Postoperative survival in stage II non-small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma

• Published in: Archivos de bronconeumología 2001-01, Vol.37 (1), p.19-26
• Main Authors: Calvo Medina, V, Padilla Alarcón, J, París Romeu, F, Blasco Armengod, E, Pastor Guillem, J, García Zarza, A
• Format: Article
• Language: Spanish
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Carcinoma, Bronchogenic - mortality; Carcinoma, Bronchogenic - pathology; Carcinoma, Bronchogenic - surgery; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - mortality; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms - mortality; Lung Neoplasms - pathology; Lung Neoplasms - surgery; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate
• ISSN: 0300-2896

This study aimed to validate in our population changes in the stage II criteria for non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. We retrospectively reviewed and followed the course of disease in 336 patients who underwent complete resection in our hospital between January 1969 and December 1995 with stage II disease, classified as T1N1M0 (41), T2N1M0 (144) and T3N0M0 (151). The expected five-year survival in our population was 43.19 +/- 2.90%. Estimated mean survival was 3 +/- 0.71 years (95% confidence interval: 1.60-4.40). Mean survival was 8.82 +/- 0.67 years (95% confidence interval 7.51-10.13). Five-year survival was 53.32 +/- 8.55% for tumors classified as T1N1M0, 38.57 +/- 4.40% for T2N1M0, and 44.46 +/- 4.30% for T3N0M0. We observed significant differences in survival depending on histological type, tumor size, and IIA or IIB staging, degree of tumor invasion (T), number of nodes involved (N1) and location. T3N0M0 tumors displayed great variation in expected survival rates in relation to structures involved (27.53% to 59.98%). Multivariate analysis confirmed degree of tumor invasion, size and histological type to be the main prognostic factors. We conclude that the new staging system gives a more realistic prognosis for patients in our practice. The stage IIA and IIB division is appropriate and gives significantly different prognoses. However, the T3N0M0 category is heterogeneous and is not significantly different from T1-2N1M0, such that stage II overall continues to be an indivisible, homogeneous group of patients. Other prognostic variables, such as histological type, affect survival in our patients.