Loading…
Calibration Choice, Rate Smoothing, and the Pattern of Tetrapod Diversification According to the Long Nuclear Gene RAG-1
A phylogeny of tetrapods is inferred from nearly complete sequences of the nuclear RAG-1 gene sampled across 88 taxa encompassing all major clades, analyzed via parsimony and Bayesian methods. The phylogeny provides support for Lissamphibia, Theria, Lepidosauria, a turtle-archosaur clade, as well as...
Saved in:
Published in: | Systematic biology 2007-08, Vol.56 (4), p.543-563 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a555t-ec5bf31627de3133da25ac4cf9d0e1e0d8417c856f16609b6e833d28aede21ab3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a555t-ec5bf31627de3133da25ac4cf9d0e1e0d8417c856f16609b6e833d28aede21ab3 |
container_end_page | 563 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 543 |
container_title | Systematic biology |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Hugall, Andrew F. Foster, Ralph Lee, Michael S. Y. Hedin, Marshal |
description | A phylogeny of tetrapods is inferred from nearly complete sequences of the nuclear RAG-1 gene sampled across 88 taxa encompassing all major clades, analyzed via parsimony and Bayesian methods. The phylogeny provides support for Lissamphibia, Theria, Lepidosauria, a turtle-archosaur clade, as well as most traditionally accepted groupings. This tree allows simultaneous molecular clock dating for all tetrapod groups using a set of well-corroborated calibrations. Relaxed clock (PLRS) methods, using the amniote = 315 Mya (million years ago) calibration or a set of consistent calibrations, recovers reasonable divergence dates for most groups. However, the analysis systematically underestimates divergence dates within archosaurs. The bird-crocodile split, robustly documented in the fossil record as being around ∼ 245 Mya, is estimated at only ∼ 190 Mya, and dates for other divergences within archosaurs are similarly underestimated. Archosaurs, and particulary turtles have slow apparent rates possibly confounding rate modeling, and inclusion of calibrations within archosaurs (despite their high deviances) not only improves divergence estimates within archosaurs, but also across other groups. Notably, the monotreme-therian split (∼ 210 Mya) matches the fossil record; the squamate radiation (∼ 190 Mya) is younger than suggested by some recent molecular studies and inconsistent with identification of ∼ 220 and ∼ 165 Myo (million-year-old) fossils as acrodont iguanians and ∼ 95 Myo fossils colubroid snakes; the bird-lizard (reptile) split is considerably older than fossil estimates (≤ 285 Mya); and Sphenodon is a remarkable phylogenetic relic, being the sole survivor of a lineage more than a quarter of a billion years old. Comparison with other molecular clock studies of tetrapod divergences suggests that the common practice of enforcing most calibrations as minima, with a single liberal maximal constraint, will systematically overestimate divergence dates. Similarly, saturation of mitochondrial DNA sequences, and the resultant greater compression of basal branches means that using only external deep calibrations will also lead to inflated age estimates within the focal ingroup. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10635150701477825 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70760582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20143064</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1080/10635150701477825</oup_id><sourcerecordid>20143064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a555t-ec5bf31627de3133da25ac4cf9d0e1e0d8417c856f16609b6e833d28aede21ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSMEon_gA3AAWRx62oAnju3scbXQLWgFqC1SxcVy7AnrJRsvtoPKt8clqyLBhdOM9H7vaTSvKJ4BfQW0oa-BCsaBU0mhlrKp-IPiGKgUZcPEzcO7XbAyA_KoOIlxSymA4PC4OAIpeM0EHBe3S927Nujk_ECWG-8MzsilTkiudt6njRu-zogeLEkbJJ90ShgG4jtyjSnovbfkjfuBIbrOmSljYYwPNttI8r9Na5_3D6PpUQeywgHJ5WJVwpPiUaf7iE8P87T4fP72enlRrj-u3i0X61JzzlOJhrcdA1FJiwwYs7ri2tSmm1uKgNQ2NUjTcNGBEHTeCmwyVDUaLVagW3ZanE25--C_jxiT2rlosO_1gH6MSuZ_Ud5UGXz5F7j1YxjybQrmtWxA1iJDMEEm-BgDdmof3E6HnwqouutE_dNJ9rw4BI_tDu0fx6GEDMwmwI_7_8p7PuHbmHy4N1QZYFTUWS8n3cWEt_e6Dt-UkExydXHzRV2t4BzW_L2as1_wwaqy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194781746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calibration Choice, Rate Smoothing, and the Pattern of Tetrapod Diversification According to the Long Nuclear Gene RAG-1</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Hugall, Andrew F. ; Foster, Ralph ; Lee, Michael S. Y. ; Hedin, Marshal</creator><contributor>Hedin, Marshal</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hugall, Andrew F. ; Foster, Ralph ; Lee, Michael S. Y. ; Hedin, Marshal ; Hedin, Marshal</creatorcontrib><description>A phylogeny