The nurse cystoscopist: a feasible option?

• Published in: BJU international 2000-04, Vol.85 (6), p.651-654
• Main Authors: Gidlow, A.B., Laniado, M.E., Ellis, B.W.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; bladder lesions; Cystoscopy; Cystoscopy - methods; detection; Endoscopy; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Feasibility Studies; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); legal; Liability, Legal; Medical sciences; nurse; Nurse Practitioners; Sensitivity and Specificity; training; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis; Urinary tract; Urology - education; Urology - legislation & jurisprudence
• ISSN: 1464-4096; 1464-410X
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00574.x

Objectives To compare the accuracy achieved by a trained urology nurse practitioner (UNP) and consultant urologist in detecting bladder tumours during flexible cystoscopy. Patients and methods Eighty‐three patients underwent flexible cystoscopy by both the UNP and consultant urologist, each unaware of the other’s findings. Before comparing the findings, each declared whether there was tumour or any suspicious lesion requiring biopsy. Results Of 83 patients examined by flexible cystoscopy, 26 were found to have a tumour or a suspicious lesion. One tumour was missed by the UNP and one by the urologist; each tumour was minute. Analysis using the chance‐corrected proportional agreement (Κ) was 0.94, indicating very close agreement. Conclusion A UNP can be trained to perform cystoscopy and detect suspicious lesions as accurately as can a consultant urologist. Legal and training issues in implementation are important.