Loading…
Adhesions: Laparoscopic Surgery versus Laparotomy
: This study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness in pregnancy rates of microsurgery and operative laparoscopy in adhesiolysis. Adhesions were found to be the sole infertility factor in 15% of our patients. One hundred and ninety infertile patients with periadnexal adhesions as the only cause...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2000-01, Vol.900 (1), p.272-285 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | : This study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness in pregnancy rates of microsurgery and operative laparoscopy in adhesiolysis. Adhesions were found to be the sole infertility factor in 15% of our patients. One hundred and ninety infertile patients with periadnexal adhesions as the only cause of their infertility were treated by microsurgery (86) or operative laparoscopy (104) and were followed up for 24 months. Our results indicate that advanced laparoscopic surgery in general is as effective as microsurgery in healthy infertile patients with adhesions but offers some advantages in comparison to laparotomy. Factors that adversely affect the postoperative success rates are the age of the women, the duration of infertility, and the severity of the adhesions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0077-8923 1749-6632 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06239.x |