of tetrapods is inferred from nearly complete sequences of the nuclear RAG-1 gene sampled across 88 taxa encompassing all major clades, analyzed via parsimony and Bayesian methods. The phylogeny provides support for Lissamphibia, Theria, Lepidosauria, a turtle-archosaur clade, as well as most traditionally accepted groupings. This tree allows simultaneous molecular clock dating for all tetrapod groups using a set of well-corroborated calibrations. Relaxed clock (PLRS) methods, using the amniote = 315 Mya (million years ago) calibration or a set of consistent calibrations, recovers reasonable divergence dates for most groups. However, the analysis systematically underestimates divergence dates within archosaurs. The bird-crocodile split, robustly documented in the fossil record as being around ∼ 245 Mya, is estimated at only ∼ 190 Mya, and dates for other divergences within archosaurs are similarly underestimated. Archosaurs, and particulary turtles have slow apparent rates possibly confounding rate modeling, and inclusion of calibrations within archosaurs (despite their high deviances) not only improves divergence estimates within archosaurs, but also across other groups. Notably, the monotreme-therian split (∼ 210 Mya) matches the fossil record; the squamate radiation (∼ 190 Mya) is younger than suggested by some recent molecular studies and inconsistent with identification of ∼ 220 and ∼ 165 Myo (million-year-old) fossils as acrodont iguanians and ∼ 95 Myo fossils colubroid snakes; the bird-lizard (reptile) split is considerably older than fossil estimates (≤ 285 Mya); and Sphenodon is a remarkable phylogenetic relic, being the sole survivor of a lineage more than a quarter of a billion years old. Comparison with other molecular clock studies of tetrapod divergences suggests that the common practice of enforcing most calibrations as minima, with a single liberal maximal constraint, will systematically overestimate divergence dates. Similarly, saturation of mitochondrial DNA sequences, and the resultant greater compression of basal branches means that using only external deep calibrations will also lead to inflated age estimates within the focal ingroup.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-5157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1076-836X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10635150701477825</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17654361</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Society of Systematic Zoology</publisher><subject>Amino acids ; Amniota ; Amphibians - genetics ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Birds - genetics ; Calibration ; cross-validation ; Estimates ; Evolution ; fossil calibration ; Fossils ; Genetics ; Homeodomain Proteins - genetics ; Hypotheses ; Mammals ; Mammals - genetics ; Marsupials ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Nucleotides ; penalized likelihood rate smoothing ; Phylogeny ; relaxed-clock ; Reptiles ; Reptiles - genetics ; Reptilia ; Research methodology ; Taxa ; tetrapod phylogeny. RAG-1 ; Time Factors ; Turtles</subject><ispartof>Systematic biology, 2007-08, Vol.56 (4), p.543-563</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Society of Systematic Biologists</rights><rights>2007 Society of Systematic Biologists 2007</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Systematic Biologists Aug 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a555t-ec5bf31627de3133da25ac4cf9d0e1e0d8417c856f16609b6e833d28aede21ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a555t-ec5bf31627de3133da25ac4cf9d0e1e0d8417c856f16609b6e833d28aede21ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20143064$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20143064$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17654361$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hedin, Marshal</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hugall, Andrew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Michael S. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedin, Marshal</creatorcontrib><title>Calibration Choice, Rate Smoothing, and the Pattern of Tetrapod Diversification According to the Long Nuclear Gene RAG-1</title><title>Systematic biology</title><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><description>A phylogeny of tetrapods is inferred from nearly complete sequences of the nuclear RAG-1 gene sampled across 88 taxa encompassing all major clades, analyzed via parsimony and Bayesian methods. The phylogeny provides support for Lissamphibia, Theria, Lepidosauria, a turtle-archosaur clade, as well as most traditionally accepted groupings. This tree allows simultaneous molecular clock dating for all tetrapod groups using a set of