Far-Field R Wave Oversensing in a Dual Chamber Arrhythmia Management Device: Predisposing Factors and Practical Implications

• Published in: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2001-08, Vol.24 (8), p.1240-1246
• Main Authors: WERETKA, SLAWOMIR, BECKER, RUEDIGER, HILBEL, THOMAS, KARLE, CHRISTOPH, OSSWALD, BRIGITTE R., KUEBLER, WOLFGANG, SCHOELS, WOLFGANG
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology; Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects; dual chamber; Electrocardiography; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Electrodes, Implanted; Equipment Failure; Female; Humans; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Male; Middle Aged; proarrhythmia
• ISSN: 0147-8389; 1540-8159
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.01240.x

WERETKA, S., et al.: Far‐Field R Wave Oversensing in a Dual Chamber Arrhythmia Management Device: Predisposing Factors and Practical Implications. Initial experience with the Medtronic Jewel 7250, the ICD designed to detect and treat ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, is very promising. Its effectiveness, however, depends on sensing performance, which has not yet been systematically examined. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of, predisposing factors for, and practical implications of far‐field R wave oversensing (FFRWOS) in this dual chamber ICD. During a total follow‐up of 797 months in 48 patients who had the Jewel 7250, follow‐up strip charts, 12‐channel Holter recordings and, in particular cases, Holter recordings with intracardiac markers were analyzed for the presence of FFRWOS. FFRWOS was documented in ten (21.3%) patients. Compared to other lead locations, the right atrial appendage lead position was most frequently associated with FFRWOS (7/27 vs 3/21, P < 0.05). Patients with FFRWOS had significantly more treated and nontreated atrial episodes, many of which were judged to have been detected inappropriately. In one case, inappropriate atrial antitachycardia pacing due to R wave oversensing triggered sustained ventricular tachycardia, terminated eventually with a high energy shock. In dual chamber ICDs, FFRWOS may represent a frequent phenomenon possibly leading to serious consequences. For atrial leads, a lateral atrial wall position seems to be preferable. In most cases, FFRWOS can be eliminated by optimization of atrial sensing parameters. Given the possibility of ventricular proarrhythmia with atrial pacing therapy, the capability of ventricular backup defibrillation in respective devices is at least reassuring.