Loading…
Brainstem frequency-following response and simple motor reaction time
Simple motor reaction times (RT) in humans show marked trial-to-trial variations. In the present study, a brief tone (400 Hz, 37.5 ms duration) that was the imperative stimulus in a RT paradigm evoked the brainstem frequency-following response (FFR). Horizontal and vertical montage FFRs were recorde...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of psychophysiology 2000-04, Vol.36 (1), p.35-44 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-220a6fb6849104515dd7fc856a0c788b1a2e38d138396abcaf73c8d5b6a774f83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-220a6fb6849104515dd7fc856a0c788b1a2e38d138396abcaf73c8d5b6a774f83 |
container_end_page | 44 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | International journal of psychophysiology |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | GALBRAITH, G. C CHAE, B. C COOPER, J. R GINDI, M. M HO, T. N KIM, B. S MANKOWSKI, D. A LUNDE, S. E |
description | Simple motor reaction times (RT) in humans show marked trial-to-trial variations. In the present study, a brief tone (400 Hz, 37.5 ms duration) that was the imperative stimulus in a RT paradigm evoked the brainstem frequency-following response (FFR). Horizontal and vertical montage FFRs were recorded to evaluate neural responses with putative origins in auditory nerve and central brainstem, respectively. The main question concerned the possible relationship between trial-to-trial variations in RT speed and FFR response properties. The results showed a reliable pattern in which fast RT trials yielded larger amplitudes (relative to slow trials) in earlier milliseconds of the FFR, and slow RT trials yielded relatively larger amplitudes in later milliseconds of the response. These results support the conclusion that early processing in the auditory brainstem is not automatic and invariant. Rather, short-latency evoked potentials appear to reflect trial-to-trial variations related to events far removed from the first synapse of sensory coding, perhaps depending upon cortically mediated influences such as cognition or attention. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00096-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70936906</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70936906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-220a6fb6849104515dd7fc856a0c788b1a2e38d138396abcaf73c8d5b6a774f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LxDAQhoMouq7-BKUHET1Uk6bNx1GX9QMWPKjnME0TibRJTbrI_nu7H6iXmcM878zwIHRG8A3BhN2-joXngjN8JeU1xliynO6hCRG8yDmTfB9NfpEjdJzS5whxIuUhOiKYY8wKMkHz-wjOp8F0mY3ma2m8XuU2tG34dv4jiyb1wSeTgW-y5Lq-NVkXhhDHCejBBZ8NrjMn6MBCm8zprk_R-8P8bfaUL14en2d3i1xTWg55UWBgtmailASXFamahlstKgZYcyFqAoWhoiFUUMmg1mA51aKpagacl1bQKbrc7u1jGH9Ng-pc0qZtwZuwTIpjSZnEbASrLahjSCkaq_roOogrRbBa-1Mbf2otR0mpNv4UHXPnuwPLujPNv9RW2Ahc7ABIGlobwWuX_jhakJIW9AfAX3hm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70936906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brainstem frequency-following response and simple motor reaction time</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>GALBRAITH, G. C ; CHAE, B. C ; COOPER, J. R ; GINDI, M. M ; HO, T. N ; KIM, B. S ; MANKOWSKI, D. A ; LUNDE, S. E</creator><creatorcontrib>GALBRAITH, G. C ; CHAE, B. C ; COOPER, J. R ; GINDI, M. M ; HO, T. N ; KIM, B. S ; MANKOWSKI, D. A ; LUNDE, S. E</creatorcontrib><description>Simple motor reaction times (RT) in humans show marked trial-to-trial variations. In the present study, a brief tone (400 Hz, 37.5 ms duration) that was the imperative stimulus in a RT paradigm evoked the brainstem frequency-following response (FFR). Horizontal and vertical montage FFRs were recorded to evaluate neural responses with putative origins in auditory nerve and central brainstem, respectively. The main question concerned the possible relationship between trial-to-trial variations in RT speed and FFR response properties. The results showed a reliable pattern in which fast RT trials yielded larger amplitudes (relative to slow trials) in earlier milliseconds of the FFR, and slow RT trials yielded relatively larger amplitudes in later milliseconds of the response. These results support the conclusion that early processing in the auditory brainstem is not automatic and invariant. Rather, short-latency evoked potentials appear to reflect trial-to-trial variations related to events far removed from the first synapse of sensory coding, perhaps depending upon cortically mediated influences such as cognition or attention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00096-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10700621</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPSEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Science</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain Stem - physiology ; Electrophysiology ; Female ; Fourier Analysis ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Motor Activity - physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of psychophysiology, 2000-04, Vol.36 (1), p.35-44</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-220a6fb6849104515dd7fc856a0c788b1a2e38d138396abcaf73c8d5b6a774f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-220a6fb6849104515dd7fc856a0c788b1a2e38d138396abcaf73c8d5b6a774f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1321432$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10700621$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GALBRAITH, G. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAE, B. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOPER, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GINDI, M. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HO, T. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIM, B. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANKOWSKI, D. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUNDE, S. E</creatorcontrib><title>Brainstem frequency-following response and simple motor reaction time</title><title>International journal of psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><description>Simple motor reaction times (RT) in humans show marked trial-to-trial variations. In the present study, a brief tone (400 Hz, 37.5 ms duration) that was the imperative stimulus in a RT paradigm evoked the brainstem frequency-following response (FFR). Horizontal and vertical montage FFRs were recorded to evaluate neural responses with putative origins in auditory nerve and central brainstem, respectively. The main question concerned the possible relationship between trial-to-trial variations in RT speed and FFR response properties. The results showed a reliable pattern in which fast RT trials yielded larger amplitudes (relative to slow trials) in earlier milliseconds of the FFR, and slow RT trials yielded relatively larger amplitudes in later milliseconds of the response. These results support the conclusion that early processing in the auditory brainstem is not automatic and invariant. Rather, short-latency evoked potentials appear to reflect trial-to-trial variations related to events far removed from the first synapse of sensory coding, perhaps depending upon cortically mediated influences such as cognition or attention.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain Stem - physiology</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fourier Analysis</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor Activity - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><issn>0167-8760</issn><issn>1872-7697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1LxDAQhoMouq7-BKUHET1Uk6bNx1GX9QMWPKjnME0TibRJTbrI_nu7H6iXmcM878zwIHRG8A3BhN2-joXngjN8JeU1xliynO6hCRG8yDmTfB9NfpEjdJzS5whxIuUhOiKYY8wKMkHz-wjOp8F0mY3ma2m8XuU2tG34dv4jiyb1wSeTgW-y5Lq-NVkXhhDHCejBBZ8NrjMn6MBCm8zprk_R-8P8bfaUL14en2d3i1xTWg55UWBgtmailASXFamahlstKgZYcyFqAoWhoiFUUMmg1mA51aKpagacl1bQKbrc7u1jGH9Ng-pc0qZtwZuwTIpjSZnEbASrLahjSCkaq_roOogrRbBa-1Mbf2otR0mpNv4UHXPnuwPLujPNv9RW2Ahc7ABIGlobwWuX_jhakJIW9AfAX3hm</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>GALBRAITH, G. C</creator><creator>CHAE, B. C</creator><creator>COOPER, J. R</creator><creator>GINDI, M. M</creator><creator>HO, T. N</creator><creator>KIM, B. S</creator><creator>MANKOWSKI, D. A</creator><creator>LUNDE, S. E</creator><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>Brainstem frequency-following response and simple motor reaction time</title><author>GALBRAITH, G. C ; CHAE, B. C ; COOPER, J. R ; GINDI, M. M ; HO, T. N ; KIM, B. S ; MANKOWSKI, D. A ; LUNDE, S. E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-220a6fb6849104515dd7fc856a0c788b1a2e38d138396abcaf73c8d5b6a774f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain Stem - physiology</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fourier Analysis</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor Activity - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GALBRAITH, G. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAE, B. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOPER, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GINDI, M. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HO, T. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIM, B. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANKOWSKI, D. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUNDE, S. E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GALBRAITH, G. C</au><au>CHAE, B. C</au><au>COOPER, J. R</au><au>GINDI, M. M</au><au>HO, T. N</au><au>KIM, B. S</au><au>MANKOWSKI, D. A</au><au>LUNDE, S. E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brainstem frequency-following response and simple motor reaction time</atitle><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>35-44</pages><issn>0167-8760</issn><eissn>1872-7697</eissn><coden>IJPSEE</coden><abstract>Simple motor reaction times (RT) in humans show marked trial-to-trial variations. In the present study, a brief tone (400 Hz, 37.5 ms duration) that was the imperative stimulus in a RT paradigm evoked the brainstem frequency-following response (FFR). Horizontal and vertical montage FFRs were recorded to evaluate neural responses with putative origins in auditory nerve and central brainstem, respectively. The main question concerned the possible relationship between trial-to-trial variations in RT speed and FFR response properties. The results showed a reliable pattern in which fast RT trials yielded larger amplitudes (relative to slow trials) in earlier milliseconds of the FFR, and slow RT trials yielded relatively larger amplitudes in later milliseconds of the response. These results support the conclusion that early processing in the auditory brainstem is not automatic and invariant. Rather, short-latency evoked potentials appear to reflect trial-to-trial variations related to events far removed from the first synapse of sensory coding, perhaps depending upon cortically mediated influences such as cognition or attention.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Science</pub><pmid>10700621</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00096-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-8760 |
ispartof | International journal of psychophysiology, 2000-04, Vol.36 (1), p.35-44 |
issn | 0167-8760 1872-7697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70936906 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Adolescent Adult Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Brain Stem - physiology Electrophysiology Female Fourier Analysis Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Motor Activity - physiology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time - physiology |
title | Brainstem frequency-following response and simple motor reaction time |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A47%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brainstem%20frequency-following%20response%20and%20simple%20motor%20reaction%20time&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20psychophysiology&rft.au=GALBRAITH,%20G.%20C&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=35-44&rft.issn=0167-8760&rft.eissn=1872-7697&rft.coden=IJPSEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00096-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70936906%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-220a6fb6849104515dd7fc856a0c788b1a2e38d138396abcaf73c8d5b6a774f83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70936906&rft_id=info:pmid/10700621&rfr_iscdi=true |