Loading…

Implementation of Dietitian Recommendations for Enteral Nutrition Results in Improved Outcomes

A primary role of the registered dietitian (RD) is to assess nutritional needs of patients in states of physiological stress and illness and to recommend changes to diet and tube feedings when warranted. However, implementation of changes is dependent upon the physician accepting the recommendations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2006-02, Vol.106 (2), p.281-284
Main Authors: Braga, Jennifer M., Hunt, Alice, Pope, Janet, Molaison, Elaine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-3141193e83006597b7f028a3621e609af80d9a94c06c7aa20f867bde7efdcb213
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-3141193e83006597b7f028a3621e609af80d9a94c06c7aa20f867bde7efdcb213
container_end_page 284
container_issue 2
container_start_page 281
container_title Journal of the American Dietetic Association
container_volume 106
creator Braga, Jennifer M.
Hunt, Alice
Pope, Janet
Molaison, Elaine
description A primary role of the registered dietitian (RD) is to assess nutritional needs of patients in states of physiological stress and illness and to recommend changes to diet and tube feedings when warranted. However, implementation of changes is dependent upon the physician accepting the recommendations of the RD. This study evaluated outcomes of two groups of enterally fed patients in a long-term acute-care facility in northwest Louisiana: (a) those for whom the physician accepted RD recommendations; and (b) those for whom the physician did not accept RD recommendations. Data showed that physician-prescribed enteral formulas provided 10.0% less kilocalories and 7.8% less protein than the RD-assessed needs. t tests showed that when RD recommendations were implemented, patients had a significantly shorter length of stay (28.5±1.8 vs 30.5±4.8 days, P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jada.2005.10.039
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70689889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002822305019127</els_id><sourcerecordid>995359041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-3141193e83006597b7f028a3621e609af80d9a94c06c7aa20f867bde7efdcb213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFrFTEQx4NY7LP6BTzoIuhtn5Nkd5MFL1KrLRQL1V4NeclEsuxuapIt9Nub7XtQ6MFTyMzvPzP8CHlDYUuBdp-G7aCt3jKAthS2wPtnZEOlkDVvBTwnGwBgtWSMH5OXKQ3lCy2FF-SYdk3DpOg35PfFdDvihHPW2Ye5Cq766jH77PVcXaMJU-nZh16qXIjV2Zwx6rH6seToHyLXmJYxp8rPVRkWwx3a6mrJJYrpFTlyekz4-vCekJtvZ79Oz-vLq-8Xp18ua9MCzTWnDaU9R8kBurYXO-GASc07RrGDXjsJttd9Y6AzQmsGTnZiZ1Ggs2bHKD8hH_dzy_6_C6asJp8MjqOeMSxJCehkL2VfwPdPwCEscS63KUZlQxk0UCC2h0wMKUV06jb6Scd7RUGt6tWgVvVqVb_WivoSenuYvOwmtI-Rg-sCfDgAOhk9uqhn49MjJ1resJYX7t2eczoo_ScW5uYnA8qBQsclXYnPewKL0juPUSXjcTZofUSTlQ3-f5f-A_JYqqs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218412040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of Dietitian Recommendations for Enteral Nutrition Results in Improved Outcomes</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Braga, Jennifer M. ; Hunt, Alice ; Pope, Janet ; Molaison, Elaine</creator><creatorcontrib>Braga, Jennifer M. ; Hunt, Alice ; Pope, Janet ; Molaison, Elaine</creatorcontrib><description>A primary role of the registered dietitian (RD) is to assess nutritional needs of patients in states of physiological stress and illness and to recommend changes to diet and tube feedings when warranted. However, implementation of changes is dependent upon the physician accepting the recommendations of the RD. This study evaluated outcomes of two groups of enterally fed patients in a long-term acute-care facility in northwest Louisiana: (a) those for whom the physician accepted RD recommendations; and (b) those for whom the physician did not accept RD recommendations. Data showed that physician-prescribed enteral formulas provided 10.0% less kilocalories and 7.8% less protein than the RD-assessed needs. t tests showed that when RD recommendations were implemented, patients had a significantly shorter length of stay (28.5±1.8 vs 30.5±4.8 days, P&lt;0.05), as well as significantly improved albumin (0.13±0.17 vs −0.44±0.21 g/dL [1.3±1.7 vs −4.4±2.1 g/L], P&lt;0.05) and weight gains (0.51±0.1 vs −0.42±0.2%, P&lt;0.05) when compared to those who continued with physician’s orders. These data suggest that if RDs had the authority to write nutrition orders and provide early nutrition intervention, patient care would improve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8223</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2212-2672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3570</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-2680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.10.039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16442879</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JADAAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Americans ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blacks ; Clinical outcomes ; Comparative studies ; Critical Care ; Dietary Proteins - administration &amp; dosage ; dietary recommendations ; dietetics ; Dietetics - methods ; Dietetics - standards ; Dietitians ; Energy Intake ; Enteral Nutrition - standards ; environment ; environmental factors ; Female ; food choices ; Food Service, Hospital - standards ; health promotion ; healthful ; Hispanics ; hospital diet ; hospitalized adult patients ; Hospitals, Convalescent - standards ; Humans ; Inpatient care ; Intervention ; Length of Stay ; Long-Term Care - standards ; low fat foods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Metabolic diseases ; Middle Aged ; nutrient requirements ; Nutrition ; Nutrition Assessment ; nutrition education ; nutritional