Loading…

Learning in medicine: chorionic villus sampling

Operator experience is considered to influence the safety and success of medical procedures. We performed a retrospective survey to assess learning curves in chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Data of 2081 consecutive women, in whom CVS was carried out in a tertiary care university hospital for prenat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Prenatal diagnosis 2000-03, Vol.20 (3), p.241-246
Main Authors: Wijnberger, Lia D. E., van der Schouw, Yvonne T., Christiaens, Godelieve C. M. L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Operator experience is considered to influence the safety and success of medical procedures. We performed a retrospective survey to assess learning curves in chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Data of 2081 consecutive women, in whom CVS was carried out in a tertiary care university hospital for prenatal diagnosis, were available for analysis. Endpoints of the analysis were fetal loss, failure of the procedure and need for several needle insertions. Frequencies of each endpoint were calculated and plotted for consecutive series of 50 samplings per operator. Logistic regression analysis was used to quantify the effect of operator experience. We observed a statistically significant learning effect for the unit as a whole as assessed by fetal loss figures and the same tendency for need to do several insertions. We did not observe a (collective) learning effect for failure of the procedure. Individual operators showed a significant learning profile for some endpoints. The individual learning profile predominantly depended on previous experience in amniocentesis. Our study substantiates the presence of a learning curve for CVS. This supports the view that centralization and restriction of CVS to a limited number of experienced operators within centres, is likely to have a positive influence on safety and success of the procedure. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:0197-3851
1097-0223
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(200003)20:3<241::AID-PD793>3.0.CO;2-X