Loading…
Assessing Excess Nurse Work Load Generated by Multiresistant Nosocomial Bacteria in Intensive Care
To compare three methods for assessing the excess nurse work load related to recommended procedures for managing nosocomial infections (NI) due to multiresistant bacteria (MRB): two activity scores, the Omega score and the Projet de Recherche en Nursing (PRN) system, and a specific evaluation based...
Saved in:
Published in: | Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2001-05, Vol.22 (5), p.273-278 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3c550c8437bfe07c02353170dc904fb3bff0a696ece5bc1c6d6944cf340034573 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3c550c8437bfe07c02353170dc904fb3bff0a696ece5bc1c6d6944cf340034573 |
container_end_page | 278 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 273 |
container_title | Infection control and hospital epidemiology |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Saulnier, Fabienne F. Hubert, Hervè Onimus, Thierry M. Beague, Sébastien Nseir, Saad Grandbastien, Bruno Renault, Catherine Y. Idzik, Myrian Erb, Martine P. Durocher, Alain V. |
description | To compare three methods for assessing the excess nurse work load related to recommended procedures for managing nosocomial infections (NI) due to multiresistant bacteria (MRB): two activity scores, the Omega score and the Projet de Recherche en Nursing (PRN) system, and a specific evaluation based on functional analysis of nursing procedures.
10 beds in a medical intensive care unit (MICU).
Patients admitted from November 15, 1995, to June 15, 1996, were included and divided in two groups based on presence of MRB colonization or infection (MRB+ and MRB-groups).
Data were collected regarding length of stay (LOS) in days; Omega score for the entire stay; PRN score for the entire stay and per day; and time required to perform correctly four nursing procedures related to MRB NI, as evaluated specifically by the nursing staff, using a detailed functional analysis document that described all elementary nursing tasks in chronological order and all material needed to carry out those tasks.
The LOS and total Omega and PRN scores were higher in the MRB+ group than in the MRB- group: LOS, 23 +/- 20.6 versus 12 +/- 15.3 days, (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/501899 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70975595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/501899</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/501899</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3c550c8437bfe07c02353170dc904fb3bff0a696ece5bc1c6d6944cf340034573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMFO3DAQQC1EBdst_AHIUqveQsdrO4mPy4pSpC1cWrW3yHEmyJCNweNU5e9rtKtSoZ5seZ6eR4-xYwFnAurykwZRG7PHZkJrU5S1VPtsBvmpqBfy5yF7S3QHAJUx4oAdCqEWtZLljLVLIiTy4y2_-O3yjV9PkZD_CPGer4Pt-CWOGG3CjrdP_Os0JB-RPCU7Jn4dKLiw8Xbg59YljN5yP_KrMeFI_hfylY34jr3p7UB4tDvn7Pvni2-rL8X65vJqtVwXTmqVCum0Bpe3qtoeoXKwkFqKCjpnQPWtbPsebGlKdKhbJ1zZlUYp10sFIJWu5Jx93HofYnickFKz8eRwGOyIYaKmAlPlOPoFdDEQReybh-g3Nj41Aprnms22ZgZPd8ap3WD3gu3yZeDDDrDk7NBHOzpP_-hyfPX84ckWu6MU4t-xhOwxWTRn7_83f7XNH6UCkAk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70975595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Excess Nurse Work Load Generated by Multiresistant Nosocomial Bacteria in Intensive Care</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Saulnier, Fabienne F. ; Hubert, Hervè ; Onimus, Thierry M. ; Beague, Sébastien ; Nseir, Saad ; Grandbastien, Bruno ; Renault, Catherine Y. ; Idzik, Myrian ; Erb, Martine P. ; Durocher, Alain V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saulnier, Fabienne F. ; Hubert, Hervè ; Onimus, Thierry M. ; Beague, Sébastien ; Nseir, Saad ; Grandbastien, Bruno ; Renault, Catherine Y. ; Idzik, Myrian ; Erb, Martine P. ; Durocher, Alain V.</creatorcontrib><description>To compare three methods for assessing the excess nurse work load related to recommended procedures for managing nosocomial infections (NI) due to multiresistant bacteria (MRB): two activity scores, the Omega score and the Projet de Recherche en Nursing (PRN) system, and a specific evaluation based on functional analysis of nursing procedures.
