Loading…
Short Communication: Bulk Tank Total Bacterial Count in Dairy Sheep: Factors of Variation and Relationship with Somatic Cell Count
A total of 9,353 records for bulk tank total bacterial count (TBC) were obtained over 1 yr from 315 dairy ewe flocks belonging to the Sheep Improvement Consortium (CPO) in Castilla-León (Spain). Analysis of variance showed significant effects of flock, breed, month within flock, dry therapy, milking...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of dairy science 2006-02, Vol.89 (2), p.549-552 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-3b4821b111ea24d1befee703a90f35fbd3f7e365ad9e5b295d4324c05657420c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-3b4821b111ea24d1befee703a90f35fbd3f7e365ad9e5b295d4324c05657420c3 |
container_end_page | 552 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 549 |
container_title | Journal of dairy science |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Gonzalo, C. Carriedo, J.A. Beneitez, E. Juárez, M.T. De La Fuente, L.F. San Primitivo, F. |
description | A total of 9,353 records for bulk tank total bacterial count (TBC) were obtained over 1 yr from 315 dairy ewe flocks belonging to the Sheep Improvement Consortium (CPO) in Castilla-León (Spain). Analysis of variance showed significant effects of flock, breed, month within flock, dry therapy, milking type and installation, and logSCC on logTBC. Flock and month within flock were important variation factors as they accounted for 22.0 and 22.1% of the variance, respectively. Considerable repeatability values were obtained for both random factors. Hand milking and bucket-milking machines elicited highest logTBC (5.31), whereas parlor systems with looped milkline (5.01) elicited the lowest logTBC. The implementation of dry therapy practice (5.12) showed significantly lower logTBC than when not used (5.25). Variability in logTBC among breeds ranged from 5.24 (Awassi) to 5.07 (Churra). However, clinical outbreaks of contagious agalactia did not increase TBC significantly. A statistically significant relationship was found between logTBC and logSCC, the correlation coefficient between the variables being r = 0.23. Programs for improving milk hygiene should be implemented for both total bacterial count and somatic cell count variables at the same time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72117-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70703862</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030206721178</els_id><sourcerecordid>1003884201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-3b4821b111ea24d1befee703a90f35fbd3f7e365ad9e5b295d4324c05657420c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURi0EokPhL4CpBIJFih9x4nRHAwWkSkikZWs5zk3jIYkHO6Hqll-OMxmBxAY2fp77-XEQek7JKaeZfLNtwmlFCGMJ4YS9ItnrnFGaJ_Ie2lDBRMJpIe-jzW_kCD0KYRunlBHxEB3RLGUyY3yDflad8xMu3TDMozV6sm48w-dz_w1f6TE2btI9PtdmAm_jqHTzOGE74nfa-jtcdQC7M3wR950P2LX4q47ckoL12OAv0O8nobM7fGunDlduiCsGl9Af0h6jB63uAzw59Mfo-uL9Vfkxufz84VP59jIxgssp4XUqGa0ppaBZ2tAaWoCccF2Qlou2bnibA8-EbgoQNStEk3KWGiIykaeMGH6MXq65O---zxAmNdhg4jX0CG4OKicxbfmVf4G0KATLxAKe_AVu3ezH-IjICEmyXOYRKlbIeBeCh1btvB20v1OUqEWnijrVXqdaXCmSqb1OJWPt08MBcz1A86fy4C8CL1agszfdrfWgwqD7PuJ0iZWFYkqkReSerVyrndI33gZ1XTFCOaFEEM5JJMqVgKjghwWvgrEwGmhiqplU4-x_XPgXnjDH5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195806787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short Communication: Bulk Tank Total Bacterial Count in Dairy Sheep: Factors of Variation and Relationship with Somatic Cell Count</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><creator>Gonzalo, C. ; Carriedo, J.A. ; Beneitez, E. ; Juárez, M.T. ; De La Fuente, L.F. ; San Primitivo, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonzalo, C. ; Carriedo, J.A. ; Beneitez, E. ; Juárez, M.T. ; De La Fuente, L.F. ; San Primitivo, F.</creatorcontrib><description>A total of 9,353 records for bulk tank total bacterial count (TBC) were obtained over 1 yr from 315 dairy ewe flocks belonging to the Sheep Improvement Consortium (CPO) in Castilla-León (Spain). Analysis of variance showed significant effects of flock, breed, month within flock, dry therapy, milking type and installation, and logSCC on logTBC. Flock and month within flock were important variation factors as they accounted for 22.0 and 22.1% of the variance, respectively. Considerable repeatability values were obtained for both random factors. Hand milking and bucket-milking machines elicited highest logTBC (5.31), whereas parlor systems with looped milkline (5.01) elicited the lowest logTBC. The implementation of dry therapy practice (5.12) showed significantly lower logTBC than when not used (5.25). Variability in logTBC among breeds ranged from 5.24 (Awassi) to 5.07 (Churra). However, clinical outbreaks of contagious agalactia did not increase TBC significantly. A statistically significant relationship was found between logTBC and logSCC, the correlation coefficient between the variables being r = 0.23. Programs for improving milk hygiene should be implemented for both total bacterial count and somatic cell count variables at the same