Loading…

Process evaluation of a clinical preventive nutrition intervention

Background. We report process data on the feasibility of delivering a clinical preventive nutrition intervention that was effective in increasing participants' consumption of fruits and vegetables. We also examine relationships between process variables and study outcomes. Methods. We randomly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Preventive medicine 2001-08, Vol.33 (2), p.82-90
Main Authors: Hunt, Mary K., Lobb, Rebecca, Delichatsios, Helen K., Stone, Courtney, Emmons, Karen, Gillman, Matthew W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23
container_end_page 90
container_issue 2
container_start_page 82
container_title Preventive medicine
container_volume 33
creator Hunt, Mary K.
Lobb, Rebecca
Delichatsios, Helen K.
Stone, Courtney
Emmons, Karen
Gillman, Matthew W.
description Background. We report process data on the feasibility of delivering a clinical preventive nutrition intervention that was effective in increasing participants' consumption of fruits and vegetables. We also examine relationships between process variables and study outcomes. Methods. We randomly assigned six practice sites in a managed care organization to a dietary intervention or control condition. We invited adults 18 years of age or older scheduled for routine health visits within the subsequent 2 months to participate. Of the 566 patients we contacted from the intervention sites, 230 (41%) enrolled. From the control sites, we contacted 617, and 274 (44%) enrolled. Intervention participants received a tailored letter providing feedback on their consumption of target foods together with recommendations for improvement, stage-matched nutrition education booklets, a diet-health endorsement from their primary care providers (PCPs), and two motivational counseling telephone calls. Of enrollees, 195 (85%) in the intervention group and 252 (92%) in the control group returned the final survey 3 months later. Results. Seventy-one percent of both participants and PCPs reported that the PCPs had discussed the relationship between diet and health at their visit. Fifty-seven percent of participants and 62% of PCPs reported that they discussed the complete diet-health endorsement, which included: (1) acknowledgment of the relationship between diet and health and (2) tailored study recommendations. The inclusion of both parts of the diet-health endorsement, but not the length of time spent, appeared to correlate with healthful outcomes. Conclusions. These process data suggest that the brief PCP diet-health endorsement contributed to the intervention effect on fruits and vegetables.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0091-7435(01)80003-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71069144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091743501800037</els_id><sourcerecordid>71069144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouq7-BKUn0UN1pk2b9CS6-AULCuo5xGQKkW66Jm3Bf2_3Az16Ghied17mYewE4RIBy6tXgApTwfPiHPBCAkCeih02QajKFLISdtnkFzlghzF-AiCWwPfZASKvcuAwYbcvoTUUY0KDbnrdudYnbZ3oxDTOO6ObZBloIN-5gRLfd8GtEec7Cut164_YXq2bSMfbOWXv93dvs8d0_vzwNLuZpyYTZZdiUdREhNxgZbNac2GkIW55VciSW0IrqQJppM2L3BiRCVFLKcAiWE6U5VN2trm7DO1XT7FTCxcNNY321PZRCYSyQs5HsNiAJrQxBqrVMriFDt8KQa3kqbU8tTKjANVanhJj7nRb0H8syP6ltrZG4HoD0Pjm4CioaBx5Q9YFMp2yrfun4gdi1H8k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71069144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Process evaluation of a clinical preventive nutrition intervention</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Hunt, Mary K. ; Lobb, Rebecca ; Delichatsios, Helen K. ; Stone, Courtney ; Emmons, Karen ; Gillman, Matthew W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Mary K. ; Lobb, Rebecca ; Delichatsios, Helen K. ; Stone, Courtney ; Emmons, Karen ; Gillman, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. We report process data on the feasibility of delivering a clinical preventive nutrition intervention that was effective in increasing participants' consumption of fruits and vegetables. We also examine relationships between process variables and study outcomes. Methods. We randomly assigned six practice sites in a managed care organization to a dietary intervention or control condition. We invited adults 18 years of age or older scheduled for routine health visits within the subsequent 2 months to participate. Of the 566 patients we contacted from the intervention sites, 230 (41%) enrolled. From the control sites, we contacted 617, and 274 (44%) enrolled. Intervention participants received a tailored letter providing feedback on their consumption of target foods together with recommendations for improvement, stage-matched nutrition education booklets, a diet-health endorsement from their primary care providers (PCPs), and two motivational counseling telephone calls. Of enrollees, 195 (85%) in the intervention group and 252 (92%) in the control group returned the final survey 3 months later. Results. Seventy-one percent of both participants and PCPs reported that the PCPs had discussed the relationship between diet and health at their visit. Fifty-seven percent of participants and 62% of PCPs reported that they discussed the complete diet-health endorsement, which included: (1) acknowledgment of the relationship between diet and health and (2) tailored study recommendations. The inclusion of both parts of the diet-health endorsement, but not the length of time spent, appeared to correlate with healthful outcomes. Conclusions. These process data suggest that the brief PCP diet-health endorsement contributed to the intervention effect on fruits and vegetables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0091-7435(01)80003-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11493040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Counseling ; Dietetics ; Female ; Health Education - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; nutrition education ; Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; physician counseling ; preventive nutrition ; Primary Health Care ; Process Assessment (Health Care) ; process evaluation</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine, 2001-08, Vol.33 (2), p.82-90</ispartof><rights>2001</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11493040$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Mary K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobb, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delichatsios, Helen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmons, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillman, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><title>Process evaluation of a clinical preventive nutrition intervention</title><title>Preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><description>Background. We report process data on the feasibility of delivering a clinical preventive nutrition intervention that was effective in increasing participants' consumption of fruits and vegetables. We also examine relationships between process variables and study outcomes. Methods. We randomly assigned six practice sites in a managed care organization to a dietary intervention or control condition. We invited