Loading…

Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms

We have developed a multistage computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme for the automated segmentation of suspicious microcalcification clusters in digital mammograms. The scheme consisted of three main processing steps. First, the breast region was segmented and its high-frequency content was enhanced...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2000-01, Vol.27 (1), p.13-22
Main Authors: Gavrielides, Marios A., Lo, Joseph Y., Vargas-Voracek, Rene, Floyd, Carey E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3842-f71f7b1a2192b9f0672f5de72f884a5f02b258d430fb4d49f4730372e8d943953
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3842-f71f7b1a2192b9f0672f5de72f884a5f02b258d430fb4d49f4730372e8d943953
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 27
creator Gavrielides, Marios A.
Lo, Joseph Y.
Vargas-Voracek, Rene
Floyd, Carey E.
description We have developed a multistage computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme for the automated segmentation of suspicious microcalcification clusters in digital mammograms. The scheme consisted of three main processing steps. First, the breast region was segmented and its high-frequency content was enhanced using unsharp masking. In the second step, individual microcalcifications were segmented using local histogram analysis on overlapping subimages. For this step, eight histogram features were extracted for each subimage and were used as input to a fuzzy rule-based classifier that identified subimages containing microcalcifications and assigned the appropriate thresholds to segment any microcalcifications within them. The final step clustered the segmented microcalcifications and extracted the following features for each cluster: the number of microcalcifications, the average distance between microcalcifications, and the average number of times pixels in the cluster were segmented in the second step. Fuzzy logic rules incorporating the cluster features were designed to remove nonsuspicious clusters, defined as those with typically benign characteristics. A database of 98 images, with 48 images containing one or more microcalcification clusters, provided training and testing sets to optimize the parameters and evaluate the CAD scheme, respectively. The results showed a true positive rate of 93.2% and an average of 0.73 false positive clusters per image. A comparison of our results with other reported segmentation results on the same database showed comparable sensitivity and at the same time an improved false positive rate. The performance of the CAD scheme is encouraging for its use as an automatic tool for efficient and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.598852
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70884900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70884900</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3842-f71f7b1a2192b9f0672f5de72f884a5f02b258d430fb4d49f4730372e8d943953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90F1LwzAYBeAgiptT8BdIr0TBzjdfa3Mpw6kwUVCvS5omI9K0tWmV_XujHSqI3iQ3Tw4nB6FDDFOMcXqOp1ykKSdbaExYQmNGQGyjMYBgMWHAR2jP-2cAmFEOu2iEYcZFQukYLR70yumqk52tq6g2ke99Y5Wtex-psvedbnUROavaWslSWWPVJ_WRrSInnatXrXR-H-0YWXp9sLkn6Glx-Ti_jpd3Vzfzi2WsaMpIbBJskhxLggXJhYFZQgwvdDjTlElugOSEpwWjYHJWMGHCZ4AmRKeFYFRwOkHHQ27T1i-99l3mrFe6LGWlQ-UsgRAkAAI8GWAo7n2rTda01sl2nWHIPjbLcDZsFujRJrPPnS5-wGGkAM4G8GZLvf4zKLu93-SdDtwrO-z69eS1br95U5j_7K-e70-bj3s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70884900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Gavrielides, Marios A. ; Lo, Joseph Y. ; Vargas-Voracek, Rene ; Floyd, Carey E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gavrielides, Marios A. ; Lo, Joseph Y. ; Vargas-Voracek, Rene ; Floyd, Carey E.</creatorcontrib><description>We have developed a multistage computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme for the automated segmentation of suspicious microcalcification clusters in digital mammograms. The scheme consisted of three main processing steps. First, the breast region was segmented and its high-frequency content was enhanced using unsharp masking. In the second step, individual microcalcifications were segmented using local histogram analysis on overlapping subimages. For this step, eight histogram features were extracted for each subimage and were used as input to a fuzzy rule-based classifier that identified subimages containing microcalcifications and assigned the appropriate thresholds to segment any microcalcifications within them. The final step clustered the segmented microcalcifications and extracted the following features for each cluster: the number of microcalcifications, the average distance between microcalcifications, and the average number of times pixels in the cluster were segmented in the second step. Fuzzy logic rules incorporating the cluster features were designed to remove nonsuspicious clusters, defined as those with typically benign characteristics. A database of 98 images, with 48 images containing one or more microcalcification clusters, provided training and testing sets to optimize the parameters and evaluate the CAD scheme, respectively. The results showed a