Classification of oral cephalosporins. A matter for debate

There are many cephalosporins available and various ways of classifying them for clinical use. Oral cephalosporins probably need a classification of their own. This informal discussion was prompted by the appearance of the recommendations of an expert committee of the Paul Ehrlich Gesellschaft. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of antimicrobial agents 2001-06, Vol.17 (6), p.443-450
Main Authors: Williams, J.D, Naber, K.G, Bryskier, A, Høby, N, Gould, I.M, Periti, P, Giamarellou, H, Rouveix, B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Administration, Oral
Bacterial Infections - drug therapy
Cephalosporins - administration & dosage
Cephalosporins - chemistry
Cephalosporins - classification
Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics
Humans
Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9f652b61a48172b73207bdc61f4977edda90be7e04ee4cf34666bad9a650418b3
cites
container_end_page 450
container_issue 6
container_start_page 443
container_title International journal of antimicrobial agents
container_volume 17
creator Williams, J.D
Naber, K.G
Bryskier, A
Høby, N
Gould, I.M
Periti, P
Giamarellou, H
Rouveix, B
description There are many cephalosporins available and various ways of classifying them for clinical use. Oral cephalosporins probably need a classification of their own. This informal discussion was prompted by the appearance of the recommendations of an expert committee of the Paul Ehrlich Gesellschaft. The views of several other commentators are included. There is considerable individual variation in preference for different styles of classification depending on what the classification is for.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0924-8579(01)00309-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70920164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0924857901003090</els_id><sourcerecordid>70920164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9f652b61a48172b73207bdc61f4977edda90be7e04ee4cf34666bad9a650418b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EglL4BFBWCBYpM7Fj12xQVfGSKrEA1pbjTIRRWhc7ReLvSR-CJavZnDtX9zB2hjBCQHn9AroQ-bhU-hLwCoCDzmGPDXCsilxp5Pts8IscseOUPgCw5KI8ZEeIXCuJfMBupq1NyTfe2c6HRRaaLETbZo6W77YNaRmiX6RRNsnmtusoZk2IWU2V7eiEHTS2TXS6u0P2dn_3On3MZ88PT9PJLHdcYpfrRpZFJdGKMaqiUrwAVdVOYiO0UlTXVkNFikAQCddwIaWsbK2tLEHguOJDdrH9u4zhc0WpM3OfHLWtXVBYJaP6mb0R0YPlFnQxpBSpMcvo5zZ-GwSzlmY20szaiAE0G2kG-tz5rmBVzan-S-0s9cDtFqB-5penaJLztHBU-0iuM3Xw_1T8AERXevk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70920164</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Classification of oral cephalosporins. A matter for debate</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Williams, J.D ; Naber, K.G ; Bryskier, A ; Høby, N ; Gould, I.M ; Periti, P ; Giamarellou, H ; Rouveix, B</creator><creatorcontrib>Williams, J.D ; Naber, K.G ; Bryskier, A ; Høby, N ; Gould, I.M ; Periti, P ; Giamarellou, H ; Rouveix, B</creatorcontrib><description>There are many cephalosporins available and various ways of classifying them for clinical use. Oral cephalosporins probably need a classification of their own. This informal discussion was prompted by the appearance of the recommendations of an expert committee of the Paul Ehrlich Gesellschaft. The views of several other commentators are included. There is considerable individual variation in preference for different styles of classification depending on what the classification is for.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-8579</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0924-8579(01)00309-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11397613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Bacterial Infections - drug therapy ; Cephalosporins - administration &amp; dosage ; Cephalosporins - chemistry ; Cephalosporins - classification ; Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics ; Humans ; Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee</subject><ispartof>International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2001-06, Vol.17 (6), p.443-450</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9f652b61a48172b73207bdc61f4977edda90be7e04ee4cf34666bad9a650418b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11397613$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williams, J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naber, K.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryskier, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Høby, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gould, I.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Periti, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giamarellou, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouveix, B</creatorcontrib><title>Classification of oral cephalosporins. A matter for debate</title><title>International journal of antimicrobial agents</title><addtitle>Int J Antimicrob Agents</addtitle><description>There are many cephalosporins available and various ways of classifying them for clinical use. Oral cephalosporins probably need a classification of their own. This informal discussion was prompted by the appearance of the recommendations of an expert committee of the Paul Ehrlich Gesellschaft. The views of several other commentators are included. There is considerable individual variation in preference for different styles of classification depending on what the classification is for.