Clinical versus sonographic evaluation of acute appendicitis in children: A comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes

• Published in: Journal of pediatric surgery 2001-05, Vol.36 (5), p.780-783
• Main Authors: Emil, Sherif, Mikhail, Peter, Laberge, Jean-Martin, Flageole, Hélène, Nguyen, Luong T., Shaw, Kenneth S., Baican, Livia, Oudjhane, Kamal
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abscess - etiology; Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Appendectomy - adverse effects; Appendicitis; Appendicitis - blood; Appendicitis - diagnosis; Appendicitis - surgery; Biological and medical sciences; Child; Diagnostic Errors - statistics & numerical data; Female; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen; Humans; Incidence; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data; Leukocyte Count; Male; Medical sciences; Other diseases. Semiology; Physical Examination - standards; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; sonography; Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases; Surgery of the digestive system; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography - standards; ultrasound diagnosis
• ISSN: 0022-3468; 1531-5037
• DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.22960

Purpose: Abdominal sonography has gained popularity in establishing the diagnosis of appendicitis in children with equivocal clinical presentations. However, no clear outcome benefits have been demonstrated to date. The authors conducted a retrospective study to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing appendectomy after clinical evaluation only with those undergoing the procedure after sonography. Methods: The charts of 454 consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis between January 1, 1998 and December 4, 1999 were reviewed. Patients operated on after clinical evaluation only were compared with patients operated on after abdominal sonography. Results: Forty-two percent of patients (n = 191) constituted the sonography group. When compared with the clinical group, these patients had higher prevalence of female gender (52% v 38%; P =.004), longer symptom duration (2.2 ± 2.5 v 1.6 ± 1.6 days; P =.003), higher incidence of preoperative in-patient observation (19% v 4%; P