Loading…

Endograft Planning without Preoperative Arteriography: A Clinical Feasibility Study

Purpose: To investigate an alternative method of preprocedural planning for aortic endografting based solely on spiral computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction without preoperative arteriography. Methods: From August 1997 to April 1998, 25 consecutive patients with abdominal a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of endovascular therapy 2000-02, Vol.7 (1), p.8-15
Main Authors: Beebe, Hugh G., Kritpracha, Boonprasit, Serres, Sharon, Pigott, John P., Price, Charles I., Williams, David M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93
container_end_page 15
container_issue 1
container_start_page 8
container_title Journal of endovascular therapy
container_volume 7
creator Beebe, Hugh G.
Kritpracha, Boonprasit
Serres, Sharon
Pigott, John P.
Price, Charles I.
Williams, David M.
description Purpose: To investigate an alternative method of preprocedural planning for aortic endografting based solely on spiral computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction without preoperative arteriography. Methods: From August 1997 to April 1998, 25 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were evaluated for endovascular repair by spiral CT scans (2-mm slice thickness) and computerized 3D model construction. No additional imaging for planning was performed. The aortoiliac dimensions, thrombus load, calcification, and vessel tortuosity were measured and evaluated from the 3D model of the aortoiliac segment. These data were used for selecting the patients; the configuration, diameter, and length of the endograft; and the attachment sites for deployment. Results: Primary procedural success was 92% (23/25). All endografts were deployed as planned, and there were no conversions to open repair. Six patients required adjunctive procedures for delivery system access or for iliac aneurysm exclusion, as predicted by the 3D model. Mean procedural time was 91 minutes (range 24 to 273). Two (8%) type II (side branch) endoleaks both sealed spontaneously within 1 month. No graft-related complications or death occurred, for a 30-day technical success rate of 100%. Conclusions: This computerized 3D model provided accurate data for preoperative evaluation of the aortoiliac segment for endovascular AAA repair. Satisfactory technical outcomes for aortic endografts can be achieved without the use of preprocedural invasive imaging.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/152660280000700102
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71043791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_152660280000700102</sage_id><sourcerecordid>71043791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRbK3-AQ-Sk7fYnU02m3grpVWhoFA9h8lm025Jk7ibKPn3bkgPguBcZhi-9-A9Qm6BPgAIMQfOooiymLoRlAJlZ2QKPOQ-cE7Ph5tF_kBMyJW1B0oZMIBLMgEqBBNhMCXbVZXXO4NF672VWFW62nnfut3XnXsYVTfKYKu_lLcwrTJ6QJt9_-gtvGWpKy2x9NYKrc50qdve27Zd3l-TiwJLq25Oe0Y-1qv35bO_eX16WS42vmQ8bH0ZZSGwPMlFFqNCGeVBmGeokkAiAqgCaZIVktFMYMw5SiUcIJMEecBimQQzcj_6Nqb-7JRt06O2UpUuh6o7mwqgYSAScCAbQWlqa40q0sboI5o-BZoOVaZ_q3Siu5N7lx1V_ksydueA-QhY3Kn0UHemcmn_s_wBr1l9Ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71043791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endograft Planning without Preoperative Arteriography: A Clinical Feasibility Study</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Beebe, Hugh G. ; Kritpracha, Boonprasit ; Serres, Sharon ; Pigott, John P. ; Price, Charles I. ; Williams, David M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beebe, Hugh G. ; Kritpracha, Boonprasit ; Serres, Sharon ; Pigott, John P. ; Price, Charles I. ; Williams, David M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To investigate an alternative method of preprocedural planning for aortic endografting based solely on spiral computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction without preoperative arteriography. Methods: From August 1997 to April 1998, 25 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were evaluated for endovascular repair by spiral CT scans (2-mm slice thickness) and computerized 3D model construction. No additional imaging for planning was performed. The aortoiliac dimensions, thrombus load, calcification, and vessel tortuosity were measured and evaluated from the 3D model of the aortoiliac segment. These data were used for selecting the patients; the configuration, diameter, and length of the endograft; and the attachment sites for deployment. Results: Primary procedural success was 92% (23/25). All endografts were deployed as planned, and there were no conversions to open repair. Six patients required adjunctive procedures for delivery system access or for iliac aneurysm exclusion, as predicted by the 3D model. Mean procedural time was 91 minutes (range 24 to 273). Two (8%) type II (side branch) endoleaks both sealed spontaneously within 1 month. No graft-related complications or death occurred, for a 30-day technical success rate of 100%. Conclusions: This computerized 3D model provided accurate data for preoperative evaluation of the aortoiliac segment for endovascular AAA repair. Satisfactory technical outcomes for aortic endografts can be achieved without the use of preprocedural invasive imaging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-6028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/152660280000700102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10772743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Aortography ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Computer Simulation ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Male ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of endovascular therapy, 2000-02, Vol.7 (1), p.8-15</ispartof><rights>2000 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10772743$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beebe, Hugh G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kritpracha, Boonprasit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serres, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pigott, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Charles I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, David M.