Loading…
Clinical Breast and Pelvic Examination Requirements for Hormonal Contraception: Current Practice vs Evidence
Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prior to provision of hormonal contraception. Such examinations, however, may reduce access to highly effective contraceptive methods, and may therefore increase women's overall health risks. These unnecessary requirements...
Saved in:
Published in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2001-05, Vol.285 (17), p.2232-2239 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 2239 |
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 2232 |
container_title | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association |
container_volume | 285 |
creator | Stewart, Felicia H Harper, Cynthia C Ellertson, Charlotte E Grimes, David A Sawaya, George F Trussell, James |
description | Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prior to provision of hormonal contraception. Such examinations, however, may reduce access to highly effective contraceptive methods, and may therefore increase women's overall health risks. These unnecessary requirements also involve ethical considerations and unwittingly reinforce the widely held but incorrect perception that hormonal contraceptive methods are dangerous.This article reviews and summarizes the relevant medical literature and policy statements from major organizations active in the field of contraception. Consensus developed during the last decade supports a change in practice: hormonal contraception can safely be provided based on careful review of medical history and blood pressure measurement. For most women, no further evaluation is necessary. Pelvic and breast examinations and screening for cervical neoplasia and sexually transmitted infection, while important in their own right, do not provide information necessary for identifying women who should avoid hormonal contraceptives or who need further evaluation before making a decision about their use. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jama.285.17.2232 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70815076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>193803</ama_id><sourcerecordid>72220134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a280t-1f50ef0aa0bfa6a58a1ff517d57194dad44f3dc700de04bb6980001dd7d067603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0VFr2zAQB3AxWta063v7UkQHe7N3sixL7ltn0mZQWBnrs7lYEijYcirZYf32VUi2wYRAcPx0cP8j5IpBzgDY1w0OmBdK5EzmRcGLD2TBBFcZF7U6IQuAWmWyVOUZOY9xA-kwLj-SM8Z4IdJdkL7pnXcd9vRbMBgnil7TZ9PvXEeXv3FwHic3evrTvM4umMH4KVI7BroawzD69K8Z_RSwM9u9u6PNHEJC9DnVJtcZuot0uXPa-M58IqcW-2guj-8FeXlY_mpW2dOPx-_N_VOGhYIpY1aAsYAIa4sVCoXMWsGkFpLVpUZdlpbrTgJoA-V6XdVqP5nWUkMlK-AX5Muh7zaMr7OJUzu42Jm-R2_GObYSFBMgqwRv_4ObcQ5pqtgWKSMhRLlHN0c0rwej221wA4a39k-ICXw-AowpSRvQdy7-dXVVpN0kdX1QaWf_etRcAefv0E-JUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211355546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Breast and Pelvic Examination Requirements for Hormonal Contraception: Current Practice vs Evidence</title><source>American Medical Association Current Titles</source><creator>Stewart, Felicia H ; Harper, Cynthia C ; Ellertson, Charlotte E ; Grimes, David A ; Sawaya, George F ; Trussell, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Felicia H ; Harper, Cynthia C ; Ellertson, Charlotte E ; Grimes, David A ; Sawaya, George F ; Trussell, James</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prior to provision of hormonal contraception. Such examinations, however, may reduce access to highly effective contraceptive methods, and may therefore increase women's overall health risks. These unnecessary requirements also involve ethical considerations and unwittingly reinforce the widely held but incorrect perception that hormonal contraceptive methods are dangerous.This article reviews and summarizes the relevant medical literature and policy statements from major organizations active in the field of contraception. Consensus developed during the last decade supports a change in practice: hormonal contraception can safely be provided based on careful review of medical history and blood pressure measurement. For most women, no further evaluation is necessary. Pelvic and breast examinations and screening for cervical neoplasia and sexually transmitted infection, while important in their own right, do not provide information necessary for identifying women who should avoid hormonal contraceptives or who need further evaluation before making a decision about their use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.17.2232</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11325325</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMAAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Contraception - standards ; Contraceptive Agents, Female ; Contraindications ; Decision Making ; Estrogens ; Ethics ; Female ; Genital Diseases, Female - diagnosis ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Hormonal contraception ; Humans ; Medical History Taking ; Medical sciences ; Medical screening ; Physical Examination ; Physical examinations ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prescriptions ; Progesterone Congeners ; Progestins ; Risk ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Women</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2001-05, Vol.285 (17), p.2232-2239</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Medical Association May 2, 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=962223$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11325325$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Felicia H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, Cynthia C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellertson, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawaya, George F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trussell, James</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Breast and Pelvic Examination Requirements for Hormonal Contraception: Current Practice vs Evidence</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prior to provision of hormonal contraception. Such examinations, however, may reduce access to highly effective contraceptive methods, and may therefore increase women's overall health risks. These unnecessary requirements also involve ethical considerations and unwittingly reinforce the widely held but incorrect perception that hormonal contraceptive methods are dangerous.This article reviews and summarizes the relevant medical literature and policy statements from major organizations active in the field of contraception. Consensus developed during the last decade supports a change in practice: hormonal contraception can safely be provided based on careful review of medical history and blood pressure measurement. For most women, no further evaluation is necessary. Pelvic and breast examinations and screening for cervical neoplasia and sexually transmitted infection, while important in their own right, do not provide information necessary for identifying women who should avoid hormonal contraceptives or who need further evaluation before making a decision about their use.