Loading…
Source Credibility in Environmental Health - Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index
This article applies an existing five‐item index for measuring source credibility in the context of environmental health – risk controversy. Survey data were gathered in five upstate New York communities facing environmental health – risk issues. Analysis of the five case studies and a combined data...
Saved in:
Published in: | Risk analysis 2001-06, Vol.21 (3), p.467-480 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-ad072fbf084a0e1ee85845a959e7f9ec6854ea41c4179de23ebe3fe8691bd3193 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 480 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 467 |
container_title | Risk analysis |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | McComas, Katherine A. Trumbo, Craig W. |
description | This article applies an existing five‐item index for measuring source credibility in the context of environmental health – risk controversy. Survey data were gathered in five upstate New York communities facing environmental health – risk issues. Analysis of the five case studies and a combined dataset (N= 870) show that the credibility index was consistently reliable across all applications. Use of the resulting index is demonstrated through a comparison of the credibility of the New York State Department of Health (active in each case), the industries associated with each case, and the newspaper providing coverage of each case. The credibility index was used to predict risk judgments in a structural equation model. Overall, the analysis demonstrated that the credibility index performed consistently well across the five cases and illuminated important differences in each. As such, the index should be a useful addition to many environmental health and risk communication studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/0272-4332.213126 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71203309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19671855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-ad072fbf084a0e1ee85845a959e7f9ec6854ea41c4179de23ebe3fe8691bd3193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1PGzEYh62qCFLK3qny1E5H_frz3C2KKESiIBEqRst3957qcjmn9oWS_55EF1Exxcs7-Pk9y0PIJ2DnsH3fGDe8kELwcw4CuH5HJqCELbTl8j2ZvH6fkA85_2EMGFPmmJwAKMMlNxMSFnGdaqSzhE2oQheGDQ09veifQor9EvvBd_QKfTf8pgW9C_mRzmI_pPiEKQfM3-l0tepC7YcQexpb-hM3mL7mN8J53-DzR3LU-i7j2f6ekl8_Lu5nV8X17eV8Nr0uailBF75hhrdVy0rpGQJiqUqpvFUWTWux1qWS6CXUEoxtkAusULRYagtVI8CKU_Jl9K5S_LvGPLhlyDV2ne8xrrMzwJkQ7DComeZMaX4QBKsNlEptQTaCdYo5J2zdKoWlTxsHzO2CuV0RtyvixmDbyee9e10tsfk_2BfaAmoE_oUONweF7m6-mI7iYtyFPODz686nR6eNMMo93Fy6hdQP9zeMOyteAHxzrrc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19671855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Source Credibility in Environmental Health - Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index</title><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Wiley</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>McComas, Katherine A. ; Trumbo, Craig W.</creator><creatorcontrib>McComas, Katherine A. ; Trumbo, Craig W.</creatorcontrib><description>This article applies an existing five‐item index for measuring source credibility in the context of environmental health – risk controversy. Survey data were gathered in five upstate New York communities facing environmental health – risk issues. Analysis of the five case studies and a combined dataset (N= 870) show that the credibility index was consistently reliable across all applications. Use of the resulting index is demonstrated through a comparison of the credibility of the New York State Department of Health (active in each case), the industries associated with each case, and the newspaper providing coverage of each case. The credibility index was used to predict risk judgments in a structural equation model. Overall, the analysis demonstrated that the credibility index performed consistently well across the five cases and illuminated important differences in each. As such, the index should be a useful addition to many environmental health and risk communication studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.213126</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11572427</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RIANDF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc</publisher><subject>Communication ; Credibility ; Data Collection ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Environmental Health ; Humans ; Models, Theoretical ; New York ; Perception ; Public Health ; Risk ; Risk Assessment ; Risk communication ; risk judgment ; risk perception ; trust</subject><ispartof>Risk analysis, 2001-06, Vol.21 (3), p.467-480</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-ad072fbf084a0e1ee85845a959e7f9ec6854ea41c4179de23ebe3fe8691bd3193</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11572427$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McComas, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trumbo, Craig W.