Loading…

Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene

Understanding the fate of hybrids in wild populations is fundamental to understanding speciation. Here we provide evidence for disruptive sexual selection against hybrids between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. The two species are sympatric across most of Central and Andean South America,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2001-09, Vol.268 (1478), p.1849-1854
Main Authors: Naisbit, Russell E., Jiggins, Chris D., Mallet, James
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c688t-9d83eb7ff7a82742536dac90cb1729f3bb5888f9319736775e9b436fc1ce6dbc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c688t-9d83eb7ff7a82742536dac90cb1729f3bb5888f9319736775e9b436fc1ce6dbc3
container_end_page 1854
container_issue 1478
container_start_page 1849
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences
container_volume 268
creator Naisbit, Russell E.
Jiggins, Chris D.
Mallet, James
description Understanding the fate of hybrids in wild populations is fundamental to understanding speciation. Here we provide evidence for disruptive sexual selection against hybrids between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. The two species are sympatric across most of Central and Andean South America, and coexist despite a low level of hybridization. No-choice mating experiments show strong assortative mating between the species. Hybrids mate readily with one another, but both sexes show a reduction in mating success of over 50% with the parental species. Mating preference is associated with a shift in the adult colour pattern, which is involved in predator defence through Müllerian mimicry, but also strongly affects male courtship probability. The hybrids, which lie outside the curve of protection afforded by mimetic resemblance to the parental species, are also largely outside the curves of parental mating preference. Disruptive sexual selection against F1 hybrids therefore forms an additional post-mating barrier to gene flow, blurring the distinction between pre-mating and post-mating isolation, and helping to maintain the distinctness of these hybridizing species.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rspb.2001.1753
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71128055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3067555</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3067555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c688t-9d83eb7ff7a82742536dac90cb1729f3bb5888f9319736775e9b436fc1ce6dbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk2P0zAQhiMEYsvClRNCOXFr8Ucc2xfEssuyiJVAUOBoOc6kdUnjYCftll-Pm1ZlK8Rysux55p0Zv5MkTzGaYCTFSx_aYkIQwhPMGb2XjHDG8ZhIlt1PRkjmZCwyRk6SRyEsEEKSCfYwOcGYEUIQGyXrCxt833Z2BWmAm17X8ajBdNY1qZ5p24QunW8Kb8uQGtd03hZ9ByHtXBpaMFYPZAHdGqBJr6C2kbJ9hDdl41LdlLcfl1C3bgkNPE4eVLoO8GR_niZfL99Oz6_G1x_fvT8_ux6bXIhuLEtBoeBVxbUgPCOM5qU2EpkCcyIrWhRMCFFJiiWnOecMZJHRvDLYQF4Whp4mr3a6bV8soTQQJ9C1ar1dar9RTlt1HGnsXM3cSmEUhbGIAi_2At797CF0ammDgbrWDbg-KI4xEYix_4JYkFxKRCI42YHGuxA8VIduMFJbU9XWVLU1VW1NjQnPb8_wB9-7GAG6A7zbxM90xkK3UQvX-yZe_y0b7sr6_OXTGxwbXpFc2LhVQiFBMeKYEqZ-2XaQ2wIqAsqG0IMasOMyf1d9tqu6CJ3zh1koyjkbfnG8C9vQwc0hrP0PlXPKmfomMpV_z_DF9MOlmkb-9Y6f29l8bT2oo2mG4tu1je4OfQ4dYpFJVfV13IOyihLkTgm3aX0ojrPpb-itGeM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18269902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read &amp; Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Naisbit, Russell E. ; Jiggins, Chris D. ; Mallet, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Naisbit, Russell E. ; Jiggins, Chris D. ; Mallet, James</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the fate of hybrids in wild populations is fundamental to understanding speciation. Here we provide evidence for disruptive sexual selection against hybrids between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. The two species are sympatric across most of Central and Andean South America, and coexist despite a low level of hybridization. No-choice mating experiments show strong assortative mating between the species. Hybrids mate readily with one another, but both sexes show a reduction in mating success of over 50% with the parental species. Mating preference is associated with a shift in the adult colour pattern, which is involved in predator defence through Müllerian mimicry, but also strongly affects male courtship probability. The hybrids, which lie outside the curve of protection afforded by mimetic