Loading…

Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany

The effectiveness of oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever (CSF) was studied in a field trial in Lower Saxony for two years, from 1993 to 1995. This field study was performed in an area of ca. 270 km 2, belonging to three military training grounds. Wild boar in one range were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veterinary microbiology 2000-04, Vol.73 (2), p.239-252
Main Authors: Kaden, V, Lange, E, Fischer, U, Strebelow, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863
container_end_page 252
container_issue 2
container_start_page 239
container_title Veterinary microbiology
container_volume 73
creator Kaden, V
Lange, E
Fischer, U
Strebelow, G
description The effectiveness of oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever (CSF) was studied in a field trial in Lower Saxony for two years, from 1993 to 1995. This field study was performed in an area of ca. 270 km 2, belonging to three military training grounds. Wild boar in one range were uninfected, whilst the wild boar population of the other two ranges were infected with CSF virus. The animals were vaccinated with a bait vaccine. The immunisation procedure included a double vaccination with an interval of ≈14 days. This was followed by repeated vaccination campaigns at 6 monthly intervals. The rate of uptake of baits at feeding places was determined to be between 85 and 100%. The bait marker oxytetracycline could be detected in bone samples in 52.4–67.6% of hunted animals. The antibody prevalence reached 49–60.3% after immunisation. However, >50% of young boars did not feed on vaccine baits nor become immunised. Therefore, an intensive hunting of this age group is a necessary adjunct to the use of oral vaccination. After the third immunisation period, no virus was detected in the areas where oral immunisation took place.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00148-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71065232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378113500001486</els_id><sourcerecordid>17535762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0btuFDEUBmALgcgSeASQC4SgGPBlfAkNQhEEpEgpgNry2Mdw0Iwn2DMb7dvjza4CXSoX_v5j6_yEPOfsLWdcv_vGpLEd51K9ZuwNY7y3nX5ANtwa2QnVi4dkc0dOyJNafzPG-jPNHpMTzoxVUvINGa-KHylO05qx-gXnTOdEb3CMdJh9of6nx1wXGkZfK4Zm6w1moAm2UN5T2PpxvYstv9oFlsYTQptQlzXuKGZ6AWXyefeUPEp-rPDseJ6SH58_fT__0l1eXXw9_3jZhV7wpZO97YcopBGgwbJBDj3EaHwMXAUIwgC3OoH0ffSQlAQppBz0kHjLR6vlKXl1mHtd5j8r1MVNWAOMo88wr9UZzrQSLXUf5EZJZfQeqgMMZa61QHLXBSdfdo4zt-_D3fbh9st2jLnbPtz-Jy-OD6zDBPG_1KGABl4ega9tu6n4HLD-c0rYM6Ua-3Bg0Na2RSiuBoQcIGKBsLg44z0_-QtKIKhG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17535762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Kaden, V ; Lange, E ; Fischer, U ; Strebelow, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaden, V ; Lange, E ; Fischer, U ; Strebelow, G</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness of oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever (CSF) was studied in a field trial in Lower Saxony for two years, from 1993 to 1995. This field study was performed in an area of ca. 270 km 2, belonging to three military training grounds. Wild boar in one range were uninfected, whilst the wild boar population of the other two ranges were infected with CSF virus. The animals were vaccinated with a bait vaccine. The immunisation procedure included a double vaccination with an interval of ≈14 days. This was followed by repeated vaccination campaigns at 6 monthly intervals. The rate of uptake of baits at feeding places was determined to be between 85 and 100%. The bait marker oxytetracycline could be detected in bone samples in 52.4–67.6% of hunted animals. The antibody prevalence reached 49–60.3% after immunisation. However, &gt;50% of young boars did not feed on vaccine baits nor become immunised. Therefore, an intensive hunting of this age group is a necessary adjunct to the use of oral vaccination. After the third immunisation period, no virus was detected in the areas where oral immunisation took place.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00148-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10785331</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VMICDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Animals ; Animals, Wild ; Antibodies, Viral ; Biological and medical sciences ; Classical Swine Fever - prevention &amp; control ; Classical swine fever virus ; Classical swine fever virus (CSFV) ; Epidemiology ; Field vaccination ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Germany ; Microbiology ; Oral immunisation ; Pestivirus ; Swine ; Vaccination - veterinary ; Viral Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage ; Virology ; Wild boar ; wild boars</subject><ispartof>Veterinary microbiology, 2000-04, Vol.73 (2), p.239-252</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1528955$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10785331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaden, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strebelow, G</creatorcontrib><title>Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany</title><title>Veterinary microbiology</title><addtitle>Vet Microbiol</addtitle><description>The effectiveness of oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever (CSF) was studied in a field trial in Lower Saxony for two years, from 1993 to 1995. This field study was performed in an area of ca. 270 km 2, belonging to three military training grounds. Wild boar in one range were uninfected, whilst the wild boar population of the other two ranges were infected with CSF virus. The animals were vaccinated with a bait vaccine. The immunisation procedure included a double vaccination with an interval of ≈14 days. This was followed by repeated vaccination campaigns at 6 monthly intervals. The rate of uptake of baits at feeding places was determined to be between 85 and 100%. The bait marker oxytetracycline could be detected in bone samples in 52.4–67.6% of hunted animals. The antibody prevalence reached 49–60.3% after immunisation. However, &gt;50% of young boars did not feed on vaccine baits nor become immunised. Therefore, an intensive hunting of this age group is a necessary adjunct to the use of oral vaccination. After the third immunisation period, no virus was detected in the areas where oral immunisation took place.