Loading…

Source Credibility in Environmental Health - Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index

This article applies an existing five‐item index for measuring source credibility in the context of environmental health – risk controversy. Survey data were gathered in five upstate New York communities facing environmental health – risk issues. Analysis of the five case studies and a combined data...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Risk analysis 2001-06, Vol.21 (3), p.467-480
Main Authors: McComas, Katherine A., Trumbo, Craig W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-ad072fbf084a0e1ee85845a959e7f9ec6854ea41c4179de23ebe3fe8691bd3193
cites
container_end_page 480
container_issue 3
container_start_page 467
container_title Risk analysis
container_volume 21
creator McComas, Katherine A.
Trumbo, Craig W.
description This article applies an existing five‐item index for measuring source credibility in the context of environmental health – risk controversy. Survey data were gathered in five upstate New York communities facing environmental health – risk issues. Analysis of the five case studies and a combined dataset (N= 870) show that the credibility index was consistently reliable across all applications. Use of the resulting index is demonstrated through a comparison of the credibility of the New York State Department of Health (active in each case), the industries associated with each case, and the newspaper providing coverage of each case. The credibility index was used to predict risk judgments in a structural equation model. Overall, the analysis demonstrated that the credibility index performed consistently well across the five cases and illuminated important differences in each. As such, the index should be a useful addition to many environmental health and risk communication studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/0272-4332.213126
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71203309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19671855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-ad072fbf084a0e1ee85845a959e7f9ec6854ea41c4179de23ebe3fe8691bd3193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1PGzEYh62qCFLK3qny1E5H_frz3C2KKESiIBEqRst3957qcjmn9oWS_55EF1Exxcs7-Pk9y0PIJ2DnsH3fGDe8kELwcw4CuH5HJqCELbTl8j2ZvH6fkA85_2EMGFPmmJwAKMMlNxMSFnGdaqSzhE2oQheGDQ09veifQor9EvvBd_QKfTf8pgW9C_mRzmI_pPiEKQfM3-l0tepC7YcQexpb-hM3mL7mN8J53-DzR3LU-i7j2f6ekl8_Lu5nV8X17eV8Nr0uailBF75hhrdVy0rpGQJiqUqpvFUWTWux1qWS6CXUEoxtkAusULRYagtVI8CKU_Jl9K5S_LvGPLhlyDV2ne8xrrMzwJkQ7DComeZMaX4QBKsNlEptQTaCdYo5J2zdKoWlTxsHzO2CuV0RtyvixmDbyee9e10tsfk_2BfaAmoE_oUONweF7m6-mI7iYtyFPODz686nR6eNMMo93Fy6hdQP9zeMOyteAHxzrrc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19671855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Source Credibility in Environmental Health - Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index</title><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Wiley</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>McComas, Katherine A. ; Trumbo, Craig W.</creator><creatorcontrib>McComas, Katherine A. ; Trumbo, Craig W.</creatorcontrib><description>This article applies an existing five‐item index for measuring source credibility in the context of environmental health – risk controversy. Survey data were gathered in five upstate New York communities facing environmental health – risk issues. Analysis of the five case studies and a combined dataset (N= 870) show that the credibility index was consistently reliable across all applications. Use of the resulting index is demonstrated through a comparison of the credibility of the New York State Department of Health (active in each case), the industries associated with each case, and the newspaper providing coverage of each case. The credibility index was used to predict risk judgments in a structural equation model. Overall, the analysis demonstrated that the credibility index performed consistently well across the five cases and illuminated important differences in each. As such, the index should be a useful addition to many environmental health and risk communication studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.213126</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11572427</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RIANDF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc</publisher><subject>Communication ; Credibility ; Data Collection ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Environmental Health ; Humans ; Models, Theoretical ; New York ; Perception ; Public Health ; Risk ; Risk Assessment ; Risk communication ; risk judgment ; risk perception ; trust</subject><ispartof>Risk analysis, 2001-06, Vol.21 (3), p.467-480</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-ad072fbf084a0e1ee85845a959e7f9ec6854ea41c4179de23ebe3fe8691bd3193</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11572427$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McComas, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trumbo, Craig W.