Bias ; spatial distribution ; Species richness ; Symbiosis ; vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae</subject><ispartof>Mycorrhiza, 2007-07, Vol.17 (5), p.429-437</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-15e7bd77861ef5d76d48d3821f9fcacd3a05bf6c07ae970c7be6c846ce2931153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-15e7bd77861ef5d76d48d3821f9fcacd3a05bf6c07ae970c7be6c846ce2931153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18915048$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17340140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whitcomb, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stutz, Jean C</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a local community: role of sampling effort and spatial heterogeneity</title><title>Mycorrhiza</title><addtitle>Mycorrhiza</addtitle><description>Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) was assessed in two 9.2 x 9.2-m plots planted with landscape trees and shrubs at an experimental site in Phoenix, AZ, USA. Twenty-five soil samples were collected in a regular grid pattern from each plot, and AMF species were identified using trap cultures. A total of 12 species were detected, with 7 species detected in one plot and 11 in the other. We found that sampling effort had a major impact on assessing species richness and composition in this local community. Fifteen samples would be necessary to detect 70-80% of species present in each plot. A limited number of additional undetected species are likely to be present in both plots, based on the sampling effort curves and jackknife estimates. Only two species, Glomus eburneum and Glomus microaggregatum, were detected in over 50% of the samples from both plots, and rank-frequency plots revealed a lognormal species distribution. Despite the patchiness of plants in the plots, the number of species detected per point exhibited spatial structuring only at the smallest sampling scale in a single plot, and only a single species in each plot was not randomly distributed. These results indicate that sampling effort and strategy can affect perceptions of AMF community structure.</description><subject>Arizona</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Fungi - classification</subject><subject>Fungi - isolation & purification</subject><subject>geostatistics</subject><subject>Glomus</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Mycorrhizae</subject><subject>Parasitism and symbiosis</subject><subject>Plant physiology and development</subject><subject>Plants - microbiology</subject><subject>Selection Bias</subject><subject>spatial distribution</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae</subject><issn>0940-6360</issn><issn>1432-1890</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCA7ABC6nsAvfGsZ10V1X8SZVYQNeWx7meukriwU6QBl4eRzNSJTasfGV93_HPYewVwnsE0B8ygNR1VcYKENtKPmEbbERdYdvBU7aBroFKCQVn7DznBwDUSuBzdoZaNIANbNif65wp5zDteB9-UcphPvDouU3bJbtlsImPBxdTug-_7cD9Mu0CDxO3fIiubLg4jstUpCue4kCrmu24H9ZA8j6mmdup53lv51Dwe5opxR1NVJQX7Jm3Q6aXp_WC3X36-OPmS3X77fPXm-vbyjVazxVK0tte61Yhedlr1TdtL9oafeeddb2wILdeOdCWOg1Ob0m5tlGO6k4gSnHB3h1z9yn-XCjPZgzZ0TDYieKSjQYla9nV_wWx07KuhS7g23_Ah7ikqTzCKBQgpOzWY_EIuRRzTuTNPoXRpoNBMGt_5tifWce1P7M6r0_By3ak_tE4FVaAyxNgc_l_n-zkQn7k2g4lNG3h3hw5b6Oxu1SYu-81lMuBbjWAEH8BRAGtng</recordid><startdate>20070701</startdate><enddate>20070701</enddate><creator>Whitcomb, Sean</creator><creator>Stutz, Jean C</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070701</creationdate><title>Assessing diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a local community: role of sampling effort and spatial heterogeneity</title><author>Whitcomb, Sean ; Stutz, Jean C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-15e7bd77861ef5d76d48d3821f9fcacd3a05bf6c07ae970c7be6c846ce2931153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Arizona</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Fungi - classification</topic><topic>Fungi - isolation & purification</topic><topic>geostatistics</topic><topic>Glomus</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Mycorrhizae</topic><topic>Parasitism and symbiosis</topic><topic>Plant physiology and development</topic><topic>Plants - microbiology</topic><topic>Selection Bias</topic><topic>spatial distribution</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whitcomb, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stutz, Jean C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Mycorrhiza</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whitcomb, Sean</au><au>Stutz, Jean C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a local community: role of sampling effort and spatial heterogeneity</atitle><jtitle>Mycorrhiza</jtitle><addtitle>Mycorrhiza</addtitle><date>2007-07-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>437</epage><pages>429-437</pages><issn>0940-6360</issn><eissn>1432-1890</eissn><abstract>Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) was assessed in two 9.2 x 9.2-m plots planted with landscape trees and shrubs at an experimental site in Phoenix, AZ, USA. Twenty-five soil samples were collected in a regular grid pattern from each plot, and AMF species were identified using trap cultures. A total of 12 species were detected, with 7 species detected in one plot and 11 in the other. We found that sampling effort had a major impact on assessing species richness and composition in this local community. Fifteen samples would be necessary to detect 70-80% of species present in each plot. A limited number of additional undetected species are likely to be present in both plots, based on the sampling effort curves and jackknife estimates. Only two species, Glomus eburneum and Glomus microaggregatum, were detected in over 50% of the samples from both plots, and rank-frequency plots revealed a lognormal species distribution. Despite the patchiness of plants in the plots, the number of species detected per point exhibited spatial structuring only at the smallest sampling scale in a single plot, and only a single species in each plot was not randomly distributed. These results indicate that sampling effort and strategy can affect perceptions of AMF community structure.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>17340140</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00572-007-0118-5</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0940-6360 |
ispartof | Mycorrhiza, 2007-07, Vol.17 (5), p.429-437 |
issn | 0940-6360 1432-1890 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70652592 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Arizona Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Community structure Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Fungi Fungi - classification Fungi - isolation & purification geostatistics Glomus Heterogeneity Mycorrhizae Parasitism and symbiosis Plant physiology and development Plants - microbiology Selection Bias spatial distribution Species richness Symbiosis vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae |
title | Assessing diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a local community: role of sampling effort and spatial heterogeneity |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A08%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20diversity%20of%20arbuscular%20mycorrhizal%20fungi%20in%20a%20local%20community:%20role%20of%20sampling%20effort%20and%20spatial%20heterogeneity&rft.jtitle=Mycorrhiza&rft.au=Whitcomb,%20Sean&rft.date=2007-07-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=437&rft.pages=429-437&rft.issn=0940-6360&rft.eissn=1432-1890&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00572-007-0118-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2082766741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-15e7bd77861ef5d76d48d3821f9fcacd3a05bf6c07ae970c7be6c846ce2931153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=613035595&rft_id=info:pmid/17340140&rfr_iscdi=true |