Loading…
First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care?
First-trimester screening for Down syndrome has been proposed as a significant improvement with respect to second-trimester serum screening programs, the current standard of care, because of apparently higher detection rates and an earlier gestational age at diagnosis. First-trimester nuchal translu...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2000-03, Vol.182 (3), p.490-496 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3 |
container_end_page | 496 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 490 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 182 |
creator | Malone, Fergal D. Berkowitz, Richard L. Canick, Jacob A. D'Alton, Mary E. |
description | First-trimester screening for Down syndrome has been proposed as a significant improvement with respect to second-trimester serum screening programs, the current standard of care, because of apparently higher detection rates and an earlier gestational age at diagnosis. First-trimester nuchal translucency on ultrasonography forms the basis of this new form of screening, although studies of its efficacy have yielded widely conflicting results, with detection rates ranging from 29% to 91 %. Studies of first-trimester serum screening with measurements of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin serum concentrations have been much more consistent, with Down syndrome detection rates of 55% to 63% at a 5% false-positive rate. The combination of first-trimester ultrasonographic and serum screening has the potential to yield a Down syndrome detection rate of 80% at a 5% false-positive rate, although this approach has not been adequately studied. There have been no studies performed to date to directly compare the performance of first-trimester and second-trimester methods of screening. Two major trials are underway that will address this issue, one in the United Kingdom and one in the United States. Until the results of these trials are available, the current standard of care with respect to Down syndrome screening should not be changed, and first-trimester screening should remain investigational. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1067/mob.2000.104802 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71006812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937800800034</els_id><sourcerecordid>71006812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7P3qQH8dYtP7o29SIy3BQGgug5pMmLRtpmJq2w_96UDvTiKby8z3t83wehS4LnBOfFonHVnGI8VBnH9AhNCS6LNOc5P0bT2KBpyQo-QWchfA4lLekpmhBcsDIr8ynarK0PXdp520DowCdBeYDWtu-JcT6RLfS72lm9v01eIID06iOJ_6GTrZZeJ84kSnq4O0cnRtYBLg7vDL2tH15Xj-n2efO0ut-mihW0SwkFaSih2EiSKcil0kzjAtOKMM4ZzqoCiAGTKYqXXElmNJNVXhnIWMaZZjN0M-7deffVx8iisUFBXcekrg-iIBjnnNAILkZQeReCByN28Ubp94JgMbgT0Z0Y3InRXZy4Oqzuqwb0H36UFYHrAyCDkrXxslU2_HKMLCnlEStHDKKHbwteBGWhVaCtB9UJ7ey_GX4ABoeKLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71006812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Malone, Fergal D. ; Berkowitz, Richard L. ; Canick, Jacob A. ; D'Alton, Mary E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malone, Fergal D. ; Berkowitz, Richard L. ; Canick, Jacob A. ; D'Alton, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><description>First-trimester screening for Down syndrome has been proposed as a significant improvement with respect to second-trimester serum screening programs, the current standard of care, because of apparently higher detection rates and an earlier gestational age at diagnosis. First-trimester nuchal translucency on ultrasonography forms the basis of this new form of screening, although studies of its efficacy have yielded widely conflicting results, with detection rates ranging from 29% to 91 %. Studies of first-trimester serum screening with measurements of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin serum concentrations have been much more consistent, with Down syndrome detection rates of 55% to 63% at a 5% false-positive rate. The combination of first-trimester ultrasonographic and serum screening has the potential to yield a Down syndrome detection rate of 80% at a 5% false-positive rate, although this approach has not been adequately studied. There have been no studies performed to date to directly compare the performance of first-trimester and second-trimester methods of screening. Two major trials are underway that will address this issue, one in the United Kingdom and one in the United States. Until the results of these trials are available, the current standard of care with respect to Down syndrome screening should not be changed, and first-trimester screening should remain investigational.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.104802</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10739496</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aneuploidy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - blood ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Down syndrome ; Down Syndrome - blood ; Down Syndrome - diagnosis ; Down Syndrome - genetics ; Female ; Fetal Death ; first trimester screening ; Genetic Testing ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; nuchal translucency ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Pregnancy Trimester, Second ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Staphylococcal Protein A - blood ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - trends</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-03, Vol.182 (3), p.490-496</ispartof><rights>2000 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1315228$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10739496$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malone, Fergal D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkowitz, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canick, Jacob A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Alton, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><title>First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care?