Loading…
Immune response to autologous transfusion in healthy volunteers: WB versus packed RBCs and FFP
BACKGROUND: Storage of blood as packed RBCs and FFP is standard practice in allogeneic transfusion. Separation into components has been proposed for autologous transfusion, as well, but beneficial effects have not yet been shown. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty‐four healthy male volunteers were ran...
Saved in:
Published in: | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2001-04, Vol.41 (4), p.470-476 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | BACKGROUND: Storage of blood as packed RBCs and FFP is standard practice in allogeneic transfusion. Separation into components has been proposed for autologous transfusion, as well, but beneficial effects have not yet been shown.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty‐four healthy male volunteers were randomly assigned to receive 1 unit of either autologous RBCs and FFP (RCP group) or WB (WB group) after 49 or 35 days of storage, respectively. The immune response was analyzed by ELISA for IL‐6, C3a, terminal complement complex SC5b‐9, TNF‐α, and neopterin. Differential WBC counts and the phagocytosis of neutrophils and monocytes were measured by flow cytometry.
RESULTS: Cell counts of monocytes (0.85 × 103 ng/mL) and neutrophils (6.9 × 103 ng/mL) increased 30 minutes after WB transfusion and then returned to close to the baseline values seen in the RCP group (0.47 and 2.9 × 103 ng/mL, respectively) throughout the monitored period (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0041-1132 1537-2995 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41040470.x |