Loading…

Stapled haemorrhoidopexy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile?

Introduction  Ten years after the introduction of stapled haemorrhoidopexy few studies have stratified patients by degree of haemorrhoidal disease when analysing results. Objective  The aim of this study was prospectively to evaluate 116 patients who underwent stapled anopexy conducted by the same s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Colorectal disease 2006-02, Vol.8 (2), p.130-134
Main Authors: Finco, C., Sarzo, G., Savastano, S., Degregori, S., Merigliano, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4052-5553a1b3429007a85810a72dbffa14073224bd0f1e994cdcf17ba698da1f40063
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4052-5553a1b3429007a85810a72dbffa14073224bd0f1e994cdcf17ba698da1f40063
container_end_page 134
container_issue 2
container_start_page 130
container_title Colorectal disease
container_volume 8
creator Finco, C.
Sarzo, G.
Savastano, S.
Degregori, S.
Merigliano, S.
description Introduction  Ten years after the introduction of stapled haemorrhoidopexy few studies have stratified patients by degree of haemorrhoidal disease when analysing results. Objective  The aim of this study was prospectively to evaluate 116 patients who underwent stapled anopexy conducted by the same surgeon for III or IV degree haemorrhoidal prolapse. Materials and methods  One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients affected by symptomatic haemorrhoids of III or IV degree underwent stapled anopexy using the technique described by Longo in the period January 2001 to October 2003. Mean follow‐up was 28.1 months. Fischer's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results, in terms of morbidity and recurrence rates, were stratified according to degree of haemorrhoidal disease. Results  There was no statistically significant difference between the results for third degree compared with fourth degree prolapse although there was a trend towards increased incidence of postoperative bleeding and recurrence. Conclusion  Third degree haemorrhoidal prolapse remains the best indication for stapled haemorrhoidopexy. This procedure may also be indicated in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse. Patients with fourth degree haemorrhoids may be subjected to this procedure following adequate discussion of the outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00912.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70688947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70688947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4052-5553a1b3429007a85810a72dbffa14073224bd0f1e994cdcf17ba698da1f40063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtP6zAQRi10Ee-_gLxilzBjO7GDhBDq5f2UALG0nMShKSnJtVO1_fe4tAKW1xuP5PPNjA8hFCHGcA5HMYqUR8hRxQwgiQEyZPFsjWx9P_z5qlmkMoRNsu39CABTiWqDbGIqkIHkW-TpqTddY0s6NHbcOjds67Lt7GxO6w9atRPXD2lp35y1vwnT0M61jem8PaK1p3VPp21Ap8O6sSe7ZL0yjbd7q3uHvJyfPQ8uo9uHi6vB6W1UCEhYlCQJN5hzwTIAaVSiEIxkZV5VBkXYjjGRl1ChzTJRlEWFMjdppkqDlQBI-Q45WPYNu_ybWN_rce0L2zTmw7YTryWkSmVCBlAtwcK13jtb6c7VY-PmGkEvhOqRXnjTC296IVR_CdWzEN1fzZjkY1v-BFcGA3C8BKbh6_P_bqwHD3-vQhXy0TJf-97OvvPGvetUcpno1_sLzdW1erzhd_qZfwLq3ZN3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70688947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stapled haemorrhoidopexy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Finco, C. ; Sarzo, G. ; Savastano, S. ; Degregori, S. ; Merigliano, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Finco, C. ; Sarzo, G. ; Savastano, S. ; Degregori, S. ; Merigliano, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction  Ten years after the introduction of stapled haemorrhoidopexy few studies have stratified patients by degree of haemorrhoidal disease when analysing results. Objective  The aim of this study was prospectively to evaluate 116 patients who underwent stapled anopexy conducted by the same surgeon for III or IV degree haemorrhoidal prolapse. Materials and methods  One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients affected by symptomatic haemorrhoids of III or IV degree underwent stapled anopexy using the technique described by Longo in the period January 2001 to October 2003. Mean follow‐up was 28.1 months. Fischer's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results, in terms of morbidity and recurrence rates, were stratified according to degree of haemorrhoidal disease. Results  There was no statistically significant difference between the results for third degree compared with fourth degree prolapse although there was a trend towards increased incidence of postoperative bleeding and recurrence. Conclusion  Third degree haemorrhoidal prolapse remains the best indication for stapled haemorrhoidopexy. This procedure may also be indicated in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse. Patients with fourth degree haemorrhoids may be subjected to this procedure following adequate discussion of the outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-8910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-1318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00912.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16412073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; fourth degree haemorrhoids ; haemorrhoids ; Hemorrhoids - classification ; Hemorrhoids - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; stapled haemorrhoidopexy ; Surgical Stapling ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Colorectal disease, 2006-02, Vol.8 (2), p.130-134</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4052-5553a1b3429007a85810a72dbffa14073224bd0f1e994cdcf17ba698da1f40063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4052-5553a1b3429007a85810a72dbffa14073224bd0f1e994cdcf17ba698da1f40063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16412073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finco, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarzo, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savastano, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degregori, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merigliano, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Stapled haemorrhoidopexy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile?