Loading…
A Model for Brief Assessment of Attachment and Its Application to Women in Inpatient Treatment for Trauma-Related Psychiatric Disorders
We adapted self-report measures of attachment style to the psychological assessment of women in specialized inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. The study employed 2 measures of adult attachment style, the Relationship Questionnaire (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) and the Adult Attac...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of personality assessment 2001-06, Vol.76 (3), p.421-447 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453 |
container_end_page | 447 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 421 |
container_title | Journal of personality assessment |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Allen, Jon G. Huntoon, Janis Fultz, Jim Stein, Helen Fonagy, Peter Evans, Richard B. |
description | We adapted self-report measures of attachment style to the psychological assessment of women in specialized inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. The study employed 2 measures of adult attachment style, the Relationship Questionnaire (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) and the Adult Attachment Scale (Collins & Read, 1990) as well as our Current Attachment Relationships questionnaire, which assesses the extent of social support in secure attachments. We administered these measures to 99 patients and to a convenience sample of 154 women in the community. We found modest correspondence between the 2 attachment style measures and substantial relations between attachment styles and range of secure attachment relationships. Women in the trauma sample reported insecure attachment styles and relatively few secure attachment figures. We discuss the implications of these findings for clinical assessment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1207/S15327752JPA7603_05 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71083356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57660109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCEyAhLxC7gB3_JRukUP6mKqKCQSyjO7ajGjlxsD1C8wS8dp3OIFhUsLq-x985snwQekLJC1oT9fILFaxWStQXV52ShPVE3EOrRawW9T5aEVLXFWtaeooepvSdEEIprx-g0zLalgu5Qr86_DEY6_EQIn4dnR1wl5JNabRTxqFsOYO-vt1gMnidE-7m2TsN2YUJ54C_hXKL3YTX01zEhdxEC_nWs8RuIuxGqD5bD9kafJX2-tpBjk7jNy6FaGxMj9DJAD7Zx8d5hr6-e7s5_1Bdfnq_Pu8uK825yhVtODS2bUQrLLTaKMUEs1I0RTVU0m3DVDmKgUg6WEqZ4BykgYZv9aC5YGfo-SF3juHHzqbcjy5p6z1MNuxSryhpGBPyv6BQUhJK2gKyA6hjSCnaoZ-jGyHue0r6paj-jqKK6-kxfrcdrfnjOTZTgGdHAJIGP0SYtEt_ZRdGkYK9OmBuKl89ws8Qvekz7H2Ivz3sXw-5ASDjsBM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57660109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Model for Brief Assessment of Attachment and Its Application to Women in Inpatient Treatment for Trauma-Related Psychiatric Disorders</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Allen, Jon G. ; Huntoon, Janis ; Fultz, Jim ; Stein, Helen ; Fonagy, Peter ; Evans, Richard B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jon G. ; Huntoon, Janis ; Fultz, Jim ; Stein, Helen ; Fonagy, Peter ; Evans, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><description>We adapted self-report measures of attachment style to the psychological assessment of women in specialized inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. The study employed 2 measures of adult attachment style, the Relationship Questionnaire (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) and the Adult Attachment Scale (Collins & Read, 1990) as well as our Current Attachment Relationships questionnaire, which assesses the extent of social support in secure attachments. We administered these measures to 99 patients and to a convenience sample of 154 women in the community. We found modest correspondence between the 2 attachment style measures and substantial relations between attachment styles and range of secure attachment relationships. Women in the trauma sample reported insecure attachment styles and relatively few secure attachment figures. We discuss the implications of these findings for clinical assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7603_05</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11499456</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNPABU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attachment style ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Clinical assessment ; Female ; Humans ; Inpatients - psychology ; Interpersonal Relations ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Object Attachment ; Psychiatric units ; Psychological trauma ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Selfreport measures ; Social Support ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Techniques and methods ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality assessment, 2001-06, Vol.76 (3), p.421-447</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2001</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1056370$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11499456$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jon G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntoon, Janis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fultz, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonagy, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><title>A Model for Brief Assessment of Attachment and Its Application to Women in Inpatient Treatment for Trauma-Related Psychiatric Disorders</title><title>Journal of personality assessment</title><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><description>We adapted self-report measures of attachment style to the psychological assessment of women in specialized inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. The study employed 2 measures of adult attachment style, the Relationship Questionnaire (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) and the Adult Attachment Scale (Collins & Read, 1990) as well as our Current Attachment Relationships questionnaire, which assesses the extent of social support in secure attachments. We administered these measures to 99 patients and to a convenience sample of 154 women in the community. We found modest correspondence between the 2 attachment style measures and substantial relations between attachment styles and range of secure attachment relationships. Women in the trauma sample reported insecure attachment styles and relatively few secure attachment figures. We discuss the implications of these findings for clinical assessment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attachment style</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients - psychology</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Psychiatric units</subject><subject>Psychological trauma</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Selfreport measures</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0022-3891</issn><issn>1532-7752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCEyAhLxC7gB3_JRukUP6mKqKCQSyjO7ajGjlxsD1C8wS8dp3OIFhUsLq-x985snwQekLJC1oT9fILFaxWStQXV52ShPVE3EOrRawW9T5aEVLXFWtaeooepvSdEEIprx-g0zLalgu5Qr86_DEY6_EQIn4dnR1wl5JNabRTxqFsOYO-vt1gMnidE-7m2TsN2YUJ54C_hXKL3YTX01zEhdxEC_nWs8RuIuxGqD5bD9kafJX2-tpBjk7jNy6FaGxMj9DJAD7Zx8d5hr6-e7s5_1Bdfnq_Pu8uK825yhVtODS2bUQrLLTaKMUEs1I0RTVU0m3DVDmKgUg6WEqZ4BykgYZv9aC5YGfo-SF3juHHzqbcjy5p6z1MNuxSryhpGBPyv6BQUhJK2gKyA6hjSCnaoZ-jGyHue0r6paj-jqKK6-kxfrcdrfnjOTZTgGdHAJIGP0SYtEt_ZRdGkYK9OmBuKl89ws8Qvekz7H2Ivz3sXw-5ASDjsBM</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Allen, Jon G.</creator><creator>Huntoon, Janis</creator><creator>Fultz, Jim</creator><creator>Stein, Helen</creator><creator>Fonagy, Peter</creator><creator>Evans, Richard B.</creator><general>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>A Model for Brief Assessment of Attachment and Its Application to Women in Inpatient Treatment for Trauma-Related Psychiatric Disorders</title><author>Allen, Jon G. ; Huntoon, Janis ; Fultz, Jim ; Stein, Helen ; Fonagy, Peter ; Evans, Richard B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attachment style</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients - psychology</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Psychiatric units</topic><topic>Psychological trauma</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Selfreport measures</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jon G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntoon, Janis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fultz, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonagy, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Jon G.</au><au>Huntoon, Janis</au><au>Fultz, Jim</au><au>Stein, Helen</au><au>Fonagy, Peter</au><au>Evans, Richard B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Model for Brief Assessment of Attachment and Its Application to Women in Inpatient Treatment for Trauma-Related Psychiatric Disorders</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>421</spage><epage>447</epage><pages>421-447</pages><issn>0022-3891</issn><eissn>1532-7752</eissn><coden>JNPABU</coden><abstract>We adapted self-report measures of attachment style to the psychological assessment of women in specialized inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. The study employed 2 measures of adult attachment style, the Relationship Questionnaire (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) and the Adult Attachment Scale (Collins & Read, 1990) as well as our Current Attachment Relationships questionnaire, which assesses the extent of social support in secure attachments. We administered these measures to 99 patients and to a convenience sample of 154 women in the community. We found modest correspondence between the 2 attachment style measures and substantial relations between attachment styles and range of secure attachment relationships. Women in the trauma sample reported insecure attachment styles and relatively few secure attachment figures. We discuss the implications of these findings for clinical assessment.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</pub><pmid>11499456</pmid><doi>10.1207/S15327752JPA7603_05</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3891 |
ispartof | Journal of personality assessment, 2001-06, Vol.76 (3), p.421-447 |
issn | 0022-3891 1532-7752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71083356 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Adult Attachment style Biological and medical sciences Case-Control Studies Clinical assessment Female Humans Inpatients - psychology Interpersonal Relations Medical sciences Middle Aged Object Attachment Psychiatric units Psychological trauma Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Selfreport measures Social Support Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Techniques and methods Women |
title | A Model for Brief Assessment of Attachment and Its Application to Women in Inpatient Treatment for Trauma-Related Psychiatric Disorders |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A13%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Model%20for%20Brief%20Assessment%20of%20Attachment%20and%20Its%20Application%20to%20Women%20in%20Inpatient%20Treatment%20for%20Trauma-Related%20Psychiatric%20Disorders&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20assessment&rft.au=Allen,%20Jon%20G.&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=421&rft.epage=447&rft.pages=421-447&rft.issn=0022-3891&rft.eissn=1532-7752&rft.coden=JNPABU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/S15327752JPA7603_05&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57660109%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57660109&rft_id=info:pmid/11499456&rfr_iscdi=true |