adequacy ; nutritional intervention ; patient care ; Patient Care Team ; patients ; Physician's Role ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Professional Autonomy ; Quality of Health Care ; Retrospective Studies ; school food service ; school lunch ; Serum Albumin - analysis ; socioeconomic status ; Treatment Outcome ; tube feeding ; Weight Gain ; Whites</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2006-02, Vol.106 (2), p.281-284</ispartof><rights>2006 American Dietetic Association</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Dietetic Association Feb 2006</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-3141193e83006597b7f028a3621e609af80d9a94c06c7aa20f867bde7efdcb213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-3141193e83006597b7f028a3621e609af80d9a94c06c7aa20f867bde7efdcb213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17534253$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16442879$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Braga, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molaison, Elaine</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of Dietitian Recommendations for Enteral Nutrition Results in Improved Outcomes</title><title>Journal of the American Dietetic Association</title><addtitle>J Am Diet Assoc</addtitle><description>A primary role of the registered dietitian (RD) is to assess nutritional needs of patients in states of physiological stress and illness and to recommend changes to diet and tube feedings when warranted. However, implementation of changes is dependent upon the physician accepting the recommendations of the RD. This study evaluated outcomes of two groups of enterally fed patients in a long-term acute-care facility in northwest Louisiana: (a) those for whom the physician accepted RD recommendations; and (b) those for whom the physician did not accept RD recommendations. Data showed that physician-prescribed enteral formulas provided 10.0% less kilocalories and 7.8% less protein than the RD-assessed needs. t tests showed that when RD recommendations were implemented, patients had a significantly shorter length of stay (28.5±1.8 vs 30.5±4.8 days, P&lt;0.05), as well as significantly improved albumin (0.13±0.17 vs −0.44±0.21 g/dL [1.3±1.7 vs −4.4±2.1 g/L], P&lt;0.05) and weight gains (0.51±0.1 vs −0.42±0.2%, P&lt;0.05) when compared to those who continued with physician’s orders. These data suggest that if RDs had the authority to write nutrition orders and provide early nutrition intervention, patient care would improve.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Americans</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blacks</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>dietary recommendations</subject><subject>dietetics</subject><subject>Dietetics - methods</subject><subject>Dietetics - standards</subject><subject>Dietitians</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - standards</subject><subject>environment</subject><subject>environmental factors</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>food choices</subject><subject>Food Service, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>health promotion</subject><subject>healthful</subject><subject>Hispanics</subject><subject>hospital diet</subject><subject>hospitalized adult patients</subject><subject>Hospitals, Convalescent - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Long-Term Care - standards</subject><subject>low fat foods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metabolic diseases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>nutrient requirements</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition Assessment</subject><subject>nutrition education</subject><subject>nutritional adequacy</subject><subject>nutritional intervention</subject><subject>patient care</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>Physician's Role</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Professional Autonomy</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>school food service</subject><subject>school lunch</subject><subject>Serum Albumin - analysis</subject><subject>socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>tube feeding</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><subject>Whites</subject><issn>0002-8223</issn><issn>2212-2672</issn><issn>1878-3570</issn><issn>2212-2680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFrFTEQx4NY7LP6BTzoIuhtn5Nkd5MFL1KrLRQL1V4NeclEsuxuapIt9Nub7XtQ6MFTyMzvPzP8CHlDYUuBdp-G7aCt3jKAthS2wPtnZEOlkDVvBTwnGwBgtWSMH5OXKQ3lCy2FF-SYdk3DpOg35PfFdDvihHPW2Ye5Cq766jH77PVcXaMJU-nZh16qXIjV2Zwx6rH6seToHyLXmJYxp8rPVRkWwx3a6mrJJYrpFTlyekz4-vCekJtvZ79Oz-vLq-8Xp18ua9MCzTWnDaU9R8kBurYXO-GASc07RrGDXjsJttd9Y6AzQmsGTnZiZ1Ggs2bHKD8hH_dzy_6_C6asJp8MjqOeMSxJCehkL2VfwPdPwCEscS63KUZlQxk0UCC2h0wMKUV06jb6Scd7RUGt6tWgVvVqVb_WivoSenuYvOwmtI-Rg-sCfDgAOhk9uqhn49MjJ1resJYX7t2eczoo_ScW5uYnA8qBQsclXYnPewKL0juPUSXjcTZofUSTlQ3-f5f-A_JYqqs</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Braga, Jennifer M.