adults 18 years of age or older scheduled for routine health visits within the subsequent 2 months to participate. Of the 566 patients we contacted from the intervention sites, 230 (41%) enrolled. From the control sites, we contacted 617, and 274 (44%) enrolled. Intervention participants received a tailored letter providing feedback on their consumption of target foods together with recommendations for improvement, stage-matched nutrition education booklets, a diet-health endorsement from their primary care providers (PCPs), and two motivational counseling telephone calls. Of enrollees, 195 (85%) in the intervention group and 252 (92%) in the control group returned the final survey 3 months later. Results. Seventy-one percent of both participants and PCPs reported that the PCPs had discussed the relationship between diet and health at their visit. Fifty-seven percent of participants and 62% of PCPs reported that they discussed the complete diet-health endorsement, which included: (1) acknowledgment of the relationship between diet and health and (2) tailored study recommendations. The inclusion of both parts of the diet-health endorsement, but not the length of time spent, appeared to correlate with healthful outcomes. Conclusions. These process data suggest that the brief PCP diet-health endorsement contributed to the intervention effect on fruits and vegetables.</description><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Dietetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Education - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>nutrition education</subject><subject>Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>physician counseling</subject><subject>preventive nutrition</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>process evaluation</subject><issn>0091-7435</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouq7-BKUn0UN1pk2b9CS6-AULCuo5xGQKkW66Jm3Bf2_3Az16Ghied17mYewE4RIBy6tXgApTwfPiHPBCAkCeih02QajKFLISdtnkFzlghzF-AiCWwPfZASKvcuAwYbcvoTUUY0KDbnrdudYnbZ3oxDTOO6ObZBloIN-5gRLfd8GtEec7Cut164_YXq2bSMfbOWXv93dvs8d0_vzwNLuZpyYTZZdiUdREhNxgZbNac2GkIW55VciSW0IrqQJppM2L3BiRCVFLKcAiWE6U5VN2trm7DO1XT7FTCxcNNY321PZRCYSyQs5HsNiAJrQxBqrVMriFDt8KQa3kqbU8tTKjANVanhJj7nRb0H8syP6ltrZG4HoD0Pjm4CioaBx5Q9YFMp2yrfun4gdi1H8k</recordid><startdate>200108</startdate><enddate>200108</enddate><creator>Hunt, Mary K.</creator><creator>Lobb, Rebecca</creator><creator>Delichatsios, Helen K.</creator><creator>Stone, Courtney</creator><creator>Emmons, Karen</creator><creator>Gillman, Matthew W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200108</creationdate><title>Process evaluation of a clinical preventive nutrition intervention</title><author>Hunt, Mary K. ; Lobb, Rebecca ; Delichatsios, Helen K. ; Stone, Courtney ; Emmons, Karen ; Gillman, Matthew W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Dietetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Education - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>nutrition education</topic><topic>Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>physician counseling</topic><topic>preventive nutrition</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>process evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Mary K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobb, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delichatsios, Helen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmons, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillman, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunt, Mary K.</au><au>Lobb, Rebecca</au><au>Delichatsios, Helen K.</au><au>Stone, Courtney</au><au>Emmons, Karen</au><au>Gillman, Matthew W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Process evaluation of a clinical preventive nutrition intervention</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><date>2001-08</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>82-90</pages><issn>0091-7435</issn><eissn>1096-0260</eissn><abstract>Background. We report process data on the feasibility of delivering a clinical preventive nutrition intervention that was effective in increasing participants' consumption of fruits and vegetables. We also examine relationships between process variables and study outcomes. Methods. We randomly assigned six practice sites in a managed care organization to a dietary intervention or control condition. We invited adults 18 years of age or older scheduled for routine health visits within the subsequent 2 months to participate. Of the 566 patients we contacted from the intervention sites, 230 (41%) enrolled. From the control sites, we contacted 617, and 274 (44%) enrolled. Intervention participants received a tailored letter providing feedback on their consumption of target foods together with recommendations for improvement, stage-matched nutrition education booklets, a diet-health endorsement from their primary care providers (PCPs), and two motivational counseling telephone calls. Of enrollees, 195 (85%) in the intervention group and 252 (92%) in the control group returned the final survey 3 months later. Results. Seventy-one percent of both participants and PCPs reported that the PCPs had discussed the relationship between diet and health at their visit. Fifty-seven percent of participants and 62% of PCPs reported that they discussed the complete diet-health endorsement, which included: (1) acknowledgment of the relationship between diet and health and (2) tailored study recommendations. The inclusion of both parts of the diet-health endorsement, but not the length of time spent, appeared to correlate with healthful outcomes. Conclusions. These process data suggest that the brief PCP diet-health endorsement contributed to the intervention effect on fruits and vegetables.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11493040</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0091-7435(01)80003-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-7435
ispartof Preventive medicine, 2001-08, Vol.33 (2), p.82-90
issn 0091-7435
1096-0260
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71069144
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Counseling
Dietetics
Female
Health Education - methods
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
nutrition education
Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
physician counseling
preventive nutrition
Primary Health Care
Process Assessment (Health Care)
process evaluation
title Process evaluation of a clinical preventive nutrition intervention
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A37%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Process%20evaluation%20of%20a%20clinical%20preventive%20nutrition%20intervention&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Hunt,%20Mary%20K.&rft.date=2001-08&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=82-90&rft.issn=0091-7435&rft.eissn=1096-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0091-7435(01)80003-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71069144%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-155feee14c19d2fa47c8ce4d495864de1d8e908c8d353cc7277f8870d10d4ee23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71069144&rft_id=info:pmid/11493040&rfr_iscdi=true