time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72117-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16428623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteria ; breed differences ; bulk milk ; bulk tank milk ; Cell Count ; Colony Count, Microbial ; dairy animals ; ewe milk ; ewes ; Female ; Mastitis - diagnosis ; Mastitis - microbiology ; Mastitis - veterinary ; Milk - cytology ; Milk - microbiology ; milk quality ; milk tanks ; milking ; milking parlors ; Mycoplasma agalactiae ; Mycoplasma Infections - diagnosis ; Mycoplasma Infections - veterinary ; plate count ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sheep ; Sheep Diseases - diagnosis ; Sheep Diseases - microbiology ; Species Specificity ; total bacterial count</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2006-02, Vol.89 (2), p.549-552</ispartof><rights>2006 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Dairy Science Association Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-3b4821b111ea24d1befee703a90f35fbd3f7e365ad9e5b295d4324c05657420c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-3b4821b111ea24d1befee703a90f35fbd3f7e365ad9e5b295d4324c05657420c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030206721178$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16428623$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonzalo, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carriedo, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beneitez, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juárez, M.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De La Fuente, L.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Primitivo, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Short Communication: Bulk Tank Total Bacterial Count in Dairy Sheep: Factors of Variation and Relationship with Somatic Cell Count</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>A total of 9,353 records for bulk tank total bacterial count (TBC) were obtained over 1 yr from 315 dairy ewe flocks belonging to the Sheep Improvement Consortium (CPO) in Castilla-León (Spain). Analysis of variance showed significant effects of flock, breed, month within flock, dry therapy, milking type and installation, and logSCC on logTBC. Flock and month within flock were important variation factors as they accounted for 22.0 and 22.1% of the variance, respectively. Considerable repeatability values were obtained for both random factors. Hand milking and bucket-milking machines elicited highest logTBC (5.31), whereas parlor systems with looped milkline (5.01) elicited the lowest logTBC. The implementation of dry therapy practice (5.12) showed significantly lower logTBC than when not used (5.25). Variability in logTBC among breeds ranged from 5.24 (Awassi) to 5.07 (Churra). However, clinical outbreaks of contagious agalactia did not increase TBC significantly. A statistically significant relationship was found between logTBC and logSCC, the correlation coefficient between the variables being r = 0.23. Programs for improving milk hygiene should be implemented for both total bacterial count and somatic cell count variables at the same time.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>breed differences</subject><subject>bulk milk</subject><subject>bulk tank milk</subject><subject>Cell Count</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>dairy animals</subject><subject>ewe milk</subject><subject>ewes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Mastitis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mastitis - microbiology</subject><subject>Mastitis - veterinary</subject><subject>Milk - cytology</subject><subject>Milk - microbiology</subject><subject>milk quality</subject><subject>milk tanks</subject><subject>milking</subject><subject>milking parlors</subject><subject>Mycoplasma agalactiae</subject><subject>Mycoplasma Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mycoplasma Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>plate count</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sheep Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sheep Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>total bacterial count</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURi0EokPhL4CpBIJFih9x4nRHAwWkSkikZWs5zk3jIYkHO6Hqll-OMxmBxAY2fp77-XEQek7JKaeZfLNtwmlFCGMJ4YS9ItnrnFGaJ_Ie2lDBRMJpIe-jzW_kCD0KYRunlBHxEB3RLGUyY3yDflad8xMu3TDMozV6sm48w-dz_w1f6TE2btI9PtdmAm_jqHTzOGE74nfa-jtcdQC7M3wR950P2LX4q47ckoL12OAv0O8nobM7fGunDlduiCsGl9Af0h6jB63uAzw59Mfo-uL9Vfkxufz84VP59jIxgssp4XUqGa0ppaBZ2tAaWoCccF2Qlou2bnibA8-EbgoQNStEk3KWGiIykaeMGH6MXq65O---zxAmNdhg4jX0CG4OKicxbfmVf4G0KATLxAKe_AVu3ezH-IjICEmyXOYRKlbIeBeCh1btvB20v1OUqEWnijrVXqdaXCmSqb1OJWPt08MBcz1A86fy4C8CL1agszfdrfWgwqD7PuJ0iZWFYkqkReSerVyrndI33gZ1XTFCOaFEEM5JJMqVgKjghwWvgrEwGmhiqplU4-x_XPgXnjDH5A</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Gonzalo, C.</creator><creator>Carriedo, J.A.</creator><creator>Beneitez, E.</creator><creator>Juárez, M.T.</creator><creator>De La Fuente, L.F.