</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>First-trimester screening for Down syndrome has been proposed as a significant improvement with respect to second-trimester serum screening programs, the current standard of care, because of apparently higher detection rates and an earlier gestational age at diagnosis. First-trimester nuchal translucency on ultrasonography forms the basis of this new form of screening, although studies of its efficacy have yielded widely conflicting results, with detection rates ranging from 29% to 91 %. Studies of first-trimester serum screening with measurements of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin serum concentrations have been much more consistent, with Down syndrome detection rates of 55% to 63% at a 5% false-positive rate. The combination of first-trimester ultrasonographic and serum screening has the potential to yield a Down syndrome detection rate of 80% at a 5% false-positive rate, although this approach has not been adequately studied. There have been no studies performed to date to directly compare the performance of first-trimester and second-trimester methods of screening. Two major trials are underway that will address this issue, one in the United Kingdom and one in the United States. Until the results of these trials are available, the current standard of care with respect to Down syndrome screening should not be changed, and first-trimester screening should remain investigational.</description><subject>Aneuploidy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - blood</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Down syndrome</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - blood</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Death</subject><subject>first trimester screening</subject><subject>Genetic Testing</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>nuchal translucency</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Protein A - blood</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - trends</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7P3qQH8dYtP7o29SIy3BQGgug5pMmLRtpmJq2w_96UDvTiKby8z3t83wehS4LnBOfFonHVnGI8VBnH9AhNCS6LNOc5P0bT2KBpyQo-QWchfA4lLekpmhBcsDIr8ynarK0PXdp520DowCdBeYDWtu-JcT6RLfS72lm9v01eIID06iOJ_6GTrZZeJ84kSnq4O0cnRtYBLg7vDL2tH15Xj-n2efO0ut-mihW0SwkFaSih2EiSKcil0kzjAtOKMM4ZzqoCiAGTKYqXXElmNJNVXhnIWMaZZjN0M-7deffVx8iisUFBXcekrg-iIBjnnNAILkZQeReCByN28Ubp94JgMbgT0Z0Y3InRXZy4Oqzuqwb0H36UFYHrAyCDkrXxslU2_HKMLCnlEStHDKKHbwteBGWhVaCtB9UJ7ey_GX4ABoeKLg</recordid><startdate>20000301</startdate><enddate>20000301</enddate><creator>Malone, Fergal D.</creator><creator>Berkowitz, Richard L.</creator><creator>Canick, Jacob A.</creator><creator>D'Alton, Mary E.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000301</creationdate><title>First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care?</title><author>Malone, Fergal D. ; Berkowitz, Richard L. ; Canick, Jacob A. ; D'Alton, Mary E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Aneuploidy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - blood</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Down syndrome</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - blood</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Death</topic><topic>first trimester screening</topic><topic>Genetic Testing</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>nuchal translucency</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Protein A - blood</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malone, Fergal D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkowitz, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canick, Jacob A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Alton, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malone, Fergal D.</au><au>Berkowitz, Richard L.</au><au>Canick, Jacob A.</au><au>D'Alton, Mary E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2000-03-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>182</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>490-496</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>First-trimester screening for Down syndrome has been proposed as a significant improvement with respect to second-trimester serum screening programs, the current standard of care, because of apparently higher detection rates and an earlier gestational age at diagnosis. First-trimester nuchal translucency on ultrasonography forms the basis of this new form of screening, although studies of its efficacy have yielded widely conflicting results, with detection rates ranging from 29% to 91 %. Studies of first-trimester serum screening with measurements of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin serum concentrations have been much more consistent, with Down syndrome detection rates of 55% to 63% at a 5% false-positive rate. The combination of first-trimester ultrasonographic and serum screening has the potential to yield a Down syndrome detection rate of 80% at a 5% false-positive rate, although this approach has not been adequately studied. There have been no studies performed to date to directly compare the performance of first-trimester and second-trimester methods of screening. Two major trials are underway that will address this issue, one in the United Kingdom and one in the United States. Until the results of these trials are available, the current standard of care with respect to Down syndrome screening should not be changed, and first-trimester screening should remain investigational.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>10739496</pmid><doi>10.1067/mob.2000.104802</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-03, Vol.182 (3), p.490-496 |
issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71006812 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Aneuploidy Biological and medical sciences Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - blood Clinical Trials as Topic Down syndrome Down Syndrome - blood Down Syndrome - diagnosis Down Syndrome - genetics Female Fetal Death first trimester screening Genetic Testing Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Management. Prenatal diagnosis Medical sciences Multicenter Studies as Topic nuchal translucency Pregnancy Pregnancy Trimester, First Pregnancy Trimester, Second Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta Staphylococcal Protein A - blood Ultrasonography, Prenatal - trends |
title | First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A35%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=First-trimester%20screening%20for%20aneuploidy:%20Research%20or%20standard%20of%20care?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Malone,%20Fergal%20D.&rft.date=2000-03-01&rft.volume=182&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=490-496&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mob.2000.104802&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71006812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-12eaf2120fa14ce6acd3d0702b1388304b7e1fef4c2058ca3fd3ab6bfe43483d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71006812&rft_id=info:pmid/10739496&rfr_iscdi=true |