Loading…

Reduced thiamine phosphate, but not thiamine diphosphate, in erythrocytes in elderly patients with congestive heart failure treated with furosemide

. Härdig L, Daae C, Dellborg M, Kontny F, Bøhmer T (Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Göteborg, Sweden, and Aker University Hospital, Oslo, Norway). Reduced thiamine phosphate, but not thiamine diphosphate, in erythrocytes in elderly patients with congestive heart failure treated with furosemid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of internal medicine 2000-05, Vol.247 (5), p.597-600
Main Authors: Härdig, L., Daae, C., Dellborg, M., Kontny, F., Bøhmer, T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:. Härdig L, Daae C, Dellborg M, Kontny F, Bøhmer T (Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Göteborg, Sweden, and Aker University Hospital, Oslo, Norway). Reduced thiamine phosphate, but not thiamine diphosphate, in erythrocytes in elderly patients with congestive heart failure treated with furosemide. J Intern Med 2000; 247: 597–600. Objectives. To measure the concentrations of thiamine and thiamine esters by high‐pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) in elderly patients treated with furosemide for heart failure and in a control group. Design. A cross‐sectional study of blood thiamine and thiamine ester concentrations. Subjects. Forty‐one patients admitted to hospital for heart failure and 34 elderly living at home. No vitamin supplementation was allowed. Results. Compared with the healthy controls, furosemide‐treated patients had significantly reduced whole blood thiamine phosphate (TP; 4.4 ± 2.2 vs. 7.6 ± 2.0 nmol L–1) and thiamine diphosphate (TPP; 76 ± 21.5 vs. 91 ± 19.8 nmol L–1) (mean ± SD). When the thiamine concentrations were related to the haemoglobin concentrations, which were reduced in the heart failure patients, the levels of TP (nmol g–1 Hb) were 0.38 ± 0.26 vs. 0.54 ± 0.17 (P 
ISSN:0954-6820
1365-2796
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00649.x