Loading…

First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care?

First-trimester screening for Down syndrome has been proposed as a significant improvement with respect to second-trimester serum screening programs, the current standard of care, because of apparently higher detection rates and an earlier gestational age at diagnosis. First-trimester nuchal translu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2000-03, Vol.182 (3), p.490-496
Main Authors: Malone, Fergal D., Berkowitz, Richard L., Canick, Jacob A., D'Alton, Mary E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3
container_end_page 496
container_issue 3
container_start_page 490
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 182
creator Malone, Fergal D.
Berkowitz, Richard L.
Canick, Jacob A.
D'Alton, Mary E.
description First-trimester screening for Down syndrome has been proposed as a significant improvement with respect to second-trimester serum screening programs, the current standard of care, because of apparently higher detection rates and an earlier gestational age at diagnosis. First-trimester nuchal translucency on ultrasonography forms the basis of this new form of screening, although studies of its efficacy have yielded widely conflicting results, with detection rates ranging from 29% to 91 %. Studies of first-trimester serum screening with measurements of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin serum concentrations have been much more consistent, with Down syndrome detection rates of 55% to 63% at a 5% false-positive rate. The combination of first-trimester ultrasonographic and serum screening has the potential to yield a Down syndrome detection rate of 80% at a 5% false-positive rate, although this approach has not been adequately studied. There have been no studies performed to date to directly compare the performance of first-trimester and second-trimester methods of screening. Two major trials are underway that will address this issue, one in the United Kingdom and one in the United States. Until the results of these trials are available, the current standard of care with respect to Down syndrome screening should not be changed, and first-trimester screening should remain investigational.
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mob.2000.104802
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71006812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937800800034</els_id><sourcerecordid>71006812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7P3qQH8dYtP7o29SIy3BQGgug5pMmLRtpmJq2w_96UDvTiKby8z3t83wehS4LnBOfFonHVnGI8VBnH9AhNCS6LNOc5P0bT2KBpyQo-QWchfA4lLekpmhBcsDIr8ynarK0PXdp520DowCdBeYDWtu-JcT6RLfS72lm9v01eIID06iOJ_6GTrZZeJ84kSnq4O0cnRtYBLg7vDL2tH15Xj-n2efO0ut-mihW0SwkFaSih2EiSKcil0kzjAtOKMM4ZzqoCiAGTKYqXXElmNJNVXhnIWMaZZjN0M-7deffVx8iisUFBXcekrg-iIBjnnNAILkZQeReCByN28Ubp94JgMbgT0Z0Y3InRXZy4Oqzuqwb0H36UFYHrAyCDkrXxslU2_HKMLCnlEStHDKKHbwteBGWhVaCtB9UJ7ey_GX4ABoeKLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71006812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Malone, Fergal D. ; Berkowitz, Richard L. ; Canick, Jacob A. ; D'Alton, Mary E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malone, Fergal D. ; Berkowitz, Richard L. ; Canick, Jacob A. ; D'Alton, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><description>First-trimester screening for Down syndrome has been proposed as a significant improvement with respect to second-trimester serum screening programs, the current standard of care, because of apparently higher detection rates and an earlier gestational age at diagnosis. First-trimester nuchal translucency on ultrasonography forms the basis of this new form of screening, although studies of its efficacy have yielded widely conflicting results, with detection rates ranging from 29% to 91 %. Studies of first-trimester serum screening with measurements of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin serum concentrations have been much more consistent, with Down syndrome detection rates of 55% to 63% at a 5% false-positive rate. The combination of first-trimester ultrasonographic and serum screening has the potential to yield a Down syndrome detection rate of 80% at a 5% false-positive rate, although this approach has not been adequately studied. There have been no studies performed to date to directly compare the performance of first-trimester and second-trimester methods of screening. Two major trials are underway that will address this issue, one in the United Kingdom and one in the United States. Until the results of these trials are available, the current standard of care with respect to Down syndrome screening should not be changed, and first-trimester screening should remain investigational.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.104802</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10739496</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aneuploidy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - blood ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Down syndrome ; Down Syndrome - blood ; Down Syndrome - diagnosis ; Down Syndrome - genetics ; Female ; Fetal Death ; first trimester screening ; Genetic Testing ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; nuchal translucency ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Pregnancy Trimester, Second ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Staphylococcal Protein A - blood ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - trends</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-03, Vol.182 (3), p.490-496</ispartof><rights>2000 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1315228$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10739496$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malone, Fergal D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkowitz, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canick, Jacob A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Alton, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><title>First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care?