</creatorcontrib><title>Source Credibility in Environmental Health - Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index</title><title>Risk analysis</title><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><description>This article applies an existing five‐item index for measuring source credibility in the context of environmental health – risk controversy. Survey data were gathered in five upstate New York communities facing environmental health – risk issues. Analysis of the five case studies and a combined dataset (N= 870) show that the credibility index was consistently reliable across all applications. Use of the resulting index is demonstrated through a comparison of the credibility of the New York State Department of Health (active in each case), the industries associated with each case, and the newspaper providing coverage of each case. The credibility index was used to predict risk judgments in a structural equation model. Overall, the analysis demonstrated that the credibility index performed consistently well across the five cases and illuminated important differences in each. As such, the index should be a useful addition to many environmental health and risk communication studies.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk communication</subject><subject>risk judgment</subject><subject>risk perception</subject><subject>trust</subject><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkb1PGzEYh62qCFLK3qny1E5H_frz3C2KKESiIBEqRst3957qcjmn9oWS_55EF1Exxcs7-Pk9y0PIJ2DnsH3fGDe8kELwcw4CuH5HJqCELbTl8j2ZvH6fkA85_2EMGFPmmJwAKMMlNxMSFnGdaqSzhE2oQheGDQ09veifQor9EvvBd_QKfTf8pgW9C_mRzmI_pPiEKQfM3-l0tepC7YcQexpb-hM3mL7mN8J53-DzR3LU-i7j2f6ekl8_Lu5nV8X17eV8Nr0uailBF75hhrdVy0rpGQJiqUqpvFUWTWux1qWS6CXUEoxtkAusULRYagtVI8CKU_Jl9K5S_LvGPLhlyDV2ne8xrrMzwJkQ7DComeZMaX4QBKsNlEptQTaCdYo5J2zdKoWlTxsHzO2CuV0RtyvixmDbyee9e10tsfk_2BfaAmoE_oUONweF7m6-mI7iYtyFPODz686nR6eNMMo93Fy6hdQP9zeMOyteAHxzrrc</recordid><startdate>200106</startdate><enddate>200106</enddate><creator>McComas, Katherine A.</creator><creator>Trumbo, Craig W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200106</creationdate><title>Source Credibility in Environmental Health - Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index</title><author>McComas, Katherine A. ; Trumbo, Craig W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-ad072fbf084a0e1ee85845a959e7f9ec6854ea41c4179de23ebe3fe8691bd3193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk communication</topic><topic>risk judgment</topic><topic>risk perception</topic><topic>trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McComas, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trumbo, Craig W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McComas, Katherine A.</au><au>Trumbo, Craig W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Source Credibility in Environmental Health - Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><date>2001-06</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>467</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>467-480</pages><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><coden>RIANDF</coden><abstract>This article applies an existing five‐item index for measuring source credibility in the context of environmental health – risk controversy. Survey data were gathered in five upstate New York communities facing environmental health – risk issues. Analysis of the five case studies and a combined dataset (N= 870) show that the credibility index was consistently reliable across all applications. Use of the resulting index is demonstrated through a comparison of the credibility of the New York State Department of Health (active in each case), the industries associated with each case, and the newspaper providing coverage of each case. The credibility index was used to predict risk judgments in a structural equation model. Overall, the analysis demonstrated that the credibility index performed consistently well across the five cases and illuminated important differences in each. As such, the index should be a useful addition to many environmental health and risk communication studies.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Inc</pub><pmid>11572427</pmid><doi>10.1111/0272-4332.213126</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-4332 |
ispartof | Risk analysis, 2001-06, Vol.21 (3), p.467-480 |
issn | 0272-4332 1539-6924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71203309 |
source | Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Wiley; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SPORTDiscus with Full Text |
subjects | Communication Credibility Data Collection Data Interpretation, Statistical Environmental Health Humans Models, Theoretical New York Perception Public Health Risk Risk Assessment Risk communication risk judgment risk perception trust |
title | Source Credibility in Environmental Health - Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A47%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Source%20Credibility%20in%20Environmental%20Health%20-%20Risk%20Controversies:%20Application%20of%20Meyer's%20Credibility%20Index&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=McComas,%20Katherine%20A.&rft.date=2001-06&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=467&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=467-480&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft.coden=RIANDF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/0272-4332.213126&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19671855%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-ad072fbf084a0e1ee85845a959e7f9ec6854ea41c4179de23ebe3fe8691bd3193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19671855&rft_id=info:pmid/11572427&rfr_iscdi=true |