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Contraception - standards</subject><subject>Contraceptive Agents, Female</subject><subject>Contraindications</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Estrogens</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital Diseases, Female - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Hormonal contraception</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical History Taking</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Physical Examination</subject><subject>Physical examinations</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Progesterone Congeners</subject><subject>Progestins</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0VFr2zAQB3AxWta063v7UkQHe7N3sixL7ltn0mZQWBnrs7lYEijYcirZYf32VUi2wYRAcPx0cP8j5IpBzgDY1w0OmBdK5EzmRcGLD2TBBFcZF7U6IQuAWmWyVOUZOY9xA-kwLj-SM8Z4IdJdkL7pnXcd9vRbMBgnil7TZ9PvXEeXv3FwHic3evrTvM4umMH4KVI7BroawzD69K8Z_RSwM9u9u6PNHEJC9DnVJtcZuot0uXPa-M58IqcW-2guj-8FeXlY_mpW2dOPx-_N_VOGhYIpY1aAsYAIa4sVCoXMWsGkFpLVpUZdlpbrTgJoA-V6XdVqP5nWUkMlK-AX5Muh7zaMr7OJUzu42Jm-R2_GObYSFBMgqwRv_4ObcQ5pqtgWKSMhRLlHN0c0rwej221wA4a39k-ICXw-AowpSRvQdy7-dXVVpN0kdX1QaWf_etRcAefv0E-JUg</recordid><startdate>20010502</startdate><enddate>20010502</enddate><creator>Stewart, Felicia H</creator><creator>Harper, Cynthia C</creator><creator>Ellertson, Charlotte E</creator><creator>Grimes, David A</creator><creator>Sawaya, George F</creator><creator>Trussell, James</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010502</creationdate><title>Clinical Breast and Pelvic Examination Requirements for Hormonal Contraception: Current Practice vs Evidence</title><author>Stewart, Felicia H ; Harper, Cynthia C ; Ellertson, Charlotte E ; Grimes, David A ; Sawaya, George F ; Trussell, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a280t-1f50ef0aa0bfa6a58a1ff517d57194dad44f3dc700de04bb6980001dd7d067603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Contraception - standards</topic><topic>Contraceptive Agents, Female</topic><topic>Contraindications</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Estrogens</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital Diseases, Female - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Hormonal contraception</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical History Taking</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Physical Examination</topic><topic>Physical examinations</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Progesterone Congeners</topic><topic>Progestins</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Felicia H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, Cynthia C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellertson, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawaya, George F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trussell, James</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stewart, Felicia H</au><au>Harper, Cynthia C</au><au>Ellertson, Charlotte E</au><au>Grimes, David A</au><au>Sawaya, George F</au><au>Trussell, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Breast and Pelvic Examination Requirements for Hormonal Contraception: Current Practice vs Evidence</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2001-05-02</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>285</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>2232</spage><epage>2239</epage><pages>2232-2239</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><coden>JAMAAP</coden><abstract>Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prior to provision of hormonal contraception. Such examinations, however, may reduce access to highly effective contraceptive methods, and may therefore increase women's overall health risks. These unnecessary requirements also involve ethical considerations and unwittingly reinforce the widely held but incorrect perception that hormonal contraceptive methods are dangerous.This article reviews and summarizes the relevant medical literature and policy statements from major organizations active in the field of contraception. Consensus developed during the last decade supports a change in practice: hormonal contraception can safely be provided based on careful review of medical history and blood pressure measurement. For most women, no further evaluation is necessary. Pelvic and breast examinations and screening for cervical neoplasia and sexually transmitted infection, while important in their own right, do not provide information necessary for identifying women who should avoid hormonal contraceptives or who need further evaluation before making a decision about their use.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>11325325</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.285.17.2232</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-7484 |
ispartof | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2001-05, Vol.285 (17), p.2232-2239 |
issn | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70815076 |
source | American Medical Association Current Titles |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences Birth control Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Contraception - standards Contraceptive Agents, Female Contraindications Decision Making Estrogens Ethics Female Genital Diseases, Female - diagnosis Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Hormonal contraception Humans Medical History Taking Medical sciences Medical screening Physical Examination Physical examinations Practice Guidelines as Topic Prescriptions Progesterone Congeners Progestins Risk Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis Women |
title | Clinical Breast and Pelvic Examination Requirements for Hormonal Contraception: Current Practice vs Evidence |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A21%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Breast%20and%20Pelvic%20Examination%20Requirements%20for%20Hormonal%20Contraception:%20Current%20Practice%20vs%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Stewart,%20Felicia%20H&rft.date=2001-05-02&rft.volume=285&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=2232&rft.epage=2239&rft.pages=2232-2239&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft.coden=JAMAAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.285.17.2232&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72220134%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a280t-1f50ef0aa0bfa6a58a1ff517d57194dad44f3dc700de04bb6980001dd7d067603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211355546&rft_id=info:pmid/11325325&rfr_iscdi=true |