10 beds in a medical intensive care unit (MICU).
Patients admitted from November 15, 1995, to June 15, 1996, were included and divided in two groups based on presence of MRB colonization or infection (MRB+ and MRB-groups).
Data were collected regarding length of stay (LOS) in days; Omega score for the entire stay; PRN score for the entire stay and per day; and time required to perform correctly four nursing procedures related to MRB NI, as evaluated specifically by the nursing staff, using a detailed functional analysis document that described all elementary nursing tasks in chronological order and all material needed to carry out those tasks.
The LOS and total Omega and PRN scores were higher in the MRB+ group than in the MRB- group: LOS, 23 +/- 20.6 versus 12 +/- 15.3 days, (P<.001); Omega score, 164 +/- 103.4 versus 123 +/- 93.7 points (P<.001); PRN score, 3,606 +/- 3,187 versus 1,854 +/- 2,356 points (P<.001), respectively. The daily PRN score was also higher in MRB+ group (PRN, 160 +/- 25 vs 146 +/- 34 points in the MRB- group; P<.028). Four nursing procedures made necessary by MRB acquisition were identified: isolation precautions, with two levels according to whether the risk of contamination was mild-moderate or high; bathing the patient with antiseptic solution; bedpan management; and microbiological screening. The functional analysis indicated that the time needed to carry out these four procedures correctly was 245 minutes per patient per day, as compared to 85 minutes according to the PRN system.
Our data confirm that MRB NIs are responsible for an increase in nurse work load, as estimated by LOS, Omega, and PRN scores. However, the daily excess nurse work load related directly to recommended procedures for managing MRB NIs in MICUs is underestimated by these activity scores, as compared to a specific functional analysis of nursing tasks. This may be of importance in evaluating potential links between nurse work load and MRB NIs and in determining the number of nurse hours needed to comply with infection control recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/501899</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11428436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thorofare, NJ: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Antiseptics ; Bacteria ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cross Infection - microbiology ; Cross Infection - nursing ; Cross Infection - prevention & control ; Drug Resistance, Microbial ; Epidemiology. Vaccinations ; Female ; Functional analysis ; General aspects ; Humans ; Infection control ; Infection Control - methods ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Intensive care ; Intensive care units ; Intensive Care Units - manpower ; Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; Middle Aged ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Original Articles ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Understaffing ; Workload - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2001-05, Vol.22 (5), p.273-278</ispartof><rights>2001 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3c550c8437bfe07c02353170dc904fb3bff0a696ece5bc1c6d6944cf340034573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3c550c8437bfe07c02353170dc904fb3bff0a696ece5bc1c6d6944cf340034573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1082345$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11428436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saulnier, Fabienne F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubert, Hervè</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onimus, Thierry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beague, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nseir, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandbastien, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renault, Catherine Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idzik, Myrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erb, Martine P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durocher, Alain V.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Excess Nurse Work Load Generated by Multiresistant Nosocomial Bacteria in Intensive Care</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><description>To compare three methods for assessing the excess nurse work load related to recommended procedures for managing nosocomial infections (NI) due to multiresistant bacteria (MRB): two activity scores, the Omega score and the Projet de Recherche en Nursing (PRN) system, and a specific evaluation based on functional analysis of nursing procedures.
10 beds in a medical intensive care unit (MICU).
Patients admitted from November 15, 1995, to June 15, 1996, were included and divided in two groups based on presence of MRB colonization or infection (MRB+ and MRB-groups).
Data were collected regarding length of stay (LOS) in days; Omega score for the entire stay; PRN score for the entire stay and per day; and time required to perform correctly four nursing procedures related to MRB NI, as evaluated specifically by the nursing staff, using a detailed functional analysis document that described all elementary nursing tasks in chronological order and all material needed to carry out those tasks.
