Loading…

Dobutamine-induced augmentation of left ventricular ejection fraction predicts survival of heart failure patients with severe non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy

Aims The prognosis of patients with severe non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy is variable. The predictive value of currently utilized tests is suboptimal. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of dobutamineinduced augmentation of left ventricular ejection fraction in pati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European heart journal 2001-05, Vol.22 (10), p.849-856
Main Authors: Ramahi, T.M, Longo, M.D, Cadariu, A.R, Rohlfs, K, Slade, M, Carolan, S, Vallejo, E, Wackers, F.J.Th
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims The prognosis of patients with severe non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy is variable. The predictive value of currently utilized tests is suboptimal. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of dobutamineinduced augmentation of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Methods and Results Sixty-two patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0·30 underwent exercise testing with gas exchange analysis and assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction at rest and after a 10-min intravenous infusion of dobutamine at 10μg.kg−1min−1, using equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography. Age was 48±11 years, 32% females, functional class 2·6±0·6, resting left ventricular ejection fraction 0·20±0·06, and peak exercise oxygen consumption (mVO2) 19±6ml.kg−1min−1. Mean dobutamine-induced augmentation of left ventricular ejection fraction (ΔLVEF) was 0·09±0·06 (median 0·08, range −0·03 to 0·26). Follow-up was 25±15 months during which there were 12 deaths and five transplantations. Patients were divided into two groups based on median ΔLVEF. The transplant-free survival was better in the group with higher ΔLVEF (94% vs 64%, P
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1053/euhj.2001.2654