</creator><creator>San Primitivo, F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Short Communication: Bulk Tank Total Bacterial Count in Dairy Sheep: Factors of Variation and Relationship with Somatic Cell Count</title><author>Gonzalo, C. ; Carriedo, J.A. ; Beneitez, E. ; Juárez, M.T. ; De La Fuente, L.F. ; San Primitivo, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-3b4821b111ea24d1befee703a90f35fbd3f7e365ad9e5b295d4324c05657420c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>breed differences</topic><topic>bulk milk</topic><topic>bulk tank milk</topic><topic>Cell Count</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>dairy animals</topic><topic>ewe milk</topic><topic>ewes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Mastitis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mastitis - microbiology</topic><topic>Mastitis - veterinary</topic><topic>Milk - cytology</topic><topic>Milk - microbiology</topic><topic>milk quality</topic><topic>milk tanks</topic><topic>milking</topic><topic>milking parlors</topic><topic>Mycoplasma agalactiae</topic><topic>Mycoplasma Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mycoplasma Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>plate count</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sheep Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sheep Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>total bacterial count</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonzalo, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carriedo, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beneitez, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juárez, M.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De La Fuente, L.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Primitivo, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonzalo, C.</au><au>Carriedo, J.A.</au><au>Beneitez, E.</au><au>Juárez, M.T.</au><au>De La Fuente, L.F.</au><au>San Primitivo, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short Communication: Bulk Tank Total Bacterial Count in Dairy Sheep: Factors of Variation and Relationship with Somatic Cell Count</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>549</spage><epage>552</epage><pages>549-552</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>A total of 9,353 records for bulk tank total bacterial count (TBC) were obtained over 1 yr from 315 dairy ewe flocks belonging to the Sheep Improvement Consortium (CPO) in Castilla-León (Spain). Analysis of variance showed significant effects of flock, breed, month within flock, dry therapy, milking type and installation, and logSCC on logTBC. Flock and month within flock were important variation factors as they accounted for 22.0 and 22.1% of the variance, respectively. Considerable repeatability values were obtained for both random factors. Hand milking and bucket-milking machines elicited highest logTBC (5.31), whereas parlor systems with looped milkline (5.01) elicited the lowest logTBC. The implementation of dry therapy practice (5.12) showed significantly lower logTBC than when not used (5.25). Variability in logTBC among breeds ranged from 5.24 (Awassi) to 5.07 (Churra). However, clinical outbreaks of contagious agalactia did not increase TBC significantly. A statistically significant relationship was found between logTBC and logSCC, the correlation coefficient between the variables being r = 0.23. Programs for improving milk hygiene should be implemented for both total bacterial count and somatic cell count variables at the same time.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16428623</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72117-8</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0302 |
ispartof | Journal of dairy science, 2006-02, Vol.89 (2), p.549-552 |
issn | 0022-0302 1525-3198 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70703862 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals; EZB Free E-Journals |
subjects | Animals Bacteria breed differences bulk milk bulk tank milk Cell Count Colony Count, Microbial dairy animals ewe milk ewes Female Mastitis - diagnosis Mastitis - microbiology Mastitis - veterinary Milk - cytology Milk - microbiology milk quality milk tanks milking milking parlors Mycoplasma agalactiae Mycoplasma Infections - diagnosis Mycoplasma Infections - veterinary plate count Reproducibility of Results Sheep Sheep Diseases - diagnosis Sheep Diseases - microbiology Species Specificity total bacterial count |
title | Short Communication: Bulk Tank Total Bacterial Count in Dairy Sheep: Factors of Variation and Relationship with Somatic Cell Count |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A11%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short%20Communication:%20Bulk%20Tank%20Total%20Bacterial%20Count%20in%20Dairy%20Sheep:%20Factors%20of%20Variation%20and%20Relationship%20with%20Somatic%20Cell%20Count&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Gonzalo,%20C.&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=549&rft.epage=552&rft.pages=549-552&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72117-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1003884201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-3b4821b111ea24d1befee703a90f35fbd3f7e365ad9e5b295d4324c05657420c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195806787&rft_id=info:pmid/16428623&rfr_iscdi=true |