The LOS and total Omega and PRN scores were higher in the MRB+ group than in the MRB- group: LOS, 23 +/- 20.6 versus 12 +/- 15.3 days, (P<.001); Omega score, 164 +/- 103.4 versus 123 +/- 93.7 points (P<.001); PRN score, 3,606 +/- 3,187 versus 1,854 +/- 2,356 points (P<.001), respectively. The daily PRN score was also higher in MRB+ group (PRN, 160 +/- 25 vs 146 +/- 34 points in the MRB- group; P<.028). Four nursing procedures made necessary by MRB acquisition were identified: isolation precautions, with two levels according to whether the risk of contamination was mild-moderate or high; bathing the patient with antiseptic solution; bedpan management; and microbiological screening. The functional analysis indicated that the time needed to carry out these four procedures correctly was 245 minutes per patient per day, as compared to 85 minutes according to the PRN system.
Our data confirm that MRB NIs are responsible for an increase in nurse work load, as estimated by LOS, Omega, and PRN scores. However, the daily excess nurse work load related directly to recommended procedures for managing MRB NIs in MICUs is underestimated by these activity scores, as compared to a specific functional analysis of nursing tasks. This may be of importance in evaluating potential links between nurse work load and MRB NIs and in determining the number of nurse hours needed to comply with infection control recommendations.</description><subject>Antiseptics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cross Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - nursing</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Microbial</subject><subject>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional analysis</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection control</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - manpower</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Understaffing</subject><subject>Workload - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkMFO3DAQQC1EBdst_AHIUqveQsdrO4mPy4pSpC1cWrW3yHEmyJCNweNU5e9rtKtSoZ5seZ6eR4-xYwFnAurykwZRG7PHZkJrU5S1VPtsBvmpqBfy5yF7S3QHAJUx4oAdCqEWtZLljLVLIiTy4y2_-O3yjV9PkZD_CPGer4Pt-CWOGG3CjrdP_Os0JB-RPCU7Jn4dKLiw8Xbg59YljN5yP_KrMeFI_hfylY34jr3p7UB4tDvn7Pvni2-rL8X65vJqtVwXTmqVCum0Bpe3qtoeoXKwkFqKCjpnQPWtbPsebGlKdKhbJ1zZlUYp10sFIJWu5Jx93HofYnickFKz8eRwGOyIYaKmAlPlOPoFdDEQReybh-g3Nj41Aprnms22ZgZPd8ap3WD3gu3yZeDDDrDk7NBHOzpP_-hyfPX84ckWu6MU4t-xhOwxWTRn7_83f7XNH6UCkAk</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>Saulnier, Fabienne F.</creator><creator>Hubert, Hervè</creator><creator>Onimus, Thierry M.</creator><creator>Beague, Sébastien</creator><creator>Nseir, Saad</creator><creator>Grandbastien, Bruno</creator><creator>Renault, Catherine Y.</creator><creator>Idzik, Myrian</creator><creator>Erb, Martine P.</creator><creator>Durocher, Alain V.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>Slack</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Assessing Excess Nurse Work Load Generated by Multiresistant Nosocomial Bacteria in Intensive Care</title><author>Saulnier, Fabienne F. ; Hubert, Hervè ; Onimus, Thierry M. ; Beague, Sébastien ; Nseir, Saad ; Grandbastien, Bruno ; Renault, Catherine Y. ; Idzik, Myrian ; Erb, Martine P. ; Durocher, Alain V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3c550c8437bfe07c02353170dc904fb3bff0a696ece5bc1c6d6944cf340034573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Antiseptics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cross Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - nursing</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Microbial</topic><topic>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional analysis</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection control</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - manpower</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Understaffing</topic><topic>Workload - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saulnier, Fabienne F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubert, Hervè</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onimus, Thierry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beague, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nseir, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandbastien, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renault, Catherine Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idzik, Myrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erb, Martine P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durocher, Alain V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saulnier, Fabienne F.</au><au>Hubert, Hervè</au><au>Onimus, Thierry M.</au><au>Beague, Sébastien</au><au>Nseir, Saad</au><au>Grandbastien, Bruno</au><au>Renault, Catherine Y.</au><au>Idzik, Myrian</au><au>Erb, Martine P.</au><au>Durocher, Alain V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Excess Nurse Work Load Generated by Multiresistant Nosocomial Bacteria in Intensive Care</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>278</epage><pages>273-278</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>To compare three methods for assessing the excess nurse work load related to recommended procedures for managing nosocomial infections (NI) due to multiresistant bacteria (MRB): two activity scores, the Omega score and the Projet de Recherche en Nursing (PRN) system, and a specific evaluation based on functional analysis of nursing procedures.
