Loading…

Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers

The genomes of domestic and jungle fowl populations maintained in Ukraine and Germany were screened using microsatellites as molecular markers. Genetic variation and genetic distances between strains of different origins and performance potentials were determined. In total, 224 individuals of 20 pop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Poultry science 2001-08, Vol.80 (8), p.1057-1063
Main Authors: Romanov, M N, Weigend, S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-cbcfa391ca92a4ca3d8c7e61e3b24ffe6aca89627a229f0ee5bbda9038a4e6bb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-cbcfa391ca92a4ca3d8c7e61e3b24ffe6aca89627a229f0ee5bbda9038a4e6bb3
container_end_page 1063
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1057
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 80
creator Romanov, M N
Weigend, S
description The genomes of domestic and jungle fowl populations maintained in Ukraine and Germany were screened using microsatellites as molecular markers. Genetic variation and genetic distances between strains of different origins and performance potentials were determined. In total, 224 individuals of 20 populations were genotyped for 14 microsatellite markers covering 11 linkage groups. Of the 14 microsatellite loci, the number of alleles ranged between 2 and 21 per locus, the mean number of alleles being 11.2 per locus. By using Nei's standard distance and the Neighbor-Joining method, a phylogenetic tree was reconstructed; its topology reflected general patterns of relatedness and genetic differentiation among the chicken populations studied. Three major phylogenetic tree groupings were found. The red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) formed a separate branch and demonstrated a specific allele distribution when compared with domestic fowl breeds analyzed. The second branch comprised commercial layer lines and chicken breeds that were subject to intense selection in the past or had common ancestral breeds with commercial strains. The third group encompassed the German native breed populations. The information about population and breed genetic relationships estimated by microsatellite analysis may be useful as an initial guide in defining objectives for designing future investigations of genetic variation and developing conservation strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ps/80.8.1057
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71072383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71072383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-cbcfa391ca92a4ca3d8c7e61e3b24ffe6aca89627a229f0ee5bbda9038a4e6bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkLtPwzAQxj2AaClszMgTE6F-5DlWFS-pEgvM1sW5FJckDnbSqv89jlqJ6e50v-_03UfIHWdPnBVy2ftlzp7yMCTZBZkzJkWUZAWfkWvvd4wJnqbZFZlxHhdJnCRzsl910By98dTWdIsdDkZThw0Mxnb-2_SeljgcEDu6B2fs6Glv-_G8n0SVbdFPKugquhu7bYO0toeGjt50W9oa7ayHAZvGDEhbcD_o_A25rKHxeHuuC_L18vy5fos2H6_v69Um0rLgQ6RLXUPoNBQCYg2yynWGKUdZiriuMQUNeZGKDIQoaoaYlGUFBZM5xJiWpVyQh9Pd3tnfMfhUrfE6eIEOwy8q4ywTMpcBfDyBk1vvsFa9M8HsUXGmpmxV71XOVK6mbAN-f747li1W__A5WPkH45t7yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71072383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Romanov, M N ; Weigend, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Romanov, M N ; Weigend, S</creatorcontrib><description>The genomes of domestic and jungle fowl populations maintained in Ukraine and Germany were screened using microsatellites as molecular markers. Genetic variation and genetic distances between strains of different origins and performance potentials were determined. In total, 224 individuals of 20 populations were genotyped for 14 microsatellite markers covering 11 linkage groups. Of the 14 microsatellite loci, the number of alleles ranged between 2 and 21 per locus, the mean number of alleles being 11.2 per locus. By using Nei's standard distance and the Neighbor-Joining method, a phylogenetic tree was reconstructed; its topology reflected general patterns of relatedness and genetic differentiation among the chicken populations studied. Three major phylogenetic tree groupings were found. The red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) formed a separate branch and demonstrated a specific allele distribution when compared with domestic fowl breeds analyzed. The second branch comprised commercial layer lines and chicken breeds that were subject to intense selection in the past or had common ancestral breeds with commercial strains. The third group encompassed the German native breed populations. The information about population and breed genetic relationships estimated by microsatellite analysis may be useful as an initial guide in defining objectives for designing future investigations of genetic variation and developing conservation strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ps/80.8.1057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11495455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Alleles ; Animals ; Animals, Domestic - genetics ; Animals, Wild - genetics ; Breeding ; Chickens - classification ; Chickens - genetics ; Genetic Linkage ; Genetic Markers ; Genetic Variation ; Genotype ; Germany ; Microsatellite Repeats ; Phylogeny ; Ukraine</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2001-08, Vol.80 (8), p.1057-1063</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-cbcfa391ca92a4ca3d8c7e61e3b24ffe6aca89627a229f0ee5bbda9038a4e6bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-cbcfa391ca92a4ca3d8c7e61e3b24ffe6aca89627a229f0ee5bbda9038a4e6bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11495455$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romanov, M N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weigend, S</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>The genomes of domestic and jungle fowl populations maintained in Ukraine and Germany were screened using microsatellites