Loading…

Developmental regulation of skull morphology II: ontogenetic dynamics of covariance

SUMMARY Canalization may play a critical role in molding patterns of integration when variability is regulated by the balance between processes that generate and remove variation. Under these conditions, the interaction among those processes may produce a dynamic structure of integration even when t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evolution & development 2006-01, Vol.8 (1), p.46-60
Main Authors: Zelditch, Miriam Leah, Mezey, Jason, Sheets, H. David, Lundrigan, Barbara L., Garland Jr, Theodore
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5494-1e85777eedb687cb45fe6bb5c8a3c44baddcd3cd51cc2cdd112470ce982f8543
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5494-1e85777eedb687cb45fe6bb5c8a3c44baddcd3cd51cc2cdd112470ce982f8543
container_end_page 60
container_issue 1
container_start_page 46
container_title Evolution & development
container_volume 8
creator Zelditch, Miriam Leah
Mezey, Jason
Sheets, H. David
Lundrigan, Barbara L.
Garland Jr, Theodore
description SUMMARY Canalization may play a critical role in molding patterns of integration when variability is regulated by the balance between processes that generate and remove variation. Under these conditions, the interaction among those processes may produce a dynamic structure of integration even when the level of variability is constant. To determine whether the constancy of variance in skull shape throughout most of postnatal growth results from a balance between processes generating and removing variation, we compare covariance structures from age to age in two rodent species, cotton rats (Sigmodon fulviventer) and house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). We assess the overall similarity of covariance matrices by the matrix correlation, and compare the structures of covariance matrices using common subspace analysis, a method related to common principal components (PCs) analysis but suited to cases in which variation is so nearly spherical that PCs are ambiguous. We find significant differences from age to age in covariance structure and the more effectively canalized ones tend to be least stable in covariance structure. We find no evidence that canalization gradually and preferentially removes deviations arising early in development as we might expect if canalization results from compensatory differential growth. Our results suggest that (co)variation patterns are continually restructured by processes that equilibrate variance, and thus that canalization plays a critical role in molding patterns of integration.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.05074.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70674970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>959607971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5494-1e85777eedb687cb45fe6bb5c8a3c44baddcd3cd51cc2cdd112470ce982f8543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1P2zAYgC3ENBjbX0ARB27J_BknO0yaoIOKahxAGjfLsd90KU7c2Qlr__2StgJpp_niV_LzPrIehBKCMzKez6uMCCpSwulTRjHOMyyw5NnmCJ2-PhzvZpwKTp5O0IcYVxgTyWn5Hp2QnOOSFfQUPVzDCzi_bqHrtUsCLAen-8Z3ia-T-Dw4l7Q-rH9555fbZD7_kviu90vooG9MYredbhsTJ9j4Fx0a3Rn4iN7V2kX4dLjP0OP32ePVbbq4v5lffVukRvCSpwQKIaUEsFVeSFNxUUNeVcIUmhnOK22tscxYQYyhxlpCKJfYQFnQuhCcnaHLvXYd_O8BYq_aJhpwTnfgh6gkziUvJR7Bi3_AlR9CN35NUSqoZDmjI1TsIRN8jAFqtQ5Nq8NWEaym6GqlprZqaqum6GoXXW3G1fODf6hasG-Lh8oj8HUP_GkcbP9brGbXs904CtK9oIk9bF4FOjyrXDIp1M8fN-qOy8UdI7cKs7928aDU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225273632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developmental regulation of skull morphology II: ontogenetic dynamics of covariance</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Zelditch, Miriam Leah ; Mezey, Jason ; Sheets, H. David ; Lundrigan, Barbara L. ; Garland Jr, Theodore</creator><creatorcontrib>Zelditch, Miriam Leah ; Mezey, Jason ; Sheets, H. David ; Lundrigan, Barbara L. ; Garland Jr, Theodore</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY Canalization may play a critical role in molding patterns of integration when variability is regulated by the balance between processes that generate and remove variation. Under these conditions, the interaction among those processes may produce a dynamic structure of integration even when the level of variability is constant. To determine whether the constancy of variance in skull shape throughout most of postnatal growth results from a balance between processes generating and removing variation, we compare covariance structures from age to age in two rodent species, cotton rats (Sigmodon fulviventer) and house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). We assess the overall similarity of covariance matrices by the matrix correlation, and