10 beds in a medical intensive care unit (MICU).
Patients admitted from November 15, 1995, to June 15, 1996, were included and divided in two groups based on presence of MRB colonization or infection (MRB+ and MRB-groups).
Data were collected regarding length of stay (LOS) in days; Omega score for the entire stay; PRN score for the entire stay and per day; and time required to perform correctly four nursing procedures related to MRB NI, as evaluated specifically by the nursing staff, using a detailed functional analysis document that described all elementary nursing tasks in chronological order and all material needed to carry out those tasks.
The LOS and total Omega and PRN scores were higher in the MRB+ group than in the MRB- group: LOS, 23 +/- 20.6 versus 12 +/- 15.3 days, (P<.001); Omega score, 164 +/- 103.4 versus 123 +/- 93.7 points (P<.001); PRN score, 3,606 +/- 3,187 versus 1,854 +/- 2,356 points (P<.001), respectively. The daily PRN score was also higher in MRB+ group (PRN, 160 +/- 25 vs 146 +/- 34 points in the MRB- group; P<.028). Four nursing procedures made necessary by MRB acquisition were identified: isolation precautions, with two levels according to whether the risk of contamination was mild-moderate or high; bathing the patient with antiseptic solution; bedpan management; and microbiological screening. The functional analysis indicated that the time needed to carry out these four procedures correctly was 245 minutes per patient per day, as compared to 85 minutes according to the PRN system.
Our data confirm that MRB NIs are responsible for an increase in nurse work load, as estimated by LOS, Omega, and PRN scores. However, the daily excess nurse work load related directly to recommended procedures for managing MRB NIs in MICUs is underestimated by these activity scores, as compared to a specific functional analysis of nursing tasks. This may be of importance in evaluating potential links between nurse work load and MRB NIs and in determining the number of nurse hours needed to comply with infection control recommendations.</abstract><cop>Thorofare, NJ</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>11428436</pmid><doi>10.1086/501899</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-823X |
ispartof | Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2001-05, Vol.22 (5), p.273-278 |
issn | 0899-823X 1559-6834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70975595 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Antiseptics Bacteria Biological and medical sciences Cross Infection - microbiology Cross Infection - nursing Cross Infection - prevention & control Drug Resistance, Microbial Epidemiology. Vaccinations Female Functional analysis General aspects Humans Infection control Infection Control - methods Infections Infectious diseases Intensive care Intensive care units Intensive Care Units - manpower Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Male Medical sciences Medical treatment Middle Aged Nurses Nursing Original Articles Retrospective Studies Statistics, Nonparametric Understaffing Workload - statistics & numerical data |
title | Assessing Excess Nurse Work Load Generated by Multiresistant Nosocomial Bacteria in Intensive Care |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A31%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Excess%20Nurse%20Work%20Load%20Generated%20by%20Multiresistant%20Nosocomial%20Bacteria%20in%20Intensive%20Care&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Saulnier,%20Fabienne%20F.&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=278&rft.pages=273-278&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/501899&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/501899%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3c550c8437bfe07c02353170dc904fb3bff0a696ece5bc1c6d6944cf340034573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70975595&rft_id=info:pmid/11428436&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/501899&rfr_iscdi=true |