</creatorcontrib><title>Source Credibility in Environmental Health - Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index</title><title>Risk analysis</title><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><description>This article applies an existing five‐item index for measuring source credibility in the context of environmental health – risk controversy. Survey data were gathered in five upstate New York communities facing environmental health – risk issues. Analysis of the five case studies and a combined dataset (N= 870) show that the credibility index was consistently reliable across all applications. Use of the resulting index is demonstrated through a comparison of the credibility of the New York State Department of Health (active in each case), the industries associated with each case, and the newspaper providing coverage of each case. The credibility index was used to predict risk judgments in a structural equation model. Overall, the analysis demonstrated that the credibility index performed consistently well across the five cases and illuminated important differences in each. As such, the index should be a useful addition to many environmental health and risk communication studies.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk communication</subject><subject>risk judgment</subject><subject>risk perception</subject><subject>trust</subject><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkb1PGzEYh62qCFLK3qny1E5H_frz3C2KKESiIBEqRst3957qcjmn9oWS_55EF1Exxcs7-Pk9y0PIJ2DnsH3fGDe8kELwcw4CuH5HJqCELbTl8j2ZvH6fkA85_2EMGFPmmJwAKMMlNxMSFnGdaqSzhE2oQheGDQ09veifQor9EvvBd_QKfTf8pgW9C_mRzmI_pPiEKQfM3-l0tepC7YcQexpb-hM3mL7mN8J53-DzR3LU-i7j2f6ekl8_Lu5nV8X17eV8Nr0uailBF75hhrdVy0rpGQJiqUqpvFUWTWux1qWS6CXUEoxtkAusULRYagtVI8CKU_Jl9K5S_LvGPLhlyDV2ne8xrrMzwJkQ7DComeZMaX4QBKsNlEptQTaCdYo5J2zdKoWlTxsHzO2CuV0RtyvixmDbyee9e10tsfk_2BfaAmoE_oUONweF7m6-mI7iYtyFPODz686nR6eNMMo93Fy6hdQP9zeMOyteAHxzrrc</recordid><startdate>200106</startdate><enddate>200106</enddate><creator>McComas, Katherine A.</creator><creator>Trumbo, Craig W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200106</creationdate><title>Source Credibility in Environmental Health - Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index</title><author>McComas, Katherine A. ; Trumbo, Craig W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-ad072fbf084a0e1ee85845a959e7f9ec6854ea41c4179de23ebe3fe8691bd3193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk communication</topic><topic>risk judgment</topic><topic>risk perception</topic><topic>trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McComas, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trumbo, Craig W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McComas, Katherine A.</au><au>Trumbo, Craig W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Source Credibility in Environmental Health - Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><date>2001-06</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>467</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>467-480</pages><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><coden>RIANDF</coden><abstract>This article applies an existing five‐item index for measuring source credibility in the context of environmental health – risk controversy. Survey data were gathered in five upstate New York communities facing environmental health – risk issues. Analysis of the five case studies and a combined dataset (N= 870) show that the credibility index was consistently reliable across all applications. Use of the resulting index is demonstrated through a comparison of the credibility of the New York State Department of Health (active in each case), the industries associated with each case, and the newspaper providing coverage of each case. The credibility index was used to predict risk judgments in a structural equation model. Overall, the analysis demonstrated that the credibility index performed consistently well across the five cases and illuminated important differences in each. As such, the index should be a useful addition to many environmental health and risk communication studies.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Inc</pub><pmid>11572427</pmid><doi>10.1111/0272-4332.213126</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-4332
ispartof Risk analysis, 2001-06, Vol.21 (3), p.467-480
issn 0272-4332
1539-6924
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71203309
source Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Wiley; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SPORTDiscus with Full Text
subjects Communication
Credibility
Data Collection
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Environmental Health
Humans
Models, Theoretical
New York
Perception
Public Health
Risk
Risk Assessment
Risk communication
risk judgment
risk perception
trust
title Source Credibility in Environmental Health - Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A47%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Source%20Credibility%20in%20Environmental%20Health%20-%20Risk%20Controversies:%20Application%20of%20Meyer's%20Credibility%20Index&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=McComas,%20Katherine%20A.&rft.date=2001-06&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=467&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=467-480&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft.coden=RIANDF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/0272-4332.213126&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19671855%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-ad072fbf084a0e1ee85845a959e7f9ec6854ea41c4179de23ebe3fe8691bd3193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19671855&rft_id=info:pmid/11572427&rfr_iscdi=true