Loading…
Endograft Planning without Preoperative Arteriography: A Clinical Feasibility Study
Purpose: To investigate an alternative method of preprocedural planning for aortic endografting based solely on spiral computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction without preoperative arteriography. Methods: From August 1997 to April 1998, 25 consecutive patients with abdominal a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of endovascular therapy 2000-02, Vol.7 (1), p.8-15 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93 |
container_end_page | 15 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 8 |
container_title | Journal of endovascular therapy |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Beebe, Hugh G. Kritpracha, Boonprasit Serres, Sharon Pigott, John P. Price, Charles I. Williams, David M. |
description | Purpose:
To investigate an alternative method of preprocedural planning for aortic endografting based solely on spiral computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction without preoperative arteriography.
Methods:
From August 1997 to April 1998, 25 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were evaluated for endovascular repair by spiral CT scans (2-mm slice thickness) and computerized 3D model construction. No additional imaging for planning was performed. The aortoiliac dimensions, thrombus load, calcification, and vessel tortuosity were measured and evaluated from the 3D model of the aortoiliac segment. These data were used for selecting the patients; the configuration, diameter, and length of the endograft; and the attachment sites for deployment.
Results:
Primary procedural success was 92% (23/25). All endografts were deployed as planned, and there were no conversions to open repair. Six patients required adjunctive procedures for delivery system access or for iliac aneurysm exclusion, as predicted by the 3D model. Mean procedural time was 91 minutes (range 24 to 273). Two (8%) type II (side branch) endoleaks both sealed spontaneously within 1 month. No graft-related complications or death occurred, for a 30-day technical success rate of 100%.
Conclusions:
This computerized 3D model provided accurate data for preoperative evaluation of the aortoiliac segment for endovascular AAA repair. Satisfactory technical outcomes for aortic endografts can be achieved without the use of preprocedural invasive imaging. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/152660280000700102 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71043791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_152660280000700102</sage_id><sourcerecordid>71043791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRbK3-AQ-Sk7fYnU02m3grpVWhoFA9h8lm025Jk7ibKPn3bkgPguBcZhi-9-A9Qm6BPgAIMQfOooiymLoRlAJlZ2QKPOQ-cE7Ph5tF_kBMyJW1B0oZMIBLMgEqBBNhMCXbVZXXO4NF672VWFW62nnfut3XnXsYVTfKYKu_lLcwrTJ6QJt9_-gtvGWpKy2x9NYKrc50qdve27Zd3l-TiwJLq25Oe0Y-1qv35bO_eX16WS42vmQ8bH0ZZSGwPMlFFqNCGeVBmGeokkAiAqgCaZIVktFMYMw5SiUcIJMEecBimQQzcj_6Nqb-7JRt06O2UpUuh6o7mwqgYSAScCAbQWlqa40q0sboI5o-BZoOVaZ_q3Siu5N7lx1V_ksydueA-QhY3Kn0UHemcmn_s_wBr1l9Ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71043791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endograft Planning without Preoperative Arteriography: A Clinical Feasibility Study</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Beebe, Hugh G. ; Kritpracha, Boonprasit ; Serres, Sharon ; Pigott, John P. ; Price, Charles I. ; Williams, David M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beebe, Hugh G. ; Kritpracha, Boonprasit ; Serres, Sharon ; Pigott, John P. ; Price, Charles I. ; Williams, David M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
To investigate an alternative method of preprocedural planning for aortic endografting based solely on spiral computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction without preoperative arteriography.
Methods:
From August 1997 to April 1998, 25 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were evaluated for endovascular repair by spiral CT scans (2-mm slice thickness) and computerized 3D model construction. No additional imaging for planning was performed. The aortoiliac dimensions, thrombus load, calcification, and vessel tortuosity were measured and evaluated from the 3D model of the aortoiliac segment. These data were used for selecting the patients; the configuration, diameter, and length of the endograft; and the attachment sites for deployment.
Results:
Primary procedural success was 92% (23/25). All endografts were deployed as planned, and there were no conversions to open repair. Six patients required adjunctive procedures for delivery system access or for iliac aneurysm exclusion, as predicted by the 3D model. Mean procedural time was 91 minutes (range 24 to 273). Two (8%) type II (side branch) endoleaks both sealed spontaneously within 1 month. No graft-related complications or death occurred, for a 30-day technical success rate of 100%.
Conclusions:
This computerized 3D model provided accurate data for preoperative evaluation of the aortoiliac segment for endovascular AAA repair. Satisfactory technical outcomes for aortic endografts can be achieved without the use of preprocedural invasive imaging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-6028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/152660280000700102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10772743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Aortography ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Computer Simulation ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Male ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of endovascular therapy, 2000-02, Vol.7 (1), p.8-15</ispartof><rights>2000 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10772743$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beebe, Hugh G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kritpracha, Boonprasit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serres, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pigott, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Charles I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, David M.</creatorcontrib><title>Endograft Planning without Preoperative Arteriography: A Clinical Feasibility Study</title><title>Journal of endovascular therapy</title><addtitle>J Endovasc Ther</addtitle><description>Purpose:
To investigate an alternative method of preprocedural planning for aortic endografting based solely on spiral computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction without preoperative arteriography.
