Loading…
Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany
The effectiveness of oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever (CSF) was studied in a field trial in Lower Saxony for two years, from 1993 to 1995. This field study was performed in an area of ca. 270 km 2, belonging to three military training grounds. Wild boar in one range were...
Saved in:
Published in: | Veterinary microbiology 2000-04, Vol.73 (2), p.239-252 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863 |
container_end_page | 252 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 239 |
container_title | Veterinary microbiology |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Kaden, V Lange, E Fischer, U Strebelow, G |
description | The effectiveness of oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever (CSF) was studied in a field trial in Lower Saxony for two years, from 1993 to 1995. This field study was performed in an area of ca. 270
km
2, belonging to three military training grounds. Wild boar in one range were uninfected, whilst the wild boar population of the other two ranges were infected with CSF virus. The animals were vaccinated with a bait vaccine. The immunisation procedure included a double vaccination with an interval of ≈14 days. This was followed by repeated vaccination campaigns at 6 monthly intervals. The rate of uptake of baits at feeding places was determined to be between 85 and 100%. The bait marker oxytetracycline could be detected in bone samples in 52.4–67.6% of hunted animals. The antibody prevalence reached 49–60.3% after immunisation. However, >50% of young boars did not feed on vaccine baits nor become immunised. Therefore, an intensive hunting of this age group is a necessary adjunct to the use of oral vaccination. After the third immunisation period, no virus was detected in the areas where oral immunisation took place. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00148-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71065232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378113500001486</els_id><sourcerecordid>17535762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0btuFDEUBmALgcgSeASQC4SgGPBlfAkNQhEEpEgpgNry2Mdw0Iwn2DMb7dvjza4CXSoX_v5j6_yEPOfsLWdcv_vGpLEd51K9ZuwNY7y3nX5ANtwa2QnVi4dkc0dOyJNafzPG-jPNHpMTzoxVUvINGa-KHylO05qx-gXnTOdEb3CMdJh9of6nx1wXGkZfK4Zm6w1moAm2UN5T2PpxvYstv9oFlsYTQptQlzXuKGZ6AWXyefeUPEp-rPDseJ6SH58_fT__0l1eXXw9_3jZhV7wpZO97YcopBGgwbJBDj3EaHwMXAUIwgC3OoH0ffSQlAQppBz0kHjLR6vlKXl1mHtd5j8r1MVNWAOMo88wr9UZzrQSLXUf5EZJZfQeqgMMZa61QHLXBSdfdo4zt-_D3fbh9st2jLnbPtz-Jy-OD6zDBPG_1KGABl4ega9tu6n4HLD-c0rYM6Ua-3Bg0Na2RSiuBoQcIGKBsLg44z0_-QtKIKhG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17535762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Kaden, V ; Lange, E ; Fischer, U ; Strebelow, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaden, V ; Lange, E ; Fischer, U ; Strebelow, G</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness of oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever (CSF) was studied in a field trial in Lower Saxony for two years, from 1993 to 1995. This field study was performed in an area of ca. 270
km
2, belonging to three military training grounds. Wild boar in one range were uninfected, whilst the wild boar population of the other two ranges were infected with CSF virus. The animals were vaccinated with a bait vaccine. The immunisation procedure included a double vaccination with an interval of ≈14 days. This was followed by repeated vaccination campaigns at 6 monthly intervals. The rate of uptake of baits at feeding places was determined to be between 85 and 100%. The bait marker oxytetracycline could be detected in bone samples in 52.4–67.6% of hunted animals. The antibody prevalence reached 49–60.3% after immunisation. However, >50% of young boars did not feed on vaccine baits nor become immunised. Therefore, an intensive hunting of this age group is a necessary adjunct to the use of oral vaccination. After the third immunisation period, no virus was detected in the areas where oral immunisation took place.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00148-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10785331</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VMICDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Animals ; Animals, Wild ; Antibodies, Viral ; Biological and medical sciences ; Classical Swine Fever - prevention & control ; Classical swine fever virus ; Classical swine fever virus (CSFV) ; Epidemiology ; Field vaccination ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Germany ; Microbiology ; Oral immunisation ; Pestivirus ; Swine ; Vaccination - veterinary ; Viral Vaccines - administration & dosage ; Virology ; Wild boar ; wild boars</subject><ispartof>Veterinary microbiology, 2000-04, Vol.73 (2), p.239-252</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1528955$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10785331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaden, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strebelow, G</creatorcontrib><title>Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany</title><title>Veterinary microbiology</title><addtitle>Vet Microbiol</addtitle><description>The effectiveness of oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever (CSF) was studied in a field trial in Lower Saxony for two years, from 1993 to 1995. This field study was performed in an area of ca. 270
km