resemblance to the parental species, are also largely outside the curves of parental mating preference. Disruptive sexual selection against F1 hybrids therefore forms an additional post-mating barrier to gene flow, blurring the distinction between pre-mating and post-mating isolation, and helping to maintain the distinctness of these hybridizing species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1753</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11522205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Butterflies ; Butterflies - physiology ; Chimera ; Ecological genetics ; Female ; Female animals ; Heliconius cydno ; Heliconius melpomene ; Hybridity ; Hybridization ; Lepidoptera ; Male ; Male animals ; Mallets ; Mate Choice ; Mating behavior ; Nymphalidae ; Post-Mating Isolation ; Pre-Mating Isolation ; Sex Preselection ; Sexual Behavior, Animal ; Sexual selection ; Speciation ; Species Specificity ; Sympatric species</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2001-09, Vol.268 (1478), p.1849-1854</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 The Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c688t-9d83eb7ff7a82742536dac90cb1729f3bb5888f9319736775e9b436fc1ce6dbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c688t-9d83eb7ff7a82742536dac90cb1729f3bb5888f9319736775e9b436fc1ce6dbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3067555$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3067555$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771,58216,58449</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11522205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naisbit, Russell E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiggins, Chris D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallet, James</creatorcontrib><title>Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Understanding the fate of hybrids in wild populations is fundamental to understanding speciation. Here we provide evidence for disruptive sexual selection against hybrids between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. The two species are sympatric across most of Central and Andean South America, and coexist despite a low level of hybridization. No-choice mating experiments show strong assortative mating between the species. Hybrids mate readily with one another, but both sexes show a reduction in mating success of over 50% with the parental species. Mating preference is associated with a shift in the adult colour pattern, which is involved in predator defence through Müllerian mimicry, but also strongly affects male courtship probability. The hybrids, which lie outside the curve of protection afforded by mimetic resemblance to the parental species, are also largely outside the curves of parental mating preference. Disruptive sexual selection against F1 hybrids therefore forms an additional post-mating barrier to gene flow, blurring the distinction between pre-mating and post-mating isolation, and helping to maintain the distinctness of these hybridizing species.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Butterflies - physiology</subject><subject>Chimera</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Heliconius cydno</subject><subject>Heliconius melpomene</subject><subject>Hybridity</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mallets</subject><subject>Mate Choice</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Nymphalidae</subject><subject>Post-Mating Isolation</subject><subject>Pre-Mating Isolation</subject><subject>Sex Preselection</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Sexual selection</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Sympatric species</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkk2P0zAQhiMEYsvClRNCOXFr8Ucc2xfEssuyiJVAUOBoOc6kdUnjYCftll-Pm1ZlK8Rysux55p0Zv5MkTzGaYCTFSx_aYkIQwhPMGb2XjHDG8ZhIlt1PRkjmZCwyRk6SRyEsEEKSCfYwOcGYEUIQGyXrCxt833Z2BWmAm17X8ajBdNY1qZ5p24QunW8Kb8uQGtd03hZ9ByHtXBpaMFYPZAHdGqBJr6C2kbJ9hDdl41LdlLcfl1C3bgkNPE4eVLoO8GR_niZfL99Oz6_G1x_fvT8_ux6bXIhuLEtBoeBVxbUgPCOM5qU2EpkCcyIrWhRMCFFJiiWnOecMZJHRvDLYQF4Whp4mr3a6bV8soTQQJ9C1ar1dar9RTlt1HGnsXM3cSmEUhbGIAi_2At797CF0ammDgbrWDbg-KI4xEYix_4JYkFxKRCI42YHGuxA8VIduMFJbU9XWVLU1VW1NjQnPb8_wB9-7GAG6A7zbxM90xkK3UQvX-yZe_y0b7sr6_OXTGxwbXpFc2LhVQiFBMeKYEqZ-2XaQ2wIqAsqG0IMasOMyf1d9tqu6CJ3zh1koyjkbfnG8C9vQwc0hrP0PlXPKmfomMpV_z_DF9MOlmkb-9Y6f29l8bT2oo2mG4tu1je4OfQ4dYpFJVfV13IOyihLkTgm3aX0ojrPpb-itGeM</recordid><startdate>20010907</startdate><enddate>20010907</enddate><creator>Naisbit, Russell E.