Loading…

A Model for Brief Assessment of Attachment and Its Application to Women in Inpatient Treatment for Trauma-Related Psychiatric Disorders

We adapted self-report measures of attachment style to the psychological assessment of women in specialized inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. The study employed 2 measures of adult attachment style, the Relationship Questionnaire (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) and the Adult Attac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of personality assessment 2001-06, Vol.76 (3), p.421-447
Main Authors: Allen, Jon G., Huntoon, Janis, Fultz, Jim, Stein, Helen, Fonagy, Peter, Evans, Richard B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453
container_end_page 447
container_issue 3
container_start_page 421
container_title Journal of personality assessment
container_volume 76
creator Allen, Jon G.
Huntoon, Janis
Fultz, Jim
Stein, Helen
Fonagy, Peter
Evans, Richard B.
description We adapted self-report measures of attachment style to the psychological assessment of women in specialized inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. The study employed 2 measures of adult attachment style, the Relationship Questionnaire (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) and the Adult Attachment Scale (Collins & Read, 1990) as well as our Current Attachment Relationships questionnaire, which assesses the extent of social support in secure attachments. We administered these measures to 99 patients and to a convenience sample of 154 women in the community. We found modest correspondence between the 2 attachment style measures and substantial relations between attachment styles and range of secure attachment relationships. Women in the trauma sample reported insecure attachment styles and relatively few secure attachment figures. We discuss the implications of these findings for clinical assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1207/S15327752JPA7603_05
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71083356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57660109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCEyAhLxC7gB3_JRukUP6mKqKCQSyjO7ajGjlxsD1C8wS8dp3OIFhUsLq-x985snwQekLJC1oT9fILFaxWStQXV52ShPVE3EOrRawW9T5aEVLXFWtaeooepvSdEEIprx-g0zLalgu5Qr86_DEY6_EQIn4dnR1wl5JNabRTxqFsOYO-vt1gMnidE-7m2TsN2YUJ54C_hXKL3YTX01zEhdxEC_nWs8RuIuxGqD5bD9kafJX2-tpBjk7jNy6FaGxMj9DJAD7Zx8d5hr6-e7s5_1Bdfnq_Pu8uK825yhVtODS2bUQrLLTaKMUEs1I0RTVU0m3DVDmKgUg6WEqZ4BykgYZv9aC5YGfo-SF3juHHzqbcjy5p6z1MNuxSryhpGBPyv6BQUhJK2gKyA6hjSCnaoZ-jGyHue0r6paj-jqKK6-kxfrcdrfnjOTZTgGdHAJIGP0SYtEt_ZRdGkYK9OmBuKl89ws8Qvekz7H2Ivz3sXw-5ASDjsBM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57660109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Model for Brief Assessment of Attachment and Its Application to Women in Inpatient Treatment for Trauma-Related Psychiatric Disorders</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Allen, Jon G. ; Huntoon, Janis ; Fultz, Jim ; Stein, Helen ; Fonagy, Peter ; Evans, Richard B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jon G. ; Huntoon, Janis ; Fultz, Jim ; Stein, Helen ; Fonagy, Peter ; Evans, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><description>We adapted self-report measures of attachment style to the psychological assessment of women in specialized inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. The study employed 2 measures of adult attachment style, the Relationship Questionnaire (Bartholomew &amp; Horowitz, 1991) and the Adult Attachment Scale (Collins &amp; Read, 1990) as well as our Current Attachment Relationships questionnaire, which assesses the extent of social support in secure attachments. We administered these measures to 99 patients and to a convenience sample of 154 women in the community. We found modest correspondence between the 2 attachment style measures and substantial relations between attachment styles and range of secure attachment relationships. Women in the trauma sample reported insecure attachment styles and relatively few secure attachment figures. We discuss the implications of these findings for clinical assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7603_05</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11499456</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNPABU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attachment style ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Clinical assessment ; Female ; Humans ; Inpatients - psychology ; Interpersonal Relations ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Object Attachment ; Psychiatric units ; Psychological trauma ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Selfreport measures ; Social Support ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Techniques and methods ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality assessment, 2001-06, Vol.76 (3), p.421-447</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2001</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1056370$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11499456$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jon G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntoon, Janis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fultz, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonagy, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><title>A Model for Brief Assessment of Attachment and Its Application to Women in Inpatient Treatment for Trauma-Related Psychiatric Disorders</title><title>Journal of personality assessment</title><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><description>We adapted self-report measures of attachment style to the psychological assessment of women in specialized inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. The study employed 2 measures of adult attachment style, the Relationship Questionnaire (Bartholomew &amp; Horowitz, 1991) and the Adult Attachment Scale (Collins &amp; Read, 1990) as well as our Current Attachment Relationships questionnaire, which assesses the extent of social support in secure attachments. We administered these measures to 99 patients and to a convenience sample of 154 women in the community. We found modest correspondence between the 2 attachment style measures and substantial relations between attachment styles and range of secure attachment relationships. Women in the trauma sample reported insecure attachment styles and relatively few secure attachment figures. We discuss the implications of these findings for clinical assessment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attachment style</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients - psychology</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Psychiatric units</subject><subject>Psychological trauma</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Selfreport measures</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0022-3891</issn><issn>1532-7752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCEyAhLxC7gB3_JRukUP6mKqKCQSyjO7ajGjlxsD1C8wS8dp3OIFhUsLq-x985snwQekLJC1oT9fILFaxWStQXV52ShPVE3EOrRawW9T5aEVLXFWtaeooepvSdEEIprx-g0zLalgu5Qr86_DEY6_EQIn4dnR1wl5JNabRTxqFsOYO-vt1gMnidE-7m2TsN2YUJ54C_hXKL3YTX01zEhdxEC_nWs8RuIuxGqD5bD9kafJX2-tpBjk7jNy6FaGxMj9DJAD7Zx8d5hr6-e7s5_1Bdfnq_Pu8uK825yhVtODS2bUQrLLTaKMUEs1I0RTVU0m3DVDmKgUg6WEqZ4BykgYZv9aC5YGfo-SF3juHHzqbcjy5p6z1MNuxSryhpGBPyv6BQUhJK2gKyA6hjSCnaoZ-jGyHue0r6paj-jqKK6-kxfrcdrfnjOTZTgGdHAJIGP0SYtEt_ZRdGkYK9OmBuKl89ws8Qvekz7H2Ivz3sXw-5ASDjsBM</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Allen, Jon G.</creator><creator>Huntoon, Janis</creator><creator>Fultz, Jim</creator><creator>Stein, Helen</creator><creator>Fonagy, Peter</creator><creator>Evans, Richard B.</creator><general>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>A Model for Brief Assessment of Attachment and Its Application to Women in Inpatient Treatment for Trauma-Related Psychiatric Disorders</title><author>Allen, Jon G. ; Huntoon, Janis ; Fultz, Jim ; Stein, Helen ; Fonagy, Peter ; Evans, Richard B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attachment style</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients - psychology</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Psychiatric units</topic><topic>Psychological trauma</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Selfreport measures</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jon G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntoon, Janis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fultz, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonagy, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Jon G.</au><au>Huntoon, Janis</au><au>Fultz, Jim</au><au>Stein, Helen</au><au>Fonagy, Peter</au><au>Evans, Richard B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Model for Brief Assessment of Attachment and Its Application to Women in Inpatient Treatment for Trauma-Related Psychiatric Disorders</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>421</spage><epage>447</epage><pages>421-447</pages><issn>0022-3891</issn><eissn>1532-7752</eissn><coden>JNPABU</coden><abstract>We adapted self-report measures of attachment style to the psychological assessment of women in specialized inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. The study employed 2 measures of adult attachment style, the Relationship Questionnaire (Bartholomew &amp; Horowitz, 1991) and the Adult Attachment Scale (Collins &amp; Read, 1990) as well as our Current Attachment Relationships questionnaire, which assesses the extent of social support in secure attachments. We administered these measures to 99 patients and to a convenience sample of 154 women in the community. We found modest correspondence between the 2 attachment style measures and substantial relations between attachment styles and range of secure attachment relationships. Women in the trauma sample reported insecure attachment styles and relatively few secure attachment figures. We discuss the implications of these findings for clinical assessment.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</pub><pmid>11499456</pmid><doi>10.1207/S15327752JPA7603_05</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3891
ispartof Journal of personality assessment, 2001-06, Vol.76 (3), p.421-447
issn 0022-3891
1532-7752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71083356
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Adult
Attachment style
Biological and medical sciences
Case-Control Studies
Clinical assessment
Female
Humans
Inpatients - psychology
Interpersonal Relations
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Object Attachment
Psychiatric units
Psychological trauma
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics
Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Selfreport measures
Social Support
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Techniques and methods
Women
title A Model for Brief Assessment of Attachment and Its Application to Women in Inpatient Treatment for Trauma-Related Psychiatric Disorders
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A13%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Model%20for%20Brief%20Assessment%20of%20Attachment%20and%20Its%20Application%20to%20Women%20in%20Inpatient%20Treatment%20for%20Trauma-Related%20Psychiatric%20Disorders&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20assessment&rft.au=Allen,%20Jon%20G.&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=421&rft.epage=447&rft.pages=421-447&rft.issn=0022-3891&rft.eissn=1532-7752&rft.coden=JNPABU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/S15327752JPA7603_05&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57660109%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-184a8e98595ea9cd77353e658a8ed161b837a8e5f061fe113544a6da84bcfc453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57660109&rft_id=info:pmid/11499456&rfr_iscdi=true