2, belonging to three military training grounds. Wild boar in one range were uninfected, whilst the wild boar population of the other two ranges were infected with CSF virus. The animals were vaccinated with a bait vaccine. The immunisation procedure included a double vaccination with an interval of ≈14 days. This was followed by repeated vaccination campaigns at 6 monthly intervals. The rate of uptake of baits at feeding places was determined to be between 85 and 100%. The bait marker oxytetracycline could be detected in bone samples in 52.4–67.6% of hunted animals. The antibody prevalence reached 49–60.3% after immunisation. However, >50% of young boars did not feed on vaccine baits nor become immunised. Therefore, an intensive hunting of this age group is a necessary adjunct to the use of oral vaccination. After the third immunisation period, no virus was detected in the areas where oral immunisation took place.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Classical Swine Fever - prevention & control</subject><subject>Classical swine fever virus</subject><subject>Classical swine fever virus (CSFV)</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Field vaccination</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Oral immunisation</subject><subject>Pestivirus</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Vaccination - veterinary</subject><subject>Viral Vaccines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Virology</subject><subject>Wild boar</subject><subject>wild boars</subject><issn>0378-1135</issn><issn>1873-2542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0btuFDEUBmALgcgSeASQC4SgGPBlfAkNQhEEpEgpgNry2Mdw0Iwn2DMb7dvjza4CXSoX_v5j6_yEPOfsLWdcv_vGpLEd51K9ZuwNY7y3nX5ANtwa2QnVi4dkc0dOyJNafzPG-jPNHpMTzoxVUvINGa-KHylO05qx-gXnTOdEb3CMdJh9of6nx1wXGkZfK4Zm6w1moAm2UN5T2PpxvYstv9oFlsYTQptQlzXuKGZ6AWXyefeUPEp-rPDseJ6SH58_fT__0l1eXXw9_3jZhV7wpZO97YcopBGgwbJBDj3EaHwMXAUIwgC3OoH0ffSQlAQppBz0kHjLR6vlKXl1mHtd5j8r1MVNWAOMo88wr9UZzrQSLXUf5EZJZfQeqgMMZa61QHLXBSdfdo4zt-_D3fbh9st2jLnbPtz-Jy-OD6zDBPG_1KGABl4ega9tu6n4HLD-c0rYM6Ua-3Bg0Na2RSiuBoQcIGKBsLg44z0_-QtKIKhG</recordid><startdate>20000413</startdate><enddate>20000413</enddate><creator>Kaden, V</creator><creator>Lange, E</creator><creator>Fischer, U</creator><creator>Strebelow, G</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000413</creationdate><title>Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany</title><author>Kaden, V ; Lange, E ; Fischer, U ; Strebelow, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Classical Swine Fever - prevention & control</topic><topic>Classical swine fever virus</topic><topic>Classical swine fever virus (CSFV)</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Field vaccination</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Oral immunisation</topic><topic>Pestivirus</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Vaccination - veterinary</topic><topic>Viral Vaccines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Virology</topic><topic>Wild boar</topic><topic>wild boars</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaden, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strebelow, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaden, V</au><au>Lange, E</au><au>Fischer, U</au><au>Strebelow, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Microbiol</addtitle><date>2000-04-13</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>239-252</pages><issn>0378-1135</issn><eissn>1873-2542</eissn><coden>VMICDQ</coden><abstract>The effectiveness of oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever (CSF) was studied in a field trial in Lower Saxony for two years, from 1993 to 1995. This field study was performed in an area of ca. 270
km
2, belonging to three military training grounds. Wild boar in one range were uninfected, whilst the wild boar population of the other two ranges were infected with CSF virus. The animals were vaccinated with a bait vaccine. The immunisation procedure included a double vaccination with an interval of ≈14 days. This was followed by repeated vaccination campaigns at 6 monthly intervals. The rate of uptake of baits at feeding places was determined to be between 85 and 100%. The bait marker oxytetracycline could be detected in bone samples in 52.4–67.6% of hunted animals. The antibody prevalence reached 49–60.3% after immunisation. However, >50% of young boars did not feed on vaccine baits nor become immunised. Therefore, an intensive hunting of this age group is a necessary adjunct to the use of oral vaccination. After the third immunisation period, no virus was detected in the areas where oral immunisation took place.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>10785331</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00148-6</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-1135 |
ispartof | Veterinary microbiology, 2000-04, Vol.73 (2), p.239-252 |
issn | 0378-1135 1873-2542 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71065232 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Administration, Oral Animals Animals, Wild Antibodies, Viral Biological and medical sciences Classical Swine Fever - prevention & control Classical swine fever virus Classical swine fever virus (CSFV) Epidemiology Field vaccination Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Germany Microbiology Oral immunisation Pestivirus Swine Vaccination - veterinary Viral Vaccines - administration & dosage Virology Wild boar wild boars |
title | Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A48%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oral%20immunisation%20of%20wild%20boar%20against%20classical%20swine%20fever:%20evaluation%20of%20the%20first%20field%20study%20in%20Germany&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20microbiology&rft.au=Kaden,%20V&rft.date=2000-04-13&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=239-252&rft.issn=0378-1135&rft.eissn=1873-2542&rft.coden=VMICDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00148-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17535762%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17535762&rft_id=info:pmid/10785331&rfr_iscdi=true |