Increased Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Risk Score in Dementia Caregivers Relative to Non-Caregiving Controls

• Published in: Gerontology (Basel) 2008-01, Vol.54 (3), p.131-137
• Main Authors: von Känel, Roland, Mausbach, Brent T., Patterson, Thomas L., Dimsdale, Joel E., Aschbacher, Kirstin, Mills, Paul J., Ziegler, Michael G., Ancoli-Israel, Sonia, Grant, Igor
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Biological and medical sciences; Cardiovascular disease; Caregivers; Caregivers - psychology; Case-Control Studies; Clinical Section; Coronary Disease - etiology; Dementia; Dementia - complications; Dementia - psychology; Dementia - therapy; Development. Metamorphosis. Moult. Ageing; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Gerontology; Health Behavior; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Older people; Risk Assessment; Socioeconomic Factors; Stress, Psychological; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
• ISSN: 0304-324X; 1423-0003
• DOI: 10.1159/000113649

Background: Elderly individuals who provide care to a spouse suffering from dementia bear an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Objective: To test the hypothesis that the Framingham CHD Risk Score would be higher in dementia caregivers relative to non-caregiving controls. Methods: We investigated 64 caregivers providing in-home care for their spouse with Alzheimer’s disease and 41 gender-matched non-caregiving controls. All subjects (mean age 70 ± 8 years, 75% women, 93% Caucasian) had a negative history of CHD and cerebrovascular disease. The original Framingham CHD Risk Score was computed adding up categorical scores for age, blood lipids, blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking with adjustment made for sex. Results: The average CHD risk score was higher in caregivers than in controls even when co-varying for socioeconomic status, health habits, medication, and psychological distress (8.0 ± 2.9 vs. 6.3 ± 3.0 points, p = 0.013). The difference showed a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.57). A relatively higher blood pressure in caregivers than in controls made the greatest contribution to this difference. The probability (area under the receiver operator curve) that a randomly selected caregiver had a greater CHD risk score than a randomly selected non-caregiver was 65.5%. Conclusions: Based on the Framingham CHD Risk Score, the potential to develop overt CHD in the following 10 years was predicted to be greater in dementia caregivers than in non-caregiving controls. The magnitude of the difference in the CHD risk between caregivers and controls appears to be clinically relevant. Clinicians may want to monitor caregiving status as a routine part of standard evaluation of their elderly patients’ cardiovascular risk.