Hierarchy of research design used to categorize the “strength of evidence” in answering clinical dental questions

The purpose of this article is to highlight important features of research design that clinicians can use to determine which articles are useful when attempting to answer clinical questions and determine the best therapy for a particular patient. This article offers a systematic means of categorizin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2000-02, Vol.83 (2), p.137-152
Main Authors: Jacob, Rhonda F., Carr, Alan B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical Trials as Topic - methods
Clinical Trials as Topic - standards
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dental Research - methods
Dental Research - standards
Dentistry
Evidence-Based Medicine
Humans
Journalism, Dental - standards
Research Design
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this article is to highlight important features of research design that clinicians can use to determine which articles are useful when attempting to answer clinical questions and determine the best therapy for a particular patient. This article offers a systematic means of categorizing the quality of research reports for clinicians and clinical investigators. A recurring clinical theme of hygiene education is used to exemplify how phrasing the clinical question determines the type of study design that could be used. The article describes the continuum of research reports, and categorizes them by their inherent strengths and weaknesses. The report describes why the research designs in the supreme position of the research hierarchy, are the most valuable to clinicians seeking evidence that defines the best therapy for their patients.
ISSN:0022-3913
1097-6841
DOI:10.1053/pr.2000.v83.apr832137