Loading…
Development and Testing of Seven New Synthetic Coyote Attractants
Available evidence indicates that effective coyote attractants are blends of volatile substances. Typically, attractants are a combination of biological substances such as fermented glandular materials, urines, and rotted meats. Although effective, these attractants have several distinct disadvantag...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2000-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1892-1897 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593 |
container_end_page | 1897 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1892 |
container_title | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Kimball, Bruce A Mason, J. Russell Blom, F. Sherman Johnston, John J Zemlicka, Doris E |
description | Available evidence indicates that effective coyote attractants are blends of volatile substances. Typically, attractants are a combination of biological substances such as fermented glandular materials, urines, and rotted meats. Although effective, these attractants have several distinct disadvantages. Among these is the possibility that they are unnecessarily complex and variable and, thus, difficult to replicate from one batch to the next. Although attractants containing a few reagent grade materials are available, the chemicals selected and their concentrations are not derived from actual attractants. For this reason, commercially available coyote attractants were analyzed with the intention of developing relatively simple synthetic alternatives. Purge and trap headspace analysis with gas chromatography/mass selective detection was employed to identify the volatile components of known conventional and synthetic attractants. All identified compounds were grouped according to chemical functionality, and one compound from each functional group was chosen to represent the group. Using only these representative compounds, seven synthetic attractants were formulated. Bioassays with captive coyotes (Canis latrans) were conducted to compare behavioral responses elicited by the seven new attractants, a currently available synthetic attractant, and a control. The results indicated that the attractants elicited significantly different behavioral profiles. Keywords: Attractants; bioassay; Canis latrans; coyotes; headspace analysis; volatiles |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/jf990648z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71139682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71139682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0MtOwzAQBVALgWgpLPgBlA1ILAJ2Er-WVYFCVfFQC2JnOckYUvIosQOUrycoVcWC1Szu0czoInRI8BnBATlfGCkxi8T3FuoTGmCfEiK2UR-3oS8oIz20Z-0CYywox7uoR7AIMCGkj4YX8AF5tSygdJ4uU28O1mXli1cZb9ZGpXcLn95sVbpXcFnijapV5cAbOlfrxOnS2X20Y3Ru4WA9B-jx6nI-uvand-Ob0XDq6zCSzpeayDg1DIzkBMcm4jwSURTQlBmZptpAJIXmYZKyMAh5ElLOcUwh0cAiTmU4QCfd3mVdvTftl6rIbAJ5rkuoGqs4IaFkImjhaQeTurK2BqOWdVboeqUIVr99qU1frT1aL23iAtI_siuoBX4HMuvga5Pr-k0xHnKq5vcz9fA8uRVPcqLGrT_uvE6sWlRNXbad_HP4B6Q1gFY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71139682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Testing of Seven New Synthetic Coyote Attractants</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Kimball, Bruce A ; Mason, J. Russell ; Blom, F. Sherman ; Johnston, John J ; Zemlicka, Doris E</creator><creatorcontrib>Kimball, Bruce A ; Mason, J. Russell ; Blom, F. Sherman ; Johnston, John J ; Zemlicka, Doris E</creatorcontrib><description>Available evidence indicates that effective coyote attractants are blends of volatile substances. Typically, attractants are a combination of biological substances such as fermented glandular materials, urines, and rotted meats. Although effective, these attractants have several distinct disadvantages. Among these is the possibility that they are unnecessarily complex and variable and, thus, difficult to replicate from one batch to the next. Although attractants containing a few reagent grade materials are available, the chemicals selected and their concentrations are not derived from actual attractants. For this reason, commercially available coyote attractants were analyzed with the intention of developing relatively simple synthetic alternatives. Purge and trap headspace analysis with gas chromatography/mass selective detection was employed to identify the volatile components of known conventional and synthetic attractants. All identified compounds were grouped according to chemical functionality, and one compound from each functional group was chosen to represent the group. Using only these representative compounds, seven synthetic attractants were formulated. Bioassays with captive coyotes (Canis latrans) were conducted to compare behavioral responses elicited by the seven new attractants, a currently available synthetic attractant, and a control. The results indicated that the attractants elicited significantly different behavioral profiles. Keywords: Attractants; bioassay; Canis latrans; coyotes; headspace analysis; volatiles</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jf990648z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10820111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Behavior, Animal ; Carnivora ; Female ; Male ; Pheromones - chemical synthesis ; Pheromones - chemistry ; Pheromones - pharmacology ; Volatilization</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2000-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1892-1897</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10820111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kimball, Bruce A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, J. Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blom, F. Sherman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zemlicka, Doris E</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Testing of Seven New Synthetic Coyote Attractants</title><title>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><description>Available evidence indicates that effective coyote attractants are blends of volatile substances. Typically, attractants are a combination of biological substances such as fermented glandular materials, urines, and rotted meats. Although effective, these attractants have several distinct disadvantages. Among these is the possibility that they are unnecessarily complex and variable and, thus, difficult to replicate from one batch to the next. Although attractants containing a few reagent grade materials are available, the chemicals selected and their concentrations are not derived from actual attractants. For this reason, commercially available coyote attractants were analyzed with the intention of developing relatively simple synthetic alternatives. Purge and trap headspace analysis with gas chromatography/mass selective detection was employed to identify the volatile components of known conventional and synthetic attractants. All identified compounds were grouped according to chemical functionality, and one compound from each functional group was chosen to represent the group. Using only these representative compounds, seven synthetic attractants were formulated. Bioassays with captive coyotes (Canis latrans) were conducted to compare behavioral responses elicited by the seven new attractants, a currently available synthetic attractant, and a control. The results indicated that the attractants elicited significantly different behavioral profiles. Keywords: Attractants; bioassay; Canis latrans; coyotes; headspace analysis; volatiles</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Carnivora</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pheromones - chemical synthesis</subject><subject>Pheromones - chemistry</subject><subject>Pheromones - pharmacology</subject><subject>Volatilization</subject><issn>0021-8561</issn><issn>1520-5118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0MtOwzAQBVALgWgpLPgBlA1ILAJ2Er-WVYFCVfFQC2JnOckYUvIosQOUrycoVcWC1Szu0czoInRI8BnBATlfGCkxi8T3FuoTGmCfEiK2UR-3oS8oIz20Z-0CYywox7uoR7AIMCGkj4YX8AF5tSygdJ4uU28O1mXli1cZb9ZGpXcLn95sVbpXcFnijapV5cAbOlfrxOnS2X20Y3Ru4WA9B-jx6nI-uvand-Ob0XDq6zCSzpeayDg1DIzkBMcm4jwSURTQlBmZptpAJIXmYZKyMAh5ElLOcUwh0cAiTmU4QCfd3mVdvTftl6rIbAJ5rkuoGqs4IaFkImjhaQeTurK2BqOWdVboeqUIVr99qU1frT1aL23iAtI_siuoBX4HMuvga5Pr-k0xHnKq5vcz9fA8uRVPcqLGrT_uvE6sWlRNXbad_HP4B6Q1gFY</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Kimball, Bruce A</creator><creator>Mason, J. Russell</creator><creator>Blom, F. Sherman</creator><creator>Johnston, John J</creator><creator>Zemlicka, Doris E</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>Development and Testing of Seven New Synthetic Coyote Attractants</title><author>Kimball, Bruce A ; Mason, J. Russell ; Blom, F. Sherman ; Johnston, John J ; Zemlicka, Doris E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Carnivora</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pheromones - chemical synthesis</topic><topic>Pheromones - chemistry</topic><topic>Pheromones - pharmacology</topic><topic>Volatilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kimball, Bruce A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, J. Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blom, F. Sherman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zemlicka, Doris E</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kimball, Bruce A</au><au>Mason, J. Russell</au><au>Blom, F. Sherman</au><au>Johnston, John J</au><au>Zemlicka, Doris E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and Testing of Seven New Synthetic Coyote Attractants</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1892</spage><epage>1897</epage><pages>1892-1897</pages><issn>0021-8561</issn><eissn>1520-5118</eissn><abstract>Available evidence indicates that effective coyote attractants are blends of volatile substances. Typically, attractants are a combination of biological substances such as fermented glandular materials, urines, and rotted meats. Although effective, these attractants have several distinct disadvantages. Among these is the possibility that they are unnecessarily complex and variable and, thus, difficult to replicate from one batch to the next. Although attractants containing a few reagent grade materials are available, the chemicals selected and their concentrations are not derived from actual attractants. For this reason, commercially available coyote attractants were analyzed with the intention of developing relatively simple synthetic alternatives. Purge and trap headspace analysis with gas chromatography/mass selective detection was employed to identify the volatile components of known conventional and synthetic attractants. All identified compounds were grouped according to chemical functionality, and one compound from each functional group was chosen to represent the group. Using only these representative compounds, seven synthetic attractants were formulated. Bioassays with captive coyotes (Canis latrans) were conducted to compare behavioral responses elicited by the seven new attractants, a currently available synthetic attractant, and a control. The results indicated that the attractants elicited significantly different behavioral profiles. Keywords: Attractants; bioassay; Canis latrans; coyotes; headspace analysis; volatiles</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>10820111</pmid><doi>10.1021/jf990648z</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8561 |
ispartof | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2000-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1892-1897 |
issn | 0021-8561 1520-5118 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71139682 |
source | American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list) |
subjects | Animals Behavior, Animal Carnivora Female Male Pheromones - chemical synthesis Pheromones - chemistry Pheromones - pharmacology Volatilization |
title | Development and Testing of Seven New Synthetic Coyote Attractants |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A36%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Testing%20of%20Seven%20New%20Synthetic%20Coyote%20Attractants&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20food%20chemistry&rft.au=Kimball,%20Bruce%20A&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1892&rft.epage=1897&rft.pages=1892-1897&rft.issn=0021-8561&rft.eissn=1520-5118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jf990648z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71139682%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71139682&rft_id=info:pmid/10820111&rfr_iscdi=true |