Loading…

The Role of GPs in Increasing Compliance to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomised Controlled Trial (Italy)

Aims To assess the effect of the provider (GPs versus hospital) on the compliance in returning the faecal occult blood test. To analyse the characteristics of the GP associated with high compliance among his beneficiaries. Methods A questionnaire about screening attitudes was mailed to the 1192 GPs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer causes & control 2006-02, Vol.17 (1), p.45-52
Main Authors: Federici, Antonio, Rossi, Paolo Giorgi, Bartolozzi, Francesco, Farchi, Sara, Borgia, Piero, Guastcchi, Gabriella
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-c8ed885c6fa0147c229db0fcd844935171b89d0368c31eb6b726ec38c66559ea3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-c8ed885c6fa0147c229db0fcd844935171b89d0368c31eb6b726ec38c66559ea3
container_end_page 52
container_issue 1
container_start_page 45
container_title Cancer causes & control
container_volume 17
creator Federici, Antonio
Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
Bartolozzi, Francesco
Farchi, Sara
Borgia, Piero
Guastcchi, Gabriella
description Aims To assess the effect of the provider (GPs versus hospital) on the compliance in returning the faecal occult blood test. To analyse the characteristics of the GP associated with high compliance among his beneficiaries. Methods A questionnaire about screening attitudes was mailed to the 1192 GPs working in 13 districts of the Lazio region. We asked the GPs to participate in a randomised trial, we sampled 130 GPs and about 1/10 of the GPs' 50-75 year old beneficiaries (n = 3657) were invited to be screened at the GP office and 1/10 (3675) at the nearest gastroenterology centre. Results 58.5% of the GPs completed the questionnaire and 22.7% agreed to participate in the trial. The compliance in the GP arm was 50%, in the hospital arm 16% (RR 3.4; 95% CI: 3.13-3.70). There was a high variability in the compliance obtained by the GPs. GPs with more than 25 patients visited/day and those incorrectly recommended screening of colorectal cancer obtained a lower compliance (OR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.95 and OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97, respectively). Conclusions The involvement of GPs in colorectal cancer screening can be very effective to enhance the compliance, but the effectiveness is dependent on their willingness to be involved.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10552-005-0380-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70688033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>29736429</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>29736429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-c8ed885c6fa0147c229db0fcd844935171b89d0368c31eb6b726ec38c66559ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10ctqGzEUBmARWho36QN0kSJaKM1i2iNpdOsumDYxBFJSZy00Gk0yRpYcabzI21fGpoFAVrp9_0HwI_SRwHcCIH8UApzTBoA3wBQ0-gjNCJeskZTyN2gGmsuG05Ydo_elrKBCQeEdOiaiJTVLZyguHzy-TcHjNODLPwWPES-iy96WMd7jeVpvwmij83hK9RRS9m6yAc93dxn_rdLHKn_iC3xrY5_WY_F9lXHKKYS6Xeax-m-Lmno6P0VvBxuK_3BYT9Dd71_L-VVzfXO5mF9cN45JMTVO-V4p7sRggbTSUar7DgbXq7bVjBNJOqV7YEI5RnwnOkmFd0w5ITjX3rIT9HU_d5PT49aXydR_OR-CjT5ti5EglALGKvzyAq7SNsf6N0OFYIpQwnlVn19VhIEAyXRFZI9cTqVkP5hNHtc2PxkCZteX2fdlag1m15fZZT4dBm-7te-fE4eCKjjbg1WZUv7_TrVkoqWa_QOzhZdi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213060739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of GPs in Increasing Compliance to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomised Controlled Trial (Italy)</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Federici, Antonio ; Rossi, Paolo Giorgi ; Bartolozzi, Francesco ; Farchi, Sara ; Borgia, Piero ; Guastcchi, Gabriella</creator><creatorcontrib>Federici, Antonio ; Rossi, Paolo Giorgi ; Bartolozzi, Francesco ; Farchi, Sara ; Borgia, Piero ; Guastcchi, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><description>Aims To assess the effect of the provider (GPs versus hospital) on the compliance in returning the faecal occult blood test. To analyse the characteristics of the GP associated with high compliance among his beneficiaries. Methods A questionnaire about screening attitudes was mailed to the 1192 GPs working in 13 districts of the Lazio region. We asked the GPs to participate in a randomised trial, we sampled 130 GPs and about 1/10 of the GPs' 50-75 year old beneficiaries (n = 3657) were invited to be screened at the GP office and 1/10 (3675) at the nearest gastroenterology centre. Results 58.5% of the GPs completed the questionnaire and 22.7% agreed to participate in the trial. The compliance in the GP arm was 50%, in the hospital arm 16% (RR 3.4; 95% CI: 3.13-3.70). There was a high variability in the compliance obtained by the GPs. GPs with more than 25 patients visited/day and those incorrectly recommended screening of colorectal cancer obtained a lower compliance (OR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.95 and OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97, respectively). Conclusions The involvement of GPs in colorectal cancer screening can be very effective to enhance the compliance, but the effectiveness is dependent on their willingness to be involved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-5243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7225</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10552-005-0380-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16411052</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCCNEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Beneficiaries ; Cancer ; Cancer screening ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology ; Compliance ; Experimentation ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; General practice ; Humans ; Italy ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Mass Screening - utilization ; Medical screening ; Middle Aged ; Occult Blood ; Occult blood testing ; Operating rooms ; Patient Compliance ; Patients ; Physician's Role ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Questionnaires ; Screening tests ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tests of compliance</subject><ispartof>Cancer causes &amp; control, 2006-02, Vol.17 (1), p.45-52</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2006</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2006.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-c8ed885c6fa0147c229db0fcd844935171b89d0368c31eb6b726ec38c66559ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-c8ed885c6fa0147c229db0fcd844935171b89d0368c31eb6b726ec38c66559ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/29736429$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/29736429$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16411052$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Federici, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Paolo Giorgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartolozzi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farchi, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borgia, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guastcchi, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of GPs in Increasing Compliance to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomised Controlled Trial (Italy)</title><title>Cancer causes &amp; control</title><addtitle>Cancer Causes Control</addtitle><description>Aims To assess the effect of the provider (GPs versus hospital) on the compliance in returning the faecal occult blood test. To analyse the characteristics of the GP associated with high compliance among his beneficiaries. Methods A questionnaire about screening attitudes was mailed to the 1192 GPs working in 13 districts of the Lazio region. We asked the GPs to participate in a randomised trial, we sampled 130 GPs and about 1/10 of the GPs' 50-75 year old beneficiaries (n = 3657) were invited to be screened at the GP office and 1/10 (3675) at the nearest gastroenterology centre. Results 58.5% of the GPs completed the questionnaire and 22.7% agreed to participate in the trial. The compliance in the GP arm was 50%, in the hospital arm 16% (RR 3.4; 95% CI: 3.13-3.70). There was a high variability in the compliance obtained by the GPs. GPs with more than 25 patients visited/day and those incorrectly recommended screening of colorectal cancer obtained a lower compliance (OR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.95 and OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97, respectively). Conclusions The involvement of GPs in colorectal cancer screening can be very effective to enhance the compliance, but the effectiveness is dependent on their willingness to be involved.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - utilization</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occult Blood</subject><subject>Occult blood testing</subject><subject>Operating rooms</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physician's Role</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Screening tests</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tests of compliance</subject><issn>0957-5243</issn><issn>1573-7225</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10ctqGzEUBmARWho36QN0kSJaKM1i2iNpdOsumDYxBFJSZy00Gk0yRpYcabzI21fGpoFAVrp9_0HwI_SRwHcCIH8UApzTBoA3wBQ0-gjNCJeskZTyN2gGmsuG05Ydo_elrKBCQeEdOiaiJTVLZyguHzy-TcHjNODLPwWPES-iy96WMd7jeVpvwmij83hK9RRS9m6yAc93dxn_rdLHKn_iC3xrY5_WY_F9lXHKKYS6Xeax-m-Lmno6P0VvBxuK_3BYT9Dd71_L-VVzfXO5mF9cN45JMTVO-V4p7sRggbTSUar7DgbXq7bVjBNJOqV7YEI5RnwnOkmFd0w5ITjX3rIT9HU_d5PT49aXydR_OR-CjT5ti5EglALGKvzyAq7SNsf6N0OFYIpQwnlVn19VhIEAyXRFZI9cTqVkP5hNHtc2PxkCZteX2fdlag1m15fZZT4dBm-7te-fE4eCKjjbg1WZUv7_TrVkoqWa_QOzhZdi</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Federici, Antonio</creator><creator>Rossi, Paolo Giorgi</creator><creator>Bartolozzi, Francesco</creator><creator>Farchi, Sara</creator><creator>Borgia, Piero</creator><creator>Guastcchi, Gabriella</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>The Role of GPs in Increasing Compliance