Methods:
From August 1997 to April 1998, 25 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were evaluated for endovascular repair by spiral CT scans (2-mm slice thickness) and computerized 3D model construction. No additional imaging for planning was performed. The aortoiliac dimensions, thrombus load, calcification, and vessel tortuosity were measured and evaluated from the 3D model of the aortoiliac segment. These data were used for selecting the patients; the configuration, diameter, and length of the endograft; and the attachment sites for deployment.
Results:
Primary procedural success was 92% (23/25). All endografts were deployed as planned, and there were no conversions to open repair. Six patients required adjunctive procedures for delivery system access or for iliac aneurysm exclusion, as predicted by the 3D model. Mean procedural time was 91 minutes (range 24 to 273). Two (8%) type II (side branch) endoleaks both sealed spontaneously within 1 month. No graft-related complications or death occurred, for a 30-day technical success rate of 100%.
Conclusions:
This computerized 3D model provided accurate data for preoperative evaluation of the aortoiliac segment for endovascular AAA repair. Satisfactory technical outcomes for aortic endografts can be achieved without the use of preprocedural invasive imaging.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Aortography</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>1526-6028</issn><issn>1545-1550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRbK3-AQ-Sk7fYnU02m3grpVWhoFA9h8lm025Jk7ibKPn3bkgPguBcZhi-9-A9Qm6BPgAIMQfOooiymLoRlAJlZ2QKPOQ-cE7Ph5tF_kBMyJW1B0oZMIBLMgEqBBNhMCXbVZXXO4NF672VWFW62nnfut3XnXsYVTfKYKu_lLcwrTJ6QJt9_-gtvGWpKy2x9NYKrc50qdve27Zd3l-TiwJLq25Oe0Y-1qv35bO_eX16WS42vmQ8bH0ZZSGwPMlFFqNCGeVBmGeokkAiAqgCaZIVktFMYMw5SiUcIJMEecBimQQzcj_6Nqb-7JRt06O2UpUuh6o7mwqgYSAScCAbQWlqa40q0sboI5o-BZoOVaZ_q3Siu5N7lx1V_ksydueA-QhY3Kn0UHemcmn_s_wBr1l9Ng</recordid><startdate>200002</startdate><enddate>200002</enddate><creator>Beebe, Hugh G.</creator><creator>Kritpracha, Boonprasit</creator><creator>Serres, Sharon</creator><creator>Pigott, John P.</creator><creator>Price, Charles I.</creator><creator>Williams, David M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200002</creationdate><title>Endograft Planning without Preoperative Arteriography: A Clinical Feasibility Study</title><author>Beebe, Hugh G. ; Kritpracha, Boonprasit ; Serres, Sharon ; Pigott, John P. ; Price, Charles I. ; Williams, David M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Aortography</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beebe, Hugh G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kritpracha, Boonprasit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serres, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pigott, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Charles I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, David M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endovascular therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beebe, Hugh G.</au><au>Kritpracha, Boonprasit</au><au>Serres, Sharon</au><au>Pigott, John P.</au><au>Price, Charles I.</au><au>Williams, David M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endograft Planning without Preoperative Arteriography: A Clinical Feasibility Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endovascular therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Endovasc Ther</addtitle><date>2000-02</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>8-15</pages><issn>1526-6028</issn><eissn>1545-1550</eissn><abstract>Purpose:
To investigate an alternative method of preprocedural planning for aortic endografting based solely on spiral computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction without preoperative arteriography.
Methods:
From August 1997 to April 1998, 25 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were evaluated for endovascular repair by spiral CT scans (2-mm slice thickness) and computerized 3D model construction. No additional imaging for planning was performed. The aortoiliac dimensions, thrombus load, calcification, and vessel tortuosity were measured and evaluated from the 3D model of the aortoiliac segment. These data were used for selecting the patients; the configuration, diameter, and length of the endograft; and the attachment sites for deployment.
Results:
Primary procedural success was 92% (23/25). All endografts were deployed as planned, and there were no conversions to open repair. Six patients required adjunctive procedures for delivery system access or for iliac aneurysm exclusion, as predicted by the 3D model. Mean procedural time was 91 minutes (range 24 to 273). Two (8%) type II (side branch) endoleaks both sealed spontaneously within 1 month. No graft-related complications or death occurred, for a 30-day technical success rate of 100%.
Conclusions:
This computerized 3D model provided accurate data for preoperative evaluation of the aortoiliac segment for endovascular AAA repair. Satisfactory technical outcomes for aortic endografts can be achieved without the use of preprocedural invasive imaging.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>10772743</pmid><doi>10.1177/152660280000700102</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-6028 |
ispartof | Journal of endovascular therapy, 2000-02, Vol.7 (1), p.8-15 |
issn | 1526-6028 1545-1550 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71043791 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Aged Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery Aortography Blood Vessel Prosthesis Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation Computer Simulation Feasibility Studies Female Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Male Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Endograft Planning without Preoperative Arteriography: A Clinical Feasibility Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A16%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endograft%20Planning%20without%20Preoperative%20Arteriography:%20A%20Clinical%20Feasibility%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endovascular%20therapy&rft.au=Beebe,%20Hugh%20G.&rft.date=2000-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=8-15&rft.issn=1526-6028&rft.eissn=1545-1550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/152660280000700102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71043791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71043791&rft_id=info:pmid/10772743&rft_sage_id=10.1177_152660280000700102&rfr_iscdi=true |