Loading…
Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations, but not methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T, are associated with recurrent miscarriages
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between recurrent miscarriages and factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutations. In this case-control study the prevalence of factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and C677T methylenetetr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 2000-02, Vol.15 (2), p.458-462 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between recurrent miscarriages and factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutations. In this case-control study the prevalence of factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutations was determined in a consecutive series of 80 recurrent miscarriage patients and 100 controls. Fifteen of 80 recurrent miscarriage patients and four out of 100 controls carried the factor V Leiden mutation (19 versus 4%, P = 0.003, odds ratio 5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7–17). Seven of 80 recurrent miscarriage patients and two of 100 controls were carriers of the prothrombin G20210A mutation (9 versus 2%, P = 0.038, odds ratio 4.6, 95% CI: 0.9–23.2). Six of 80 recurrent miscarriage women and 15 of 100 controls were homozygotes for the C677T MTHFR mutation (8 versus 15%, P = 0.134, odds ratio: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.1–1.2). Our results suggest that the presence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A polymorphism, but not MTHFR C677T homozygosity, could be additional risk factors for recurrent miscarriages. Furthermore, it was suggested that the prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations is more prominent in second trimester, primary fetal losses and it is independent of the existence of additional pathology predisposing to recurrent fetal losses. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-1161 1460-2350 1460-2350 |
DOI: | 10.1093/humrep/15.2.458 |