Loading…
Process evaluation of a clinical preventive nutrition intervention
Background. We report process data on the feasibility of delivering a clinical preventive nutrition intervention that was effective in increasing participants' consumption of fruits and vegetables. We also examine relationships between process variables and study outcomes. Methods. We randomly...
Saved in:
Published in: | Preventive medicine 2001-08, Vol.33 (2), p.82-90 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23 |
container_end_page | 90 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 82 |
container_title | Preventive medicine |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Hunt, Mary K. Lobb, Rebecca Delichatsios, Helen K. Stone, Courtney Emmons, Karen Gillman, Matthew W. |
description | Background. We report process data on the feasibility of delivering a clinical preventive nutrition intervention that was effective in increasing participants' consumption of fruits and vegetables. We also examine relationships between process variables and study outcomes.
Methods. We randomly assigned six practice sites in a managed care organization to a dietary intervention or control condition. We invited adults 18 years of age or older scheduled for routine health visits within the subsequent 2 months to participate. Of the 566 patients we contacted from the intervention sites, 230 (41%) enrolled. From the control sites, we contacted 617, and 274 (44%) enrolled. Intervention participants received a tailored letter providing feedback on their consumption of target foods together with recommendations for improvement, stage-matched nutrition education booklets, a diet-health endorsement from their primary care providers (PCPs), and two motivational counseling telephone calls. Of enrollees, 195 (85%) in the intervention group and 252 (92%) in the control group returned the final survey 3 months later.
Results. Seventy-one percent of both participants and PCPs reported that the PCPs had discussed the relationship between diet and health at their visit. Fifty-seven percent of participants and 62% of PCPs reported that they discussed the complete diet-health endorsement, which included: (1) acknowledgment of the relationship between diet and health and (2) tailored study recommendations. The inclusion of both parts of the diet-health endorsement, but not the length of time spent, appeared to correlate with healthful outcomes.
Conclusions. These process data suggest that the brief PCP diet-health endorsement contributed to the intervention effect on fruits and vegetables. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0091-7435(01)80003-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71069144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091743501800037</els_id><sourcerecordid>71069144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouq7-BKUn0UN1pk2b9CS6-AULCuo5xGQKkW66Jm3Bf2_3Az16Ghied17mYewE4RIBy6tXgApTwfPiHPBCAkCeih02QajKFLISdtnkFzlghzF-AiCWwPfZASKvcuAwYbcvoTUUY0KDbnrdudYnbZ3oxDTOO6ObZBloIN-5gRLfd8GtEec7Cut164_YXq2bSMfbOWXv93dvs8d0_vzwNLuZpyYTZZdiUdREhNxgZbNac2GkIW55VciSW0IrqQJppM2L3BiRCVFLKcAiWE6U5VN2trm7DO1XT7FTCxcNNY321PZRCYSyQs5HsNiAJrQxBqrVMriFDt8KQa3kqbU8tTKjANVanhJj7nRb0H8syP6ltrZG4HoD0Pjm4CioaBx5Q9YFMp2yrfun4gdi1H8k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71069144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Process evaluation of a clinical preventive nutrition intervention</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Hunt, Mary K. ; Lobb, Rebecca ; Delichatsios, Helen K. ; Stone, Courtney ; Emmons, Karen ; Gillman, Matthew W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Mary K. ; Lobb, Rebecca ; Delichatsios, Helen K. ; Stone, Courtney ; Emmons, Karen ; Gillman, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. We report process data on the feasibility of delivering a clinical preventive nutrition intervention that was effective in increasing participants' consumption of fruits and vegetables. We also examine relationships between process variables and study outcomes.
Methods. We randomly assigned six practice sites in a managed care organization to a dietary intervention or control condition. We invited adults 18 years of age or older scheduled for routine health visits within the subsequent 2 months to participate. Of the 566 patients we contacted from the intervention sites, 230 (41%) enrolled. From the control sites, we contacted 617, and 274 (44%) enrolled. Intervention participants received a tailored letter providing feedback on their consumption of target foods together with recommendations for improvement, stage-matched nutrition education booklets, a diet-health endorsement from their primary care providers (PCPs), and two motivational counseling telephone calls. Of enrollees, 195 (85%) in the intervention group and 252 (92%) in the control group returned the final survey 3 months later.
Results. Seventy-one percent of both participants and PCPs reported that the PCPs had discussed the relationship between diet and health at their visit. Fifty-seven percent of participants and 62% of PCPs reported that they discussed the complete diet-health endorsement, which included: (1) acknowledgment of the relationship between diet and health and (2) tailored study recommendations. The inclusion of both parts of the diet-health endorsement, but not the length of time spent, appeared to correlate with healthful outcomes.
Conclusions. These process data suggest that the brief PCP diet-health endorsement contributed to the intervention effect on fruits and vegetables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0091-7435(01)80003-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11493040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Counseling ; Dietetics ; Female ; Health Education - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; nutrition education ; Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; physician counseling ; preventive nutrition ; Primary Health Care ; Process Assessment (Health Care) ; process evaluation</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine, 2001-08, Vol.33 (2), p.82-90</ispartof><rights>2001</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11493040$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Mary K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobb, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delichatsios, Helen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmons, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillman, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><title>Process evaluation of a clinical preventive nutrition intervention</title><title>Preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><description>Background. We report process data on the feasibility of delivering a clinical preventive nutrition intervention that was effective in increasing participants' consumption of fruits and vegetables. We also examine relationships between process variables and study outcomes.