true positive rate of 93.2% and an average of 0.73 false positive clusters per image. A comparison of our results with other reported segmentation results on the same database showed comparable sensitivity and at the same time an improved false positive rate. The performance of the CAD scheme is encouraging for its use as an automatic tool for efficient and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.598852</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10659733</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Biophysical Phenomena ; Biophysics ; breast neoplasms ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging ; cancer ; clustered microcalcifications ; Computer aided diagnosis ; Databases, Factual ; diagnostic radiography ; digital mammography ; Digital radiography ; Diseases ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Fuzzy Logic ; Humans ; Image analysis ; image classification ; image segmentation ; Mammography ; Mammography - methods ; Medical diagnosis ; medical image processing ; Medical imaging ; Neural networks, fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence ; Physicists ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; segmentation ; Testing procedures</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2000-01, Vol.27 (1), p.13-22</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2000 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3842-f71f7b1a2192b9f0672f5de72f884a5f02b258d430fb4d49f4730372e8d943953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3842-f71f7b1a2192b9f0672f5de72f884a5f02b258d430fb4d49f4730372e8d943953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10659733$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gavrielides, Marios A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Joseph Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas-Voracek, Rene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Floyd, Carey E.</creatorcontrib><title>Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>We have developed a multistage computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme for the automated segmentation of suspicious microcalcification clusters in digital mammograms. The scheme consisted of three main processing steps. First, the breast region was segmented and its high-frequency content was enhanced using unsharp masking. In the second step, individual microcalcifications were segmented using local histogram analysis on overlapping subimages. For this step, eight histogram features were extracted for each subimage and were used as input to a fuzzy rule-based classifier that identified subimages containing microcalcifications and assigned the appropriate thresholds to segment any microcalcifications within them. The final step clustered the segmented microcalcifications and extracted the following features for each cluster: the number of microcalcifications, the average distance between microcalcifications, and the average number of times pixels in the cluster were segmented in the second step. Fuzzy logic rules incorporating the cluster features were designed to remove nonsuspicious clusters, defined as those with typically benign characteristics. A database of 98 images, with 48 images containing one or more microcalcification clusters, provided training and testing sets to optimize the parameters and evaluate the CAD scheme, respectively. The results showed a true positive rate of 93.2% and an average of 0.73 false positive clusters per image. A comparison of our results with other reported segmentation results on the same database showed comparable sensitivity and at the same time an improved false positive rate. The performance of the CAD scheme is encouraging for its use as an automatic tool for efficient and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer.</description><subject>Biophysical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>breast neoplasms</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>clustered microcalcifications</subject><subject>Computer aided diagnosis</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>diagnostic radiography</subject><subject>digital mammography</subject><subject>Digital radiography</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fuzzy Logic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>image classification</subject><subject>image segmentation</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Neural networks, fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Physicists</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>segmentation</subject><subject>Testing procedures</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90F1LwzAYBeAgiptT8BdIr0TBzjdfa3Mpw6kwUVCvS5omI9K0tWmV_XujHSqI3iQ3Tw4nB6FDDFOMcXqOp1ykKSdbaExYQmNGQGyjMYBgMWHAR2jP-2cAmFEOu2iEYcZFQukYLR70yumqk52tq6g2ke99Y5Wtex-psvedbnUROavaWslSWWPVJ_WRrSInnatXrXR-H-0YWXp9sLkn6Glx-Ti_jpd3Vzfzi2WsaMpIbBJskhxLggXJhYFZQgwvdDjTlElugOSEpwWjYHJWMGHCZ4AmRKeFYFRwOkHHQ27T1i-99l3mrFe6LGWlQ-UsgRAkAAI8GWAo7n2rTda01sl2nWHIPjbLcDZsFujRJrPPnS5-wGGkAM4G8GZLvf4zKLu93-SdDtwrO-z69eS1br95U5j_7K-e70-bj3s</recordid><startdate>200001</startdate><enddate>200001</enddate><creator>Gavrielides, Marios A.</creator><creator>Lo, Joseph Y.