</title><title>Colorectal disease</title><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><description>Introduction  Ten years after the introduction of stapled haemorrhoidopexy few studies have stratified patients by degree of haemorrhoidal disease when analysing results. Objective  The aim of this study was prospectively to evaluate 116 patients who underwent stapled anopexy conducted by the same surgeon for III or IV degree haemorrhoidal prolapse. Materials and methods  One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients affected by symptomatic haemorrhoids of III or IV degree underwent stapled anopexy using the technique described by Longo in the period January 2001 to October 2003. Mean follow‐up was 28.1 months. Fischer's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results, in terms of morbidity and recurrence rates, were stratified according to degree of haemorrhoidal disease. Results  There was no statistically significant difference between the results for third degree compared with fourth degree prolapse although there was a trend towards increased incidence of postoperative bleeding and recurrence. Conclusion  Third degree haemorrhoidal prolapse remains the best indication for stapled haemorrhoidopexy. This procedure may also be indicated in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse. Patients with fourth degree haemorrhoids may be subjected to this procedure following adequate discussion of the outcome.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fourth degree haemorrhoids</subject><subject>haemorrhoids</subject><subject>Hemorrhoids - classification</subject><subject>Hemorrhoids - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>stapled haemorrhoidopexy</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1462-8910</issn><issn>1463-1318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtP6zAQRi10Ee-_gLxilzBjO7GDhBDq5f2UALG0nMShKSnJtVO1_fe4tAKW1xuP5PPNjA8hFCHGcA5HMYqUR8hRxQwgiQEyZPFsjWx9P_z5qlmkMoRNsu39CABTiWqDbGIqkIHkW-TpqTddY0s6NHbcOjds67Lt7GxO6w9atRPXD2lp35y1vwnT0M61jem8PaK1p3VPp21Ap8O6sSe7ZL0yjbd7q3uHvJyfPQ8uo9uHi6vB6W1UCEhYlCQJN5hzwTIAaVSiEIxkZV5VBkXYjjGRl1ChzTJRlEWFMjdppkqDlQBI-Q45WPYNu_ybWN_rce0L2zTmw7YTryWkSmVCBlAtwcK13jtb6c7VY-PmGkEvhOqRXnjTC296IVR_CdWzEN1fzZjkY1v-BFcGA3C8BKbh6_P_bqwHD3-vQhXy0TJf-97OvvPGvetUcpno1_sLzdW1erzhd_qZfwLq3ZN3</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Finco, C.</creator><creator>Sarzo, G.</creator><creator>Savastano, S.</creator><creator>Degregori, S.</creator><creator>Merigliano, S.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>Stapled haemorrhoidopexy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile?</title><author>Finco, C. ; Sarzo, G. ; Savastano, S. ; Degregori, S. ; Merigliano, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4052-5553a1b3429007a85810a72dbffa14073224bd0f1e994cdcf17ba698da1f40063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fourth degree haemorrhoids</topic><topic>haemorrhoids</topic><topic>Hemorrhoids - classification</topic><topic>Hemorrhoids - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>stapled haemorrhoidopexy</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finco, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarzo, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savastano, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degregori, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merigliano, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finco, C.</au><au>Sarzo, G.</au><au>Savastano, S.</au><au>Degregori, S.</au><au>Merigliano, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stapled haemorrhoidopexy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile?</atitle><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>130-134</pages><issn>1462-8910</issn><eissn>1463-1318</eissn><abstract>Introduction  Ten years after the introduction of stapled haemorrhoidopexy few studies have stratified patients by degree of haemorrhoidal disease when analysing results. Objective  The aim of this study was prospectively to evaluate 116 patients who underwent stapled anopexy conducted by the same surgeon for III or IV degree haemorrhoidal prolapse. Materials and methods  One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients affected by symptomatic haemorrhoids of III or IV degree underwent stapled anopexy using the technique described by Longo in the period January 2001 to October 2003. Mean follow‐up was 28.1 months. Fischer's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results, in terms of morbidity and recurrence rates, were stratified according to degree of haemorrhoidal disease. Results  There was no statistically significant difference between the results for third degree compared with fourth degree prolapse although there was a trend towards increased incidence of postoperative bleeding and recurrence. Conclusion  Third degree haemorrhoidal prolapse remains the best indication for stapled haemorrhoidopexy. This procedure may also be indicated in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse. Patients with fourth degree haemorrhoids may be subjected to this procedure following adequate discussion of the outcome.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>16412073</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00912.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-8910
ispartof Colorectal disease, 2006-02, Vol.8 (2), p.130-134
issn 1462-8910
1463-1318
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70688947
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
fourth degree haemorrhoids
haemorrhoids
Hemorrhoids - classification
Hemorrhoids - surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
stapled haemorrhoidopexy
Surgical Stapling
Treatment Outcome
title Stapled haemorrhoidopexy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A29%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stapled%20haemorrhoidopexy%20in%20fourth%20degree%20haemorrhoidal%20prolapse:%20is%20it%20worthwhile?&rft.jtitle=Colorectal%20disease&rft.au=Finco,%20C.&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=130-134&rft.issn=1462-8910&rft.eissn=1463-1318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00912.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70688947%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4052-5553a1b3429007a85810a72dbffa14073224bd0f1e994cdcf17ba698da1f40063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70688947&rft_id=info:pmid/16412073&rfr_iscdi=true