</creator><creator>Jiggins, Chris D.</creator><creator>Mallet, James</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010907</creationdate><title>Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene</title><author>Naisbit, Russell E. ; Jiggins, Chris D. ; Mallet, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c688t-9d83eb7ff7a82742536dac90cb1729f3bb5888f9319736775e9b436fc1ce6dbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Butterflies - physiology</topic><topic>Chimera</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Heliconius cydno</topic><topic>Heliconius melpomene</topic><topic>Hybridity</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mallets</topic><topic>Mate Choice</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Nymphalidae</topic><topic>Post-Mating Isolation</topic><topic>Pre-Mating Isolation</topic><topic>Sex Preselection</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Sexual selection</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Sympatric species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naisbit, Russell E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiggins, Chris D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallet, James</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naisbit, Russell E.</au><au>Jiggins, Chris D.</au><au>Mallet, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2001-09-07</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>268</volume><issue>1478</issue><spage>1849</spage><epage>1854</epage><pages>1849-1854</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>Understanding the fate of hybrids in wild populations is fundamental to understanding speciation. Here we provide evidence for disruptive sexual selection against hybrids between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. The two species are sympatric across most of Central and Andean South America, and coexist despite a low level of hybridization. No-choice mating experiments show strong assortative mating between the species. Hybrids mate readily with one another, but both sexes show a reduction in mating success of over 50% with the parental species. Mating preference is associated with a shift in the adult colour pattern, which is involved in predator defence through Müllerian mimicry, but also strongly affects male courtship probability. The hybrids, which lie outside the curve of protection afforded by mimetic resemblance to the parental species, are also largely outside the curves of parental mating preference. Disruptive sexual selection against F1 hybrids therefore forms an additional post-mating barrier to gene flow, blurring the distinction between pre-mating and post-mating isolation, and helping to maintain the distinctness of these hybridizing species.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>11522205</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2001.1753</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8452
ispartof Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2001-09, Vol.268 (1478), p.1849-1854
issn 0962-8452
1471-2954
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71128055
source JSTOR Archival Journals; PubMed Central; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)
subjects Animals
Butterflies
Butterflies - physiology
Chimera
Ecological genetics
Female
Female animals
Heliconius cydno
Heliconius melpomene
Hybridity
Hybridization
Lepidoptera
Male
Male animals
Mallets
Mate Choice
Mating behavior
Nymphalidae
Post-Mating Isolation
Pre-Mating Isolation
Sex Preselection
Sexual Behavior, Animal
Sexual selection
Speciation
Species Specificity
Sympatric species
title Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A17%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disruptive%20sexual%20selection%20against%20hybrids%20contributes%20to%20speciation%20between%20Heliconius%20cydno%20and%20Heliconius%20melpomene&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Naisbit,%20Russell%20E.&rft.date=2001-09-07&rft.volume=268&rft.issue=1478&rft.spage=1849&rft.epage=1854&rft.pages=1849-1854&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2001.1753&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3067555%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c688t-9d83eb7ff7a82742536dac90cb1729f3bb5888f9319736775e9b436fc1ce6dbc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18269902&rft_id=info:pmid/11522205&rft_jstor_id=3067555&rfr_iscdi=true