</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>First-trimester screening for Down syndrome has been proposed as a significant improvement with respect to second-trimester serum screening programs, the current standard of care, because of apparently higher detection rates and an earlier gestational age at diagnosis. First-trimester nuchal translucency on ultrasonography forms the basis of this new form of screening, although studies of its efficacy have yielded widely conflicting results, with detection rates ranging from 29% to 91 %. Studies of first-trimester serum screening with measurements of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin serum concentrations have been much more consistent, with Down syndrome detection rates of 55% to 63% at a 5% false-positive rate. The combination of first-trimester ultrasonographic and serum screening has the potential to yield a Down syndrome detection rate of 80% at a 5% false-positive rate, although this approach has not been adequately studied. There have been no studies performed to date to directly compare the performance of first-trimester and second-trimester methods of screening. Two major trials are underway that will address this issue, one in the United Kingdom and one in the United States. Until the results of these trials are available, the current standard of care with respect to Down syndrome screening should not be changed, and first-trimester screening should remain investigational.</description><subject>Aneuploidy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - blood</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Down syndrome</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - blood</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Death</subject><subject>first trimester screening</subject><subject>Genetic Testing</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>nuchal translucency</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Protein A - blood</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - trends</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7P3qQH8dYtP7o29SIy3BQGgug5pMmLRtpmJq2w_96UDvTiKby8z3t83wehS4LnBOfFonHVnGI8VBnH9AhNCS6LNOc5P0bT2KBpyQo-QWchfA4lLekpmhBcsDIr8ynarK0PXdp520DowCdBeYDWtu-JcT6RLfS72lm9v01eIID06iOJ_6GTrZZeJ84kSnq4O0cnRtYBLg7vDL2tH15Xj-n2efO0ut-mihW0SwkFaSih2EiSKcil0kzjAtOKMM4ZzqoCiAGTKYqXXElmNJNVXhnIWMaZZjN0M-7deffVx8iisUFBXcekrg-iIBjnnNAILkZQeReCByN28Ubp94JgMbgT0Z0Y3InRXZy4Oqzuqwb0H36UFYHrAyCDkrXxslU2_HKMLCnlEStHDKKHbwteBGWhVaCtB9UJ7ey_GX4ABoeKLg</recordid><startdate>20000301</startdate><enddate>20000301</enddate><creator>Malone, Fergal D.</creator><creator>Berkowitz, Richard L.</creator><creator>Canick, Jacob A.</creator><creator>D'Alton, Mary E.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000301</creationdate><title>First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care?</title><author>Malone, Fergal D. ; Berkowitz, Richard L. ; Canick, Jacob A. ; D'Alton, Mary E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Aneuploidy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - blood</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Down syndrome</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - blood</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Death</topic><topic>first trimester screening</topic><topic>Genetic Testing</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>nuchal translucency</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Protein A - blood</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malone, Fergal D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkowitz, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canick, Jacob A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Alton, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malone, Fergal D.</au><au>Berkowitz, Richard L.</au><au>Canick, Jacob A.</au><au>D'Alton, Mary E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2000-03-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>182</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>490-496</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>First-trimester screening for Down syndrome has been proposed as a significant improvement with respect to second-trimester serum screening programs, the current standard of care, because of apparently higher detection rates and an earlier gestational age at diagnosis. First-trimester nuchal translucency on ultrasonography forms the basis of this new form of screening, although studies of its efficacy have yielded widely conflicting results, with detection rates ranging from 29% to 91 %. Studies of first-trimester serum screening with measurements of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin serum concentrations have been much more consistent, with Down syndrome detection rates of 55% to 63% at a 5% false-positive rate. The combination of first-trimester ultrasonographic and serum screening has the potential to yield a Down syndrome detection rate of 80% at a 5% false-positive rate, although this approach has not been adequately studied. There have been no studies performed to date to directly compare the performance of first-trimester and second-trimester methods of screening. Two major trials are underway that will address this issue, one in the United Kingdom and one in the United States. Until the results of these trials are available, the current standard of care with respect to Down syndrome screening should not be changed, and first-trimester screening should remain investigational.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>10739496</pmid><doi>10.1067/mob.2000.104802</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-03, Vol.182 (3), p.490-496
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71006812
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Aneuploidy
Biological and medical sciences
Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - blood
Clinical Trials as Topic
Down syndrome
Down Syndrome - blood
Down Syndrome - diagnosis
Down Syndrome - genetics
Female
Fetal Death
first trimester screening
Genetic Testing
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Management. Prenatal diagnosis
Medical sciences
Multicenter Studies as Topic
nuchal translucency
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, First
Pregnancy Trimester, Second
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Staphylococcal Protein A - blood
Ultrasonography, Prenatal - trends
title First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A35%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=First-trimester%20screening%20for%20aneuploidy:%20Research%20or%20standard%20of%20care?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Malone,%20Fergal%20D.&rft.date=2000-03-01&rft.volume=182&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=490-496&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mob.2000.104802&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71006812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71006812&rft_id=info:pmid/10739496&rfr_iscdi=true