Loading…

The use of glass wool as an attachment surface for studying phenotypic changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

Two‐dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to demonstrate phenotypic differences between Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm cells and the planktonic counterpart cells under defined culture conditions. Glass wool was used as a substratum for cell attachment as it affords a large surface‐...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proteomics (Weinheim) 2001-07, Vol.1 (7), p.871-879
Main Authors: Steyn, Bridgitta, Oosthuizen, Marinda C., MacDonald, Raynard, Theron, Jacques, Brözel, Volker S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 879
container_issue 7
container_start_page 871
container_title Proteomics (Weinheim)
container_volume 1
creator Steyn, Bridgitta
Oosthuizen, Marinda C.
MacDonald, Raynard
Theron, Jacques
Brözel, Volker S.
description Two‐dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to demonstrate phenotypic differences between Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm cells and the planktonic counterpart cells under defined culture conditions. Glass wool was used as a substratum for cell attachment as it affords a large surface‐to‐volume ratio (1 g with a mean diameter of 15 νm = 1300 cm2), supports the growth of biofilms, allows for free movement of cells between the inter‐strand spaces, and it facilitates the exchange of nutrients and oxygen. It also allows for the separation of the biofilm biomass from the surrounding surface influenced planktonic (SIP) cells for further characterization. Comparative analysis of the respective proteomes indicated striking differences in the protein patterns of planktonic, biofilm and SIP cells. We selected 41 proteins, the levels of which varied in a significant and reproducible way in the respective protein profiles. In the biofilm cells, a general up‐regulation of the spots was seen, but in SIP cells expression of these spots were generally down‐regulated. Altogether six unique proteins were seen in the planktonic cells, while the biofilm and SIP cells contained five and two unique proteins, respectively. Glass wool, therefore, appears to be an ideal attachment surface for the study of biofilm development.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1615-9861(200107)1:7<871::AID-PROT871>3.0.CO;2-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71092637</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18172952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i2681-d1505e9a1331257d65d2d5f28b50e3b3aed1182c147ddcca5a6301e2ad751d533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1u0zAYQCMEYmPwCshXCC5S_Nk4TgpCmgpsE9M6UPm5--TEX1qPJC5xotI34XFx1VIuUS4c28dHsk-S5MAnwLl4CRmotMgzeC44B65fwFS_yTVMp-dX79Lbz_NFnLyVEz6ZzV-LVNxLTo9H7h__lTxJHoVwFxU6L_TD5ARAcSkATpPfixWxMRDzNVs2JgS28b5hJjDTMTMMplq11A0sjH1tKmK171kYRrt13ZKtV9T5Ybt2FatWpltSYK5jt4FG61vf7STUj0vX-WBY6XztmjawcsuGjU-ti-LgItawJTWMGqqG3q9XvqfgwuPkQW2aQE8O41ny5cP7xewyvZ5fXM3Or1MnshxSG2-iqDAgJQilbaassKoWeak4yVIasgC5qOCVtraqjDKZ5EDCWK3AKinPkmd777r3P0cKA7YuVNQ0piM_BtTAC5FJ_V8QctCiUCKCTw_gWLZkcd271vRb_PvoEVjsgY1raPtvn-MuOu6q4a4g7qMjoMbYGWNzPDRHiRxncxTxOyxFbbrXujDQr6PW9D8w01Ir_HZzgZ_y_OYjfP2Ol_IPz9G2Cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18172952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of glass wool as an attachment surface for studying phenotypic changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Steyn, Bridgitta ; Oosthuizen, Marinda C. ; MacDonald, Raynard ; Theron, Jacques ; Brözel, Volker S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Steyn, Bridgitta ; Oosthuizen, Marinda C. ; MacDonald, Raynard ; Theron, Jacques ; Brözel, Volker S.</creatorcontrib><description>Two‐dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to demonstrate phenotypic differences between Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm cells and the planktonic counterpart cells under defined culture conditions. Glass wool was used as a substratum for cell attachment as it affords a large surface‐to‐volume ratio (1 g with a mean diameter of 15 νm = 1300 cm2), supports the growth of biofilms, allows for free movement of cells between the inter‐strand spaces, and it facilitates the exchange of nutrients and oxygen. It also allows for the separation of the biofilm biomass from the surrounding surface influenced planktonic (SIP) cells for further characterization. Comparative analysis of the respective proteomes indicated striking differences in the protein patterns of planktonic, biofilm and SIP cells. We selected 41 proteins, the levels of which varied in a significant and reproducible way in the respective protein profiles. In the biofilm cells, a general up‐regulation of the spots was seen, but in SIP cells expression