Loading…

Concurrent validation of schizotaxia: a pilot study

Background: Many first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia show deficits in clinical, neuropsychological, neurobiological and social domains, in the absence of psychosis. We recently reformulated Meehl’s concept of schizotaxia to conceptualize the liability to schizophrenia, and we propo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biological psychiatry (1969) 2001-09, Vol.50 (6), p.434-440
Main Authors: Stone, William S, Faraone, Stephen V, Seidman, Larry J, Green, Alan I, Wojcik, Joanne D, Tsuang, Ming T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c379d5d4791a2ed370ccd52bf82d75215b9afc8b52675660b524ae5fa68032403
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c379d5d4791a2ed370ccd52bf82d75215b9afc8b52675660b524ae5fa68032403
container_end_page 440
container_issue 6
container_start_page 434
container_title Biological psychiatry (1969)
container_volume 50
creator Stone, William S
Faraone, Stephen V
Seidman, Larry J
Green, Alan I
Wojcik, Joanne D
Tsuang, Ming T
description Background: Many first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia show deficits in clinical, neuropsychological, neurobiological and social domains, in the absence of psychosis. We recently reformulated Meehl’s concept of schizotaxia to conceptualize the liability to schizophrenia, and we proposed preliminary criteria based on the presence of negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits. Here we investigate the concurrent validity of schizotaxia by comparing a group of subjects who met criteria for schizotaxia with a group who did not on independent measures of clinical function, and on lifetime rates of selected comorbid psychiatric disorders. Methods: Twenty-seven adults who were first-degree, biological relatives of patients with schizophrenia were evaluated for schizotaxia based on our predetermined criteria involving negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits. Subjects also received portions of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies, the Structured Interview for Schizotypy, the Family Interview for Genetic Studies, the DSM-IV Global Assessment of Functioning, the Physical Anhedonia Scale, the Social Adjustment Scale and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Subjects who met criteria for schizotaxia were compared with those who did not on each of the clinical measures, and on their rates of comorbid DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses. Results: Eight subjects met criteria for schizotaxia, and 19 did not. Subjects with schizotaxia showed significantly lower levels of function on each of the clinical scales. Differences in comorbid psychiatric diagnoses were not significant, although the rate of lifetime substance abuse diagnoses in the schizotaxic group (50%) approached levels that are often seen in schizophrenia. Conclusions: These findings provide the first evidence of concurrent validation for a proposed syndrome of schizotaxia. They are also consistent with the view that the vulnerability to schizophrenia may be defined, at least partially, although larger studies to assess both the concurrent and predictive validity of schizotaxia will be required to confirm these results.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01116-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71190176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006322301011167</els_id><sourcerecordid>71190176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c379d5d4791a2ed370ccd52bf82d75215b9afc8b52675660b524ae5fa68032403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMotlZ_grIXRQ-rmWSTdL2IFF9Q8KCeQzbJYmS7qclusf560wd69DKZgW8yMx9Cx4AvAQO_esEY85wSQs8xXGAA4LnYQUMYC5qTApNdNPxFBuggxo9UCkJgHw0AGOfA8RDRiW91H4Jtu2yhGmdU53yb-TqL-t19-059OXWdqWzuGt9lsevN8hDt1aqJ9mj7jtDb_d3r5DGfPj88TW6nuaYldCmK0jBTiBIUsYYKrLVhpKrHxAhGgFWlqvW4YoSLtA5OSaEsqxUfY5ouoCN0tvl3Hvxnb2MnZy5q2zSqtb6PUgCUGARPINuAOvgYg63lPLiZCksJWK5sybUtuVIhMci1LSlS38l2QF_NrPnr2upJwOkWUFGrpg6q1S7-cQXmjDKWuJsNZ5OOhbNBRu1sq61xwepOGu_-WeUHADOEqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71190176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concurrent validation of schizotaxia: a pilot study</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Stone, William S ; Faraone, Stephen V ; Seidman, Larry J ; Green, Alan I ; Wojcik, Joanne D ; Tsuang, Ming T</creator><creatorcontrib>Stone, William S ; Faraone, Stephen V ; Seidman, Larry J ; Green, Alan I ; Wojcik, Joanne D ; Tsuang, Ming T</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Many first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia show deficits in clinical, neuropsychological, neurobiological and social domains, in the absence of psychosis. We recently reformulated Meehl’s concept of schizotaxia to conceptualize the liability to schizophrenia, and we proposed preliminary criteria based on the presence of negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits. Here we investigate the concurrent validity of schizotaxia by comparing a group of subjects who met criteria for schizotaxia with a group who did not on independent measures of clinical function, and on lifetime rates of selected comorbid psychiatric disorders. Methods: Twenty-seven adults who were first-degree, biological relatives of patients with schizophrenia were evaluated for schizotaxia based on our predetermined criteria involving negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits. Subjects also received portions of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies, the Structured Interview for Schizotypy, the Family Interview for Genetic Studies, the DSM-IV Global Assessment of Functioning, the Physical Anhedonia Scale, the Social Adjustment Scale and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Subjects who met criteria