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Classical Swine Fever - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Classical swine fever virus</subject><subject>Classical swine fever virus (CSFV)</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Field vaccination</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Oral immunisation</subject><subject>Pestivirus</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Vaccination - veterinary</subject><subject>Viral Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Virology</subject><subject>Wild boar</subject><subject>wild boars</subject><issn>0378-1135</issn><issn>1873-2542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0btuFDEUBmALgcgSeASQC4SgGPBlfAkNQhEEpEgpgNry2Mdw0Iwn2DMb7dvjza4CXSoX_v5j6_yEPOfsLWdcv_vGpLEd51K9ZuwNY7y3nX5ANtwa2QnVi4dkc0dOyJNafzPG-jPNHpMTzoxVUvINGa-KHylO05qx-gXnTOdEb3CMdJh9of6nx1wXGkZfK4Zm6w1moAm2UN5T2PpxvYstv9oFlsYTQptQlzXuKGZ6AWXyefeUPEp-rPDseJ6SH58_fT__0l1eXXw9_3jZhV7wpZO97YcopBGgwbJBDj3EaHwMXAUIwgC3OoH0ffSQlAQppBz0kHjLR6vlKXl1mHtd5j8r1MVNWAOMo88wr9UZzrQSLXUf5EZJZfQeqgMMZa61QHLXBSdfdo4zt-_D3fbh9st2jLnbPtz-Jy-OD6zDBPG_1KGABl4ega9tu6n4HLD-c0rYM6Ua-3Bg0Na2RSiuBoQcIGKBsLg44z0_-QtKIKhG</recordid><startdate>20000413</startdate><enddate>20000413</enddate><creator>Kaden, V</creator><creator>Lange, E</creator><creator>Fischer, U</creator><creator>Strebelow, G</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000413</creationdate><title>Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany</title><author>Kaden, V ; Lange, E ; Fischer, U ; Strebelow, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Classical Swine Fever - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Classical swine fever virus</topic><topic>Classical swine fever virus (CSFV)</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Field vaccination</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Oral immunisation</topic><topic>Pestivirus</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Vaccination - veterinary</topic><topic>Viral Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Virology</topic><topic>Wild boar</topic><topic>wild boars</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaden, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strebelow, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaden, V</au><au>Lange, E</au><au>Fischer, U</au><au>Strebelow, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Microbiol</addtitle><date>2000-04-13</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>239-252</pages><issn>0378-1135</issn><eissn>1873-2542</eissn><coden>VMICDQ</coden><abstract>The effectiveness of oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever (CSF) was studied in a field trial in Lower Saxony for two years, from 1993 to 1995. This field study was performed in an area of ca. 270 km 2, belonging to three military training grounds. Wild boar in one range were uninfected, whilst the wild boar population of the other two ranges were infected with CSF virus. The animals were vaccinated with a bait vaccine. The immunisation procedure included a double vaccination with an interval of ≈14 days. This was followed by repeated vaccination campaigns at 6 monthly intervals. The rate of uptake of baits at feeding places was determined to be between 85 and 100%. The bait marker oxytetracycline could be detected in bone samples in 52.4–67.6% of hunted animals. The antibody prevalence reached 49–60.3% after immunisation. However, &gt;50% of young boars did not feed on vaccine baits nor become immunised. Therefore, an intensive hunting of this age group is a necessary adjunct to the use of oral vaccination. After the third immunisation period, no virus was detected in the areas where oral immunisation took place.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>10785331</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00148-6</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-1135
ispartof Veterinary microbiology, 2000-04, Vol.73 (2), p.239-252
issn 0378-1135
1873-2542
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71065232
source Elsevier
subjects Administration, Oral
Animals
Animals, Wild
Antibodies, Viral
Biological and medical sciences
Classical Swine Fever - prevention & control
Classical swine fever virus
Classical swine fever virus (CSFV)
Epidemiology
Field vaccination
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Germany
Microbiology
Oral immunisation
Pestivirus
Swine
Vaccination - veterinary
Viral Vaccines - administration & dosage
Virology
Wild boar
wild boars
title Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A48%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oral%20immunisation%20of%20wild%20boar%20against%20classical%20swine%20fever:%20evaluation%20of%20the%20first%20field%20study%20in%20Germany&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20microbiology&rft.au=Kaden,%20V&rft.date=2000-04-13&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=239-252&rft.issn=0378-1135&rft.eissn=1873-2542&rft.coden=VMICDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00148-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17535762%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3484bd2372e6e80b3b4edd7adc15cec27e186fe3a4daef53e3233b6bf1c42d863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17535762&rft_id=info:pmid/10785331&rfr_iscdi=true