compare the structures of covariance matrices using common subspace analysis, a method related to common principal components (PCs) analysis but suited to cases in which variation is so nearly spherical that PCs are ambiguous. We find significant differences from age to age in covariance structure and the more effectively canalized ones tend to be least stable in covariance structure. We find no evidence that canalization gradually and preferentially removes deviations arising early in development as we might expect if canalization results from compensatory differential growth. Our results suggest that (co)variation patterns are continually restructured by processes that equilibrate variance, and thus that canalization plays a critical role in molding patterns of integration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-142X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.05074.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16409382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Science Inc</publisher><subject>Anatomy, Comparative ; Animals ; Comparative analysis ; Genetics ; Head ; Mice ; Morphogenesis ; Principal Component Analysis ; Rodents ; Sigmodontinae - growth &amp; development ; Skull - anatomy &amp; histology ; Skull - growth &amp; development</subject><ispartof>Evolution &amp; development, 2006-01, Vol.8 (1), p.46-60</ispartof><rights>2006 BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5494-1e85777eedb687cb45fe6bb5c8a3c44baddcd3cd51cc2cdd112470ce982f8543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5494-1e85777eedb687cb45fe6bb5c8a3c44baddcd3cd51cc2cdd112470ce982f8543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16409382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zelditch, Miriam Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mezey, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheets, H. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundrigan, Barbara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garland Jr, Theodore</creatorcontrib><title>Developmental regulation of skull morphology II: ontogenetic dynamics of covariance</title><title>Evolution &amp; development</title><addtitle>Evol Dev</addtitle><description>SUMMARY Canalization may play a critical role in molding patterns of integration when variability is regulated by the balance between processes that generate and remove variation. Under these conditions, the interaction among those processes may produce a dynamic structure of integration even when the level of variability is constant. To determine whether the constancy of variance in skull shape throughout most of postnatal growth results from a balance between processes generating and removing variation, we compare covariance structures from age to age in two rodent species, cotton rats (Sigmodon fulviventer) and house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). We assess the overall similarity of covariance matrices by the matrix correlation, and compare the structures of covariance matrices using common subspace analysis, a method related to common principal components (PCs) analysis but suited to cases in which variation is so nearly spherical that PCs are ambiguous. We find significant differences from age to age in covariance structure and the more effectively canalized ones tend to be least stable in covariance structure. We find no evidence that canalization gradually and preferentially removes deviations arising early in development as we might expect if canalization results from compensatory differential growth. Our results suggest that (co)variation patterns are continually restructured by processes that equilibrate variance, and thus that canalization plays a critical role in molding patterns of integration.</description><subject>Anatomy, Comparative</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Morphogenesis</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Sigmodontinae - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Skull - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Skull - growth &amp; development</subject><issn>1520-541X</issn><issn>1525-142X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1P2zAYgC3ENBjbX0ARB27J_BknO0yaoIOKahxAGjfLsd90KU7c2Qlr__2StgJpp_niV_LzPrIehBKCMzKez6uMCCpSwulTRjHOMyyw5NnmCJ2-PhzvZpwKTp5O0IcYVxgTyWn5Hp2QnOOSFfQUPVzDCzi_bqHrtUsCLAen-8Z3ia-T-Dw4l7Q-rH9555fbZD7_kviu90vooG9MYredbhsTJ9j4Fx0a3Rn4iN7V2kX4dLjP0OP32ePVbbq4v5lffVukRvCSpwQKIaUEsFVeSFNxUUNeVcIUmhnOK22tscxYQYyhxlpCKJfYQFnQuhCcnaHLvXYd_O8BYq_aJhpwTnfgh6gkziUvJR7Bi3_AlR9CN35NUSqoZDmjI1TsIRN8jAFqtQ5Nq8NWEaym6GqlprZqaqum6GoXXW3G1fODf6hasG-Lh8oj8HUP_GkcbP9brGbXs904CtK9oIk9bF4FOjyrXDIp1M8fN-qOy8UdI7cKs7928aDU</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Zelditch, Miriam Leah</creator><creator>Mezey, Jason</creator><creator>Sheets, H. David</creator><creator>Lundrigan, Barbara L.