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cephalosporins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cephalosporins - chemistry</subject><subject>Cephalosporins - classification</subject><subject>Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee</subject><issn>0924-8579</issn><issn>1872-7913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EglL4BFBWCBYpM7Fj12xQVfGSKrEA1pbjTIRRWhc7ReLvSR-CJavZnDtX9zB2hjBCQHn9AroQ-bhU-hLwCoCDzmGPDXCsilxp5Pts8IscseOUPgCw5KI8ZEeIXCuJfMBupq1NyTfe2c6HRRaaLETbZo6W77YNaRmiX6RRNsnmtusoZk2IWU2V7eiEHTS2TXS6u0P2dn_3On3MZ88PT9PJLHdcYpfrRpZFJdGKMaqiUrwAVdVOYiO0UlTXVkNFikAQCddwIaWsbK2tLEHguOJDdrH9u4zhc0WpM3OfHLWtXVBYJaP6mb0R0YPlFnQxpBSpMcvo5zZ-GwSzlmY20szaiAE0G2kG-tz5rmBVzan-S-0s9cDtFqB-5penaJLztHBU-0iuM3Xw_1T8AERXevk</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Williams, J.D</creator><creator>Naber, K.G</creator><creator>Bryskier, A</creator><creator>Høby, N</creator><creator>Gould, I.M</creator><creator>Periti, P</creator><creator>Giamarellou, H</creator><creator>Rouveix, B</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Classification of oral cephalosporins. A matter for debate</title><author>Williams, J.D ; Naber, K.G ; Bryskier, A ; Høby, N ; Gould, I.M ; Periti, P ; Giamarellou, H ; Rouveix, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9f652b61a48172b73207bdc61f4977edda90be7e04ee4cf34666bad9a650418b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cephalosporins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cephalosporins - chemistry</topic><topic>Cephalosporins - classification</topic><topic>Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williams, J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naber, K.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryskier, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Høby, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gould, I.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Periti, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giamarellou, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouveix, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of antimicrobial agents</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williams, J.D</au><au>Naber, K.G</au><au>Bryskier, A</au><au>Høby, N</au><au>Gould, I.M</au><au>Periti, P</au><au>Giamarellou, H</au><au>Rouveix, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Classification of oral cephalosporins. A matter for debate</atitle><jtitle>International journal of antimicrobial agents</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Antimicrob Agents</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>443</spage><epage>450</epage><pages>443-450</pages><issn>0924-8579</issn><eissn>1872-7913</eissn><abstract>There are many cephalosporins available and various ways of classifying them for clinical use. Oral cephalosporins probably need a classification of their own. This informal discussion was prompted by the appearance of the recommendations of an expert committee of the Paul Ehrlich Gesellschaft. The views of several other commentators are included. There is considerable individual variation in preference for different styles of classification depending on what the classification is for.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>11397613</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0924-8579(01)00309-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0924-8579
ispartof International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2001-06, Vol.17 (6), p.443-450
issn 0924-8579
1872-7913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70920164
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Administration, Oral
Bacterial Infections - drug therapy
Cephalosporins - administration & dosage
Cephalosporins - chemistry
Cephalosporins - classification
Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics
Humans
Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee
title Classification of oral cephalosporins. A matter for debate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A43%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classification%20of%20oral%20cephalosporins.%20A%20matter%20for%20debate&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20agents&rft.au=Williams,%20J.D&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=450&rft.pages=443-450&rft.issn=0924-8579&rft.eissn=1872-7913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0924-8579(01)00309-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70920164%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9f652b61a48172b73207bdc61f4977edda90be7e04ee4cf34666bad9a650418b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70920164&rft_id=info:pmid/11397613&rfr_iscdi=true