Loading…

Development and Testing of Seven New Synthetic Coyote Attractants

Available evidence indicates that effective coyote attractants are blends of volatile substances. Typically, attractants are a combination of biological substances such as fermented glandular materials, urines, and rotted meats. Although effective, these attractants have several distinct disadvantag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2000-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1892-1897
Main Authors: Kimball, Bruce A, Mason, J. Russell, Blom, F. Sherman, Johnston, John J, Zemlicka, Doris E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593
container_end_page 1897
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1892
container_title Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
container_volume 48
creator Kimball, Bruce A
Mason, J. Russell
Blom, F. Sherman
Johnston, John J
Zemlicka, Doris E
description Available evidence indicates that effective coyote attractants are blends of volatile substances. Typically, attractants are a combination of biological substances such as fermented glandular materials, urines, and rotted meats. Although effective, these attractants have several distinct disadvantages. Among these is the possibility that they are unnecessarily complex and variable and, thus, difficult to replicate from one batch to the next. Although attractants containing a few reagent grade materials are available, the chemicals selected and their concentrations are not derived from actual attractants. For this reason, commercially available coyote attractants were analyzed with the intention of developing relatively simple synthetic alternatives. Purge and trap headspace analysis with gas chromatography/mass selective detection was employed to identify the volatile components of known conventional and synthetic attractants. All identified compounds were grouped according to chemical functionality, and one compound from each functional group was chosen to represent the group. Using only these representative compounds, seven synthetic attractants were formulated. Bioassays with captive coyotes (Canis latrans) were conducted to compare behavioral responses elicited by the seven new attractants, a currently available synthetic attractant, and a control. The results indicated that the attractants elicited significantly different behavioral profiles. Keywords: Attractants; bioassay; Canis latrans; coyotes; headspace analysis; volatiles
doi_str_mv 10.1021/jf990648z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71139682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71139682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0MtOwzAQBVALgWgpLPgBlA1ILAJ2Er-WVYFCVfFQC2JnOckYUvIosQOUrycoVcWC1Szu0czoInRI8BnBATlfGCkxi8T3FuoTGmCfEiK2UR-3oS8oIz20Z-0CYywox7uoR7AIMCGkj4YX8AF5tSygdJ4uU28O1mXli1cZb9ZGpXcLn95sVbpXcFnijapV5cAbOlfrxOnS2X20Y3Ru4WA9B-jx6nI-uvand-Ob0XDq6zCSzpeayDg1DIzkBMcm4jwSURTQlBmZptpAJIXmYZKyMAh5ElLOcUwh0cAiTmU4QCfd3mVdvTftl6rIbAJ5rkuoGqs4IaFkImjhaQeTurK2BqOWdVboeqUIVr99qU1frT1aL23iAtI_siuoBX4HMuvga5Pr-k0xHnKq5vcz9fA8uRVPcqLGrT_uvE6sWlRNXbad_HP4B6Q1gFY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71139682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Testing of Seven New Synthetic Coyote Attractants</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Kimball, Bruce A ; Mason, J. Russell ; Blom, F. Sherman ; Johnston, John J ; Zemlicka, Doris E</creator><creatorcontrib>Kimball, Bruce A ; Mason, J. Russell ; Blom, F. Sherman ; Johnston, John J ; Zemlicka, Doris E</creatorcontrib><description>Available evidence indicates that effective coyote attractants are blends of volatile substances. Typically, attractants are a combination of biological substances such as fermented glandular materials, urines, and rotted meats. Although effective, these attractants have several distinct disadvantages. Among these is the possibility that they are unnecessarily complex and variable and, thus, difficult to replicate from one batch to the next. Although attractants containing a few reagent grade materials are available, the chemicals selected and their concentrations are not derived from actual attractants. For this reason, commercially available coyote attractants were analyzed with the intention of developing relatively simple synthetic alternatives. Purge and trap headspace analysis with gas chromatography/mass selective detection was employed to identify the volatile components of known conventional and synthetic attractants. All identified compounds were grouped according to chemical functionality, and one compound from each functional group was chosen to represent the group. Using only these representative compounds, seven synthetic attractants were formulated. Bioassays with captive coyotes (Canis latrans) were conducted to compare behavioral responses elicited by the seven new attractants, a currently available synthetic attractant, and a control. The results indicated that the attractants elicited significantly different behavioral profiles. Keywords: Attractants; bioassay; Canis latrans; coyotes; headspace analysis; volatiles</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jf990648z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10820111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Behavior, Animal ; Carnivora ; Female ; Male ; Pheromones - chemical synthesis ; Pheromones - chemistry ; Pheromones - pharmacology ; Volatilization</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2000-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1892-1897</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10820111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kimball, Bruce A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, J. Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blom, F. Sherman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zemlicka, Doris E</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Testing of Seven New Synthetic Coyote Attractants</title><title>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><description>Available evidence indicates that effective coyote attractants are blends of volatile substances. Typically, attractants are a combination of biological substances such as fermented glandular materials, urines, and rotted meats. Although effective, these attractants have several distinct disadvantages. Among these is the possibility that they are unnecessarily complex and variable and, thus, difficult to replicate from one batch to the next. Although attractants containing a few reagent grade materials are available, the chemicals selected and their concentrations are not derived from actual attractants. For this reason, commercially available coyote attractants were analyzed with the intention of developing relatively simple synthetic alternatives. Purge and trap headspace analysis with gas chromatography/mass selective detection was employed to identify the volatile components of known conventional and synthetic attractants. All identified compounds were grouped according to chemical functionality, and one compound from each functional group was chosen to represent the group. Using only these representative compounds, seven synthetic attractants were formulated. Bioassays with captive coyotes (Canis latrans) were conducted to compare behavioral responses elicited by the seven new attractants, a currently available synthetic attractant, and a control. The results indicated that the attractants elicited significantly different behavioral profiles. Keywords: Attractants; bioassay; Canis latrans; coyotes; headspace analysis; volatiles</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Carnivora</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pheromones - chemical synthesis</subject><subject>Pheromones - chemistry</subject><subject>Pheromones - pharmacology</subject><subject>Volatilization</subject><issn>0021-8561</issn><issn>1520-5118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0MtOwzAQBVALgWgpLPgBlA1ILAJ2Er-WVYFCVfFQC2JnOckYUvIosQOUrycoVcWC1Szu0czoInRI8BnBATlfGCkxi8T3FuoTGmCfEiK2UR-3oS8oIz20Z-0CYywox7uoR7AIMCGkj4YX8AF5tSygdJ4uU28O1mXli1cZb9ZGpXcLn95sVbpXcFnijapV5cAbOlfrxOnS2X20Y3Ru4WA9B-jx6nI-uvand-Ob0XDq6zCSzpeayDg1DIzkBMcm4jwSURTQlBmZptpAJIXmYZKyMAh5ElLOcUwh0cAiTmU4QCfd3mVdvTftl6rIbAJ5rkuoGqs4IaFkImjhaQeTurK2BqOWdVboeqUIVr99qU1frT1aL23iAtI_siuoBX4HMuvga5Pr-k0xHnKq5vcz9fA8uRVPcqLGrT_uvE6sWlRNXbad_HP4B6Q1gFY</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Kimball, Bruce A</creator><creator>Mason, J. Russell</creator><creator>Blom, F. Sherman</creator><creator>Johnston, John J</creator><creator>Zemlicka, Doris E</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>Development and Testing of Seven New Synthetic Coyote Attractants</title><author>Kimball, Bruce A ; Mason, J. Russell ; Blom, F. Sherman ; Johnston, John J ; Zemlicka, Doris E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Carnivora</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pheromones - chemical synthesis</topic><topic>Pheromones - chemistry</topic><topic>Pheromones - pharmacology</topic><topic>Volatilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kimball, Bruce A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, J. Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blom, F. Sherman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zemlicka, Doris E</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kimball, Bruce A</au><au>Mason, J. Russell</au><au>Blom, F. Sherman</au><au>Johnston, John J</au><au>Zemlicka, Doris E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and Testing of Seven New Synthetic Coyote Attractants</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1892</spage><epage>1897</epage><pages>1892-1897</pages><issn>0021-8561</issn><eissn>1520-5118</eissn><abstract>Available evidence indicates that effective coyote attractants are blends of volatile substances. Typically, attractants are a combination of biological substances such as fermented glandular materials, urines, and rotted meats. Although effective, these attractants have several distinct disadvantages. Among these is the possibility that they are unnecessarily complex and variable and, thus, difficult to replicate from one batch to the next. Although attractants containing a few reagent grade materials are available, the chemicals selected and their concentrations are not derived from actual attractants. For this reason, commercially available coyote attractants were analyzed with the intention of developing relatively simple synthetic alternatives. Purge and trap headspace analysis with gas chromatography/mass selective detection was employed to identify the volatile components of known conventional and synthetic attractants. All identified compounds were grouped according to chemical functionality, and one compound from each functional group was chosen to represent the group. Using only these representative compounds, seven synthetic attractants were formulated. Bioassays with captive coyotes (Canis latrans) were conducted to compare behavioral responses elicited by the seven new attractants, a currently available synthetic attractant, and a control. The results indicated that the attractants elicited significantly different behavioral profiles. Keywords: Attractants; bioassay; Canis latrans; coyotes; headspace analysis; volatiles</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>10820111</pmid><doi>10.1021/jf990648z</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8561
ispartof Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2000-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1892-1897
issn 0021-8561
1520-5118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71139682
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Animals
Behavior, Animal
Carnivora
Female
Male
Pheromones - chemical synthesis
Pheromones - chemistry
Pheromones - pharmacology
Volatilization
title Development and Testing of Seven New Synthetic Coyote Attractants
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A36%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Testing%20of%20Seven%20New%20Synthetic%20Coyote%20Attractants&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20food%20chemistry&rft.au=Kimball,%20Bruce%20A&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1892&rft.epage=1897&rft.pages=1892-1897&rft.issn=0021-8561&rft.eissn=1520-5118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jf990648z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71139682%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-9a19bdf6ef9710bf477484425d6f9ddafe498a73cd63237c35770b5ecae647593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71139682&rft_id=info:pmid/10820111&rfr_iscdi=true