</creator><creator>Hunt, Alice</creator><creator>Pope, Janet</creator><creator>Molaison, Elaine</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Implementation of Dietitian Recommendations for Enteral Nutrition Results in Improved Outcomes</title><author>Braga, Jennifer M. ; Hunt, Alice ; Pope, Janet ; Molaison, Elaine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-3141193e83006597b7f028a3621e609af80d9a94c06c7aa20f867bde7efdcb213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Americans</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blacks</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>dietary recommendations</topic><topic>dietetics</topic><topic>Dietetics - methods</topic><topic>Dietetics - standards</topic><topic>Dietitians</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - standards</topic><topic>environment</topic><topic>environmental factors</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>food choices</topic><topic>Food Service, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>health promotion</topic><topic>healthful</topic><topic>Hispanics</topic><topic>hospital diet</topic><topic>hospitalized adult patients</topic><topic>Hospitals, Convalescent - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Long-Term Care - standards</topic><topic>low fat foods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metabolic diseases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>nutrient requirements</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition Assessment</topic><topic>nutrition education</topic><topic>nutritional adequacy</topic><topic>nutritional intervention</topic><topic>patient care</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>Physician's Role</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Professional Autonomy</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>school food service</topic><topic>school lunch</topic><topic>Serum Albumin - analysis</topic><topic>socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>tube feeding</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><topic>Whites</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Braga, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molaison, Elaine</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Dietetic Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Braga, Jennifer M.</au><au>Hunt, Alice</au><au>Pope, Janet</au><au>Molaison, Elaine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of Dietitian Recommendations for Enteral Nutrition Results in Improved Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Dietetic Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Diet Assoc</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>281-284</pages><issn>0002-8223</issn><issn>2212-2672</issn><eissn>1878-3570</eissn><eissn>2212-2680</eissn><coden>JADAAE</coden><abstract>A primary role of the registered dietitian (RD) is to assess nutritional needs of patients in states of physiological stress and illness and to recommend changes to diet and tube feedings when warranted. However, implementation of changes is dependent upon the physician accepting the recommendations of the RD. This study evaluated outcomes of two groups of enterally fed patients in a long-term acute-care facility in northwest Louisiana: (a) those for whom the physician accepted RD recommendations; and (b) those for whom the physician did not accept RD recommendations. Data showed that physician-prescribed enteral formulas provided 10.0% less kilocalories and 7.8% less protein than the RD-assessed needs. t tests showed that when RD recommendations were implemented, patients had a significantly shorter length of stay (28.5±1.8 vs 30.5±4.8 days, P&lt;0.05), as well as significantly improved albumin (0.13±0.17 vs −0.44±0.21 g/dL [1.3±1.7 vs −4.4±2.1 g/L], P&lt;0.05) and weight gains (0.51±0.1 vs −0.42±0.2%, P&lt;0.05) when compared to those who continued with physician’s orders. These data suggest that if RDs had the authority to write nutrition orders and provide early nutrition intervention, patient care would improve.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16442879</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jada.2005.10.039</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8223
ispartof Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2006-02, Vol.106 (2), p.281-284
issn 0002-8223
2212-2672
1878-3570
2212-2680
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70689889
source Elsevier
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Americans
Biological and medical sciences
Blacks
Clinical outcomes
Comparative studies
Critical Care
Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage
dietary recommendations
dietetics
Dietetics - methods
Dietetics - standards
Dietitians
Energy Intake
Enteral Nutrition - standards
environment
environmental factors
Female
food choices
Food Service, Hospital - standards
health promotion
healthful
Hispanics
hospital diet
hospitalized adult patients
Hospitals, Convalescent - standards
Humans
Inpatient care
Intervention
Length of Stay
Long-Term Care - standards
low fat foods
Male
Medical sciences
Metabolic diseases
Middle Aged
nutrient requirements
Nutrition
Nutrition Assessment
nutrition education
nutritional adequacy
nutritional intervention
patient care
Patient Care Team
patients
Physician's Role
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Professional Autonomy
Quality of Health Care
Retrospective Studies
school food service
school lunch
Serum Albumin - analysis
socioeconomic status
Treatment Outcome
tube feeding
Weight Gain
Whites
title Implementation of Dietitian Recommendations for Enteral Nutrition Results in Improved Outcomes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T02%3A15%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20Dietitian%20Recommendations%20for%20Enteral%20Nutrition%20Results%20in%20Improved%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Dietetic%20Association&rft.au=Braga,%20Jennifer%20M.&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=281-284&rft.issn=0002-8223&rft.eissn=1878-3570&rft.coden=JADAAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jada.2005.10.039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E995359041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-3141193e83006597b7f028a3621e609af80d9a94c06c7aa20f867bde7efdcb213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218412040&rft_id=info:pmid/16442879&rfr_iscdi=true