as molecular markers. Genetic variation and genetic distances between strains of different origins and performance potentials were determined. In total, 224 individuals of 20 populations were genotyped for 14 microsatellite markers covering 11 linkage groups. Of the 14 microsatellite loci, the number of alleles ranged between 2 and 21 per locus, the mean number of alleles being 11.2 per locus. By using Nei's standard distance and the Neighbor-Joining method, a phylogenetic tree was reconstructed; its topology reflected general patterns of relatedness and genetic differentiation among the chicken populations studied. Three major phylogenetic tree groupings were found. The red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) formed a separate branch and demonstrated a specific allele distribution when compared with domestic fowl breeds analyzed. The second branch comprised commercial layer lines and chicken breeds that were subject to intense selection in the past or had common ancestral breeds with commercial strains. The third group encompassed the German native breed populations. The information about population and breed genetic relationships estimated by microsatellite analysis may be useful as an initial guide in defining objectives for designing future investigations of genetic variation and developing conservation strategies.</description><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Domestic - genetics</subject><subject>Animals, Wild - genetics</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Chickens - classification</subject><subject>Chickens - genetics</subject><subject>Genetic Linkage</subject><subject>Genetic Markers</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Ukraine</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkLtPwzAQxj2AaClszMgTE6F-5DlWFS-pEgvM1sW5FJckDnbSqv89jlqJ6e50v-_03UfIHWdPnBVy2ftlzp7yMCTZBZkzJkWUZAWfkWvvd4wJnqbZFZlxHhdJnCRzsl910By98dTWdIsdDkZThw0Mxnb-2_SeljgcEDu6B2fs6Glv-_G8n0SVbdFPKugquhu7bYO0toeGjt50W9oa7ayHAZvGDEhbcD_o_A25rKHxeHuuC_L18vy5fos2H6_v69Um0rLgQ6RLXUPoNBQCYg2yynWGKUdZiriuMQUNeZGKDIQoaoaYlGUFBZM5xJiWpVyQh9Pd3tnfMfhUrfE6eIEOwy8q4ywTMpcBfDyBk1vvsFa9M8HsUXGmpmxV71XOVK6mbAN-f747li1W__A5WPkH45t7yg</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>Romanov, M N</creator><creator>Weigend, S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers</title><author>Romanov, M N ; Weigend, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-cbcfa391ca92a4ca3d8c7e61e3b24ffe6aca89627a229f0ee5bbda9038a4e6bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Domestic - genetics</topic><topic>Animals, Wild - genetics</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Chickens - classification</topic><topic>Chickens - genetics</topic><topic>Genetic Linkage</topic><topic>Genetic Markers</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Ukraine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romanov, M N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weigend, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romanov, M N</au><au>Weigend, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1057</spage><epage>1063</epage><pages>1057-1063</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><abstract>The genomes of domestic and jungle fowl populations maintained in Ukraine and Germany were screened using microsatellites as molecular markers. Genetic variation and genetic distances between strains of different origins and performance potentials were determined. In total, 224 individuals of 20 populations were genotyped for 14 microsatellite markers covering 11 linkage groups. Of the 14 microsatellite loci, the number of alleles ranged between 2 and 21 per locus, the mean number of alleles being 11.2 per locus. By using Nei's standard distance and the Neighbor-Joining method, a phylogenetic tree was reconstructed; its topology reflected general patterns of relatedness and genetic differentiation among the chicken populations studied. Three major phylogenetic tree groupings were found. The red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) formed a separate branch and demonstrated a specific allele distribution when compared with domestic fowl breeds analyzed. The second branch comprised commercial layer lines and chicken breeds that were subject to intense selection in the past or had common ancestral breeds with commercial strains. The third group encompassed the German native breed populations. The information about population and breed genetic relationships estimated by microsatellite analysis may be useful as an initial guide in defining objectives for designing future investigations of genetic variation and developing conservation strategies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>11495455</pmid><doi>10.1093/ps/80.8.1057</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 2001-08, Vol.80 (8), p.1057-1063
issn 0032-5791
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71072383
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Alleles
Animals
Animals, Domestic - genetics
Animals, Wild - genetics
Breeding
Chickens - classification
Chickens - genetics
Genetic Linkage
Genetic Markers
Genetic Variation
Genotype
Germany
Microsatellite Repeats
Phylogeny
Ukraine
title Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A24%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20genetic%20relationships%20between%20various%20populations%20of%20domestic%20and%20jungle%20fowl%20using%20microsatellite%20markers&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Romanov,%20M%20N&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1057&rft.epage=1063&rft.pages=1057-1063&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ps/80.8.1057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71072383%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-cbcfa391ca92a4ca3d8c7e61e3b24ffe6aca89627a229f0ee5bbda9038a4e6bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71072383&rft_id=info:pmid/11495455&rfr_iscdi=true