Loading…
A comparison of the bullard laryngoscope versus the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope during intubation in patients afforded inline stabilization
Study Objective: To compare the Bullard laryngoscope (BL) with the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (FFB) in a cervical spine injury model, using inline stabilization. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: Main operating room of a tertiary care hospital. Patients: 50 adult, ASA physical status...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical anesthesia 2001-05, Vol.13 (3), p.182-185 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Study Objective:
To compare the Bullard laryngoscope (BL) with the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (FFB) in a cervical spine injury model, using inline stabilization.
Design:
Randomized clinical trial.
Setting:
Main operating room of a tertiary care hospital.
Patients:
50 adult, ASA physical status I, II, and III patients undergoing an elective general anesthetic.
Interventions:
Each patient’s trachea was intubated with both techniques. Cricoid pressure was applied to half of the study patients.
Measurements:
The time for laryngoscopic view and the time to intubation were recorded for each technique. The effects of cricoid pressure on laryngoscopic view and intubation time were determined.
Main results:
The times for laryngoscopy and intubation were longer in the FFB group than in the BL group (p <
0.004). There was a significantly lower success rate of laryngoscopy view in the FFB group in the presence of cricoid pressure (15 of 25 patients, or 60%) than either of the BL groups or the FFB no-cricoid pressure group.
Conclusions:
The BL is more reliable, quicker, and more resistant to the effects of cricoid pressure than is the FFB. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0952-8180 1873-4529 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0952-8180(01)00241-0 |