Human endothelial cells grow poorly on vitronectin: Role of PAI-1

• Published in: Journal of cellular biochemistry 2001-07, Vol.82 (1), p.98-109
• Main Authors: Underwood, P. Anne, Bean, Penny A., Cubeddu, Liza
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: cell adhesion; Cell Adhesion - drug effects; Cell Adhesion - physiology; Cell Division - drug effects; Cell Division - physiology; Cells, Cultured; Collagen - metabolism; endothelial; Endothelium, Vascular - cytology; Endothelium, Vascular - metabolism; Extracellular Matrix - chemistry; Extracellular Matrix - metabolism; Fibronectins - metabolism; Fibronectins - pharmacology; Humans; Laminin - analysis; PAI-1; Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 - analysis; Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 - metabolism; Receptors, Cell Surface - antagonists & inhibitors; Receptors, Cell Surface - metabolism; Receptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator; Signal Transduction; uPA; uPAR; Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator - antagonists & inhibitors; Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator - metabolism; vitronectin; Vitronectin - metabolism; Vitronectin - pharmacology
• ISSN: 0730-2312; 1097-4644
• DOI: 10.1002/jcb.1112

The cell adhesive protein vitronectin is a common component of interstitial extracellular matrix and circulates in plasma. It competes effectively with other plasma proteins to adsorb to certain biomaterial surfaces, and is likely to represent an important cell adhesion mediator on the luminal surface of vascular grafts. It is also found associated with certain vascular pathologies. We have shown previously that human endothelial cells grow poorly on a vitronectin surface compared with other extracellular matrix molecules. In this paper we show that endothelial cells seeded on vitronectin and fibronectin produced substantially different profiles of extracellular matrix molecules. The most outstanding difference was in the amount of matrix‐localised plasminogen activator‐inhibitor‐1 which was high on vitronectin and negligible on fibronectin. This was correlated with a small but significant inhibition of cell adhesion to vitronectin compared with fibronectin, and very significant interference with dissociation of cell: extracellular matrix contacts, resulting either from direct inhibition of the proteolytic activity of urokinase, or from interference with urokinase‐receptor signaling and consequent focal adhesion turnover. Such interference would inhibit cell proliferation by disabling the cells from loosening their matrix contacts in order to proceed through mitosis. This would seriously compromise endothelial recovery in cases of damage to the vascular wall and placement of stents or grafts, where the presence of surface‐adsorbed vitronectin is likely to modulate the tissue response. J. Cell. Biochem. 82: 98–109, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.