well-corroborated calibrations. Relaxed clock (PLRS) methods, using the amniote = 315 Mya (million years ago) calibration or a set of consistent calibrations, recovers reasonable divergence dates for most groups. However, the analysis systematically underestimates divergence dates within archosaurs. The bird-crocodile split, robustly documented in the fossil record as being around ∼ 245 Mya, is estimated at only ∼ 190 Mya, and dates for other divergences within archosaurs are similarly underestimated. Archosaurs, and particulary turtles have slow apparent rates possibly confounding rate modeling, and inclusion of calibrations within archosaurs (despite their high deviances) not only improves divergence estimates within archosaurs, but also across other groups. Notably, the monotreme-therian split (∼ 210 Mya) matches the fossil record; the squamate radiation (∼ 190 Mya) is younger than suggested by some recent molecular studies and inconsistent with identification of ∼ 220 and ∼ 165 Myo (million-year-old) fossils as acrodont iguanians and ∼ 95 Myo fossils colubroid snakes; the bird-lizard (reptile) split is considerably older than fossil estimates (≤ 285 Mya); and Sphenodon is a remarkable phylogenetic relic, being the sole survivor of a lineage more than a quarter of a billion years old. Comparison with other molecular clock studies of tetrapod divergences suggests that the common practice of enforcing most calibrations as minima, with a single liberal maximal constraint, will systematically overestimate divergence dates. Similarly, saturation of mitochondrial DNA sequences, and the resultant greater compression of basal branches means that using only external deep calibrations will also lead to inflated age estimates within the focal ingroup.</description><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Amniota</subject><subject>Amphibians - genetics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Birds - genetics</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>cross-validation</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>fossil calibration</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Homeodomain Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Mammals - genetics</subject><subject>Marsupials</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Nucleotides</subject><subject>penalized likelihood rate smoothing</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>relaxed-clock</subject><subject>Reptiles</subject><subject>Reptiles - genetics</subject><subject>Reptilia</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>tetrapod phylogeny. RAG-1</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><issn>1063-5157</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSMEon_gA3AAWRx62oAnju3scbXQLWgFqC1SxcVy7AnrJRsvtoPKt8clqyLBhdOM9H7vaTSvKJ4BfQW0oa-BCsaBU0mhlrKp-IPiGKgUZcPEzcO7XbAyA_KoOIlxSymA4PC4OAIpeM0EHBe3S927Nujk_ECWG-8MzsilTkiudt6njRu-zogeLEkbJJ90ShgG4jtyjSnovbfkjfuBIbrOmSljYYwPNttI8r9Na5_3D6PpUQeywgHJ5WJVwpPiUaf7iE8P87T4fP72enlRrj-u3i0X61JzzlOJhrcdA1FJiwwYs7ri2tSmm1uKgNQ2NUjTcNGBEHTeCmwyVDUaLVagW3ZanE25--C_jxiT2rlosO_1gH6MSuZ_Ud5UGXz5F7j1YxjybQrmtWxA1iJDMEEm-BgDdmof3E6HnwqouutE_dNJ9rw4BI_tDu0fx6GEDMwmwI_7_8p7PuHbmHy4N1QZYFTUWS8n3cWEt_e6Dt-UkExydXHzRV2t4BzW_L2as1_wwaqy</recordid><startdate>200708</startdate><enddate>200708</enddate><creator>Hugall, Andrew F.</creator><creator>Foster, Ralph</creator><creator>Lee, Michael S. Y.</creator><creator>Hedin, Marshal</creator><general>Society of Systematic Zoology</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200708</creationdate><title>Calibration Choice, Rate Smoothing, and the Pattern of Tetrapod Diversification According to the Long Nuclear Gene RAG-1</title><author>Hugall, Andrew F. ; Foster, Ralph ; Lee, Michael S. Y. ; Hedin, Marshal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a555t-ec5bf31627de3133da25ac4cf9d0e1e0d8417c856f16609b6e833d28aede21ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Amniota</topic><topic>Amphibians - genetics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Birds - genetics</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>cross-validation</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>fossil calibration</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Homeodomain Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Mammals - genetics</topic><topic>Marsupials</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Nucleotides</topic><topic>penalized likelihood rate smoothing</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>relaxed-clock</topic><topic>Reptiles</topic><topic>Reptiles - genetics</topic><topic>Reptilia</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>tetrapod phylogeny. RAG-1</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hugall, Andrew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Michael S. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedin, Marshal</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hugall, Andrew F.</au><au>Foster, Ralph</au><au>Lee, Michael S. Y.</au><au>Hedin, Marshal</au><au>Hedin, Marshal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calibration Choice, Rate Smoothing, and the Pattern of Tetrapod Diversification According to the Long Nuclear Gene RAG-1</atitle><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><date>2007-08</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>563</epage><pages>543-563</pages><issn>1063-5157</issn><eissn>1076-836X</eissn><abstract>A phylogeny of tetrapods is inferred from nearly complete sequences of the nuclear RAG-1 gene sampled across 88 taxa encompassing all major clades, analyzed via parsimony and Bayesian methods. The phylogeny provides support for Lissamphibia, Theria, Lepidosauria, a turtle-archosaur clade, as well as most traditionally accepted groupings. This tree allows simultaneous molecular clock dating for all tetrapod groups using a set of well-corroborated calibrations. Relaxed clock (PLRS) methods, using the amniote = 315 Mya (million years ago) calibration or a set of consistent calibrations, recovers reasonable divergence dates for most groups. However, the analysis systematically underestimates divergence dates within archosaurs. The bird-crocodile split, robustly documented in the fossil record as being around ∼ 245 Mya, is estimated at only ∼ 190 Mya, and dates for other divergences within archosaurs are similarly underestimated. Archosaurs, and particulary turtles have slow apparent rates possibly confounding rate modeling, and inclusion of calibrations within archosaurs (despite their high deviances) not only improves divergence estimates within archosaurs, but also across other groups. Notably, the monotreme-therian split (∼ 210 Mya) matches the fossil record; the squamate radiation (∼ 190 Mya) is younger than suggested by some recent molecular studies and inconsistent with identification of ∼ 220 and ∼ 165 Myo (million-year-old) fossils as acrodont iguanians and ∼ 95 Myo fossils colubroid snakes; the bird-lizard (reptile) split is considerably older than fossil estimates (≤ 285 Mya); and Sphenodon is a remarkable phylogenetic relic, being the sole survivor of a lineage more than a quarter of a billion years old. Comparison with other molecular clock studies of tetrapod divergences suggests that the common practice of enforcing most calibrations as minima, with a single liberal maximal constraint, will systematically overestimate divergence dates. Similarly, saturation of mitochondrial DNA sequences, and the resultant greater compression of basal branches means that using only external deep calibrations will also lead to inflated age estimates within the focal ingroup.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Society of Systematic Zoology</pub><pmid>17654361</pmid><doi>10.1080/10635150701477825</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1063-5157 |
ispartof | Systematic biology, 2007-08, Vol.56 (4), p.543-563 |
issn | 1063-5157 1076-836X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70760582 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Amino acids Amniota Amphibians - genetics Animals Biodiversity Birds - genetics Calibration cross-validation Estimates Evolution fossil calibration Fossils Genetics Homeodomain Proteins - genetics Hypotheses Mammals Mammals - genetics Marsupials Mitochondrial DNA Nucleotides penalized likelihood rate smoothing Phylogeny relaxed-clock Reptiles Reptiles - genetics Reptilia Research methodology Taxa tetrapod phylogeny. RAG-1 Time Factors Turtles |
title | Calibration Choice, Rate Smoothing, and the Pattern of Tetrapod Diversification According to the Long Nuclear Gene RAG-1 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A42%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calibration%20Choice,%20Rate%20Smoothing,%20and%20the%20Pattern%20of%20Tetrapod%20Diversification%20According%20to%20the%20Long%20Nuclear%20Gene%20RAG-1&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20biology&rft.au=Hugall,%20Andrew%20F.&rft.date=2007-08&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=563&rft.pages=543-563&rft.issn=1063-5157&rft.eissn=1076-836X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10635150701477825&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20143064%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a555t-ec5bf31627de3133da25ac4cf9d0e1e0d8417c856f16609b6e833d28aede21ab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194781746&rft_id=info:pmid/17654361&rft_jstor_id=20143064&rft_oup_id=10.1080/10635150701477825&rfr_iscdi=true |