Report of the National Consensus Conference on Family Presence During Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Procedures

• Published in: Journal of emergency nursing 2006-02, Vol.32 (1), p.23-29
• Main Authors: Parkman Henderson, Deborah, Knapp, Jane F.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Attitude of Health Personnel; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - psychology; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards; Child; Delphi Technique; Dissent and Disputes; Emergency Medicine - education; Emergency Medicine - organization & administration; Emergency Nursing - education; Emergency Nursing - organization & administration; Family - psychology; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Nurse's Role; Nursing; Nursing Assessment; Patient Care Team - organization & administration; Patient Transfer - standards; Pediatrics - education; Pediatrics - organization & administration; Professional-Family Relations; Safety Management - organization & administration; Social Support; Societies, Scientific; Surveys and Questionnaires; Transportation of Patients - standards; Visitors to Patients - psychology
• ISSN: 0099-1767; 1527-2966
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2005.11.009

Representatives from 18 national organizations were convened for a conference to develop recommendations regarding family presence (FP) during pediatric procedures and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Before the conference, invitees were given a questionnaire and provided with current literature regarding FP. A modified Delphi process was used to develop consensus, including use of multiple questionnaires and breakouts for discussion of specific issues. Participants were encouraged to develop consensus recommendations based on the literature and discussions. Changes in attitude were tracked with repeat questionnaires. Results of the conference were circulated to participants for review and revision. Consensus recommendations include (1) consider FP as an option for families during pediatric procedures and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (2) offer FP as an option after assessing factors that could adversely affect the interaction, (3) if family is not offered the option for FP, document the reasons why, (4) always consider the safety of the health care team, (5) develop in-hospital transport and transfer policies and procedures for FP, such as family member definition, preparation of the family, handling disagreements, and providing support for the staff, (6) obtain legal review of policies, (7) include education in FP in all core curricula and orientation for health care providers, (8) promote research into best methods for education; effects of FP on patients, family, and staff; best practices for FP; and legal issues regarding FP, among others. These recommendations were approved in concept by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Ambulatory Pediatrics Association.