Methods. We randomly assigned six practice sites in a managed care organization to a dietary intervention or control condition. We invited adults 18 years of age or older scheduled for routine health visits within the subsequent 2 months to participate. Of the 566 patients we contacted from the intervention sites, 230 (41%) enrolled. From the control sites, we contacted 617, and 274 (44%) enrolled. Intervention participants received a tailored letter providing feedback on their consumption of target foods together with recommendations for improvement, stage-matched nutrition education booklets, a diet-health endorsement from their primary care providers (PCPs), and two motivational counseling telephone calls. Of enrollees, 195 (85%) in the intervention group and 252 (92%) in the control group returned the final survey 3 months later.
Results. Seventy-one percent of both participants and PCPs reported that the PCPs had discussed the relationship between diet and health at their visit. Fifty-seven percent of participants and 62% of PCPs reported that they discussed the complete diet-health endorsement, which included: (1) acknowledgment of the relationship between diet and health and (2) tailored study recommendations. The inclusion of both parts of the diet-health endorsement, but not the length of time spent, appeared to correlate with healthful outcomes.
Conclusions. These process data suggest that the brief PCP diet-health endorsement contributed to the intervention effect on fruits and vegetables.</description><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Dietetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Education - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>nutrition education</subject><subject>Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>physician counseling</subject><subject>preventive nutrition</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>process evaluation</subject><issn>0091-7435</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouq7-BKUn0UN1pk2b9CS6-AULCuo5xGQKkW66Jm3Bf2_3Az16Ghied17mYewE4RIBy6tXgApTwfPiHPBCAkCeih02QajKFLISdtnkFzlghzF-AiCWwPfZASKvcuAwYbcvoTUUY0KDbnrdudYnbZ3oxDTOO6ObZBloIN-5gRLfd8GtEec7Cut164_YXq2bSMfbOWXv93dvs8d0_vzwNLuZpyYTZZdiUdREhNxgZbNac2GkIW55VciSW0IrqQJppM2L3BiRCVFLKcAiWE6U5VN2trm7DO1XT7FTCxcNNY321PZRCYSyQs5HsNiAJrQxBqrVMriFDt8KQa3kqbU8tTKjANVanhJj7nRb0H8syP6ltrZG4HoD0Pjm4CioaBx5Q9YFMp2yrfun4gdi1H8k</recordid><startdate>200108</startdate><enddate>200108</enddate><creator>Hunt, Mary K.</creator><creator>Lobb, Rebecca</creator><creator>Delichatsios, Helen K.</creator><creator>Stone, Courtney</creator><creator>Emmons, Karen</creator><creator>Gillman, Matthew W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200108</creationdate><title>Process evaluation of a clinical preventive nutrition intervention</title><author>Hunt, Mary K. ; Lobb, Rebecca ; Delichatsios, Helen K. ; Stone, Courtney ; Emmons, Karen ; Gillman, Matthew W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Dietetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Education - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>nutrition education</topic><topic>Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>physician counseling</topic><topic>preventive nutrition</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>process evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Mary K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobb, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delichatsios, Helen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmons, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillman, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunt, Mary K.</au><au>Lobb, Rebecca</au><au>Delichatsios, Helen K.</au><au>Stone, Courtney</au><au>Emmons, Karen</au><au>Gillman, Matthew W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Process evaluation of a clinical preventive nutrition intervention</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><date>2001-08</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>82-90</pages><issn>0091-7435</issn><eissn>1096-0260</eissn><abstract>Background. We report process data on the feasibility of delivering a clinical preventive nutrition intervention that was effective in increasing participants' consumption of fruits and vegetables. We also examine relationships between process variables and study outcomes.
Methods. We randomly assigned six practice sites in a managed care organization to a dietary intervention or control condition. We invited adults 18 years of age or older scheduled for routine health visits within the subsequent 2 months to participate. Of the 566 patients we contacted from the intervention sites, 230 (41%) enrolled. From the control sites, we contacted 617, and 274 (44%) enrolled. Intervention participants received a tailored letter providing feedback on their consumption of target foods together with recommendations for improvement, stage-matched nutrition education booklets, a diet-health endorsement from their primary care providers (PCPs), and two motivational counseling telephone calls. Of enrollees, 195 (85%) in the intervention group and 252 (92%) in the control group returned the final survey 3 months later.
Results. Seventy-one percent of both participants and PCPs reported that the PCPs had discussed the relationship between diet and health at their visit. Fifty-seven percent of participants and 62% of PCPs reported that they discussed the complete diet-health endorsement, which included: (1) acknowledgment of the relationship between diet and health and (2) tailored study recommendations. The inclusion of both parts of the diet-health endorsement, but not the length of time spent, appeared to correlate with healthful outcomes.
Conclusions. These process data suggest that the brief PCP diet-health endorsement contributed to the intervention effect on fruits and vegetables.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11493040</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0091-7435(01)80003-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-7435 |
ispartof | Preventive medicine, 2001-08, Vol.33 (2), p.82-90 |
issn | 0091-7435 1096-0260 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71069144 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Counseling Dietetics Female Health Education - methods Humans Male Middle Aged nutrition education Nutritional Physiological Phenomena physician counseling preventive nutrition Primary Health Care Process Assessment (Health Care) process evaluation |
title | Process evaluation of a clinical preventive nutrition intervention |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A37%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Process%20evaluation%20of%20a%20clinical%20preventive%20nutrition%20intervention&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Hunt,%20Mary%20K.&rft.date=2001-08&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=82-90&rft.issn=0091-7435&rft.eissn=1096-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0091-7435(01)80003-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71069144%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71069144&rft_id=info:pmid/11493040&rfr_iscdi=true |