Loading…

Clinical Breast and Pelvic Examination Requirements for Hormonal Contraception: Current Practice vs Evidence

Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prior to provision of hormonal contraception. Such examinations, however, may reduce access to highly effective contraceptive methods, and may therefore increase women's overall health risks. These unnecessary requirements...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2001-05, Vol.285 (17), p.2232-2239
Main Authors: Stewart, Felicia H, Harper, Cynthia C, Ellertson, Charlotte E, Grimes, David A, Sawaya, George F, Trussell, James
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 2239
container_issue 17
container_start_page 2232
container_title JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
container_volume 285
creator Stewart, Felicia H
Harper, Cynthia C
Ellertson, Charlotte E
Grimes, David A
Sawaya, George F
Trussell, James
description Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prior to provision of hormonal contraception. Such examinations, however, may reduce access to highly effective contraceptive methods, and may therefore increase women's overall health risks. These unnecessary requirements also involve ethical considerations and unwittingly reinforce the widely held but incorrect perception that hormonal contraceptive methods are dangerous.This article reviews and summarizes the relevant medical literature and policy statements from major organizations active in the field of contraception. Consensus developed during the last decade supports a change in practice: hormonal contraception can safely be provided based on careful review of medical history and blood pressure measurement. For most women, no further evaluation is necessary. Pelvic and breast examinations and screening for cervical neoplasia and sexually transmitted infection, while important in their own right, do not provide information necessary for identifying women who should avoid hormonal contraceptives or who need further evaluation before making a decision about their use.
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jama.285.17.2232
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70815076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>193803</ama_id><sourcerecordid>72220134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a280t-1f50ef0aa0bfa6a58a1ff517d57194dad44f3dc700de04bb6980001dd7d067603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0VFr2zAQB3AxWta063v7UkQHe7N3sixL7ltn0mZQWBnrs7lYEijYcirZYf32VUi2wYRAcPx0cP8j5IpBzgDY1w0OmBdK5EzmRcGLD2TBBFcZF7U6IQuAWmWyVOUZOY9xA-kwLj-SM8Z4IdJdkL7pnXcd9vRbMBgnil7TZ9PvXEeXv3FwHic3evrTvM4umMH4KVI7BroawzD69K8Z_RSwM9u9u6PNHEJC9DnVJtcZuot0uXPa-M58IqcW-2guj-8FeXlY_mpW2dOPx-_N_VOGhYIpY1aAsYAIa4sVCoXMWsGkFpLVpUZdlpbrTgJoA-V6XdVqP5nWUkMlK-AX5Muh7zaMr7OJUzu42Jm-R2_GObYSFBMgqwRv_4ObcQ5pqtgWKSMhRLlHN0c0rwej221wA4a39k-ICXw-AowpSRvQdy7-dXVVpN0kdX1QaWf_etRcAefv0E-JUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211355546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Breast and Pelvic Examination Requirements for Hormonal Contraception: Current Practice vs Evidence</title><source>American Medical Association Current Titles</source><creator>Stewart, Felicia H ; Harper, Cynthia C ; Ellertson, Charlotte E ; Grimes, David A ; Sawaya, George F ; Trussell, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Felicia H ; Harper, Cynthia C ; Ellertson, Charlotte E ; Grimes, David A ; Sawaya, George F ; Trussell, James</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prior to provision of hormonal contraception. Such examinations, however, may reduce access to highly effective contraceptive methods, and may therefore increase women's overall health risks. These unnecessary requirements also involve ethical considerations and unwittingly reinforce the widely held but incorrect perception that hormonal contraceptive methods are dangerous.This article reviews and summarizes the relevant medical literature and policy statements from major organizations active in the field of contraception. Consensus developed during the last decade supports a change in practice: hormonal contraception can safely be provided based on careful review of medical history and blood pressure measurement. For most women, no further evaluation is necessary. Pelvic and breast examinations and screening for cervical neoplasia and sexually transmitted infection, while important in their own right, do not provide information necessary for identifying women who should avoid hormonal contraceptives or who need further evaluation before making a decision about their use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.17.2232</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11325325</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMAAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Contraception - standards ; Contraceptive Agents, Female ; Contraindications ; Decision Making ; Estrogens ; Ethics ; Female ; Genital Diseases, Female - diagnosis ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Hormonal contraception ; Humans ; Medical History Taking ; Medical sciences ; Medical screening ; Physical Examination ; Physical examinations ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prescriptions ; Progesterone Congeners ; Progestins ; Risk ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Women</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2001-05, Vol.285 (17), p.2232-2239</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Medical Association May 2, 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=962223$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11325325$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Felicia H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, Cynthia C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellertson, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawaya, George F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trussell, James</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Breast and Pelvic Examination Requirements for Hormonal Contraception: Current Practice vs Evidence</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prior to provision of hormonal contraception. Such examinations, however, may reduce access to highly effective contraceptive methods, and may therefore increase women's overall health risks. These unnecessary requirements also involve ethical considerations and unwittingly reinforce the widely held but incorrect perception that hormonal contraceptive methods are dangerous.This article reviews and summarizes the relevant medical literature and policy statements from major organizations active in the field of contraception. Consensus developed during the last decade supports a change in practice: hormonal contraception can safely be provided based on careful review of medical history and blood pressure measurement. For most women, no further evaluation is necessary. Pelvic and breast examinations and screening for cervical neoplasia and sexually transmitted infection, while important in their own right, do not provide information necessary for identifying women who should avoid hormonal contraceptives or who need further evaluation before making a decision about their use.