of these spots were generally down‐regulated. Altogether six unique proteins were seen in the planktonic cells, while the biofilm and SIP cells contained five and two unique proteins, respectively. Glass wool, therefore, appears to be an ideal attachment surface for the study of biofilm development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-9853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-9861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1615-9861(200107)1:7&lt;871::AID-PROT871&gt;3.0.CO;2-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11503211</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH</publisher><subject>Bacterial Adhesion ; Bacterial Proteins - isolation &amp; purification ; Biofilm ; Biofilms - growth &amp; development ; Biomass ; Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional - methods ; Glass ; Glass wool ; Phenotype ; Proteome ; Proteome - isolation &amp; purification ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa - physiology ; Surface Properties ; Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis</subject><ispartof>Proteomics (Weinheim), 2001-07, Vol.1 (7), p.871-879</ispartof><rights>2001 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, Fed. Rep. of Germany</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11503211$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steyn, Bridgitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oosthuizen, Marinda C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Raynard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theron, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brözel, Volker S.</creatorcontrib><title>The use of glass wool as an attachment surface for studying phenotypic changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis</title><title>Proteomics (Weinheim)</title><addtitle>Proteomics</addtitle><description>Two‐dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to demonstrate phenotypic differences between Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm cells and the planktonic counterpart cells under defined culture conditions. Glass wool was used as a substratum for cell attachment as it affords a large surface‐to‐volume ratio (1 g with a mean diameter of 15 νm = 1300 cm2), supports the growth of biofilms, allows for free movement of cells between the inter‐strand spaces, and it facilitates the exchange of nutrients and oxygen. It also allows for the separation of the biofilm biomass from the surrounding surface influenced planktonic (SIP) cells for further characterization. Comparative analysis of the respective proteomes indicated striking differences in the protein patterns of planktonic, biofilm and SIP cells. We selected 41 proteins, the levels of which varied in a significant and reproducible way in the respective protein profiles. In the biofilm cells, a general up‐regulation of the spots was seen, but in SIP cells expression of these spots were generally down‐regulated. Altogether six unique proteins were seen in the planktonic cells, while the biofilm and SIP cells contained five and two unique proteins, respectively. Glass wool, therefore, appears to be an ideal attachment surface for the study of biofilm development.</description><subject>Bacterial Adhesion</subject><subject>Bacterial Proteins - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Biofilm</subject><subject>Biofilms - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Glass wool</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Proteome</subject><subject>Proteome - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - physiology</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis</subject><issn>1615-9853</issn><issn>1615-9861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkd1u0zAYQCMEYmPwCshXCC5S_Nk4TgpCmgpsE9M6UPm5--TEX1qPJC5xotI34XFx1VIuUS4c28dHsk-S5MAnwLl4CRmotMgzeC44B65fwFS_yTVMp-dX79Lbz_NFnLyVEz6ZzV-LVNxLTo9H7h__lTxJHoVwFxU6L_TD5ARAcSkATpPfixWxMRDzNVs2JgS28b5hJjDTMTMMplq11A0sjH1tKmK171kYRrt13ZKtV9T5Ybt2FatWpltSYK5jt4FG61vf7STUj0vX-WBY6XztmjawcsuGjU-ti-LgItawJTWMGqqG3q9XvqfgwuPkQW2aQE8O41ny5cP7xewyvZ5fXM3Or1MnshxSG2-iqDAgJQilbaassKoWeak4yVIasgC5qOCVtraqjDKZ5EDCWK3AKinPkmd777r3P0cKA7YuVNQ0piM_BtTAC5FJ_V8QctCiUCKCTw_gWLZkcd271vRb_PvoEVjsgY1raPtvn-MuOu6q4a4g7qMjoMbYGWNzPDRHiRxncxTxOyxFbbrXujDQr6PW9D8w01Ir_HZzgZ_y_OYjfP2Ol_IPz9G2Cw</recordid><startdate>200107</startdate><enddate>200107</enddate><creator>Steyn, Bridgitta</creator><creator>Oosthuizen, Marinda C.</creator><creator>MacDonald, Raynard</creator><creator>Theron, Jacques</creator><creator>Brözel, Volker S.