for schizotaxia were compared with those who did not on each of the clinical measures, and on their rates of comorbid DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses. Results: Eight subjects met criteria for schizotaxia, and 19 did not. Subjects with schizotaxia showed significantly lower levels of function on each of the clinical scales. Differences in comorbid psychiatric diagnoses were not significant, although the rate of lifetime substance abuse diagnoses in the schizotaxic group (50%) approached levels that are often seen in schizophrenia. Conclusions: These findings provide the first evidence of concurrent validation for a proposed syndrome of schizotaxia. They are also consistent with the view that the vulnerability to schizophrenia may be defined, at least partially, although larger studies to assess both the concurrent and predictive validity of schizotaxia will be required to confirm these results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01116-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11566160</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIPCBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognition Disorders - etiology ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; negative symptoms ; neuropsychological deficits ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Pilot Projects ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychoses ; Schizophrenia ; Schizophrenia - diagnosis ; Schizophrenic Psychology ; Schizotaxia ; Schizotypal Personality Disorder - diagnosis ; Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology ; Terminology as Topic</subject><ispartof>Biological psychiatry (1969), 2001-09, Vol.50 (6), p.434-440</ispartof><rights>2001 Society of Biological Psychiatry</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c379d5d4791a2ed370ccd52bf82d75215b9afc8b52675660b524ae5fa68032403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c379d5d4791a2ed370ccd52bf82d75215b9afc8b52675660b524ae5fa68032403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14065355$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11566160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stone, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faraone, Stephen V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidman, Larry J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Alan I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojcik, Joanne D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuang, Ming T</creatorcontrib><title>Concurrent validation of schizotaxia: a pilot study</title><title>Biological psychiatry (1969)</title><addtitle>Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Background: Many first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia show deficits in clinical, neuropsychological, neurobiological and social domains, in the absence of psychosis. We recently reformulated Meehl’s concept of schizotaxia to conceptualize the liability to schizophrenia, and we proposed preliminary criteria based on the presence of negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits. Here we investigate the concurrent validity of schizotaxia by comparing a group of subjects who met criteria for schizotaxia with a group who did not on independent measures of clinical function, and on lifetime rates of selected comorbid psychiatric disorders. Methods: Twenty-seven adults who were first-degree, biological relatives of patients with schizophrenia were evaluated for schizotaxia based on our predetermined criteria involving negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits. Subjects also received portions of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies, the Structured Interview for Schizotypy, the Family Interview for Genetic Studies, the DSM-IV Global Assessment of Functioning, the Physical Anhedonia Scale, the Social Adjustment Scale and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Subjects who met criteria for schizotaxia were compared with those who did not on each of the clinical measures, and on their rates of comorbid DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses. Results: Eight subjects met criteria for schizotaxia, and 19 did not. Subjects with schizotaxia showed significantly lower levels of function on each of the clinical scales. Differences in comorbid psychiatric diagnoses were not significant, although the rate of lifetime substance abuse diagnoses in the schizotaxic group (50%) approached levels that are often seen in schizophrenia. Conclusions: These findings provide the first evidence of concurrent validation for a proposed syndrome of schizotaxia. They are also consistent with the view that the vulnerability to schizophrenia may be defined, at least partially, although larger studies to assess both the concurrent and predictive validity of schizotaxia will be required to confirm these results.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>negative symptoms</subject><subject>neuropsychological deficits</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychoses</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenic Psychology</subject><subject>Schizotaxia</subject><subject>Schizotypal Personality Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><issn>0006-3223</issn><issn>1873-2402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMotlZ_grIXRQ-rmWSTdL2IFF9Q8KCeQzbJYmS7qclusf560wd69DKZgW8yMx9Cx4AvAQO_esEY85wSQs8xXGAA4LnYQUMYC5qTApNdNPxFBuggxo9UCkJgHw0AGOfA8RDRiW91H4Jtu2yhGmdU53yb-TqL-t19-059OXWdqWzuGt9lsevN8hDt1aqJ9mj7jtDb_d3r5DGfPj88TW6nuaYldCmK0jBTiBIUsYYKrLVhpKrHxAhGgFWlqvW4YoSLtA5OSaEsqxUfY5ouoCN0tvl3Hvxnb2MnZy5q2zSqtb6PUgCUGARPINuAOvgYg63lPLiZCksJWK5sybUtuVIhMci1LSlS38l2QF_NrPnr2upJwOkWUFGrpg6q1S7-cQXmjDKWuJsNZ5OOhbNBRu1sq61xwepOGu_-WeUHADOEqQ</recordid><startdate>20010915</startdate><enddate>20010915</enddate><creator>Stone, William