</creatorcontrib><title>Endograft Planning without Preoperative Arteriography: A Clinical Feasibility Study</title><title>Journal of endovascular therapy</title><addtitle>J Endovasc Ther</addtitle><description>Purpose: To investigate an alternative method of preprocedural planning for aortic endografting based solely on spiral computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction without preoperative arteriography. Methods: From August 1997 to April 1998, 25 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were evaluated for endovascular repair by spiral CT scans (2-mm slice thickness) and computerized 3D model construction. No additional imaging for planning was performed. The aortoiliac dimensions, thrombus load, calcification, and vessel tortuosity were measured and evaluated from the 3D model of the aortoiliac segment. These data were used for selecting the patients; the configuration, diameter, and length of the endograft; and the attachment sites for deployment. Results: Primary procedural success was 92% (23/25). All endografts were deployed as planned, and there were no conversions to open repair. Six patients required adjunctive procedures for delivery system access or for iliac aneurysm exclusion, as predicted by the 3D model. Mean procedural time was 91 minutes (range 24 to 273). Two (8%) type II (side branch) endoleaks both sealed spontaneously within 1 month. No graft-related complications or death occurred, for a 30-day technical success rate of 100%. Conclusions: This computerized 3D model provided accurate data for preoperative evaluation of the aortoiliac segment for endovascular AAA repair. Satisfactory technical outcomes for aortic endografts can be achieved without the use of preprocedural invasive imaging.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Aortography</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>1526-6028</issn><issn>1545-1550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRbK3-AQ-Sk7fYnU02m3grpVWhoFA9h8lm025Jk7ibKPn3bkgPguBcZhi-9-A9Qm6BPgAIMQfOooiymLoRlAJlZ2QKPOQ-cE7Ph5tF_kBMyJW1B0oZMIBLMgEqBBNhMCXbVZXXO4NF672VWFW62nnfut3XnXsYVTfKYKu_lLcwrTJ6QJt9_-gtvGWpKy2x9NYKrc50qdve27Zd3l-TiwJLq25Oe0Y-1qv35bO_eX16WS42vmQ8bH0ZZSGwPMlFFqNCGeVBmGeokkAiAqgCaZIVktFMYMw5SiUcIJMEecBimQQzcj_6Nqb-7JRt06O2UpUuh6o7mwqgYSAScCAbQWlqa40q0sboI5o-BZoOVaZ_q3Siu5N7lx1V_ksydueA-QhY3Kn0UHemcmn_s_wBr1l9Ng</recordid><startdate>200002</startdate><enddate>200002</enddate><creator>Beebe, Hugh G.</creator><creator>Kritpracha, Boonprasit</creator><creator>Serres, Sharon</creator><creator>Pigott, John P.</creator><creator>Price, Charles I.</creator><creator>Williams, David M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200002</creationdate><title>Endograft Planning without Preoperative Arteriography: A Clinical Feasibility Study</title><author>Beebe, Hugh G. ; Kritpracha, Boonprasit ; Serres, Sharon ; Pigott, John P. ; Price, Charles I. ; Williams, David M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Aortography</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beebe, Hugh G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kritpracha, Boonprasit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serres, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pigott, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Charles I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, David M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endovascular therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beebe, Hugh G.</au><au>Kritpracha, Boonprasit</au><au>Serres, Sharon</au><au>Pigott, John P.</au><au>Price, Charles I.</au><au>Williams, David M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endograft Planning without Preoperative Arteriography: A Clinical Feasibility Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endovascular therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Endovasc Ther</addtitle><date>2000-02</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>8-15</pages><issn>1526-6028</issn><eissn>1545-1550</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To investigate an alternative method of preprocedural planning for aortic endografting based solely on spiral computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction without preoperative arteriography. Methods: From August 1997 to April 1998, 25 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were evaluated for endovascular repair by spiral CT scans (2-mm slice thickness) and computerized 3D model construction. No additional imaging for planning was performed. The aortoiliac dimensions, thrombus load, calcification, and vessel tortuosity were measured and evaluated from the 3D model of the aortoiliac segment. These data were used for selecting the patients; the configuration, diameter, and length of the endograft; and the attachment sites for deployment. Results: Primary procedural success was 92% (23/25). All endografts were deployed as planned, and there were no conversions to open repair. Six patients required adjunctive procedures for delivery system access or for iliac aneurysm exclusion, as predicted by the 3D model. Mean procedural time was 91 minutes (range 24 to 273). Two (8%) type II (side branch) endoleaks both sealed spontaneously within 1 month. No graft-related complications or death occurred, for a 30-day technical success rate of 100%. Conclusions: This computerized 3D model provided accurate data for preoperative evaluation of the aortoiliac segment for endovascular AAA repair. Satisfactory technical outcomes for aortic endografts can be achieved without the use of preprocedural invasive imaging.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>10772743</pmid><doi>10.1177/152660280000700102</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-6028
ispartof Journal of endovascular therapy, 2000-02, Vol.7 (1), p.8-15
issn 1526-6028
1545-1550
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71043791
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Aged
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery
Aortography
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
Computer Simulation
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Male
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Endograft Planning without Preoperative Arteriography: A Clinical Feasibility Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A16%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endograft%20Planning%20without%20Preoperative%20Arteriography:%20A%20Clinical%20Feasibility%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endovascular%20therapy&rft.au=Beebe,%20Hugh%20G.&rft.date=2000-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=8-15&rft.issn=1526-6028&rft.eissn=1545-1550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/152660280000700102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71043791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-c6b412d9d7b8aeac6d34dbae93caa11efa09bfc20b7a855ace734dc99a5328c93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71043791&rft_id=info:pmid/10772743&rft_sage_id=10.1177_152660280000700102&rfr_iscdi=true