to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomised Controlled Trial (Italy)</title><author>Federici, Antonio ; Rossi, Paolo Giorgi ; Bartolozzi, Francesco ; Farchi, Sara ; Borgia, Piero ; Guastcchi, Gabriella</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-c8ed885c6fa0147c229db0fcd844935171b89d0368c31eb6b726ec38c66559ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - utilization</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occult Blood</topic><topic>Occult blood testing</topic><topic>Operating rooms</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physician's Role</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Screening tests</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tests of compliance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Federici, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Paolo Giorgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartolozzi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farchi, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borgia, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guastcchi, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer causes &amp; control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Federici, Antonio</au><au>Rossi, Paolo Giorgi</au><au>Bartolozzi, Francesco</au><au>Farchi, Sara</au><au>Borgia, Piero</au><au>Guastcchi, Gabriella</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of GPs in Increasing Compliance to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomised Controlled Trial (Italy)</atitle><jtitle>Cancer causes &amp; control</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Causes Control</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>45-52</pages><issn>0957-5243</issn><eissn>1573-7225</eissn><coden>CCCNEN</coden><abstract>Aims To assess the effect of the provider (GPs versus hospital) on the compliance in returning the faecal occult blood test. To analyse the characteristics of the GP associated with high compliance among his beneficiaries. Methods A questionnaire about screening attitudes was mailed to the 1192 GPs working in 13 districts of the Lazio region. We asked the GPs to participate in a randomised trial, we sampled 130 GPs and about 1/10 of the GPs' 50-75 year old beneficiaries (n = 3657) were invited to be screened at the GP office and 1/10 (3675) at the nearest gastroenterology centre. Results 58.5% of the GPs completed the questionnaire and 22.7% agreed to participate in the trial. The compliance in the GP arm was 50%, in the hospital arm 16% (RR 3.4; 95% CI: 3.13-3.70). There was a high variability in the compliance obtained by the GPs. GPs with more than 25 patients visited/day and those incorrectly recommended screening of colorectal cancer obtained a lower compliance (OR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.95 and OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97, respectively). Conclusions The involvement of GPs in colorectal cancer screening can be very effective to enhance the compliance, but the effectiveness is dependent on their willingness to be involved.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>16411052</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10552-005-0380-9</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-5243
ispartof Cancer causes & control, 2006-02, Vol.17 (1), p.45-52
issn 0957-5243
1573-7225
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70688033
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature
subjects Aged
Analysis of Variance
Attitude of Health Personnel
Beneficiaries
Cancer
Cancer screening
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology
Compliance
Experimentation
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Gastroenterology
General practice
Humans
Italy
Logistic Models
Male
Mass Screening - utilization
Medical screening
Middle Aged
Occult Blood
Occult blood testing
Operating rooms
Patient Compliance
Patients
Physician's Role
Physician-Patient Relations
Questionnaires
Screening tests
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tests of compliance
title The Role of GPs in Increasing Compliance to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomised Controlled Trial (Italy)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T00%3A35%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20GPs%20in%20Increasing%20Compliance%20to%20Colorectal%20Cancer%20Screening:%20A%20Randomised%20Controlled%20Trial%20(Italy)&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20causes%20&%20control&rft.au=Federici,%20Antonio&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=45-52&rft.issn=0957-5243&rft.eissn=1573-7225&rft.coden=CCCNEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10552-005-0380-9&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E29736429%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-c8ed885c6fa0147c229db0fcd844935171b89d0368c31eb6b726ec38c66559ea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213060739&rft_id=info:pmid/16411052&rft_jstor_id=29736429&rfr_iscdi=true