S</creator><creator>Faraone, Stephen V</creator><creator>Seidman, Larry J</creator><creator>Green, Alan I</creator><creator>Wojcik, Joanne D</creator><creator>Tsuang, Ming T</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010915</creationdate><title>Concurrent validation of schizotaxia: a pilot study</title><author>Stone, William S ; Faraone, Stephen V ; Seidman, Larry J ; Green, Alan I ; Wojcik, Joanne D ; Tsuang, Ming T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c379d5d4791a2ed370ccd52bf82d75215b9afc8b52675660b524ae5fa68032403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>negative symptoms</topic><topic>neuropsychological deficits</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychoses</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenic Psychology</topic><topic>Schizotaxia</topic><topic>Schizotypal Personality Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stone, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faraone, Stephen V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidman, Larry J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Alan I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojcik, Joanne D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuang, Ming T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological psychiatry (1969)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stone, William S</au><au>Faraone, Stephen V</au><au>Seidman, Larry J</au><au>Green, Alan I</au><au>Wojcik, Joanne D</au><au>Tsuang, Ming T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concurrent validation of schizotaxia: a pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Biological psychiatry (1969)</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2001-09-15</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>434</spage><epage>440</epage><pages>434-440</pages><issn>0006-3223</issn><eissn>1873-2402</eissn><coden>BIPCBF</coden><abstract>Background: Many first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia show deficits in clinical, neuropsychological, neurobiological and social domains, in the absence of psychosis. We recently reformulated Meehl’s concept of schizotaxia to conceptualize the liability to schizophrenia, and we proposed preliminary criteria based on the presence of negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits. Here we investigate the concurrent validity of schizotaxia by comparing a group of subjects who met criteria for schizotaxia with a group who did not on independent measures of clinical function, and on lifetime rates of selected comorbid psychiatric disorders. Methods: Twenty-seven adults who were first-degree, biological relatives of patients with schizophrenia were evaluated for schizotaxia based on our predetermined criteria involving negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits. Subjects also received portions of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies, the Structured Interview for Schizotypy, the Family Interview for Genetic Studies, the DSM-IV Global Assessment of Functioning, the Physical Anhedonia Scale, the Social Adjustment Scale and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Subjects who met criteria for schizotaxia were compared with those who did not on each of the clinical measures, and on their rates of comorbid DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses. Results: Eight subjects met criteria for schizotaxia, and 19 did not. Subjects with schizotaxia showed significantly lower levels of function on each of the clinical scales. Differences in comorbid psychiatric diagnoses were not significant, although the rate of lifetime substance abuse diagnoses in the schizotaxic group (50%) approached levels that are often seen in schizophrenia. Conclusions: These findings provide the first evidence of concurrent validation for a proposed syndrome of schizotaxia. They are also consistent with the view that the vulnerability to schizophrenia may be defined, at least partially, although larger studies to assess both the concurrent and predictive validity of schizotaxia will be required to confirm these results.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11566160</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01116-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3223
ispartof Biological psychiatry (1969), 2001-09, Vol.50 (6), p.434-440
issn 0006-3223
1873-2402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71190176
source Elsevier
subjects Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition Disorders - diagnosis
Cognition Disorders - etiology
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
negative symptoms
neuropsychological deficits
Neuropsychological Tests
Pilot Projects
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Psychoses
Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia - diagnosis
Schizophrenic Psychology
Schizotaxia
Schizotypal Personality Disorder - diagnosis
Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology
Terminology as Topic
title Concurrent validation of schizotaxia: a pilot study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A43%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concurrent%20validation%20of%20schizotaxia:%20a%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Biological%20psychiatry%20(1969)&rft.au=Stone,%20William%20S&rft.date=2001-09-15&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=434&rft.epage=440&rft.pages=434-440&rft.issn=0006-3223&rft.eissn=1873-2402&rft.coden=BIPCBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01116-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71190176%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c379d5d4791a2ed370ccd52bf82d75215b9afc8b52675660b524ae5fa68032403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71190176&rft_id=info:pmid/11566160&rfr_iscdi=true