</creator><creator>Vargas-Voracek, Rene</creator><creator>Floyd, Carey E.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200001</creationdate><title>Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms</title><author>Gavrielides, Marios A. ; Lo, Joseph Y. ; Vargas-Voracek, Rene ; Floyd, Carey E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3842-f71f7b1a2192b9f0672f5de72f884a5f02b258d430fb4d49f4730372e8d943953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Biophysical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>breast neoplasms</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>clustered microcalcifications</topic><topic>Computer aided diagnosis</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>diagnostic radiography</topic><topic>digital mammography</topic><topic>Digital radiography</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fuzzy Logic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>image classification</topic><topic>image segmentation</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Neural networks, fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Physicists</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>segmentation</topic><topic>Testing procedures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gavrielides, Marios A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Joseph Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas-Voracek, Rene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Floyd, Carey E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gavrielides, Marios A.</au><au>Lo, Joseph Y.</au><au>Vargas-Voracek, Rene</au><au>Floyd, Carey E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2000-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>13-22</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>We have developed a multistage computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme for the automated segmentation of suspicious microcalcification clusters in digital mammograms. The scheme consisted of three main processing steps. First, the breast region was segmented and its high-frequency content was enhanced using unsharp masking. In the second step, individual microcalcifications were segmented using local histogram analysis on overlapping subimages. For this step, eight histogram features were extracted for each subimage and were used as input to a fuzzy rule-based classifier that identified subimages containing microcalcifications and assigned the appropriate thresholds to segment any microcalcifications within them. The final step clustered the segmented microcalcifications and extracted the following features for each cluster: the number of microcalcifications, the average distance between microcalcifications, and the average number of times pixels in the cluster were segmented in the second step. Fuzzy logic rules incorporating the cluster features were designed to remove nonsuspicious clusters, defined as those with typically benign characteristics. A database of 98 images, with 48 images containing one or more microcalcification clusters, provided training and testing sets to optimize the parameters and evaluate the CAD scheme, respectively. The results showed a true positive rate of 93.2% and an average of 0.73 false positive clusters per image. A comparison of our results with other reported segmentation results on the same database showed comparable sensitivity and at the same time an improved false positive rate. The performance of the CAD scheme is encouraging for its use as an automatic tool for efficient and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>10659733</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.598852</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2000-01, Vol.27 (1), p.13-22
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70884900
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Biophysical Phenomena
Biophysics
breast neoplasms
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging
cancer
clustered microcalcifications
Computer aided diagnosis
Databases, Factual
diagnostic radiography
digital mammography
Digital radiography
Diseases
Evaluation Studies as Topic
False Positive Reactions
Female
Fuzzy Logic
Humans
Image analysis
image classification
image segmentation
Mammography
Mammography - methods
Medical diagnosis
medical image processing
Medical imaging
Neural networks, fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence
Physicists
Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
segmentation
Testing procedures
title Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A49%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Segmentation%20of%20suspicious%20clustered%20microcalcifications%20in%20mammograms&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Gavrielides,%20Marios%20A.&rft.date=2000-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=13-22&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.598852&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E70884900%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3842-f71f7b1a2192b9f0672f5de72f884a5f02b258d430fb4d49f4730372e8d943953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70884900&rft_id=info:pmid/10659733&rfr_iscdi=true