</creator><creator>Garland Jr, Theodore</creator><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Developmental regulation of skull morphology II: ontogenetic dynamics of covariance</title><author>Zelditch, Miriam Leah ; Mezey, Jason ; Sheets, H. David ; Lundrigan, Barbara L. ; Garland Jr, Theodore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5494-1e85777eedb687cb45fe6bb5c8a3c44baddcd3cd51cc2cdd112470ce982f8543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Anatomy, Comparative</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Morphogenesis</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Sigmodontinae - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Skull - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Skull - growth &amp; development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zelditch, Miriam Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mezey, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheets, H. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundrigan, Barbara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garland Jr, Theodore</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evolution &amp; development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zelditch, Miriam Leah</au><au>Mezey, Jason</au><au>Sheets, H. David</au><au>Lundrigan, Barbara L.</au><au>Garland Jr, Theodore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developmental regulation of skull morphology II: ontogenetic dynamics of covariance</atitle><jtitle>Evolution &amp; development</jtitle><addtitle>Evol Dev</addtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>46-60</pages><issn>1520-541X</issn><eissn>1525-142X</eissn><abstract>SUMMARY Canalization may play a critical role in molding patterns of integration when variability is regulated by the balance between processes that generate and remove variation. Under these conditions, the interaction among those processes may produce a dynamic structure of integration even when the level of variability is constant. To determine whether the constancy of variance in skull shape throughout most of postnatal growth results from a balance between processes generating and removing variation, we compare covariance structures from age to age in two rodent species, cotton rats (Sigmodon fulviventer) and house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). We assess the overall similarity of covariance matrices by the matrix correlation, and compare the structures of covariance matrices using common subspace analysis, a method related to common principal components (PCs) analysis but suited to cases in which variation is so nearly spherical that PCs are ambiguous. We find significant differences from age to age in covariance structure and the more effectively canalized ones tend to be least stable in covariance structure. We find no evidence that canalization gradually and preferentially removes deviations arising early in development as we might expect if canalization results from compensatory differential growth. Our results suggest that (co)variation patterns are continually restructured by processes that equilibrate variance, and thus that canalization plays a critical role in molding patterns of integration.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Inc</pub><pmid>16409382</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.05074.x</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-541X
ispartof Evolution & development, 2006-01, Vol.8 (1), p.46-60
issn 1520-541X
1525-142X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70674970
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Anatomy, Comparative
Animals
Comparative analysis
Genetics
Head
Mice
Morphogenesis
Principal Component Analysis
Rodents
Sigmodontinae - growth & development
Skull - anatomy & histology
Skull - growth & development
title Developmental regulation of skull morphology II: ontogenetic dynamics of covariance
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T06%3A52%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developmental%20regulation%20of%20skull%20morphology%20II:%20ontogenetic%20dynamics%20of%20covariance&rft.jtitle=Evolution%20&%20development&rft.au=Zelditch,%20Miriam%20Leah&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=46-60&rft.issn=1520-541X&rft.eissn=1525-142X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.05074.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E959607971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5494-1e85777eedb687cb45fe6bb5c8a3c44baddcd3cd51cc2cdd112470ce982f8543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225273632&rft_id=info:pmid/16409382&rfr_iscdi=true