</creator><general>WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH</general><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200107</creationdate><title>The use of glass wool as an attachment surface for studying phenotypic changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis</title><author>Steyn, Bridgitta ; Oosthuizen, Marinda C. ; MacDonald, Raynard ; Theron, Jacques ; Brözel, Volker S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i2681-d1505e9a1331257d65d2d5f28b50e3b3aed1182c147ddcca5a6301e2ad751d533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Adhesion</topic><topic>Bacterial Proteins - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Biofilm</topic><topic>Biofilms - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Glass wool</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Proteome</topic><topic>Proteome - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - physiology</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steyn, Bridgitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oosthuizen, Marinda C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Raynard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theron, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brözel, Volker S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Proteomics (Weinheim)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steyn, Bridgitta</au><au>Oosthuizen, Marinda C.</au><au>MacDonald, Raynard</au><au>Theron, Jacques</au><au>Brözel, Volker S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of glass wool as an attachment surface for studying phenotypic changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis</atitle><jtitle>Proteomics (Weinheim)</jtitle><addtitle>Proteomics</addtitle><date>2001-07</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>871</spage><epage>879</epage><pages>871-879</pages><issn>1615-9853</issn><eissn>1615-9861</eissn><abstract>Two‐dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to demonstrate phenotypic differences between Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm cells and the planktonic counterpart cells under defined culture conditions. Glass wool was used as a substratum for cell attachment as it affords a large surface‐to‐volume ratio (1 g with a mean diameter of 15 νm = 1300 cm2), supports the growth of biofilms, allows for free movement of cells between the inter‐strand spaces, and it facilitates the exchange of nutrients and oxygen. It also allows for the separation of the biofilm biomass from the surrounding surface influenced planktonic (SIP) cells for further characterization. Comparative analysis of the respective proteomes indicated striking differences in the protein patterns of planktonic, biofilm and SIP cells. We selected 41 proteins, the levels of which varied in a significant and reproducible way in the respective protein profiles. In the biofilm cells, a general up‐regulation of the spots was seen, but in SIP cells expression of these spots were generally down‐regulated. Altogether six unique proteins were seen in the planktonic cells, while the biofilm and SIP cells contained five and two unique proteins, respectively. Glass wool, therefore, appears to be an ideal attachment surface for the study of biofilm development.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH</pub><pmid>11503211</pmid><doi>10.1002/1615-9861(200107)1:7&lt;871::AID-PROT871&gt;3.0.CO;2-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1615-9853
ispartof Proteomics (Weinheim), 2001-07, Vol.1 (7), p.871-879
issn 1615-9853
1615-9861
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71092637
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Bacterial Adhesion
Bacterial Proteins - isolation & purification
Biofilm
Biofilms - growth & development
Biomass
Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional - methods
Glass
Glass wool
Phenotype
Proteome
Proteome - isolation & purification
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa - physiology
Surface Properties
Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis
title The use of glass wool as an attachment surface for studying phenotypic changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A42%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20glass%20wool%20as%20an%20attachment%20surface%20for%20studying%20phenotypic%20changes%20in%20Pseudomonas%20aeruginosa%20biofilms%20by%20two-dimensional%20gel%20electrophoresis&rft.jtitle=Proteomics%20(Weinheim)&rft.au=Steyn,%20Bridgitta&rft.date=2001-07&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=871&rft.epage=879&rft.pages=871-879&rft.issn=1615-9853&rft.eissn=1615-9861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1615-9861(200107)1:7%3C871::AID-PROT871%3E3.0.CO;2-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E18172952%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i2681-d1505e9a1331257d65d2d5f28b50e3b3aed1182c147ddcca5a6301e2ad751d533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18172952&rft_id=info:pmid/11503211&rfr_iscdi=true