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Contraception - standards</subject><subject>Contraceptive Agents, Female</subject><subject>Contraindications</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Estrogens</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital Diseases, Female - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Hormonal contraception</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical History Taking</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Physical Examination</subject><subject>Physical examinations</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Progesterone Congeners</subject><subject>Progestins</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0VFr2zAQB3AxWta063v7UkQHe7N3sixL7ltn0mZQWBnrs7lYEijYcirZYf32VUi2wYRAcPx0cP8j5IpBzgDY1w0OmBdK5EzmRcGLD2TBBFcZF7U6IQuAWmWyVOUZOY9xA-kwLj-SM8Z4IdJdkL7pnXcd9vRbMBgnil7TZ9PvXEeXv3FwHic3evrTvM4umMH4KVI7BroawzD69K8Z_RSwM9u9u6PNHEJC9DnVJtcZuot0uXPa-M58IqcW-2guj-8FeXlY_mpW2dOPx-_N_VOGhYIpY1aAsYAIa4sVCoXMWsGkFpLVpUZdlpbrTgJoA-V6XdVqP5nWUkMlK-AX5Muh7zaMr7OJUzu42Jm-R2_GObYSFBMgqwRv_4ObcQ5pqtgWKSMhRLlHN0c0rwej221wA4a39k-ICXw-AowpSRvQdy7-dXVVpN0kdX1QaWf_etRcAefv0E-JUg</recordid><startdate>20010502</startdate><enddate>20010502</enddate><creator>Stewart, Felicia H</creator><creator>Harper, Cynthia C</creator><creator>Ellertson, Charlotte E</creator><creator>Grimes, David A</creator><creator>Sawaya, George F</creator><creator>Trussell, James</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010502</creationdate><title>Clinical Breast and Pelvic Examination Requirements for Hormonal Contraception: Current Practice vs Evidence</title><author>Stewart, Felicia H ; Harper, Cynthia C ; Ellertson, Charlotte E ; Grimes, David A ; Sawaya, George F ; Trussell, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a280t-1f50ef0aa0bfa6a58a1ff517d57194dad44f3dc700de04bb6980001dd7d067603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Contraception - standards</topic><topic>Contraceptive Agents, Female</topic><topic>Contraindications</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Estrogens</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital Diseases, Female - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Hormonal contraception</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical History Taking</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Physical Examination</topic><topic>Physical examinations</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Progesterone Congeners</topic><topic>Progestins</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Felicia H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, Cynthia C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellertson, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawaya, George F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trussell, James</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stewart, Felicia H</au><au>Harper, Cynthia C</au><au>Ellertson, Charlotte E</au><au>Grimes, David A</au><au>Sawaya, George F</au><au>Trussell, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Breast and Pelvic Examination Requirements for Hormonal Contraception: Current Practice vs Evidence</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2001-05-02</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>285</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>2232</spage><epage>2239</epage><pages>2232-2239</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><coden>JAMAAP</coden><abstract>Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prior to provision of hormonal contraception. Such examinations, however, may reduce access to highly effective contraceptive methods, and may therefore increase women's overall health risks. These unnecessary requirements also involve ethical considerations and unwittingly reinforce the widely held but incorrect perception that hormonal contraceptive methods are dangerous.This article reviews and summarizes the relevant medical literature and policy statements from major organizations active in the field of contraception. Consensus developed during the last decade supports a change in practice: hormonal contraception can safely be provided based on careful review of medical history and blood pressure measurement. For most women, no further evaluation is necessary. Pelvic and breast examinations and screening for cervical neoplasia and sexually transmitted infection, while important in their own right, do not provide information necessary for identifying women who should avoid hormonal contraceptives or who need further evaluation before making a decision about their use.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>11325325</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.285.17.2232</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-7484
ispartof JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2001-05, Vol.285 (17), p.2232-2239
issn 0098-7484
1538-3598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70815076
source American Medical Association Current Titles
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Contraception - standards
Contraceptive Agents, Female
Contraindications
Decision Making
Estrogens
Ethics
Female
Genital Diseases, Female - diagnosis
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Hormonal contraception
Humans
Medical History Taking
Medical sciences
Medical screening
Physical Examination
Physical examinations
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prescriptions
Progesterone Congeners
Progestins
Risk
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis
Women
title Clinical Breast and Pelvic Examination Requirements for Hormonal Contraception: Current Practice vs Evidence
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A21%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Breast%20and%20Pelvic%20Examination%20Requirements%20for%20Hormonal%20Contraception:%20Current%20Practice%20vs%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Stewart,%20Felicia%20H&rft.date=2001-05-02&rft.volume=285&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=2232&rft.epage=2239&rft.pages=2232-2239&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft.coden=JAMAAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.285.17.2232&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72220134%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a280t-1f50ef0aa0bfa6a58a1ff517d57194dad44f3dc700de04bb6980001dd7d067603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211355546&rft_id=info:pmid/11325325&rfr_iscdi=true